Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘

[Taskford]

I think I disagree with you on this thing.  Abusers will always try to abuse the system whether the casino is on hand stopping them to abuse the bonus and promotions.  The casino had put lots of restrictions even banning or freezing the same IP accounts.  They even clearly stated their rules on both TOS and promotional rules.  It is that these abusers are getting smarter in creating a workaround to exploit the system and bypass rules.  These abusers even extend their creativity to hiring people just to bypass KYC and other stuff.  So basically the casino is trying their best not to get exploited but the method in combatting fraudsters and cheaters are limited.

Hackers and scammers are very innovative as well, they follow the trend and yes with that KYC, they tend to pay people in return of their personal identity which is also happening in my place. There’s a lot of victim with this already, and that’s why we cannot blame the site to strengthen their security with KYC level 2, if Roobet implement this, I’m pretty sure many will get mad again but sooner or later they will realize that it’s for their own benefit especially if its about security.

A reminder to anyone that they should never sell their own data's because those scammers could use their identities for what every they like and if they use the same like this then the authority will find the accused person then the person who sell their identities for KYC purposes will be sued. Maybe in future we can see that level 2 to happen if there will be many cases like this will exist on Roobet.

[aysg76]

A reminder to anyone that they should never sell their own data's because those scammers could use their identities for what every they like and if they use the same like this then the authority will find the accused person then the person who sell their identities for KYC purposes will be sued. Maybe in future we can see that level 2 to happen if there will be many cases like this will exist on Roobet.

This is what I was saying in the above post as if you are engaged in document forging or selling them then you may face the consequences for it once it's known to the authorities as whosoever is buying documents his intentions are for some illicit work only.But I think we should focus more on the Roobet discussion in this thread not going off topic more.

[l3pox]

<snip>
What happens is that always in a casino when they find a way to abuse a system they will exploit it until there are no more exploitable resources, and even more so when the casino is not aware of a certain vulnerability, there is a reason to be able to decapitalize the money. of a casino, this gives a step to continue looking for ways to continue doing it and not saying it, maybe in casinos they do not put a high enough reward to encourage them to collaborate with security, sometimes a casino pays a lot of money in security so that those holes of pertinent insecurity do not exist, that happens in all casinos, there will always be those problems.

I believe the description you've pointed out from this post is about bug bounty.
For companies' websites, specially if it is crucial which involves money or big amount of data, security testing and bug hunting should be practiced (and I think most of them are doing it).
In the past, various bounty campaigns from different companies were announced here.

I agree bug bounties are important programs for big companies to develop
specially those that work with values like roobet, duelbits, so forth and so on

great point

[wiss19]

That's cool. Although I am a big fan of GGG, this contract is good news for crypto in general. Canelo is currently the biggest name in boxing and if only he wanted to fight thrice a year, he can easily become the world's highest-paid athlete just like his superstar predecessors Pacman and Mayweather.

This is a great move by Roobet as another crypto casino Stake also is becoming the major sponsor of world title fights in Japan, probably the main target is Japanese superstar and boxing's pound-for-pound Naoya Inoue.

The addition of Canelo as a brand ambassador is indeed a big step as he is one of the biggest name in boxing (together with Fury, Joshua, Uysk, ...). Seems that more and more casinos are starting to sponsor different sports such as UFC, boxing or soccer.

That’s mainly because people saw that it is working. I mean I am not saying that it is working because I cannot possibly know if it is or not, but from what I gather, if one place did it once and then everyone followed and casinos keep doing it, that feels like maybe it did work and it has been something good. I feel like if all these places are sponsoring or hiring famous sports ambassadors then it would be a great deal for all of them.

I am super happy about the potential this carries, eventually the crypto market will be like betting market where they will do advertisement anywhere they possibly can, which will result with crypto growing as a whole.

[Apocollapse]

Good to see Roobet keep improving to advertise their casino on many popular players.

Previously Charles Oliveira who very known on UFC became Roobet's brand ambassador, now Canelo Alvarez as the most known on boxing, I think no one will don't know Canelo if anyone are interested with boxing. Roobet as a kangaroo is right to focus on UFC and boxing since kangaroo is a powerful animal.

I don't surprised if Roobet will looking for other MMA events e.g. Bellator, KSW, CageWarrior etc.

[suzanne5223]

There are some casino that has already integrated Monero as a payment method before the compliance risk which led to the delisting of Monero on some tier 1 exchanges and the integration of Monero can still happen in some casinos. However, it's going to be 1 out of 10 casinos because of any form of anonymous deposit or withdrawal against casino Master license holder rules and regulations.

Yes, and I really like that integration in the event that it happens, because not everyone will do it, perhaps for fear that they might give them even more follow-up? I'm not very sure, but the SEC may be able to get in there, I think that the current KYC requirements that are so demanding, both for casinos and exchanges, is for that same action, to be able to do follow-ups, so they don't use Monero, because I've seen As an exchange as prestigious as Binance, they have surrendered to the is of many governments and authorities of some countries and have blocked many users of the exchange, including the blocking of some user funds that those governments considered suspicious, this is good for users. which are bad actually, but Monero makes the transactions more private, and more anonymous, I think that would make it more difficult for the authorities to trace them. I think that may be a compelling reason today.

The SEC doing some follow-up is the reason why I said if we're going to count 1-10 the casinos that will make use of XMR in the future it will be only 1 casino which believe may be created by a privacy focus project.
The exchange like Binance has to surrender to the authorities because it's never a DEX, to begin with, but I'm surprised that they never delist Monero.
Having said that, I just want people to understand that no matter how we like privacy and no KYC for huge withdrawals on casinos since Cryptocurrency is the talk worldwide we will never escape the KYC aspect except if a privacy focus project creates a no KYC casino but if we consider the risk involved it doesn't worth it.

[aysg76]

You can read the review of Roobet here: http://100bookies.com/roobet-review/

We already know about Roobet being legit casino without any doubt and don't want to click on any links here.We have been around here on the forum from a long time and Roobet has proved and build the reputation in the market with so many options for players along with the promotion and events for the community to help them.So we know about it.

[redsun114]

I really like that integration in the event that it happens, because not everyone will do it, perhaps for fear that they might give them even more follow-up? I'm not very sure, but the SEC may be able to get in there, I think that the current KYC requirements that are so demanding, both for casinos and exchanges, is for that same action, to be able to do follow-ups, so they don't use Monero, because I've seen As an exchange as prestigious as Binance, they have surrendered to the is of many governments and authorities of some countries and have blocked many users of the exchange, including the blocking of some user funds that those governments considered suspicious, this is good for users. which are bad actually, but Monero makes the transactions more private, more anonymous, I think that would make it more difficult for the authorities to trace them. I think that may be a compelling reason today.

When governments come for a person, there are millions that use it, but when those millions are stuck in one place then government could bottleneck that place and could check it anyway they want.

Just think about the Binance example you are giving, if they didn't do KYC then they would not be able to do exchanging anywhere in the west, because they all want that, and I personally would prefer it if they just operated here and give KYC, but the difference between Binance and a casino is that we are talking about something that is gambling vs trading. One of them is legal and the other is not so legal in other places which is the trouble.

[Eureka_07]

<snip>

In addition to that, for those people who are still and are planning to sell their identities through verifying different accounts (such as casino account, social media, exchange accounts, etc.) worst is to give documents and verification photos to anyone specially whom that  are unknown for them, you do not want yourself to get in trouble as if those people you've transacted with might have shady transactions being done.
To hide their identity. This is one of the major reasons why people ask others to verify an account using their name.

[l3pox]

There are some casino that has already integrated Monero as a payment method before the compliance risk which led to the delisting of Monero on some tier 1 exchanges and the integration of Monero can still happen in some casinos. However, it's going to be 1 out of 10 casinos because of any form of anonymous deposit or withdrawal against casino Master license holder rules and regulations.

Yes, and I really like that integration in the event that it happens, because not everyone will do it, perhaps for fear that they might give them even more follow-up? I'm not very sure, but the SEC may be able to get in there, I think that the current KYC requirements that are so demanding, both for casinos and exchanges, is for that same action, to be able to do follow-ups, so they don't use Monero, because I've seen As an exchange as prestigious as Binance, they have surrendered to the is of many governments and authorities of some countries and have blocked many users of the exchange, including the blocking of some user funds that those governments considered suspicious, this is good for users. which are bad actually, but Monero makes the transactions more private, and more anonymous, I think that would make it more difficult for the authorities to trace them. I think that may be a compelling reason today.

The SEC doing some follow-up is the reason why I said if we're going to count 1-10 the casinos that will make use of XMR in the future it will be only 1 casino which believe may be created by a privacy focus project.
The exchange like Binance has to surrender to the authorities because it's never a DEX, to begin with, but I'm surprised that they never delist Monero.
Having said that, I just want people to understand that no matter how we like privacy and no KYC for huge withdrawals on casinos since Cryptocurrency is the talk worldwide we will never escape the KYC aspect except if a privacy focus project creates a no KYC casino but if we consider the risk involved it doesn't worth it.

I think this trend will continue and probably get more extreme in the future
governments sanctioning privacy tools and people having to find alternatives if they care about privacy
it won't be different with online casinos.

[Apocollapse]

but the difference between Binance and a casino is that we are talking about something that is gambling vs trading. One of them is legal and the other is not so legal in other places which is the trouble.

What is the trouble if you live in a country where gambling is legal? I don't see any problem about it. That's why for those people who live in a country where gambling is illegal, they shouldn't gambling in the first place, if they really want to gamble, they need to change their nationally first. Moving to other countries where your ID are still on your main country doesn't solve the problem if the casino ask your KYC. Your account might be terminated since you're broke their rules.

[so98nn]

but the difference between Binance and a casino is that we are talking about something that is gambling vs trading. One of them is legal and the other is not so legal in other places which is the trouble.

What is the trouble if you live in a country where gambling is legal? I don't see any problem about it. That's why for those people who live in a country where gambling is illegal, they shouldn't gambling in the first place, if they really want to gamble, they need to change their nationally first. Moving to other countries where your ID are still on your main country doesn't solve the problem if the casino ask your KYC. Your account might be terminated since you're broke their rules.

I am pretty sure just for gambling anyone would go and change their nationality. Lolz. This is why they are using VPN and working with altered IPs. Definitely it’s not the legal way to get what you want and it might be fun for that user to get some money from the gambling site but the problem is for the gambling site owners. They can not just allow anyone to gamble and if any user is found using prohibited services then they always blame the Gambling sites and it could be troublesome for them. This is why most of the gambling sites and exchangers will take strict actions against such peeps and won’t allow them no matter what amount of money is involved.

[suzanne5223]

The SEC doing some follow-up is the reason why I said if we're going to count 1-10 the casinos that will make use of XMR in the future it will be only 1 casino which believe may be created by a privacy focus project.
The exchange like Binance has to surrender to the authorities because it's never a DEX, to begin with, but I'm surprised that they never delist Monero.
Having said that, I just want people to understand that no matter how we like privacy and no KYC for huge withdrawals on casinos since Cryptocurrency is the talk worldwide we will never escape the KYC aspect except if a privacy focus project creates a no KYC casino but if we consider the risk involved it doesn't worth it.

I think this trend will continue and probably get more extreme in the future
governments sanctioning privacy tools and people having to find alternatives if they care about privacy
it won't be different with online casinos.

The trend will always continue since there is so much potential and opportunity involved in cryptocurrency and get more extreme in the future because the world is going digital this is the reason why the US government believes they need to set regulations for cryptocurrency so they can support it totally and never be left behind.

[Lanatsa]

The SEC doing some follow-up is the reason why I said if we're going to count 1-10 the casinos that will make use of XMR in the future it will be only 1 casino which believe may be created by a privacy focus project.
The exchange like Binance has to surrender to the authorities because it's never a DEX, to begin with, but I'm surprised that they never delist Monero.
Having said that, I just want people to understand that no matter how we like privacy and no KYC for huge withdrawals on casinos since Cryptocurrency is the talk worldwide we will never escape the KYC aspect except if a privacy focus project creates a no KYC casino but if we consider the risk involved it doesn't worth it.

I think this trend will continue and probably get more extreme in the future
governments sanctioning privacy tools and people having to find alternatives if they care about privacy
it won't be different with online casinos.

The trend will always continue since there is so much potential and opportunity involved in cryptocurrency and get more extreme in the future because the world is going digital this is the reason why the US government believes they need to set regulations for cryptocurrency so they can support it totally and never be left behind.

What would you expect? Government would be always like that, they do really love on touching up everything and would be avoiding that they are letting themselves getting behind on what ever new trend or discoveries or innovations that do exist.
You could really anticipate that whenever there's new then always expect that government would really be trying out their best to have a good grip of it.
Even we do have crypto casinos that currently existing but sooner or later they would really be still heavily regulated despite on making involvement with crypto.

[Taskford]

The SEC doing some follow-up is the reason why I said if we're going to count 1-10 the casinos that will make use of XMR in the future it will be only 1 casino which believe may be created by a privacy focus project.
The exchange like Binance has to surrender to the authorities because it's never a DEX, to begin with, but I'm surprised that they never delist Monero.
Having said that, I just want people to understand that no matter how we like privacy and no KYC for huge withdrawals on casinos since Cryptocurrency is the talk worldwide we will never escape the KYC aspect except if a privacy focus project creates a no KYC casino but if we consider the risk involved it doesn't worth it.

I think this trend will continue and probably get more extreme in the future
governments sanctioning privacy tools and people having to find alternatives if they care about privacy
it won't be different with online casinos.

The trend will always continue since there is so much potential and opportunity involved in cryptocurrency and get more extreme in the future because the world is going digital this is the reason why the US government believes they need to set regulations for cryptocurrency so they can support it totally and never be left behind.

What would you expect? Government would be always like that, they do really love on touching up everything and would be avoiding that they are letting themselves getting behind on what ever new trend or discoveries or innovations that do exist.
You could really anticipate that whenever there's new then always expect that government would really be trying out their best to have a good grip of it.
Even we do have crypto casinos that currently existing but sooner or later they would really be still heavily regulated despite on making involvement with crypto.

People need to know that government regulating the casino or any other platform is not bad because they just make sure that they are following the legal procedures before they can operate their businesses in their country and it add another extra protection to costumers because we can assure if the casino or platform is well regulated then we can say they are legit ones. Although some part of it maybe government will create laws that required us to pay tax on our crypto income but I think its still fine as long as we can use crypto and can able to continue to use the platforms we want.

[goaldigger]

You can read the review of Roobet here: http://100bookies.com/roobet-review/

We already know about Roobet being legit casino without any doubt and don't want to click on any links here.We have been around here on the forum from a long time and Roobet has proved and build the reputation in the market with so many options for players along with the promotion and events for the community to help them.So we know about it.

Review site can still review top sites which already here for years, so probably their target is the new gamblers looking for the site so let’s not be harsh since he is just sharing some reviews about Roobet, it can only be bad if they put wrong information there. Anyway, what’s new with Roobet? It’s been months now since I gamble with Roobet, is there a new games with Roobet?

[Apocollapse]

Anyway, what’s new with Roobet? It’s been months now since I gamble with Roobet, is there a new games with Roobet?

Yes, there's many new games comes up since Hacksaw Gaming and Blueprint Gaming providers has been listed on Roobet. I really like Stack'Em and Mystery Motel on Hacksaw Gaming, while on Blueprint I only like Wild ANTics. It's not really a popular providers, many people will not recognize either the games and the providers.

Roobet have a new promotion of $100K knockout prize to split among 10 random players, the requirement is wager for every $10 to get 1 ticket and you must play on Play'n Go provider.

[vv181]

You can read the review of Roobet here: ~

We already know about Roobet being legit casino without any doubt and don't want to click on any links here.We have been around here on the forum from a long time and Roobet has proved and build the reputation in the market with so many options for players along with the promotion and events for the community to help them.So we know about it.

Review site can still review top sites which already here for years, so probably their target is the new gamblers looking for the site so let’s not be harsh since he is just sharing some reviews about Roobet, it can only be bad if they put wrong information there. Anyway, what’s new with Roobet? It’s been months now since I gamble with Roobet, is there a new games with Roobet?

The site in question is likely just to feed the owner gambling site referral revenue. There is no clear clarity regarding how the rating system is being adhered to within the site, like what kind of criteria that as in result the current Roobet displayed rating is shown. It is essential for users to choose a platform from a gambling review site objectively based on a specified rate system. But that does not exist on the site.

If you see @sportbettor feedback and post histories, you can simply acknowledge that he is here only for spam.

[l3pox]

<...>

People need to know that government regulating the casino or any other platform is not bad because they just make sure that they are following the legal procedures before they can operate their businesses in their country and it add another extra protection to costumers because we can assure if the casino or platform is well regulated then we can say they are legit ones. Although some part of it maybe government will create laws that required us to pay tax on our crypto income but I think its still fine as long as we can use crypto and can able to continue to use the platforms we want.

from this comment I suppose you live in a country with lower level of corruption than I do and probably more efficiency in government decisions
this is not how the music plays in most of the countries, unfortunately.

[wiss19]

I think this trend will continue and probably get more extreme in the future
governments sanctioning privacy tools and people having to find alternatives if they care about privacy
it won't be different with online casinos.

Online casinos do not have to follow up though, that's the difference. If SEC is trying to do something about ETH, that would be only regarding ETH investors in USA, so as a person who is not from there, I won't care about that at all. Same goes with casinos, like they could ban casinos in the USA if they want to, but I would be able to gamble the way I want without care.

What USA needs to understand is that roobet, and all others, are already established in other nations and they can't control it. They like to think that they can control the world but we are getting digital, there is no place to invade, it's all around the world and we can do whatever we want.