Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘

[serjent05]

I think the only situation where it should be ok to work in something only for the money is if you're doing it for a temporary time and plan to change your situation soon, would still be hard to sustain and not sure if it's worth it, it'll vary from situation to situation

sometimes one can work a lot for, let's say, 5 years and then be set for decades.

Plus, a competition and a work is not the same thing, even if you get paid in the end. Art for work and art for competition have different reasons, if you work and earn a salary and your job is to create art then its fine, its one thing. But, if you are working a not making any profit at all and just end up doing art for hobby and want to test yourself with the results here with a competition? That’s sitll something for fun and not something serious.

A person will be proud and happy when they won a competition, while a person will just feel normal if he has successfully done his job since it is a normal thing for a worker to do.

After all you do not know how great or terrible it will be. It’s not always the quality of the art, but the meaning of it. You could do something with amazing quality but with no soul in it, and could lose to someone who draws stickman but can make you feel something from it.

Still, the presentation of the idea is one of the criteria in Arts, so judges would prefer a more attractive presentation than a stick art that equally conveys the same degree of emotion and connection to the given theme.

[stomachgrowls]

I personally think that it is a must especially if it involves money. It's a pre-cautionary protection that we should be attentive. I've avoided few incidents of potential hacking because of this IP blocking. I don't remember the name of that exchange but it blocked the hacker from withdrawing anything from my account because according to the email, The log in was suspicious and the IP address is new to the account, I was saved by a notification from my phone. I believe that all of casino should have a feature like this, I know a tedious task for a casino to put a security like this but I think it is a must.

Blocking IP is a good practice. If anyone hacks any of your financial accounts either any exchange account or gambling account where you have funds. Hackers can get access your account by hacking but they would not be able to hack your IP so, if they block withdrawing funds from that new IP then your fund can remain safe.

But it would really be a hassle on users side when you do tend to make out withdrawals specially when you are in transit which it do basically you cant make out withdrawals unless you are in your home or the router
which that certain IP is tied up on such account.Its indeed a good security feature but there are some con's into it but in overall it would really be a good one and should be considered.
I have tested out this kind of thing on discord which it do ask out for some verification if your account is logged in into a different IP or connection which
it is hassle but when it comes to security its a sure thing.

[ultrloa]

I personally think that it is a must especially if it involves money. It's a pre-cautionary protection that we should be attentive. I've avoided few incidents of potential hacking because of this IP blocking. I don't remember the name of that exchange but it blocked the hacker from withdrawing anything from my account because according to the email, The log in was suspicious and the IP address is new to the account, I was saved by a notification from my phone. I believe that all of casino should have a feature like this, I know a tedious task for a casino to put a security like this but I think it is a must.

Blocking IP is a good practice. If anyone hacks any of your financial accounts either any exchange account or gambling account where you have funds. Hackers can get access your account by hacking but they would not be able to hack your IP so, if they block withdrawing funds from that new IP then your fund can remain safe.

But it would really be a hassle on users side when you do tend to make out withdrawals specially when you are in transit which it do basically you cant make out withdrawals unless you are in your home or the router
which that certain IP is tied up on such account.Its indeed a good security feature but there are some con's into it but in overall it would really be a good one and should be considered.
I have tested out this kind of thing on discord which it do ask out for some verification if your account is logged in into a different IP or connection which
it is hassle but when it comes to security its a sure thing.

Not convenient if you are always away from your home so for sure you will find hassle to transact things on your account but its somehow addition on security measure if this one will be implemented since no one can withdraw your funds unless you are at your home and use the tied up IP on your account. But I don't think this one will be is also a good option since there are so many users who frequently not at home so doing transactions will really be hassle to them. But if Roobet will do a poll towards this and see the people sentiments on this possible implementation then they might read what people thoughts about this discussion.

[stomachgrowls]

I personally think that it is a must especially if it involves money. It's a pre-cautionary protection that we should be attentive. I've avoided few incidents of potential hacking because of this IP blocking. I don't remember the name of that exchange but it blocked the hacker from withdrawing anything from my account because according to the email, The log in was suspicious and the IP address is new to the account, I was saved by a notification from my phone. I believe that all of casino should have a feature like this, I know a tedious task for a casino to put a security like this but I think it is a must.

Blocking IP is a good practice. If anyone hacks any of your financial accounts either any exchange account or gambling account where you have funds. Hackers can get access your account by hacking but they would not be able to hack your IP so, if they block withdrawing funds from that new IP then your fund can remain safe.

But it would really be a hassle on users side when you do tend to make out withdrawals specially when you are in transit which it do basically you cant make out withdrawals unless you are in your home or the router
which that certain IP is tied up on such account.Its indeed a good security feature but there are some con's into it but in overall it would really be a good one and should be considered.
I have tested out this kind of thing on discord which it do ask out for some verification if your account is logged in into a different IP or connection which
it is hassle but when it comes to security its a sure thing.

Not convenient if you are always away from your home so for sure you will find hassle to transact things on your account but its somehow addition on security measure if this one will be implemented since no one can withdraw your funds unless you are at your home and use the tied up IP on your account. But I don't think this one will be is also a good option since there are so many users who frequently not at home so doing transactions will really be hassle to them. But if Roobet will do a poll towards this and see the people sentiments on this possible implementation then they might read what people thoughts about this discussion.

Correct, adding out a feature and implementing it should really be asked out if this one would be preferred or they would rather stick out on the traditional way of withdrawing without having those IP restriction.

Its true that it wont really be that convenient since you cant really make any withdraw if you are out of your own home since IP would be different but just as said that security is much more tighter with this.
Asking the community would really be a good idea because implementing it directly might really be ending up on lots of bashes and complaints because not all would really be that confident on having this.

[Taskford]

I personally think that it is a must especially if it involves money. It's a pre-cautionary protection that we should be attentive. I've avoided few incidents of potential hacking because of this IP blocking. I don't remember the name of that exchange but it blocked the hacker from withdrawing anything from my account because according to the email, The log in was suspicious and the IP address is new to the account, I was saved by a notification from my phone. I believe that all of casino should have a feature like this, I know a tedious task for a casino to put a security like this but I think it is a must.

Blocking IP is a good practice. If anyone hacks any of your financial accounts either any exchange account or gambling account where you have funds. Hackers can get access your account by hacking but they would not be able to hack your IP so, if they block withdrawing funds from that new IP then your fund can remain safe.

But it would really be a hassle on users side when you do tend to make out withdrawals specially when you are in transit which it do basically you cant make out withdrawals unless you are in your home or the router
which that certain IP is tied up on such account.Its indeed a good security feature but there are some con's into it but in overall it would really be a good one and should be considered.
I have tested out this kind of thing on discord which it do ask out for some verification if your account is logged in into a different IP or connection which
it is hassle but when it comes to security its a sure thing.

Not convenient if you are always away from your home so for sure you will find hassle to transact things on your account but its somehow addition on security measure if this one will be implemented since no one can withdraw your funds unless you are at your home and use the tied up IP on your account. But I don't think this one will be is also a good option since there are so many users who frequently not at home so doing transactions will really be hassle to them. But if Roobet will do a poll towards this and see the people sentiments on this possible implementation then they might read what people thoughts about this discussion.

Correct, adding out a feature and implementing it should really be asked out if this one would be preferred or they would rather stick out on the traditional way of withdrawing without having those IP restriction.

Its true that it wont really be that convenient since you cant really make any withdraw if you are out of your own home since IP would be different but just as said that security is much more tighter with this.
Asking the community would really be a good idea because implementing it directly might really be ending up on lots of bashes and complaints because not all would really be that confident on having this.

Ideas should be voted out by the community since this kind of feature might create conflict of interest on each user since this might create dislikes to others who doesn't want to make their life more hassle, so maybe if many users would agree on this feature to be added then this is the time roobet should think about adding it. But it will be a hell of inconvenience since imagine you are out for vacation and you cannot withdraw your funds anytime you want.

[vv181]

A horrible and unreasonable idea of the IP blocking initiative.

If you are keeping funds that security of itself specifically needs IP address allowance, you truly should reflect on whether you should keep such an amount on a casino or not. 2FA for security measures is enough, for casino scale. IP address limitation requires users have a static IP address, which only a few people may have it. Plus, this is a casino, not an exchange or store/keeping funds-oriented platform.

[FanEagle]

Ideas should be voted out by the community since this kind of feature might create conflict of interest on each user since this might create dislikes to others who doesn't want to make their life more hassle, so maybe if many users would agree on this feature to be added then this is the time roobet should think about adding it. But it will be a hell of inconvenience since imagine you are out for vacation and you cannot withdraw your funds anytime you want.

I do agree that it should be asked, but it's a company in the end and not every company has to ask peoples opinions when they are doing something. You may dislike it and move your funds somewhere else and gamble there, it's your decision but you don't have to be asked. Look at Apple for example, do they ask you when they make a new phone? Of course not, but what they do is get a new phone and provide it to people and if people like it they buy it, if they don't like it then they could end up buying samsung or xiaomi or whatever else. Which is the point here as well, if Roobet feels like something should be done, they can do it, and if some people dislike it, it's their problem.

[EarnOnVictor]

A horrible and unreasonable idea of the IP blocking initiative.

If you are keeping funds that security of itself specifically needs IP address allowance, you truly should reflect on whether you should keep such an amount on a casino or not. 2FA for security measures is enough, for casino scale. IP address limitation requires users have a static IP address, which only a few people may have it. Plus, this is a casino, not an exchange or store/keeping funds-oriented platform.

This is often optional, but I hope such a person taking this step should rethink, or else regret might happen in the end. The issue of restricting access to a certain IP did not just start, it started over 2 decades ago with some trading and sports betting sites, but it has dwindled to the extent that you hardly hear about it anymore. This is because its disadvantages outweigh its advantages and might kick the account owner out when access is so desired.

Also, the initiative might be ill to many as you would hardly see a country's IP that is not dynamic, so what is the use for that? It's better to use the combinations of other protective options, if you like, use all that is provided by the site.

 

[vv181]

This is often optional, but I hope such a person taking this step should rethink, or else regret might happen in the end.

I get it that they might do also want it as optional, but still, pointless, IMO.

The issue of restricting access to a certain IP did not just start, it started over 2 decades ago with some trading and sports betting sites, but it has dwindled to the extent that you hardly hear about it anymore.

Would be good if anyone shares the references site that actually implements these kinds of system, if any.

This is because its disadvantages outweigh its advantages and might kick the account owner out when access is so desired.

Actually, there is nothing as disadvantages if you implement this kind of system. The problem is where and in what context it should get implemented, like on what purpose and its basis. Do casinos actually need this IP limit withdrawal? Do 2-factor authentication not enough?

Or we should think as simple end-user what currently does, they can easily set up a strong password with 2FA activated. I believe that is secure enough if the user is doing it right.

[l3pox]

I think the only situation where it should be ok to work in something only for the money is if you're doing it for a temporary time and plan to change your situation soon, would still be hard to sustain and not sure if it's worth it, it'll vary from situation to situation

sometimes one can work a lot for, let's say, 5 years and then be set for decades.

Plus, a competition and a work is not the same thing, even if you get paid in the end. Art for work and art for competition have different reasons, if you work and earn a salary and your job is to create art then its fine, its one thing. But, if you are working a not making any profit at all and just end up doing art for hobby and want to test yourself with the results here with a competition? That’s sitll something for fun and not something serious.

After all you do not know how great or terrible it will be. It’s not always the quality of the art, but the meaning of it. You could do something with amazing quality but with no soul in it, and could lose to someone who draws stickman but can make you feel something from it.

I think when it comes to competitions we should level the playing field in a fair way
it'd be the same to have a fight competition with people weighting 50kg VS those weighting 120kg, it won't be fair

totally agree that art has other layers on it and need soul and channeling to reach us at an emotional level

[Captain Corporate]

I agree that it doesn't really need to be "fair" in a way where people at the same level of expertise need to compete with each other. We are here to find the best of the best and if Roobet wants the best that will be an open call for everyone.

I have to say this type of competition is unique and can't be found anywhere else and that means they are going to have the upper hand when they are requesting art from people, not like they would have a hard time doing something their own, and not like they are using the winners all that much, it's only to appease the needs of people who want to earn something from the casino, that's it.

[noormcs5]

I think the only situation where it should be ok to work in something only for the money is if you're doing it for a temporary time and plan to change your situation soon, would still be hard to sustain and not sure if it's worth it, it'll vary from situation to situation

sometimes one can work a lot for, let's say, 5 years and then be set for decades.

Plus, a competition and a work is not the same thing, even if you get paid in the end. Art for work and art for competition have different reasons, if you work and earn a salary and your job is to create art then its fine, its one thing. But, if you are working a not making any profit at all and just end up doing art for hobby and want to test yourself with the results here with a competition? That’s sitll something for fun and not something serious.

After all you do not know how great or terrible it will be. It’s not always the quality of the art, but the meaning of it. You could do something with amazing quality but with no soul in it, and could lose to someone who draws stickman but can make you feel something from it.

I think when it comes to competitions we should level the playing field in a fair way
it'd be the same to have a fight competition with people weighting 50kg VS those weighting 120kg, it won't be fair

totally agree that art has other layers on it and need soul and channeling to reach us at an emotional level

By getting artwork by competition, you get more variety and a better end result however if you hire a graphics designer for the artwork, he/she will give you only limited design options. While it is ok for a small scale company, a gambling site that is too popular like Roobet, there is no harm in conducting a competition for the artwork and getting the best of the best design and graphics,

[Hamphser]

I think the only situation where it should be ok to work in something only for the money is if you're doing it for a temporary time and plan to change your situation soon, would still be hard to sustain and not sure if it's worth it, it'll vary from situation to situation

sometimes one can work a lot for, let's say, 5 years and then be set for decades.

Plus, a competition and a work is not the same thing, even if you get paid in the end. Art for work and art for competition have different reasons, if you work and earn a salary and your job is to create art then its fine, its one thing. But, if you are working a not making any profit at all and just end up doing art for hobby and want to test yourself with the results here with a competition? That’s sitll something for fun and not something serious.

After all you do not know how great or terrible it will be. It’s not always the quality of the art, but the meaning of it. You could do something with amazing quality but with no soul in it, and could lose to someone who draws stickman but can make you feel something from it.

I think when it comes to competitions we should level the playing field in a fair way
it'd be the same to have a fight competition with people weighting 50kg VS those weighting 120kg, it won't be fair

totally agree that art has other layers on it and need soul and channeling to reach us at an emotional level

By getting artwork by competition, you get more variety and a better end result however if you hire a graphics designer for the artwork, he/she will give you only limited design options. While it is ok for a small scale company, a gambling site that is too popular like Roobet, there is no harm in conducting a competition for the artwork and getting the best of the best design and graphics,

Its actually a beneficial thing for Roobet.They arent spending on something that they could benefit out.

•In terms of using up on their site design or logo with those artworks
•In terms of marketing and exposure

Its a win-win for them and as a business, you wont really be spending a decent or generous amount of money if you cant really be able benefit from it.
It is really just a casual thing to be done by a company.It isnt surprising on how Roobet did able to get so much interest and success on this forum even when it just starting up.
They do already have this kind of competition and other decent marketing which it did really spark out soo much attention and its one of the reasons
on what they had achieved or attained as of this moment.

[Apocollapse]

I have to say this type of competition is unique and can't be found anywhere else

Its a win-win for them and as a business, you wont really be spending a decent or generous amount of money if you cant really be able benefit from it.

Since Roobet is the one who start art contest about their casino promotion and they're already success, why the campaign you promoted under your signature haven't run any art contest yet? they must be aware if they can also conduct art contest as long as they want. I've remember Winz.io have start two art contest about their mascot, but when they've found the good mascot for them, they're not launch another more contest.

Maybe you guys can reach the representative and suggest to launch art contest

[SquirrelJulietGarden]

Since Roobet is the one who start art contest about their casino promotion and they're already success, why the campaign you promoted under your signature haven't run any art contest yet? they must be aware if they can also conduct art contest as long as they want.

I did not know too long about the past campaigns or art contests from casinos. I am only new member and with my limited time here, I only knew what you wrote, Roobet is the first casino runs art contest recent years. Maybe there were other casinos did art contests in the past farther years but I did not know about them.

I don't know the art contest from Roobet is their team initiative or it is an initiative recommended by Hhampuz. He managed a signature campaign for Roobet long time before their first art contest. I think Hhampus is the one stands behind this idea.

I've remember Winz.io have start two art contest about their mascot, but when they've found the good mascot for them, they're not launch another more contest.

In my opinion, don't mention other casinos in Roobet's announcement topic is better.

[aysg76]

I did not know too long about the past campaigns or art contests from casinos. I am only new member and with my limited time here, I only knew what you wrote, Roobet is the first casino runs art contest recent years. Maybe there were other casinos did art contests in the past farther years but I did not know about them.

The campaign is only six months old when you registered on the forum in 2020 as they have been running successfully for 3 years now under the effective management of @Hhampuz but yes they launched the art contest after some time only as you can see they have been running it from 2020 or maybe even earlier also but yes it's fun contest and have not taken part in recent one due to time problem but members like it very much.

[Johnyz]

I did not know too long about the past campaigns or art contests from casinos. I am only new member and with my limited time here, I only knew what you wrote, Roobet is the first casino runs art contest recent years. Maybe there were other casinos did art contests in the past farther years but I did not know about them.

The campaign is only six months old when you registered on the forum in 2020 as they have been running successfully for 3 years now under the effective management of @Hhampuz but yes they launched the art contest after some time only as you can see they have been running it from 2020 or maybe even earlier also but yes it's fun contest and have not taken part in recent one due to time problem but members like it very much.

Roobet started the contest last 2020, though Theymos already hosted a contest like this before but Roobet is the only site who becomes more consistent with this contest. Other site like Duelbits, Winz and CSGO500 also have their own version of art contest but it didn't last. It's fun to see great art and participate as well with the recent art contest with Roobet, many are waiting for the result since this time only 5 great art will be chosen as the winner. 

[shasan]

A horrible and unreasonable idea of the IP blocking initiative.

If you are keeping funds that security of itself specifically needs IP address allowance, you truly should reflect on whether you should keep such an amount on a casino or not. 2FA for security measures is enough, for casino scale. IP address limitation requires users have a static IP address, which only a few people may have it. Plus, this is a casino, not an exchange or store/keeping funds-oriented platform.

If you have IP address allowance option that what problem may happen? There will have no problem except clicking on the link from your email. If anyone can hack your information but could not hack your email then you may save your fund from being hacked. I think it is nothing but an extra security measure.

[vv181]

A horrible and unreasonable idea of the IP blocking initiative.

If you are keeping funds that security of itself specifically needs IP address allowance, you truly should reflect on whether you should keep such an amount on a casino or not. 2FA for security measures is enough, for casino scale. IP address limitation requires users have a static IP address, which only a few people may have it. Plus, this is a casino, not an exchange or store/keeping funds-oriented platform.

If you have IP address allowance option that what problem may happen? There will have no problem except clicking on the link from your email. If anyone can hack your information but could not hack your email then you may save your fund from being hacked. I think it is nothing but an extra security measure.

Surely that would benefit the most since it would make people opt-in to use multi-factor authentication. 2FA + email confirmation. But from the previous conversation, what I do get is that people propose IP withdrawal limitations, which made me think it is too much, even what exchanges do implement is withdrawal addresses whitelisting, not an IP. But even if that feature gets proposed, I still do think it is unnecessary.

[l3pox]

I think the only situation where it should be ok to work in something only for the money is if you're doing it for a temporary time and plan to change your situation soon, would still be hard to sustain and not sure if it's worth it, it'll vary from situation to situation

sometimes one can work a lot for, let's say, 5 years and then be set for decades.

Plus, a competition and a work is not the same thing, even if you get paid in the end. Art for work and art for competition have different reasons, if you work and earn a salary and your job is to create art then its fine, its one thing. But, if you are working a not making any profit at all and just end up doing art for hobby and want to test yourself with the results here with a competition? That’s sitll something for fun and not something serious.

After all you do not know how great or terrible it will be. It’s not always the quality of the art, but the meaning of it. You could do something with amazing quality but with no soul in it, and could lose to someone who draws stickman but can make you feel something from it.

I think when it comes to competitions we should level the playing field in a fair way
it'd be the same to have a fight competition with people weighting 50kg VS those weighting 120kg, it won't be fair

totally agree that art has other layers on it and need soul and channeling to reach us at an emotional level

By getting artwork by competition, you get more variety and a better end result however if you hire a graphics designer for the artwork, he/she will give you only limited design options. While it is ok for a small scale company, a gambling site that is too popular like Roobet, there is no harm in conducting a competition for the artwork and getting the best of the best design and graphics,

Its actually a beneficial thing for Roobet.They arent spending on something that they could benefit out.

•In terms of using up on their site design or logo with those artworks
•In terms of marketing and exposure

Its a win-win for them and as a business, you wont really be spending a decent or generous amount of money if you cant really be able benefit from it.
It is really just a casual thing to be done by a company.It isnt surprising on how Roobet did able to get so much interest and success on this forum even when it just starting up.
They do already have this kind of competition and other decent marketing which it did really spark out soo much attention and its one of the reasons
on what they had achieved or attained as of this moment.

I agree there's a benefit for them, the thing with these contests is that it's hard to measure the directly benefit, a lot of subjective factors are in play too.
I just feel good and thankful that they keep organizing it, also it's probably not a huge cost for them to make it happen