[ANN] Qora | Released 16 May | 100% POS | New Source

[jeffyeah]

at java.awt.EventDispatchThrea.run<unknown source>,Why?

Can you try to delete the wallet and data folders and create a new wallet and tell me what it says on the command line?

OK!Thanks

[spring.yu]

Nice coin,  wait for you guys

[dwzzow]

keep watching

[qora]

There are still plenty of beta funds to give out.
Just post your address here.

[precrime3]

There are still plenty of beta funds to give out.
Just post your address here.

Will post when I get home. More the merrier 

[TheMightyX]

- The escrow must be released within the first month of release. After the escrow has been released the participants will get access to their funds.

Participants not getting access to funds until after escrow is released somewhat defeats the point of escrow!

Also, please make it clear (qora & any escrow provider) what the participants' cancellation terms are, should they choose not to go ahead (assuming it is not a blatant scam). E.g. can they simply say "I'm no longer interested" and get their funds back, and if so until what time?

The purpose of the escrow is to make sure there is a valid and working client.
If I would not release the funds after he has released the escrow it would destroy this project.
The same goes for him. If he doesn't release the escrow it would destroy the project and I can not give him that much power.

People can always ask for refunds.
And after the launch they can exchange their funds back for their investment.

While I agree people shouldn't just trust me blindly; I am a lot more trustworthy than you are at this point in time.
I have been a part of and actually contributed to the cryptocurrency community. I received part of the developer bounty funds for my work on the BoottleXCP Counterparty GUI. I have worked closely with JahPowerBit one of the major contributors to the Counterparty Counterwallet system on that.
I have a history here and all though I may be kind of a dick some times; People can go back and check my posts from months ago to see the kind of person that I am. I believe people will see that I am honest and fair.

You, not so much history.

Me handing over funds to you first = Protecting the developer
Me holding funds until you've handed over wallet/coins to investors = Protecting the investors

As previously mentioned, I would be protecting investor interests in all cases.

regarding restarting the IPO... it "wouldn't be fair" to the whole 6 people that have invested 1 BTC so far?

You do know that until eXoCoin accepted escrow it got maybe a couple BTC and after allowing escrow it got over 200 BTC in total?
If this project really is what you claim it to be, you are selling yourself short.
The only reason I can think of to intentionally do that is poor business sense or malicious intentions.

[qora]

While I agree people shouldn't just trust me blindly; I am a lot more trustworthy than you are at this point in time.
I have been a part of and actually contributed to the cryptocurrency community. I received part of the developer bounty funds for my work on the BoottleXCP Counterparty GUI. I have worked closely with JahPowerBit one of the major contributors to the Counterparty Counterwallet system on that.
I have a history here and all though I may be kind of a dick some times; People can go back and check my posts from months ago to see the kind of person that I am. I believe people will see that I am honest and fair.

You, not so much history.

Me handing over funds to you first = Protecting the developer
Me holding funds until you've handed over wallet/coins to investors = Protecting the investors

As previously mentioned, I would be protecting investor interests in all cases.

regarding restarting the IPO... it "wouldn't be fair" to the whole 6 people that have invested 1 BTC so far?

You do know that until eXoCoin accepted escrow it got maybe a couple BTC and after allowing escrow it got over 200 BTC in total?
If this project really is what you claim it to be, you are selling yourself short.
The only reason I can think of to intentionally do that is poor business sense or malicious intentions.

If investors want to be protected from a not working client they can use escrow.
If investors want to be protected from me not sending them the funds on launch they can simple buy some after the launch.

It doesn't matter how trusted someone is. I can not allow an escrow provider to have the power to destroy this project.

[Troonetpt]

I can not allow an escrow provider to have the power to destroy this project.

Why would an escrow destroy this project?
May be you can choose Anon136 who provide escrow for eXoCoin.

[precrime3]

If beta funds are still available for giving:
QMrpMzJqzwxDUHHLLEQi5g2SmwpAM2FZxC
Thanks In advance 

[notsoshifty]

I can not allow an escrow provider to have the power to destroy this project.

Why would an escrow destroy this project?
May be you can choose Anon136 who provide escrow for eXoCoin.

I also don't understand why an established escrow provider in this forum would want to destroy his own reputation in this way.

As well as Anon136 and TheMightyX, consider TomatoCage. Although probably none of these three would provide escrow if funds are delivered to dev before dev delivers coins to investors.

Without suitable escrow, will this coin get wide enough distribution to allow it to be a success? Nxt got 73 investors and that low number is still its biggest problem.

[kdrop22]

I trust Qora Devs, I invest without escrow.

[kdrop22]

Send me some Beta coins for testing.
QiLMJyyxzRzY8NF5ZD5W2h18VXQJhmrWF8

[91porn]

Look it great.

[91porn]

I can not allow an escrow provider to have the power to destroy this project.

Why would an escrow destroy this project?
May be you can choose Anon136 who provide escrow for eXoCoin.

I also don't understand why an established escrow provider in this forum would want to destroy his own reputation in this way.

As well as Anon136 and TheMightyX, consider TomatoCage. Although probably none of these three would provide escrow if funds are delivered to dev before dev delivers coins to investors.

Without suitable escrow, will this coin get wide enough distribution to allow it to be a success? Nxt got 73 investors and that low number is still its biggest problem.

I agree with you.
Anon136 is a great man we can trust.

[qora]

IPO is still open until Wednesday 9 April 2014 1pm GMT.

Oke about the escrow I checked out the approach eXocoin used.
On launch the provider will have the possibility to check out the whole application.
If he agrees the application is working correctly we can start exchanging Qora <-> BTC in small increments.
The exchange of Qora <-> BTC must happen within the first month of release.
The escrow provider is responsible for delivering the funds.
The escrow provider must contact me first and ask me if the investment will be accepted.

This way we are both protected.

[standards]

IPO is still open until Wednesday 9 April 2014 1pm GMT.

Oke about the escrow I checked out the approach eXocoin used.
On launch the provider will have the possibility to check out the whole application.
If he agrees the application is working correctly we can start exchanging Qora <-> BTC in small increments.
The exchange of Qora <-> BTC must happen within the first month of release.
The escrow provider is responsible for delivering the funds.

This way we are both protected.

With escrow available, you can gain much more BTC in IPO.

[ShadowOfScales]

In the case beta funds are available, some coins to start off would honestly be amazing.
QfnJG3eVJjMgK4nifMm7jPyPbUKzQDvmQ5

[SerDonald]

sent you some btc please confirm

[qora]

sent you some btc please confirm

Confirmed.

[ms983845]

With escrow Im in.
Also background/info on dev team would be great. Would give some real credibility to the project and what you could achieve