I must admit I find it quite crazy that people are already trading their stakes.
I intend to create blockexplorer soon after release.
If you would like I could give you more info about the API or you could tell me which functions you would need.
The new API will be more REST like using HTTP methods and urls to make it easier to use.
I want to be able to use RPC to receive information on all transactions in a given block.
And I am interested in the possibility of starting a wallet (as a daemon?) on Ubuntu Server, without the graphical interface.
You can start the program command line only using the -disablegui flag.
That's not the job of stakeholders but the developer who has 130 BTC to play with. He can do the logo and everything in my mind. Has anyone asked if QORA wants other people to make websites? Seems like pointless interference to me.
Ofcourse I can create a website and logo but I am far from a master in it.
If someone who is more capable wants to contribute who can stop him from doing it?
If it is good and they allow me to use it I could use it as the base of the official website.
I will maintain a website myself because of the trust needed when it comes to hosting the client.
I will not transfer any of the BTC invested before the release because people need to be able to ask for refunds.
OK, you first.
And do you actually know what people mean by "projects to build applications and services and infrastructure that will use the coin"
I'm not aware of any service that anyone needs?
The only thing I can think of is a mobile wallet, but I would prefer to pay 1$ for a good one rather than do a charity job for one. This is how NXT became a sprawling mess. Lets wait to see what the maker thinks needs help with before people jump around like headless chickens forming committees.
People can provide bounties if that is what they want to do with their stake.
The only way I would be able to provide bounties is when people do not collect their stake.
I agree that if we want to keep things simply and organised one centralized party should be in control of all the wallets. When we look at bitcoin there is one official wallet that almost nobody is using anymore and a lot of 'light' wallets and mobile wallets that use servers but are still secure.
The plan is after the pc client is perfect to also develop light clients and mobile wallets.
There is still a lot of work to be done until we get to that point and the chance is big that mobile wallets will already be available by that time but they will not be officially supported.
In the end it will all come down to user-friendliness and documentation.
