Premier League Prediction Thread 2024/2025

[len01]

-snip

FA cup actually isn't really light weighted but more were expected of ten hag and if the management of Manchester united still decides to keep him then for whatever reason it may be I think it's rather going to be more detrimental than beneficial except they will seel of some players aswell and bring in new ones as recommended by ten hag which will be seen as those he can work with.

If indeed the reason for retaining Ten Hag is because of his success in winning the FA Cup title, it seems reasonable and natural for Man United management to try to give him another chance after winning the title and according to my predictions it looks like Ten Hag will be given the opportunity in several matches after the next season begins and will see whether there is any development in terms of Man United performance.
and if there are good developments, maybe it will be maintained until the end of the season, but if there are no changes, maybe in the second half of the season, Ten Hag will be replaced by a new coach and this is just my speculation.
what happened to Man United last season is actually understandable to me because this team had several problems which made Ten Hag team fail to finish in the best position and the real problems were only the main players who were not performing optimally and the new players who brought in last season didn't seem to make a maximum contribution.

after Ten Hag is given the opportunity next season, it looks like he will be more careful and will choose truly quality players who can make a difference to Man United appearance and win several titles which can give confidence to the fans of this team again.

[knowngunman]

Chelsea should be able to put trust in every coach they employ, like Ten Hag at Manchester United and Arsenal with Artata. Not all coaches are able to do a great job in just one first season, even if it is not impossible, it will be really difficult because of the adaptation process.

Chelsea is completely different from other elite EPL club. They're strict when it comes to their managers and not welcoming any relenting outcomes. Erik Ten Hag in Chelsea? He would have been sacked long time ago. The previous owner, Abramovic doesn't welcome any relenting efforts or if he sensed any form of incompetence from the headcoach, he will definitely make good use of the sack letter.

It's not about having trust in their couch, it's their tradition and I don't blame them because I will definitely do the same thing if I should be in their shoes. Take a look at Ten Hang in Manchester united since you used him as example, can you continue to have trust in such couch if you are the owner of the club? I guess your answer will be No. I know it takes more than just a season to build a team but even at the beginning, there suppose to be signs to show that the team is on the right track and the couch is worthy to be given more years to build a dream team but what can you tell of Ten Hang at Manchester united to prove he should be trusted for more seasons?

If Ten Hang is in Chelsea, he would have been the least serving couch in the club if his performance will be as same as it is now in Manchester united. I like how Abrahamovic was making good use of his sack letter because some of these couches are just there to earn a living without impact on the club development. Todd is too calm and tolerate what shouldn't be tolerated in order to maintain the standard of the club.

[Warkop]

Chelsea is completely different from other elite EPL club. They're strict when it comes to their managers and not welcoming any relenting outcomes. Erik Ten Hag in Chelsea? He would have been sacked long time ago. The previous owner, Abramovic doesn't welcome any relenting efforts or if he sensed any form of incompetence from the headcoach, he will definitely make good use of the sack letter.

Yes of course, during the Abramovich period, Chelsea was known to be very strict with its manager. The decision to fire a manager is often made quickly if expected results are not achieved. This was done as an effort to ensure the club remains competitive at the highest level and wins trophies consistently. This philosophy has brought much success, including several Premier League titles, the Champions League and other domestic trophies.
However, it should be noted that each club has different policies and managerial philosophies. Some clubs prefer to give managers time to build a team and achieve long-term results, as seen at Manchester United with Erik Ten Hag. This approach can provide stability and sustainable development although it requires patience and time.

[Bobrox]

Yes of course, during the Abramovich period, Chelsea was known to be very strict with its manager. The decision to fire a manager is often made quickly if expected results are not achieved. This was done as an effort to ensure the club remains competitive at the highest level and wins trophies consistently. This philosophy has brought much success, including several Premier League titles, the Champions League and other domestic trophies.
However, it should be noted that each club has different policies and managerial philosophies. Some clubs prefer to give managers time to build a team and achieve long-term results, as seen at Manchester United with Erik Ten Hag. This approach can provide stability and sustainable development although it requires patience and time.

During Abramovic era the manager keep existing around more than one until two season without sacked them such as did by Todd Boehly era because some manager leaving their position without one season over. Chelsea faced difficulty return back to be big four team of premier league since acquisition by Todd Boehly and never yet participants in Champion League or Europe League competition. Chelsea under Todd Boehly era made more interventions in recruiting players, even Pochettino had to leave his position after not being given the freedom to recruit new players.

Build up one team with full youth player need time for development and I think Chelsea owner more patience waiting for giving opportunity more longer time to manager find right tactician. In this season Chelsea will perform in UEFA Conference League and its opportunity after absent last two season with European competition.

[Leviathan.007]

They keep changing coaches like selfies, no matter how experienced a coach is, it will take him a long time to understand the club. Because it is not possible to do everything at the beginning, because no matter how experienced a coach is, he has to spend one to two or three seasons to convince the team that he can fully teach his team with good experience. However, I don't support the Chelsea team changing the coach so much, the coach should be given time only if he can take the team to the top with his experience.

No matter how much Chelsea tries to change coaches, I think Chelsea will not be as successful as before because the previous Chelsea did not often take quick decisions which ultimately destroyed the club itself because any coach also needs time to bring the club to success. If we look at Pochettino's abilities we will see Chelsea's progress has been significant compared to last season, but unfortunately the management doesn't see that and only wants to see Chelsea at the top level without seeing the coach's struggle when he is working hard to train the club to perform well in the remaining matches so that they manage to finish in 6th place.

We'll see how Chelsea performs next season with their new coach, whether it can be better than Pochettino or worse than before because Chelsea has too high expectations and tends to fire the coach as quickly as possible if they don't meet expectations. Todd Boehly has not achieved success like the previous Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich because Todd Boehly wasted too much money by recruiting young players and easily changing coaches compared to what the previous owner did who understood the situation and was good at managing management so that Chelsea could be successful in his hands.

I already said before, that the problem in Chelsea is not about their coach, Chelsea tried to use many other coaches in the past after they stopped working with Potter but it didn't work for them and they still couldn't get good results in the Premier League and Chelsea is still far from the top of the table where they were before.
I think Tod Boehly has no idea about how to manage the team and the only thing he can do is to just spend money every season for rebuilding the team but in the end, they can't get good results.
 

[slapper]

Chelsea should be able to put trust in every coach they employ, like Ten Hag at Manchester United and Arsenal with Artata. Not all coaches are able to do a great job in just one first season, even if it is not impossible, it will be really difficult because of the adaptation process.

Chelsea is completely different from other elite EPL club. They're strict when it comes to their managers and not welcoming any relenting outcomes. Erik Ten Hag in Chelsea? He would have been sacked long time ago. The previous owner, Abramovic doesn't welcome any relenting efforts or if he sensed any form of incompetence from the headcoach, he will definitely make good use of the sack letter.

It's a shark tank. You either eat trophies or are chum. We've seen this movie with Abramovich: the manager turnover, enormous expectations, and ruthless pursuit of trophies. Ten Hag is next in line? He's a tactical genius. At Chelsea? Come on, guy. A titanium spine and steel nerves are needed to handle that pressure cooker. The Chelsea way, right? Zero patience, constant churn. The ride is chaotic but effective. Check their trophy case. It overflows

Chelsea managers, prepare for the hot seat. If you can endure the heat, you could become a legend. Just ask Mourinho. Or Ancelotti. Or one of the other dozen managers who've been through that meat grinder

[rendravolt]

Chelsea should be able to put trust in every coach they employ, like Ten Hag at Manchester United and Arsenal with Artata. Not all coaches are able to do a great job in just one first season, even if it is not impossible, it will be really difficult because of the adaptation process.

Chelsea is completely different from other elite EPL club. They're strict when it comes to their managers and not welcoming any relenting outcomes. Erik Ten Hag in Chelsea? He would have been sacked long time ago. The previous owner, Abramovic doesn't welcome any relenting efforts or if he sensed any form of incompetence from the headcoach, he will definitely make good use of the sack letter.

If we think that Pochettino can lead Chelsea to finish in a better place than last season, he will immediately be fired, especially if we compare him with Erik Ten Hag, of course they already did in the first season. Each club has its own stance on handling this matter and Chelsea is known to be quite serious about their coach's problems.

I think Chelsea is really targeting results beyond their capabilities so any coach will think twice before deciding whether to handle a team that is still in the transition process. Apart from that, Enzo Maresca certainly wants to take this job considering that his name will also become more popular if he can manage Chelsea and compared to other experienced coaches, they are definitely reluctant to take this job.

[Altryist]

I already said before, that the problem in Chelsea is not about their coach, Chelsea tried to use many other coaches in the past after they stopped working with Potter but it didn't work for them and they still couldn't get good results in the Premier League and Chelsea is still far from the top of the table where they were before.
I think Tod Boehly has no idea about how to manage the team and the only thing he can do is to just spend money every season for rebuilding the team but in the end, they can't get good results.
 

Boehly did not spend money on acquiring new players, just when Pochettino arrived, Chelsea sold a lot of players, and therefore Pochettino was in a comparatively worse position with his predecessors. Boehly is a businessman, perhaps at first he wanted to achieve some titles, now I assume that he will try to get some kind of profit from the team. It is clear that he does not understand how to manage a team, at the moment he is learning how to do it.

[hahay]

Chelsea should be able to put trust in every coach they employ, like Ten Hag at Manchester United and Arsenal with Artata. Not all coaches are able to do a great job in just one first season, even if it is not impossible, it will be really difficult because of the adaptation process.

Chelsea is completely different from other elite EPL club. They're strict when it comes to their managers and not welcoming any relenting outcomes. Erik Ten Hag in Chelsea? He would have been sacked long time ago. The previous owner, Abramovic doesn't welcome any relenting efforts or if he sensed any form of incompetence from the headcoach, he will definitely make good use of the sack letter.

If we think that Pochettino can lead Chelsea to finish in a better place than last season, he will immediately be fired, especially if we compare him with Erik Ten Hag, of course they already did in the first season. Each club has its own stance on handling this matter and Chelsea is known to be quite serious about their coach's problems.

I think Chelsea is really targeting results beyond their capabilities so any coach will think twice before deciding whether to handle a team that is still in the transition process. Apart from that, Enzo Maresca certainly wants to take this job considering that his name will also become more popular if he can manage Chelsea and compared to other experienced coaches, they are definitely reluctant to take this job.

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either. Unless the team finishes outside the top five, then of course Chelsea will immediately fire their head coach when the league is over. But indeed, Chelsea also looks like they are making a big effort to get the right coach but unfortunately, Chelsea wants quick success, because Chelsea doesn't respect the process.

[BALIK]

I already said before, that the problem in Chelsea is not about their coach, Chelsea tried to use many other coaches in the past after they stopped working with Potter but it didn't work for them and they still couldn't get good results in the Premier League and Chelsea is still far from the top of the table where they were before.
I think Tod Boehly has no idea about how to manage the team and the only thing he can do is to just spend money every season for rebuilding the team but in the end, they can't get good results.

Boehly did not spend money on acquiring new players, just when Pochettino arrived, Chelsea sold a lot of players, and therefore Pochettino was in a comparatively worse position with his predecessors. Boehly is a businessman, perhaps at first he wanted to achieve some titles, now I assume that he will try to get some kind of profit from the team. It is clear that he does not understand how to manage a team, at the moment he is learning how to do it.

I think Chelsea Management is not experienced enough in managing the renowned club like Chelsea. At the same time, management's relationship with coaches and players is not good. And this is one of Chelsea's bad performance.

Chelsea management now wants to make money from the Chelsea Club. This is why they are not very worried about Chelsea's over -performance. Coach changed many times in the last few years. As Chelsea is now in a situation, the coach change cannot be any solution. Wanting to change Chelsea's over -standing position, the experienced coach is needed. At the same time, big funds need to buy players.

[Oluwa-btc]

When it comes to the Manchester United, what is broken is the manager himself. He's not gotten that true and real connection with the team players, rather he just work with them as their manager is what I feel. Hence he's not able to get the motivation he needs from.each and every player he needs in his toolbox. All I advice the team to do and the club in the entirely is to sit well and have an open discussion between the players and the manager of the club so as to fix all the differences between them. This is if Eric Ten Hag is to continue as a manager. Personally, I like the guy and he's hardworking but I need him to control himself the more to become more of a sportsman than a boss to the players. Let him.be more magnanimous at heart.

Even the new owners seem dump to me because they should already be making moves for players in my opinion. I still don't know why it's taking too long with the evaluation.
They should know it's taken too long already, it's time for them to start backing up the manager if they have no plans sacking him.

Erik Ten Hag is a good coach, tactically sound and reads the game very well, during his first season I can boast of him having all of his decisions correct because he also had enough options of players to make selections from. It's not the same since that lose to Sevilla during the European Europa League Competition.

Manchester United lose some of them most important players to Injury even before the preseason even the decisions from the medical team affected his decisions as he sent back Sergio Regulon back to Tottenham Hotspur after completing him loan deal for the club.
All Erik Ten Hag needs is the right backing.

[piebeyb]

after Ten Hag is given the opportunity next season, it looks like he will be more careful and will choose truly quality players who can make a difference to Man United appearance and win several titles which can give confidence to the fans of this team again.

If he is given another chance actually I am not sure that he will get good results next season and maybe Manchester United will be a bad team again like this season they suffered a lot of defeats so they ended up in 8th place, I think Ten Hag should be replaced and there also needs to be an overhaul of their main squad, it's true that there are several players who are less productive so in my opinion they need to be replaced and sold in order to be able to buy players who are truly productive next season.

The competition next season will clearly be very difficult if there are no changes to Manchester United, I'm sure there will be no changes to Manchester United next season and the results will definitely not be much different from this season, just look at the many teams that are already planning to make changes. main squad and head coach, changes must be made if they have failed before, Ten hag has been given the opportunity for several seasons but the results continue to decline and that is not good to maintain.

[Farma]

During Abramovic era the manager keep existing around more than one until two season without sacked them such as did by Todd Boehly era because some manager leaving their position without one season over. Chelsea faced difficulty return back to be big four team of premier league since acquisition by Todd Boehly and never yet participants in Champion League or Europe League competition. Chelsea under Todd Boehly era made more interventions in recruiting players, even Pochettino had to leave his position after not being given the freedom to recruit new players.

Build up one team with full youth player need time for development and I think Chelsea owner more patience waiting for giving opportunity more longer time to manager find right tactician. In this season Chelsea will perform in UEFA Conference League and its opportunity after absent last two season with European competition.

Todd Boehly doesn't seem to understand how to build a team and Chelsea's management made a lot of mistakes so they are down like they are now, they don't want a process as if everything can be bought with money, that's a big mistake and if that can't be changed then forever Chelsea will not develop.

Everything takes a process and time to build a team, like what Manchester City did several seasons ago and Chelsea management should be able to do the same thing.
Now Chelsea has a new coach and I am pessimistic that Chelsea can recover in the near future.

[Roseline492]

Chelsea is completely different from other elite EPL club. They're strict when it comes to their managers and not welcoming any relenting outcomes. Erik Ten Hag in Chelsea? He would have been sacked long time ago.

That's one of the unique thing about Chelsea they hardly tolerate inexperienced coaches that is why they always sack coaches whenever they feel he is not doing what they hired him for, so actually Chelsea management is so strict that they always expect there coaches to effect there coaching skills to there players immediately without given them a lot of time to get use to team, so I agree with you that if it was Chelsea that Erik Ten Hag was coaching they would have actually sacked him long time ago because he lack some qualities but however fortunately for him Manchester United is not like Chelsea that doesn't think twice of sacking there coach but instead they always give there coach enough time to get use to the players and at the time develop the perfect strategy that would work for them.

[Ndabagi01]

Chelsea should be able to put trust in every coach they employ, like Ten Hag at Manchester United and Arsenal with Artata. Not all coaches are able to do a great job in just one first season, even if it is not impossible, it will be really difficult because of the adaptation process.

Chelsea is completely different from other elite EPL club. They're strict when it comes to their managers and not welcoming any relenting outcomes. Erik Ten Hag in Chelsea? He would have been sacked long time ago. The previous owner, Abramovic doesn't welcome any relenting efforts or if he sensed any form of incompetence from the headcoach, he will definitely make good use of the sack letter.

Could it have also been that since Abramovich left Chelsea, their performance have been declining? They had their best season some years back when Abramovich was still the owner of the club. Maybe those strict rules made managers to perform above expectations to keep their job at Chelsea and the club was truly shining during those periods. In as much as some of those sackings aren’t so warrant, I think we should respect the decision of the owner for what they want for their clubs, because those are what keep them in the game to keep shining and also be on high demand in business terms also.

If Ten Hang is in Chelsea, he would have been the least serving couch in the club if his performance will be as same as it is now in Manchester united. I like how Abrahamovic was making good use of his sack letter because some of these couches are just there to earn a living without impact on the club development. Todd is too calm and tolerate what shouldn't be tolerated in order to maintain the standard of the club.

We can’t be so sure that Eric Ten Hag if given the position of the manager at Chelsea won’t perform well. In cases like this, it depends on the atmosphere and environment these coaches find themselves that they’ll put in effort to make the team prevail amongst other clubs. If Ten Hag is under a more strict management, he might have done better than what he’s doing now at Manchester United if he was in Chelsea as their coach. Ten Hag is not even an option for Chelsea to consider, so let this comparison just slide by and see how the new coach will do in Chelsea.

[topbitcoin]

Actually, for this matter, I read that Pochettino himself resigned and it was not a dismissal, so in this case we cannot equate dismissal and resignation because after all they are 2 different things.
So in this case we cannot seem to blame Chelsea for everything that is happening to Poche and Chelsea at the moment because Chelsea also does not have the option to maintain the coaching position that Poche previously had this season.

Now all that has to be done is to see what next steps Chelsea will take because forcing their will on Poche is also not possible now because when Poche decides to resign then indirectly they have to look for a new replacement coach and it is worth seeing what Todd will do. do it this season because of the possibility that a change could occur with the new coach now.

We know that Pochettino was not fired by the Chelsea management. Pochettino voluntarily re-signed. However, Pochettino re-signed because his relationship with Chelsea management is not good. And since Chelsea's change of ownership, no coach has had a good relationship with Chelsea management. And that's why we hold Chelsea management responsible for Chelsea's decline.

Chelsea will now look for a new coach. It will not be easy for the new coach to stabilize the team. It needs time. So it seems very unlikely that we will see Chelsea in the top 4 of the table next season as well.

By looking at this situation, the point is that we cannot fully blame Chelsea for Poche's departure now even though this initially happened because of poor communication and cooperation but still we must also know that sacking and resignation are 2 different things so we do not have to fully say that this is Chelsea's fault.
From the beginning, Poche's appointment as coach was doubtful but he did a good job towards the end of the season even though the beginning and middle of the season were not very good in terms of performance.

As I said before, the situation will remain the same as 2 seasons ago where Chelsea will again feel the strength with a new coach who will definitely do a scheme and game that could even be directly different from this season so things like this cannot be changed because after all this is a certainty where when a new coach then there needs to be a situation where a reshuffle is definitely done to make the squad fit the criteria.

[GiftedMAN]

They keep changing coaches like selfies, no matter how experienced a coach is, it will take him a long time to understand the club. Because it is not possible to do everything at the beginning, because no matter how experienced a coach is, he has to spend one to two or three seasons to convince the team that he can fully teach his team with good experience. However, I don't support the Chelsea team changing the coach so much, the coach should be given time only if he can take the team to the top with his experience.

No matter how much Chelsea tries to change coaches, I think Chelsea will not be as successful as before because the previous Chelsea did not often take quick decisions which ultimately destroyed the club itself because any coach also needs time to bring the club to success. If we look at Pochettino's abilities we will see Chelsea's progress has been significant compared to last season, but unfortunately the management doesn't see that and only wants to see Chelsea at the top level without seeing the coach's struggle when he is working hard to train the club to perform well in the remaining matches so that they manage to finish in 6th place.

We'll see how Chelsea performs next season with their new coach, whether it can be better than Pochettino or worse than before because Chelsea has too high expectations and tends to fire the coach as quickly as possible if they don't meet expectations. Todd Boehly has not achieved success like the previous Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich because Todd Boehly wasted too much money by recruiting young players and easily changing coaches compared to what the previous owner did who understood the situation and was good at managing management so that Chelsea could be successful in his hands.

I already said before, that the problem in Chelsea is not about their coach, Chelsea tried to use many other coaches in the past after they stopped working with Potter but it didn't work for them and they still couldn't get good results in the Premier League and Chelsea is still far from the top of the table where they were before.
I think Tod Boehly has no idea about how to manage the team and the only thing he can do is to just spend money every season for rebuilding the team but in the end, they can't get good results.
 

I think a good coach is part of the problem of the Chelsea team, the problem of Chelsea team escalated when they sacked Thomas Tuchel as their manager they failed to replace him with a better experience coach who would have helped the team to get back to form because as at the time when Tuchel was having a difficult moment in winning matches the team was already struggling in all aspects the better Idea would have been given the manager a little more time until a better replacement is brought in.

Tod Boehly misunderstood the problem with the team at that time not that he couldn't manage the team,  as some one who wants fast results he swang into action to spend money thinking that getting some quality players and getting another manager would help to salvage the problem in the team but that didn't work at for the team but I think getting a good result for Chelsea is possible anyways especially seeing how they improved in their last few matches before the end of the season so hopefully they are going to have a good next season if they maintain their performance and the winning mentality they have got right now.

[tusandii]

During Abramovic era the manager keep existing around more than one until two season without sacked them such as did by Todd Boehly era because some manager leaving their position without one season over. Chelsea faced difficulty return back to be big four team of premier league since acquisition by Todd Boehly and never yet participants in Champion League or Europe League competition. Chelsea under Todd Boehly era made more interventions in recruiting players, even Pochettino had to leave his position after not being given the freedom to recruit new players.

Build up one team with full youth player need time for development and I think Chelsea owner more patience waiting for giving opportunity more longer time to manager find right tactician. In this season Chelsea will perform in UEFA Conference League and its opportunity after absent last two season with European competition.

Todd Boehly doesn't seem to understand how to build a team and Chelsea's management made a lot of mistakes so they are down like they are now, they don't want a process as if everything can be bought with money, that's a big mistake and if that can't be changed then forever Chelsea will not develop.

Everything takes a process and time to build a team, like what Manchester City did several seasons ago and Chelsea management should be able to do the same thing.
Now Chelsea has a new coach and I am pessimistic that Chelsea can recover in the near future.

In fact, Todd Boehly is not at fault regarding Chelsea's current failure, but for me this mistake occurred with Chelsea management who did not manage their finances well so they bought players who perhaps did not have good talent but instead were determined to buy these players while Todd Boehly just left all of this to management.
Meanwhile, the management mistake was even worse when he fired Pochettino who had worked hard to rebuild Chelsea's strongest performance and this is a big mistake that Chelsea has often experienced since last season, which is always trying to change the coach when they are trying to improve Chelsea's future and I agree with If Chelsea really wants to get good results, you should try to look at Manchester City, which has successfully won various titles just by retaining its old coach.

After the decision to sign Enzo Maresca as Chelsea's new coach, I hope that Chelsea management will retain the coach longer and give him the opportunity to realize Chelsea's dream which has been lost for the last 2 seasons and also hopefully Enzo Maresca can become a Chelsea coach who can be trusted for improve the club's performance in the future.

[Google+]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either. Unless the team finishes outside the top five, then of course Chelsea will immediately fire their head coach when the league is over. But indeed, Chelsea also looks like they are making a big effort to get the right coach but unfortunately, Chelsea wants quick success, because Chelsea doesn't respect the process.

Chelsea performance this season is certainly beyond the expectations expected by the current management, so it is not surprising that Pochettino was sacked Although able to make Chelsea finish in the Conference League zone this season, Chelsea of course are now starting to build a squad with a strong foundation and also rely on young players so it is not surprising that Todd Boehly as the owner of Chelsea budgeted a lot of money to recruit talented young players,  not only young players, but now also Chelsea are starting to trust their long-term project to a young coach who does have a lot of experience.

Pochettino dismissal certainly indicates if the Chelsea owner is not satisfied with Pochettino performance, and we can say if with the big money that has been spent by Chelsea so far, of course the level of the Conference League zone is not what they expected, it seems that Chelsea management next season has high expectations and of course they want to get instant results and maybe even if Chelsea new coach will not last long at Chelsea if he Unable to meet the targets implemented by Todd Boehly.

[mammusu]

In fact, Todd Boehly is not at fault regarding Chelsea's current failure, but for me this mistake occurred with Chelsea management who did not manage their finances well so they bought players who perhaps did not have good talent but instead were determined to buy these players while Todd Boehly just left all of this to management.
Meanwhile, the management mistake was even worse when he fired Pochettino who had worked hard to rebuild Chelsea's strongest performance and this is a big mistake that Chelsea has often experienced since last season, which is always trying to change the coach when they are trying to improve Chelsea's future and I agree with If Chelsea really wants to get good results, you should try to look at Manchester City, which has successfully won various titles just by retaining its old coach.

They have money and unfortunately they just waste it on bringing in players who don't contribute much to Chelsea, and in fact most of the players they bring in are playing below their best. Obviously this is a useless thing that they do, because they spend a lot of money but they don't get anything in return for what they spend. they seem to be in a rush when bringing in players, that's the problem.

I would rather a team only bring in 2 to 3 players but make a big contribution to the game than bring in a lot of players but don't have any impact on the team. This is clearly something wrong that the management did because they did not consider it carefully when bringing in players. I hope they will be better when bringing in players, because what they are experiencing now should be a valuable lesson for them in the future.