Premier League Prediction Thread 2023/2024

[Unity for Humanity]

Even if Manchester City finishes the season on a high, some of the teams at the top, including Arsenal and Liverpool, may be left regretting that they were not able to compete in the end. Arsenal should be particularly hard hit in this regard as they last survived the competition. But since their dream of winning the title this season has not been fulfilled, they should plan the next season hard and perform well in the next season to win the Premier League title.

[asriloni]

Yes, it is difficult to understand with Boehly's plan, he should learn from his inappropriate decisions like last season. The current management should not adopt the old system like the Roman era which was known as a dictatorship, but there are good sides which must be the main consideration for building a better club. Now coaching has moved to Maresca and he has also been given the best coaching staff. Hopefully Maresca will get full support from the club board and he can work freely without interference.

I agree with you. I think Boehly should learn from the experience of last season. Club management should not give Maresca big targets in his first season. Now Maresca already has the best coaching staff. I don't know what budget the club has given, but in my opinion the current squad is actually quite good. At the end of the season Pochettino has found chemistry between the players and I think Chelsea's game is very good. But all decisions are up to the coach. They can choose which players suit their coaching style.

About football, Todd knows nothing for sure. He governs the club how he feels. That's the reason I don't think that man should be Chelsea chairman. Better still, Chelsea investors should vote for a competent replacement for him for the upcoming season following his bad decision making about the club. Todd was dead wrong to think that selling the players would bring him fast money but this is a really wrong strategy took by him.

I meant that the young players need time to mature and have more experience. To impress other clubs to purchase Chelsea's players at a very high price, the team must have also performed really well in any contests. Todd never got this, hiring a lousy coach to run the team which is one of bad decision making from him. No doubt that chelsea was always struggle since todd was coming as a new chairman. Any of his decision never gave good impact to the club. 

These days, Chelsea seems like a pitiful team. Just stating the facts based on what I have observed thus far. Todd is not making jokes with his scheme. Almost every Blues supporter is against Todd's decision to sign Maresca.
His collaboration with Pep Guardiola in the past was the only reason he was receiving accolades. Maresca's employment is clearly another risk taken by Chelsea. With so many expert caoches on the market, I vehemently disagree with this concept.

[Ahli38]

Yes, it is difficult to understand with Boehly's plan, he should learn from his inappropriate decisions like last season. The current management should not adopt the old system like the Roman era which was known as a dictatorship, but there are good sides which must be the main consideration for building a better club. Now coaching has moved to Maresca and he has also been given the best coaching staff. Hopefully Maresca will get full support from the club board and he can work freely without interference.

I really don't understand everything that happened at Chelsea after Todd Boehly took over there. In fact, I was very surprised last season when Tuchel was fired. even though we all know Tuchel has brought glory to Chelsea. And the coaching changes have continued since last season and it all only makes the situation worse. And this season Pochettino improved it little by little and at the end of the season everything changed for the better thanks to Pochettino. But then Pochettino left. And yeah, I don't understand any of that. Honestly, at first I thought that Boehly had learned a lot from the bad results that Chelsea got last season. Because I see Pochettino making good results this season. But well now my assumptions seem to have changed again. And yes, it can be said that I am still quite disappointed with Pochettino's departure.

[Obim34]

I think personally it would be the other way round, Pochettino will be more successful compared to Ten Hag if he managed United because they really fell out by ending below Chelsea.

Every coach will certainly be great if he has a productive main squad, it doesn't matter if it's Pochettino or Tenhag if it is not supported by a productive main squad of players it will also be useless, we can indeed see that Chelsea is much better than Manchester United in the EPL this season but success It's not entirely because of the coach, if Pochettino replaces Ten Hag without financial support it will be useless because Manchester United needs to make a lot of changes because many of their players are really unproductive.

I think we all know that Pochettino being fired by Chelsea was a big mistake, that's why it will be difficult for Chelsea to achieve satisfactory results if management is too quick to make the decision to fire the coach, I don't think Pochettino is too bad for Chelsea because he has brought Chelsea to a high ranking. well in the EPL this season, if only Chelsea gave him the opportunity to stay until next season the results would definitely be satisfactory, Chelsea seems to be working hard again with their new coach and Manchester United has not yet made a decision about whether Ten Hag will be fired or retained.

Yes, the quality of squad available to the coach plays an important role on the outcome of the team in various leagues, if the team are quality enough probably at their own best they might achieve better results than a club with a better coach and less potential players.  If peradventure the both managers are to swap teams then Pochettino will do better managing United than Ten Hag on Chelsea, it's my own observation without being biased I always feel this connection between Pochettino and his players. Chelsea really made an awful decision letting him go so easy, he would have done better in more season to come. Manchester United are keeping Ten Hag for another season, let's see how he does this time.

[QueenVera]

Last season there were three promotions wheres none of them remained in this division because all three returned to the championship, and this season Leicester City returned to the English Premier League, this club was once a quite competitive team and it will be a question of whether they will perform well enough in their first season later.
Liverpool, with their new head coach, will also be waiting to see what their fate will be next season, whether they will challenge for the championship or Arne Slot will experience difficulties in his first season.
Meanwhile, in the competition for the title, there is a chance that other teams will become strong competitors, but Manchester City and Arsenal will again become strong teams.
In the new season there will be changes but how big the changes will be in the competitive maps is still a question mark, but hopefully it will remain tight.

Of course, we don’t expect next season in the EPL to be one pretty easy one especially with how we have seen some great changes going on around the team. At this point, you can say so many moves such as change of coach, players buy and sale etc can of course affect the performance of a team. ⁠Of course you can say that newly promoted teams usually struggle to keep up with the fascinating challenges of top flight football in the EPL. Last season we can see how the 3 newly promoted clubs were sent back to relegation, this now points the light to Leicester and how they will perform.

 If they keep uo with the performance from the championship then I think they can pretty be able to still retain their stand in the EPL. ⁠Now we can start thinking of how Liverpool will be able to keep up especially with the huge change from the board to the coach. This could be a real difficult season for Liverpool well it’s up to Slot and how he quickly transforms the team, now he has to input his style of olay and do that quickly because the EPL is really competitive.

 Well I think just Man City and Arsenal will still remain top of the league next season because they are the only consistent team and at this point you can see how much they will be able to contest. Now going forward, the uncertainty yes will be there but Man City still have a better chance to still remain top of the league and win but you can’t be so sure than to wait till how the season starts.

[Oluwa-btc]

I really don't understand everything that happened at Chelsea after Todd Boehly took over there. In fact, I was very surprised last season when Tuchel was fired. even though we all know Tuchel has brought glory to Chelsea. And the coaching changes have continued since last season and it all only makes the situation worse. And this season Pochettino improved it little by little and at the end of the season everything changed for the better thanks to Pochettino. But then Pochettino left. And yeah, I don't understand any of that. Honestly, at first I thought that Boehly had learned a lot from the bad results that Chelsea got last season. Because I see Pochettino making good results this season. But well now my assumptions seem to have changed again. And yes, it can be said that I am still quite disappointed with Pochettino's departure.

For Thomas Tuchel, he had some disagreement with Todd Boehly as the rumour said lol, and it was about Cristiano Ronaldo joining them.
He said no to this offer and Todd Boehly interpreted it wrongly which lead to his sack.
Chelsea also has the history of sacking coaches that jas won them the Champions League Competition, they did with Did Matteoe, Yes?
Though before he left, he had some difficulties and some errors. Todd Boehly has indeed made bad decisions which has affected everyone including them fans.

Mauricio Pochetino did well finally to bring them back up again but again, the management had them own plans for the club. Pochetino anyways deserves a second season but it's what it's.

[Silence Scream]

I think personally it would be the other way round, Pochettino will be more successful compared to Ten Hag if he managed United because they really fell out by ending below Chelsea.

Every coach will certainly be great if he has a productive main squad, it doesn't matter if it's Pochettino or Tenhag if it is not supported by a productive main squad of players it will also be useless, we can indeed see that Chelsea is much better than Manchester United in the EPL this season but success It's not entirely because of the coach, if Pochettino replaces Ten Hag without financial support it will be useless because Manchester United needs to make a lot of changes because many of their players are really unproductive.

I think we all know that Pochettino being fired by Chelsea was a big mistake, that's why it will be difficult for Chelsea to achieve satisfactory results if management is too quick to make the decision to fire the coach, I don't think Pochettino is too bad for Chelsea because he has brought Chelsea to a high ranking. well in the EPL this season, if only Chelsea gave him the opportunity to stay until next season the results would definitely be satisfactory, Chelsea seems to be working hard again with their new coach and Manchester United has not yet made a decision about whether Ten Hag will be fired or retained.

Yes, the quality of squad available to the coach plays an important role on the outcome of the team in various leagues, if the team are quality enough probably at their own best they might achieve better results than a club with a better coach and less potential players.  If peradventure the both managers are to swap teams then Pochettino will do better managing United than Ten Hag on Chelsea, it's my own observation without being biased I always feel this connection between Pochettino and his players. Chelsea really made an awful decision letting him go so easy, he would have done better in more season to come. Manchester United are keeping Ten Hag for another season, let's see how he does this time.

I think Ten Hag lasted longer at Manchester United. I would also like Pochettino to be the person to manage a team full of success like Manchester United, because Ten Hag does not know the opportunities he has. He can't use it correctly. I think they should be dismissed from that team and move on with a better candidate. I don't understand why Manchester United management is giving him a chance because he can't manage as well as Arteta. Arteta is doing everything for Arsenal and it is understandable that he did not provide continuity, but I think Ten Hag is managing terribly.

[Luzin]

Manchester United are keeping Ten Hag for another season, let's see how he does this time.

Is this official news? I haven't seen any official news about Ten Hag and Man United. It could be that the FA Champions made the management want to give a new chance, but the current situation is too bad. Ten Hag is too stubborn that even the excellent Sancho can't make him change his mind. Even Sancho doesn't seem to want to be with Ten Hag, he's arguing for Man United to choose him or Ten Hag.  Even Sacho is ready to return to Man United if Ten Hag is not there anymore.

It seems that Sancho really hates Ten Hag after his statement of criticism. Now Sancho whit Dortmund is very suces, even he going to final UCL and he perform is great. I think Ten Hag is wrong decision remove Sancho this season. And for the next Ten Hag needed him, but Ten Hag was too proud to call him.

Source: https://www.goal.com/lists/jadon-sancho-refusal-apologise-erik-ten-hag-explained-man-utd-coach-benni-mccarthy/blt83467b136d828b0c

[ginsan]

I think Ten Hag lasted longer at Manchester United. I would also like Pochettino to be the person to manage a team full of success like Manchester United, because Ten Hag does not know the opportunities he has. He can't use it correctly. I think they should be dismissed from that team and move on with a better candidate. I don't understand why Manchester United management is giving him a chance because he can't manage as well as Arteta. Arteta is doing everything for Arsenal and it is understandable that he did not provide continuity, but I think Ten Hag is managing terribly.

Regarding Erik Ten Hag future with Manchester United, it seems like it will be safe or he will stay with Manchester United for a long time. This season, Erik Ten Hag failed to bring Manchester United to a top 4 finish, which of course was a big failure for Erik Ten Hag this season. But yes, on the one hand, there is no hot issue about Erik Ten Hag dismissal, so I think Manchester United management will still give Erik Ten Hag time next season.

Erik Ten Hag success in bringing Manchester United to the FA Cup trophy is of course an important point in Manchester United management's consideration of him. But currently there are quite a lot of good quality coaches who don't have new teams, such as Xavi, Tuchel and several other coaches. So, if Manchester United is looking for a new coach, they will definitely choose between the two coaches.

[Jody.Drummer]

I think Ten Hag lasted longer at Manchester United. I would also like Pochettino to be the person to manage a team full of success like Manchester United, because Ten Hag does not know the opportunities he has. He can't use it correctly. I think they should be dismissed from that team and move on with a better candidate. I don't understand why Manchester United management is giving him a chance because he can't manage as well as Arteta. Arteta is doing everything for Arsenal and it is understandable that he did not provide continuity, but I think Ten Hag is managing terribly.

Manchester United are not so bold as to take action to fire Erik Ten Hag this season, it looks like they will give him the opportunity for at least one more season. If you see what he has shown with Manchester United this season, it should be enough to make Manchester United make the decision to fire him. Or maybe Manchester United is making the FA Cup a consideration, yes, only internal people know why they are retaining Erik Ten Hag.

If we look at Thomas Tuchel this season, his performance is much better than Manchester United, but he also left Bayern Munich. I know and understand that the process will always be there, but I mean Erik Ten Hag did not show the process in a better direction this season, so it is very doubtful and does not bring hope for the next season. The players in the squad were not able to show their best abilities, and I think that is directly related to the coach.

[Blitzboy]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

Chelsea is not like Manchester United, the owners don't give second chance and they're not relenting when the appointed coach in charge looks incompetent. Todd Boehly sack Mauricio Pochettino and was bad news for the Blues because Mauricio Pochettino have sealed the europa spot but couldn't convert his chances. Manchester United hooked up with Erik Ten Hag because he was the man for the job. He deliver quite exceptional tasks for the growth of the Red Devils. Erik Ten Hag would have been successful in Chelsea.

That is the problem we are having with Chelsea, the idea of always wanting their team to win trophies under the first season management of their new coaches which is never certain to happen. Chelsea started quite wrongly and of course took some time to adapt but later on they improved which they ended their Premier League season on the 6th position but looking back from where they came from, atleast Chelsea should have been considerate to retain Pochettino for a while because everyone believes his going to improve.

I think personally it would be the other way round, Pochettino will be more successful compared to Ten Hag if he managed United because they really fell out by ending below Chelsea.

I know Poch was good and helped Chelsea. Getting them to top six after their debacle is difficult. But this is Chelsea, guys. Winning is a must. One shot from Poch wasnt enough. Maybe he could've done something remarkable with another season. This league doesnt allow "maybes." You must deliver or leave. Thats the goal.

Not fair, not right. However, large clubs work that way. They want results now. So they changed. They want the next leader. Maybe Pochettino will succeed elsewhere. Maybe Chelsea's next manager will fail. But this is the Premier League, baby. You never know what'll happen in the world's most thrilling league.

[Weawant]

I think Ten Hag lasted longer at Manchester United. I would also like Pochettino to be the person to manage a team full of success like Manchester United, because Ten Hag does not know the opportunities he has. He can't use it correctly. I think they should be dismissed from that team and move on with a better candidate. I don't understand why Manchester United management is giving him a chance because he can't manage as well as Arteta. Arteta is doing everything for Arsenal and it is understandable that he did not provide continuity, but I think Ten Hag is managing terribly.

I agree with you, I have always been of the opinion than ten hag has got a terrible management skill especially at Manchester united, he keeps saying he has won trophies but then he has been unable to give the team a stable form or even making the team appear strong enough amongst it's equal in the premier league and generally in other European competitions, they have literally been struggling under his management.

I agree that a coach like pochettino will do greatly at Manchester united because he's the kind of coach who has got the. Patience to build a team and helping their mind and mentality to be in such a direction that will get them wanting to win mostly, he met Chelsea in a very poor state and was on the path to getting the team to be revived but it appears the management weren't even patient enough with him, I believe if the management of Chelsea were as patient as rhst of Manchester united have been with ten hag, sooner they would have seen good results from pochettino.

Manchester united needs a coach who's willing to build the team altho they don't have a really good depth, he will be able to develop the depth of the team to the point where it gets to attain a level of stability so the team can be able to confidently okay against any team in the premier league and across Europe and some how I think pochettimo has got that quality because he has done it with Chelsea such that all through the season Manchester city who happens to be a top team in Europe couldn't defeat them home and away this season.

[asriloni]

I think personally it would be the other way round, Pochettino will be more successful compared to Ten Hag if he managed United because they really fell out by ending below Chelsea.

Every coach will certainly be great if he has a productive main squad, it doesn't matter if it's Pochettino or Tenhag if it is not supported by a productive main squad of players it will also be useless, we can indeed see that Chelsea is much better than Manchester United in the EPL this season but success It's not entirely because of the coach, if Pochettino replaces Ten Hag without financial support it will be useless because Manchester United needs to make a lot of changes because many of their players are really unproductive.

I think we all know that Pochettino being fired by Chelsea was a big mistake, that's why it will be difficult for Chelsea to achieve satisfactory results if management is too quick to make the decision to fire the coach, I don't think Pochettino is too bad for Chelsea because he has brought Chelsea to a high ranking. well in the EPL this season, if only Chelsea gave him the opportunity to stay until next season the results would definitely be satisfactory, Chelsea seems to be working hard again with their new coach and Manchester United has not yet made a decision about whether Ten Hag will be fired or retained.

Yes, the quality of squad available to the coach plays an important role on the outcome of the team in various leagues, if the team are quality enough probably at their own best they might achieve better results than a club with a better coach and less potential players.  If peradventure the both managers are to swap teams then Pochettino will do better managing United than Ten Hag on Chelsea, it's my own observation without being biased I always feel this connection between Pochettino and his players. Chelsea really made an awful decision letting him go so easy, he would have done better in more season to come. Manchester United are keeping Ten Hag for another season, let's see how he does this time.

For sure. This is the reason I am really let down by Chelsea's choice to replace the old coach with a new one. The team was rushing to get a new coach in place of the previous one which is having lower quality compared to the . I meant that if, by the conclusion of the season, Pochettino has been beginning to demonstrate his potential when chelsea was climbing up from top 10 to the big six. It means pochettino really brings a huge improvements happened to the chelsea at this moment. How come Chelsea didn't give him a chance? This still baffles me as well.

Sometimes a coach will ask the owner to get the player to follow his recommendation and this is a comon thing in the football but the owner will object it. The different thing showed by chelsea as the owner denied any request from the coach. It's incredibly inappropriate of Todd Boehly. This person was not that dictatorial as Abramovich.
It is beyond a doubt that he is now the worst club owner in the Premier League. I firmly think Maresca will not last even a season.

[arimamib]

Sometimes a coach will ask the owner to get the player to follow his recommendation and this is a comon thing in the football but the owner will object it. The different thing showed by chelsea as the owner denied any request from the coach. It's incredibly inappropriate of Todd Boehly. This person was not that dictatorial as Abramovich.
It is beyond a doubt that he is now the worst club owner in the Premier League. I firmly think Maresca will not last even a season.

The club investment on the squad should always be based on the plan of the manager. It would be a waste of signings if the club sign players who don't suit the tactical plan of the manager. The problem at Chelsea is that they have lack of coordination between manager and the sporting director. Chelsea failed to put a right person in the position of football director.

Maresca is a new figure at Chelsea who is also lacking experience of managing a big club. If he doesn't get a proper backing from the club, it will highly possible that he will fail to meet the club's target. Chelsea need to stop sacking manager in a short period of tenure. Without enough time to build a strong team, any manager will happen to fail with the current competitiveness of Premier League.

[Gallar]

Yes, it is difficult to understand with Boehly's plan, he should learn from his inappropriate decisions like last season. The current management should not adopt the old system like the Roman era which was known as a dictatorship, but there are good sides which must be the main consideration for building a better club. Now coaching has moved to Maresca and he has also been given the best coaching staff. Hopefully Maresca will get full support from the club board and he can work freely without interference.

I agree with you. I think Boehly should learn from the experience of last season. Club management should not give Maresca big targets in his first season. Now Maresca already has the best coaching staff. I don't know what budget the club has given, but in my opinion the current squad is actually quite good. At the end of the season Pochettino has found chemistry between the players and I think Chelsea's game is very good. But all decisions are up to the coach. They can choose which players suit their coaching style.

In my opinion, Boehly was too hasty to get satisfactory results in an instant. Meanwhile, in the world of football, this would certainly be very difficult to happen. Because of course there must be an adjustment between the coach and the players first. So after the players find chemistry and the coach finds the perfect composition of players, then the real team journey begins. But unfortunately Boehly didn't think about that, he only thought about how his team could shine quickly. In fact, if only Boehly gave Pochettino one more season to continue as coach at Chelsea, I'm sure Boehly would get what he wanted. Because as we know, at the end of the season Chelsea can be said to have experienced significant progress. The reason is that he was able to sweep all matches in the remaining 5 matches. So, if for example Chelsea's good performance is maintained until next season, with the condition that Pochettino must become the coach, I am sure Chelsea will get a place in the top 3 of the Premier League next season.

But it can't be helped, Boehly has power over the club he owns. So the decisions he takes absolutely must be implemented at Chelsea. Apart from that, currently Chelsea has recruited Enzo Maresca as coach, hopefully Enzo will be able to bring Chelsea to shine next season. Although personally I have a little doubt about it. Because, so far Maresca's experience in his coaching career has only been at Manchester United U23 and also at Leicester City. So if you look at the experience in Enzo's coaching career, in my opinion his experience is not very broad. But we don't know what will happen next season. So basically, hopefully Enzo can surprise us all by bringing Chelsea back to its glory days.

[Farma]

I think Ten Hag lasted longer at Manchester United. I would also like Pochettino to be the person to manage a team full of success like Manchester United, because Ten Hag does not know the opportunities he has. He can't use it correctly. I think they should be dismissed from that team and move on with a better candidate. I don't understand why Manchester United management is giving him a chance because he can't manage as well as Arteta. Arteta is doing everything for Arsenal and it is understandable that he did not provide continuity, but I think Ten Hag is managing terribly.

Ten Hag's Manchester United have not found their best point this season, but firing Ten Hag is not the solution to their dissatisfaction this season, because this season they lost a lot of players due to injuries to several important players in their main squad and forced Ten Hag to call up several academy players to join the first team to cover the places left by injured players.

Man United management also understands that this season Ten Hag is struggling quite hard to give his best, they also want to see another season where Ten Hag will lead Man United, if Ten Hag fails they will be firm, but for this season I am a little satisfied because we success in the FA, and Man United can qualify for the Europa League, with the results of teamwork and of course Ten Hag.

[Oluwa-btc]

I think Ten Hag lasted longer at Manchester United. I would also like Pochettino to be the person to manage a team full of success like Manchester United, because Ten Hag does not know the opportunities he has. He can't use it correctly. I think they should be dismissed from that team and move on with a better candidate. I don't understand why Manchester United management is giving him a chance because he can't manage as well as Arteta. Arteta is doing everything for Arsenal and it is understandable that he did not provide continuity, but I think Ten Hag is managing terribly.

He had a great first season better that Mauricio Pochetino's first season. He won the Carabao Cup, Lead Manchester United to the Emirate FA Cup Finals finished third position. His first season saw Marcus Rashford scoring the highest goals he's ever had in his career.
Had 31 games unbeaten run at Old Trafford, he had some more better records

So what has Mauricio Pochetino won in his first season?

Bringing Mauricio Pochetino is like prostitute for complete man to get married too. No! He can never be Manchester United manager in his life more when they wanted him he had agreement with Paris Saint Germany.

This is crazyy argument. Erik Ten Hag already won series of trophies with Ajax, even before joining Manchester United. Comparison between Erik Ten Hag and Mikel Arteta is lame ASF. Erik Ten Hag even won and knocked out Real Madrid in the Champions League Competition before all of you just talk about him without checking facts.

He's won trophies Arteta hasn't even in the Premier League Competition. It took Mikel Arteta some time before his team started playing good football and saw old players leaving too, Erik Ten Hag can do same. All that's needed is the right backing.

[marcous]

For sure. This is the reason I am really let down by Chelsea's choice to replace the old coach with a new one. The team was rushing to get a new coach in place of the previous one which is having lower quality compared to the . I meant that if, by the conclusion of the season, Pochettino has been beginning to demonstrate his potential when chelsea was climbing up from top 10 to the big six. It means pochettino really brings a huge improvements happened to the chelsea at this moment. How come Chelsea didn't give him a chance? This still baffles me as well.

Sometimes a coach will ask the owner to get the player to follow his recommendation and this is a comon thing in the football but the owner will object it. The different thing showed by chelsea as the owner denied any request from the coach. It's incredibly inappropriate of Todd Boehly. This person was not that dictatorial as Abramovich.
It is beyond a doubt that he is now the worst club owner in the Premier League. I firmly think Maresca will not last even a season.

It seems that what you say has the potential to happen, Maresca may only last one season, where the demands from the club owner will definitely be very large. Pochettino has shown significant progress, where he was able to bring Chelsea to finish in 6th place in the standings, while the previous season Chelsea was only able to finish in 12th place.

Most fans regretted Pochettino dismissal, where Chelsea management did not appoint a more experienced coach, instead deciding to appoint Maresca. Chelsea is famous for its penchant for firing coaches, if club officials don't satisfied, they will immediately fire them without much thought. Meanwhile, there is no news about Pochetttino next move, but it is certain that many clubs are interested in him.

Chelsea failure to finish in the Champions League zone is believed to be the main reason for Pochettino dismissal, and it is also not certain that Maresca will be able to bring Chelsea to a top four finish, if Chelsea does not recruit a quality striker. The competition next season will clearly be fiercer, because almost all contestants will improve the depth of their squad, I think City and Arsenal will continue to dominate the competition for the trophy.

[Hyphen(-)]

The club investment on the squad should always be based on the plan of the manager. It would be a waste of signings if the club sign players who don't suit the tactical plan of the manager. The problem at Chelsea is that they have lack of coordination between manager and the sporting director. Chelsea failed to put a right person in the position of football director.

If Chelsea decides to sell any of the big players they signed for a huge amount of money for another set of players, they will make a financial error, which will affect the finances of the club because they will lose a lot of money as no team will be willing to buy them with the exact amount Chelsea spent on them because the players respective quality and individual ability have dropped and same as their market price.

Their football directors did not know their jobs, they are after fancy players and big names, not after a good manager who will have a great future at Chelsea, That is why all the managers they signed since the new ownership are not staying for long because they have not given them enough time to build a team.

Maresca is a new figure at Chelsea who is also lacking experience of managing a big club. If he doesn't get a proper backing from the club, it will highly possible that he will fail to meet the club's target. Chelsea need to stop sacking manager in a short period of tenure. Without enough time to build a strong team, any manager will happen to fail with the current competitiveness of Premier League.

He need all the support from the management to succeed in the team and the Premier League.

His lack of experience of coaching big teams should not be a problem since Arteta was able to succeed at Arsenal with support of the mnagement and the fans.

[marii awan]

I think personally it would be the other way round, Pochettino will be more successful compared to Ten Hag if he managed United because they really fell out by ending below Chelsea.

Every coach will certainly be great if he has a productive main squad, it doesn't matter if it's Pochettino or Tenhag if it is not supported by a productive main squad of players it will also be useless, we can indeed see that Chelsea is much better than Manchester United in the EPL this season but success It's not entirely because of the coach, if Pochettino replaces Ten Hag without financial support it will be useless because Manchester United needs to make a lot of changes because many of their players are really unproductive.

I think we all know that Pochettino being fired by Chelsea was a big mistake, that's why it will be difficult for Chelsea to achieve satisfactory results if management is too quick to make the decision to fire the coach, I don't think Pochettino is too bad for Chelsea because he has brought Chelsea to a high ranking. well in the EPL this season, if only Chelsea gave him the opportunity to stay until next season the results would definitely be satisfactory, Chelsea seems to be working hard again with their new coach and Manchester United has not yet made a decision about whether Ten Hag will be fired or retained.

Yes, the quality of squad available to the coach plays an important role on the outcome of the team in various leagues, if the team are quality enough probably at their own best they might achieve better results than a club with a better coach and less potential players.  If peradventure the both managers are to swap teams then Pochettino will do better managing United than Ten Hag on Chelsea, it's my own observation without being biased I always feel this connection between Pochettino and his players. Chelsea really made an awful decision letting him go so easy, he would have done better in more season to come. Manchester United are keeping Ten Hag for another season, let's see how he does this time.

I think Ten Hag lasted longer at Manchester United. I would also like Pochettino to be the person to manage a team full of success like Manchester United, because Ten Hag does not know the opportunities he has. He can't use it correctly. I think they should be dismissed from that team and move on with a better candidate. I don't understand why Manchester United management is giving him a chance because he can't manage as well as Arteta. Arteta is doing everything for Arsenal and it is understandable that he did not provide continuity, but I think Ten Hag is managing terribly.

Ten Hag is not going anywhere at least for 1st 10-15 matches of EPL and he is doing well yes he cannot get the best from some of the players but he did good for the team and ManU management is happy with him after Man U beat Man city in final and won the cup.