Premier League Prediction Thread 2023/2024

[Strongkored]

I am not sure what kind of changes will happen during the summer, and because of that I also do not know what I could expect from next season neither. In fact, even if I knew all the changes and the rosters and the managers, that still doesn't mean anything because sometimes teams do better or worse than expected as well. I think it's quite clear that we are going to have some trouble with some teams and overachievers will also happen.

We should wait and see for a while, because time will show how good teams are or how bad they are. Too many people are making comments on next season already, and you guys should not react this quickly, we have no idea how things will be next season, anything could change and very quickly as well.

Last season there were three promotions wheres none of them remained in this division because all three returned to the championship, and this season Leicester City returned to the English Premier League, this club was once a quite competitive team and it will be a question of whether they will perform well enough in their first season later.
Liverpool, with their new head coach, will also be waiting to see what their fate will be next season, whether they will challenge for the championship or Arne Slot will experience difficulties in his first season.
Meanwhile, in the competition for the title, there is a chance that other teams will become strong competitors, but Manchester City and Arsenal will again become strong teams.
In the new season there will be changes but how big the changes will be in the competitive maps is still a question mark, but hopefully it will remain tight.

[Docnaster]

I am not sure what kind of changes will happen during the summer, and because of that I also do not know what I could expect from next season neither. In fact, even if I knew all the changes and the rosters and the managers, that still doesn't mean anything because sometimes teams do better or worse than expected as well. I think it's quite clear that we are going to have some trouble with some teams and overachievers will also happen.

We should wait and see for a while, because time will show how good teams are or how bad they are. Too many people are making comments on next season already, and you guys should not react this quickly, we have no idea how things will be next season, anything could change and very quickly as well.

Last season there were three promotions wheres none of them remained in this division because all three returned to the championship, and this season Leicester City returned to the English Premier League, this club was once a quite competitive team and it will be a question of whether they will perform well enough in their first season later.
Liverpool, with their new head coach, will also be waiting to see what their fate will be next season, whether they will challenge for the championship or Arne Slot will experience difficulties in his first season.
Meanwhile, in the competition for the title, there is a chance that other teams will become strong competitors, but Manchester City and Arsenal will again become strong teams.
In the new season there will be changes but how big the changes will be in the competitive maps is still a question mark, but hopefully it will remain tight.

The three clubs that were promoted to the English Premier League last season were all relegated back to the championship because in my own opinion, I think they were too relaxed as well as being carried away with the joy that comes with playing in the top flight of English football. Leicester City were once playing in the second division of the English Premier League before they were promoted to the Premier League in the 2014/15 season and in their second season after that promotion, they went on to win the English Premier League title.
Leicester might not repeat that history again any time soon because of how strong and consistent some of the top clubs in the league is and will continue to be but I strongly believe that the Foxes will not be relegated anytime soon. Their manager who helped them get promoted Enzo Maresca have just left the club after he was signed by Chelsea but I still believe that Leicester City will get another manager that'll further improve the team.

[Weawant]

But they will most likely keep Erik Ten Hag despite his poor performance this season. For the first season, it was a good thing that he could show because he was able to bring Manchester United to a top-flight finish, but this season he is in the middle of the table, and actually compared to Chelsea, both of them should have fired their coaches, even Erik Ten. Hag led Manchester United to win the FA Cup.
However, each team's management decisions are different, some make the decision to fire and some don't. This is completely their decision, because maybe on the other hand Manchester United wants to give Erik Ten Hag more opportunities. It's just whether Erik Ten Hag will answer with a good performance or not.

Ten hag has not performed well enough and has aswell not even showed signs of wanting to improve his performance any soon as well with the way he's going with his team so far, some times I even think it's best for the team to look into letting go of him so they will be able to get another coach who can help them build back the team to their optimum performance as they should be because the results they got this season isn't befitting to the team.

For Chelsea it's even different for me because I feel they are even in a better position as they had a coach who has been able to get them through to the point of finishing fairly on the table as compared to what Manchester united performance was like at the very beginning of the season which they didn't get to get to even keep of well enough, using the FA cup trophy as a cover up for why they should be considered to have had a successful season is another funny aspect of the whole situation because winning the FA cup isn't good enough reason why you shouldn't have finished decently in the premier league.

Firing a coach is usually dependent on the decision of the management of the team and it usually has to do with the performance and productivity of the team and that's why stable teams still have their coaches in place without having them sacked just yet as some others have done this season, this can be seen with Manchester city and Arsenal who's performance this season were quite impressive and productive.

[BALIK]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

Chelsea is not like Manchester United, the owners don't give second chance and they're not relenting when the appointed coach in charge looks incompetent. Todd Boehly sack Mauricio Pochettino and was bad news for the Blues because Mauricio Pochettino have sealed the europa spot but couldn't convert his chances. Manchester United hooked up with Erik Ten Hag because he was the man for the job. He deliver quite exceptional tasks for the growth of the Red Devils. Erik Ten Hag would have been successful in Chelsea.

But they will most likely keep Erik Ten Hag despite his poor performance this season. For the first season, it was a good thing that he could show because he was able to bring Manchester United to a top-flight finish, but this season he is in the middle of the table, and actually compared to Chelsea, both of them should have fired their coaches, even Erik Ten. Hag led Manchester United to win the FA Cup.
However, each team's management decisions are different, some make the decision to fire and some don't. This is completely their decision, because maybe on the other hand Manchester United wants to give Erik Ten Hag more opportunities. It's just whether Erik Ten Hag will answer with a good performance or not.

Although Manchester United won the FA Cup, Manchester United's overall performance was not good. I was not satisfied with Manchester United's performance. Even against lesser teams we have seen poor and erratic performances from Manchester United players.

Manchester United's performance in both attack and defense was poor. Chelsea scored 77 goals in 38 matches and Manchester United scored just 57. With such a weak attack it is impossible to be in the top 4 in the Premier League. Even with Ten Hag as coach, we don't seem to see any improvement in United's performance next season. Manchester United's performance is likely to be unstable in the next season as well.

[zaim7413]

Yes, it is difficult to understand with Boehly's plan, he should learn from his inappropriate decisions like last season. The current management should not adopt the old system like the Roman era which was known as a dictatorship, but there are good sides which must be the main consideration for building a better club. Now coaching has moved to Maresca and he has also been given the best coaching staff. Hopefully Maresca will get full support from the club board and he can work freely without interference.

I agree with you. I think Boehly should learn from the experience of last season. Club management should not give Maresca big targets in his first season. Now Maresca already has the best coaching staff. I don't know what budget the club has given, but in my opinion the current squad is actually quite good. At the end of the season Pochettino has found chemistry between the players and I think Chelsea's game is very good. But all decisions are up to the coach. They can choose which players suit their coaching style.

Boehly has made major changes to the Chelsea squad after replacing Pochettino as main coach, appointing Maresca as the new coach as a result of being inspired by Arsenal success in improving the team's performance. Arteta and Maresca once worked as Guardiola assistants, Boehly hopes a lot from Maresca to improve Chelsea performance like Arteta did at Arsenal. Boehly must be more patient, just as Roman Abramovich built Chelsea from a mediocre team into a team capable of winning the title, Boehly must give full confidence to Maresca to build Chelsea into a team capable of providing competition for the title.

[Unity for Humanity]

Even if Manchester City finishes the season on a high, some of the teams at the top, including Arsenal and Liverpool, may be left regretting that they were not able to compete in the end. Arsenal should be particularly hard hit in this regard as they last survived the competition. But since their dream of winning the title this season has not been fulfilled, they should plan the next season hard and perform well in the next season to win the Premier League title.

[asriloni]

Yes, it is difficult to understand with Boehly's plan, he should learn from his inappropriate decisions like last season. The current management should not adopt the old system like the Roman era which was known as a dictatorship, but there are good sides which must be the main consideration for building a better club. Now coaching has moved to Maresca and he has also been given the best coaching staff. Hopefully Maresca will get full support from the club board and he can work freely without interference.

I agree with you. I think Boehly should learn from the experience of last season. Club management should not give Maresca big targets in his first season. Now Maresca already has the best coaching staff. I don't know what budget the club has given, but in my opinion the current squad is actually quite good. At the end of the season Pochettino has found chemistry between the players and I think Chelsea's game is very good. But all decisions are up to the coach. They can choose which players suit their coaching style.

About football, Todd knows nothing for sure. He governs the club how he feels. That's the reason I don't think that man should be Chelsea chairman. Better still, Chelsea investors should vote for a competent replacement for him for the upcoming season following his bad decision making about the club. Todd was dead wrong to think that selling the players would bring him fast money but this is a really wrong strategy took by him.

I meant that the young players need time to mature and have more experience. To impress other clubs to purchase Chelsea's players at a very high price, the team must have also performed really well in any contests. Todd never got this, hiring a lousy coach to run the team which is one of bad decision making from him. No doubt that chelsea was always struggle since todd was coming as a new chairman. Any of his decision never gave good impact to the club. 

These days, Chelsea seems like a pitiful team. Just stating the facts based on what I have observed thus far. Todd is not making jokes with his scheme. Almost every Blues supporter is against Todd's decision to sign Maresca.
His collaboration with Pep Guardiola in the past was the only reason he was receiving accolades. Maresca's employment is clearly another risk taken by Chelsea. With so many expert caoches on the market, I vehemently disagree with this concept.

[Ahli38]

Yes, it is difficult to understand with Boehly's plan, he should learn from his inappropriate decisions like last season. The current management should not adopt the old system like the Roman era which was known as a dictatorship, but there are good sides which must be the main consideration for building a better club. Now coaching has moved to Maresca and he has also been given the best coaching staff. Hopefully Maresca will get full support from the club board and he can work freely without interference.

I really don't understand everything that happened at Chelsea after Todd Boehly took over there. In fact, I was very surprised last season when Tuchel was fired. even though we all know Tuchel has brought glory to Chelsea. And the coaching changes have continued since last season and it all only makes the situation worse. And this season Pochettino improved it little by little and at the end of the season everything changed for the better thanks to Pochettino. But then Pochettino left. And yeah, I don't understand any of that. Honestly, at first I thought that Boehly had learned a lot from the bad results that Chelsea got last season. Because I see Pochettino making good results this season. But well now my assumptions seem to have changed again. And yes, it can be said that I am still quite disappointed with Pochettino's departure.

[Obim34]

I think personally it would be the other way round, Pochettino will be more successful compared to Ten Hag if he managed United because they really fell out by ending below Chelsea.

Every coach will certainly be great if he has a productive main squad, it doesn't matter if it's Pochettino or Tenhag if it is not supported by a productive main squad of players it will also be useless, we can indeed see that Chelsea is much better than Manchester United in the EPL this season but success It's not entirely because of the coach, if Pochettino replaces Ten Hag without financial support it will be useless because Manchester United needs to make a lot of changes because many of their players are really unproductive.

I think we all know that Pochettino being fired by Chelsea was a big mistake, that's why it will be difficult for Chelsea to achieve satisfactory results if management is too quick to make the decision to fire the coach, I don't think Pochettino is too bad for Chelsea because he has brought Chelsea to a high ranking. well in the EPL this season, if only Chelsea gave him the opportunity to stay until next season the results would definitely be satisfactory, Chelsea seems to be working hard again with their new coach and Manchester United has not yet made a decision about whether Ten Hag will be fired or retained.

Yes, the quality of squad available to the coach plays an important role on the outcome of the team in various leagues, if the team are quality enough probably at their own best they might achieve better results than a club with a better coach and less potential players.  If peradventure the both managers are to swap teams then Pochettino will do better managing United than Ten Hag on Chelsea, it's my own observation without being biased I always feel this connection between Pochettino and his players. Chelsea really made an awful decision letting him go so easy, he would have done better in more season to come. Manchester United are keeping Ten Hag for another season, let's see how he does this time.

[QueenVera]

Last season there were three promotions wheres none of them remained in this division because all three returned to the championship, and this season Leicester City returned to the English Premier League, this club was once a quite competitive team and it will be a question of whether they will perform well enough in their first season later.
Liverpool, with their new head coach, will also be waiting to see what their fate will be next season, whether they will challenge for the championship or Arne Slot will experience difficulties in his first season.
Meanwhile, in the competition for the title, there is a chance that other teams will become strong competitors, but Manchester City and Arsenal will again become strong teams.
In the new season there will be changes but how big the changes will be in the competitive maps is still a question mark, but hopefully it will remain tight.

Of course, we don’t expect next season in the EPL to be one pretty easy one especially with how we have seen some great changes going on around the team. At this point, you can say so many moves such as change of coach, players buy and sale etc can of course affect the performance of a team. ⁠Of course you can say that newly promoted teams usually struggle to keep up with the fascinating challenges of top flight football in the EPL. Last season we can see how the 3 newly promoted clubs were sent back to relegation, this now points the light to Leicester and how they will perform.

 If they keep uo with the performance from the championship then I think they can pretty be able to still retain their stand in the EPL. ⁠Now we can start thinking of how Liverpool will be able to keep up especially with the huge change from the board to the coach. This could be a real difficult season for Liverpool well it’s up to Slot and how he quickly transforms the team, now he has to input his style of olay and do that quickly because the EPL is really competitive.

 Well I think just Man City and Arsenal will still remain top of the league next season because they are the only consistent team and at this point you can see how much they will be able to contest. Now going forward, the uncertainty yes will be there but Man City still have a better chance to still remain top of the league and win but you can’t be so sure than to wait till how the season starts.

[Oluwa-btc]

I really don't understand everything that happened at Chelsea after Todd Boehly took over there. In fact, I was very surprised last season when Tuchel was fired. even though we all know Tuchel has brought glory to Chelsea. And the coaching changes have continued since last season and it all only makes the situation worse. And this season Pochettino improved it little by little and at the end of the season everything changed for the better thanks to Pochettino. But then Pochettino left. And yeah, I don't understand any of that. Honestly, at first I thought that Boehly had learned a lot from the bad results that Chelsea got last season. Because I see Pochettino making good results this season. But well now my assumptions seem to have changed again. And yes, it can be said that I am still quite disappointed with Pochettino's departure.

For Thomas Tuchel, he had some disagreement with Todd Boehly as the rumour said lol, and it was about Cristiano Ronaldo joining them.
He said no to this offer and Todd Boehly interpreted it wrongly which lead to his sack.
Chelsea also has the history of sacking coaches that jas won them the Champions League Competition, they did with Did Matteoe, Yes?
Though before he left, he had some difficulties and some errors. Todd Boehly has indeed made bad decisions which has affected everyone including them fans.

Mauricio Pochetino did well finally to bring them back up again but again, the management had them own plans for the club. Pochetino anyways deserves a second season but it's what it's.

[Silence Scream]

I think personally it would be the other way round, Pochettino will be more successful compared to Ten Hag if he managed United because they really fell out by ending below Chelsea.

Every coach will certainly be great if he has a productive main squad, it doesn't matter if it's Pochettino or Tenhag if it is not supported by a productive main squad of players it will also be useless, we can indeed see that Chelsea is much better than Manchester United in the EPL this season but success It's not entirely because of the coach, if Pochettino replaces Ten Hag without financial support it will be useless because Manchester United needs to make a lot of changes because many of their players are really unproductive.

I think we all know that Pochettino being fired by Chelsea was a big mistake, that's why it will be difficult for Chelsea to achieve satisfactory results if management is too quick to make the decision to fire the coach, I don't think Pochettino is too bad for Chelsea because he has brought Chelsea to a high ranking. well in the EPL this season, if only Chelsea gave him the opportunity to stay until next season the results would definitely be satisfactory, Chelsea seems to be working hard again with their new coach and Manchester United has not yet made a decision about whether Ten Hag will be fired or retained.

Yes, the quality of squad available to the coach plays an important role on the outcome of the team in various leagues, if the team are quality enough probably at their own best they might achieve better results than a club with a better coach and less potential players.  If peradventure the both managers are to swap teams then Pochettino will do better managing United than Ten Hag on Chelsea, it's my own observation without being biased I always feel this connection between Pochettino and his players. Chelsea really made an awful decision letting him go so easy, he would have done better in more season to come. Manchester United are keeping Ten Hag for another season, let's see how he does this time.

I think Ten Hag lasted longer at Manchester United. I would also like Pochettino to be the person to manage a team full of success like Manchester United, because Ten Hag does not know the opportunities he has. He can't use it correctly. I think they should be dismissed from that team and move on with a better candidate. I don't understand why Manchester United management is giving him a chance because he can't manage as well as Arteta. Arteta is doing everything for Arsenal and it is understandable that he did not provide continuity, but I think Ten Hag is managing terribly.

[Luzin]

Manchester United are keeping Ten Hag for another season, let's see how he does this time.

Is this official news? I haven't seen any official news about Ten Hag and Man United. It could be that the FA Champions made the management want to give a new chance, but the current situation is too bad. Ten Hag is too stubborn that even the excellent Sancho can't make him change his mind. Even Sancho doesn't seem to want to be with Ten Hag, he's arguing for Man United to choose him or Ten Hag.  Even Sacho is ready to return to Man United if Ten Hag is not there anymore.

It seems that Sancho really hates Ten Hag after his statement of criticism. Now Sancho whit Dortmund is very suces, even he going to final UCL and he perform is great. I think Ten Hag is wrong decision remove Sancho this season. And for the next Ten Hag needed him, but Ten Hag was too proud to call him.

Source: https://www.goal.com/lists/jadon-sancho-refusal-apologise-erik-ten-hag-explained-man-utd-coach-benni-mccarthy/blt83467b136d828b0c

[ginsan]

I think Ten Hag lasted longer at Manchester United. I would also like Pochettino to be the person to manage a team full of success like Manchester United, because Ten Hag does not know the opportunities he has. He can't use it correctly. I think they should be dismissed from that team and move on with a better candidate. I don't understand why Manchester United management is giving him a chance because he can't manage as well as Arteta. Arteta is doing everything for Arsenal and it is understandable that he did not provide continuity, but I think Ten Hag is managing terribly.

Regarding Erik Ten Hag future with Manchester United, it seems like it will be safe or he will stay with Manchester United for a long time. This season, Erik Ten Hag failed to bring Manchester United to a top 4 finish, which of course was a big failure for Erik Ten Hag this season. But yes, on the one hand, there is no hot issue about Erik Ten Hag dismissal, so I think Manchester United management will still give Erik Ten Hag time next season.

Erik Ten Hag success in bringing Manchester United to the FA Cup trophy is of course an important point in Manchester United management's consideration of him. But currently there are quite a lot of good quality coaches who don't have new teams, such as Xavi, Tuchel and several other coaches. So, if Manchester United is looking for a new coach, they will definitely choose between the two coaches.

[Jody.Drummer]

I think Ten Hag lasted longer at Manchester United. I would also like Pochettino to be the person to manage a team full of success like Manchester United, because Ten Hag does not know the opportunities he has. He can't use it correctly. I think they should be dismissed from that team and move on with a better candidate. I don't understand why Manchester United management is giving him a chance because he can't manage as well as Arteta. Arteta is doing everything for Arsenal and it is understandable that he did not provide continuity, but I think Ten Hag is managing terribly.

Manchester United are not so bold as to take action to fire Erik Ten Hag this season, it looks like they will give him the opportunity for at least one more season. If you see what he has shown with Manchester United this season, it should be enough to make Manchester United make the decision to fire him. Or maybe Manchester United is making the FA Cup a consideration, yes, only internal people know why they are retaining Erik Ten Hag.

If we look at Thomas Tuchel this season, his performance is much better than Manchester United, but he also left Bayern Munich. I know and understand that the process will always be there, but I mean Erik Ten Hag did not show the process in a better direction this season, so it is very doubtful and does not bring hope for the next season. The players in the squad were not able to show their best abilities, and I think that is directly related to the coach.

[Blitzboy]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

Chelsea is not like Manchester United, the owners don't give second chance and they're not relenting when the appointed coach in charge looks incompetent. Todd Boehly sack Mauricio Pochettino and was bad news for the Blues because Mauricio Pochettino have sealed the europa spot but couldn't convert his chances. Manchester United hooked up with Erik Ten Hag because he was the man for the job. He deliver quite exceptional tasks for the growth of the Red Devils. Erik Ten Hag would have been successful in Chelsea.

That is the problem we are having with Chelsea, the idea of always wanting their team to win trophies under the first season management of their new coaches which is never certain to happen. Chelsea started quite wrongly and of course took some time to adapt but later on they improved which they ended their Premier League season on the 6th position but looking back from where they came from, atleast Chelsea should have been considerate to retain Pochettino for a while because everyone believes his going to improve.

I think personally it would be the other way round, Pochettino will be more successful compared to Ten Hag if he managed United because they really fell out by ending below Chelsea.

I know Poch was good and helped Chelsea. Getting them to top six after their debacle is difficult. But this is Chelsea, guys. Winning is a must. One shot from Poch wasnt enough. Maybe he could've done something remarkable with another season. This league doesnt allow "maybes." You must deliver or leave. Thats the goal.

Not fair, not right. However, large clubs work that way. They want results now. So they changed. They want the next leader. Maybe Pochettino will succeed elsewhere. Maybe Chelsea's next manager will fail. But this is the Premier League, baby. You never know what'll happen in the world's most thrilling league.

[Weawant]

I think Ten Hag lasted longer at Manchester United. I would also like Pochettino to be the person to manage a team full of success like Manchester United, because Ten Hag does not know the opportunities he has. He can't use it correctly. I think they should be dismissed from that team and move on with a better candidate. I don't understand why Manchester United management is giving him a chance because he can't manage as well as Arteta. Arteta is doing everything for Arsenal and it is understandable that he did not provide continuity, but I think Ten Hag is managing terribly.

I agree with you, I have always been of the opinion than ten hag has got a terrible management skill especially at Manchester united, he keeps saying he has won trophies but then he has been unable to give the team a stable form or even making the team appear strong enough amongst it's equal in the premier league and generally in other European competitions, they have literally been struggling under his management.

I agree that a coach like pochettino will do greatly at Manchester united because he's the kind of coach who has got the. Patience to build a team and helping their mind and mentality to be in such a direction that will get them wanting to win mostly, he met Chelsea in a very poor state and was on the path to getting the team to be revived but it appears the management weren't even patient enough with him, I believe if the management of Chelsea were as patient as rhst of Manchester united have been with ten hag, sooner they would have seen good results from pochettino.

Manchester united needs a coach who's willing to build the team altho they don't have a really good depth, he will be able to develop the depth of the team to the point where it gets to attain a level of stability so the team can be able to confidently okay against any team in the premier league and across Europe and some how I think pochettimo has got that quality because he has done it with Chelsea such that all through the season Manchester city who happens to be a top team in Europe couldn't defeat them home and away this season.

[asriloni]

I think personally it would be the other way round, Pochettino will be more successful compared to Ten Hag if he managed United because they really fell out by ending below Chelsea.

Every coach will certainly be great if he has a productive main squad, it doesn't matter if it's Pochettino or Tenhag if it is not supported by a productive main squad of players it will also be useless, we can indeed see that Chelsea is much better than Manchester United in the EPL this season but success It's not entirely because of the coach, if Pochettino replaces Ten Hag without financial support it will be useless because Manchester United needs to make a lot of changes because many of their players are really unproductive.

I think we all know that Pochettino being fired by Chelsea was a big mistake, that's why it will be difficult for Chelsea to achieve satisfactory results if management is too quick to make the decision to fire the coach, I don't think Pochettino is too bad for Chelsea because he has brought Chelsea to a high ranking. well in the EPL this season, if only Chelsea gave him the opportunity to stay until next season the results would definitely be satisfactory, Chelsea seems to be working hard again with their new coach and Manchester United has not yet made a decision about whether Ten Hag will be fired or retained.

Yes, the quality of squad available to the coach plays an important role on the outcome of the team in various leagues, if the team are quality enough probably at their own best they might achieve better results than a club with a better coach and less potential players.  If peradventure the both managers are to swap teams then Pochettino will do better managing United than Ten Hag on Chelsea, it's my own observation without being biased I always feel this connection between Pochettino and his players. Chelsea really made an awful decision letting him go so easy, he would have done better in more season to come. Manchester United are keeping Ten Hag for another season, let's see how he does this time.

For sure. This is the reason I am really let down by Chelsea's choice to replace the old coach with a new one. The team was rushing to get a new coach in place of the previous one which is having lower quality compared to the . I meant that if, by the conclusion of the season, Pochettino has been beginning to demonstrate his potential when chelsea was climbing up from top 10 to the big six. It means pochettino really brings a huge improvements happened to the chelsea at this moment. How come Chelsea didn't give him a chance? This still baffles me as well.

Sometimes a coach will ask the owner to get the player to follow his recommendation and this is a comon thing in the football but the owner will object it. The different thing showed by chelsea as the owner denied any request from the coach. It's incredibly inappropriate of Todd Boehly. This person was not that dictatorial as Abramovich.
It is beyond a doubt that he is now the worst club owner in the Premier League. I firmly think Maresca will not last even a season.

[arimamib]

Sometimes a coach will ask the owner to get the player to follow his recommendation and this is a comon thing in the football but the owner will object it. The different thing showed by chelsea as the owner denied any request from the coach. It's incredibly inappropriate of Todd Boehly. This person was not that dictatorial as Abramovich.
It is beyond a doubt that he is now the worst club owner in the Premier League. I firmly think Maresca will not last even a season.

The club investment on the squad should always be based on the plan of the manager. It would be a waste of signings if the club sign players who don't suit the tactical plan of the manager. The problem at Chelsea is that they have lack of coordination between manager and the sporting director. Chelsea failed to put a right person in the position of football director.

Maresca is a new figure at Chelsea who is also lacking experience of managing a big club. If he doesn't get a proper backing from the club, it will highly possible that he will fail to meet the club's target. Chelsea need to stop sacking manager in a short period of tenure. Without enough time to build a strong team, any manager will happen to fail with the current competitiveness of Premier League.

[Gallar]

Yes, it is difficult to understand with Boehly's plan, he should learn from his inappropriate decisions like last season. The current management should not adopt the old system like the Roman era which was known as a dictatorship, but there are good sides which must be the main consideration for building a better club. Now coaching has moved to Maresca and he has also been given the best coaching staff. Hopefully Maresca will get full support from the club board and he can work freely without interference.

I agree with you. I think Boehly should learn from the experience of last season. Club management should not give Maresca big targets in his first season. Now Maresca already has the best coaching staff. I don't know what budget the club has given, but in my opinion the current squad is actually quite good. At the end of the season Pochettino has found chemistry between the players and I think Chelsea's game is very good. But all decisions are up to the coach. They can choose which players suit their coaching style.

In my opinion, Boehly was too hasty to get satisfactory results in an instant. Meanwhile, in the world of football, this would certainly be very difficult to happen. Because of course there must be an adjustment between the coach and the players first. So after the players find chemistry and the coach finds the perfect composition of players, then the real team journey begins. But unfortunately Boehly didn't think about that, he only thought about how his team could shine quickly. In fact, if only Boehly gave Pochettino one more season to continue as coach at Chelsea, I'm sure Boehly would get what he wanted. Because as we know, at the end of the season Chelsea can be said to have experienced significant progress. The reason is that he was able to sweep all matches in the remaining 5 matches. So, if for example Chelsea's good performance is maintained until next season, with the condition that Pochettino must become the coach, I am sure Chelsea will get a place in the top 3 of the Premier League next season.

But it can't be helped, Boehly has power over the club he owns. So the decisions he takes absolutely must be implemented at Chelsea. Apart from that, currently Chelsea has recruited Enzo Maresca as coach, hopefully Enzo will be able to bring Chelsea to shine next season. Although personally I have a little doubt about it. Because, so far Maresca's experience in his coaching career has only been at Manchester United U23 and also at Leicester City. So if you look at the experience in Enzo's coaching career, in my opinion his experience is not very broad. But we don't know what will happen next season. So basically, hopefully Enzo can surprise us all by bringing Chelsea back to its glory days.