Russian Invasion of Ukraine[In Progress]

[BADecker]

.................
Russia bit off a big chunk when it 'conquered' Siberia. But the fact that it could do this, shows that Russia has way more strength than the nations around it.
.........

In a legal sense the sale of Alaska to US is not legitimate because unlawfully taking land from natives is not rightful ownership.
It is like holding a gun to someone's head and demanding the keys for his car and selling ill-gotten car.
Abusing, mudering, mistreading people might be strenght in satans world, but not in a rightous one.

You talk so silly. Legally, possession is nine tenths of the law. The Alaskan purchase has stood the trial of time.

The people of Siberia have had ages to dispute ownership of their lands. Perhaps they have, and maybe they won. But nobody knows it. So what's the difference?

Beautiful, white Russia (Belarus) in revolt, Transnistria seen the light wants to rejoin Moldova, Serbia breaking ties with evil.....
Putin's relative injured and crime boss Viktor Averin, second-in-command of the Solntsevskaya Russian crime gang died in hovercraft crash in Moscow.
Dmitry Kozak Putins lawyer, closesed confider resigned from his positon as deputy chief of staff

Story has it that Putin is president on paper only for the last few days, aka paper tiger.
Russia is now run by a military junta and the nuke briefcase is with Valery Garasimov.

https://youtu.be/RKFKt2uQyF8

All one need do is review the fact that Russia is gradually taking over more and more of Ukraine. Youtube is controlled by the Western media, so they will always show Western success, even when they show Russian success.

Zelensky gave up Ukraine when he wouldn't allow elections. He is a terrorist, and as such, he is being conquered. The fact that the EU is backing him shows that the whole EU leadership is a big terrorist organization... as is the US government,which is an unConstitutional government. The people are gradually waking up to all this.

[BADecker]

Taurox seems to want to ignore the fact that Zelensky was killing his own citizens in the areas Russia took at the beginning of the war... and destroying their property. This not only makes him a terrorist, but a warmonger. Why a warmonger? Because when Russia moved to police Zelensky, Z turned it into a full-blown war that has gotten nearly 2-million of his own people killed.

Since Russia was originally out to protect Ukrainians from Zelensky, Russia is acting reasonably righteously. Of course, because of Z's stubbornness, Russia may have changed its goals in the direction of war, somewhat. Just too bad that there are a bunch of Ukrainians who believe Z's propaganda, and are making themselves civilian enemies of Russia.

Notice that Russia hasn't attacked Western Europe. Russia doesn't want war. But since the EU and NATO seem to want to provoke Russia in Ukraine, they just might find out what war with Russia is really like.

Elections being stopped by Z is simply one more thing that shows him to be the terrorist that he is. It was Z attacking civilians of Russia in Russia, a long time before Russia stopped being careful to not harm civilians in Ukraine.


Since Russia is gradually taking over Ukraine in the war, Russia has one simple thing to do. And it should be done whether or not Zelensky decides to set up elections. Russia should set up Ukrainian elections in the land that they took from Ukraine (the Donbas, etc.). And then invite all Ukrainians to come there to vote, including the ones that fled Ukraine at, before and during the war.

Since Russia will win the war anyway, and since Russia has stated that they don't want Ukraine (outside of what they have already taken), this will simply set things up for when the fighting is finished, and terrorist Z is gone. I mean, since Russia doesn't accept Zelensky as anything other than a terrorist, why not legitimize Ukraine for the Ukrainian people, right now? It would even help with getting the war over faster.

[montaga]

Postmortem of the failed "special military operation"
The Battle of Antonov Airport raged from Feb 24 to April 2 in 22. The key point of the conflict and as the blitz assault failed was the beginning of the end.
https://youtu.be/tT00V7WBLb4

Long time friend of Putin who was on the same boot as the mafia boss.
Three others on board, asuming one who was licensed to operate the craft and a 18 year old only fans model.
https://youtu.be/owQsqYtfIRk

.................
The Alaskan purchase has stood the trial of time.
........

That is not the point. The point is locals mind the own business, live the life then someone comes clubs them over the head and says that is now my land

Not Sakha (Siberia) but Bashkortostan at the Euro-Asia border edges closer to open defiance and once again protests.



The very heart of Russian southern command center (Mariupol) has been hit, 28 flat lined with direct line to Moscow.

[DaRude]

The Ukrainian army announced on December 23 that it had fully withdrawn from the city of Siversk, which had long served as a bastion that halted the Russian advance toward Sloviansk and Kramatorsk, the last major conurbation in the Donetsk region to still be under Ukrainian control. With the other large conurbation of Pokrovsk and Myrnohrad to the southeast also being on the verge of falling, Sloviansk and Kramatorsk now represent the last Donbas cities not devastated by Russia in four years of war.

Look how slow Ukraine is retreating, they should definitely not sign any peace deals and just keep throwing more Ukrainian souls in so that they can turn the tide and go on offensive continue their slow retreat and still eventually loose Donbas.

Only thing left in Donbas still under Ukrainian control is Dobropillia and agglomeration of Kramatorsk, Sloviansk, Kostiantynivka, Druzhkivka. Lets see how many Ukrainian souls Europeans will force Zelenskiy to burn for them.

The sad truth is that European leaders are well aware that if Russia is forced to take the remainder of Donbas by force, then there's no reason for Russia to stop and freeze the lines in Zaporizhzhia and Kherson. So that guarantees that the conflict will continue! It will bring a risk of total collapse in Ukraine, but let's be honest who among Ukrainian leaders really cares about Ukraine when they have their own skins to protect. They just somehow need to find a way to use up the funds for warfare now instead of keeping them for reconstruction.

[BADecker]

Postmortem of the failed "special military operation"
The Battle of Antonov Airport raged from Feb 24 to April 2 in 22. The key point of the conflict and as the blitz assault failed was the beginning of the end.
https://youtu.be/tT00V7WBLb4

Long time friend of Putin who was on the same boot as the mafia boss.
Three others on board, asuming one who was licensed to operate the craft and a 18 year old only fans model.
https://youtu.be/owQsqYtfIRk
https://i.ibb.co/0RGcpq9P/Untitled.png

.................
The Alaskan purchase has stood the trial of time.
........

That is not the point. The point is locals mind the own business, live the life then someone comes clubs them over the head and says that is now my land

Not Sakha (Siberia) but Bashkortostan at the Euro-Asia border edges closer to open defiance and once again protests.
https://i.ibb.co/21MWzLSx/Untitled.png


The very heart of Russian southern command center (Mariupol) has been hit, 28 flat lined with direct line to Moscow.

It's difficult to see your point. If Putin weakens and leaves his post for some reason, Medvedev will take over. If that happens, Ukraine will immediately be entirely lost, Kiev will instantly be under direct Russian control, Russian enemies of Putin will become very pro Russia because Russia is winning, and Europe will be at war with Russia... real war, not some pussyfooting around like it is now. Even the US will have a struggle.

Somebody has said that US GDP is 15 times that of Russia, why why fear Russia? Well, the larger part of the US GDP revolves around 'toys' for the people, while Russia's GDP revolves around war.

If Ukraine has hit Mariupol lately, it simply shows the terrorism of Zelensky and the Ukraine military. Russia is rebuilding Mariupol which it destroyed early in the war trying to root out Ukraine terrorism.

[NINI2501]

tbh i dont think the european leaders are forcing anything, they are probably just happy the front is moving by meters instead of kilometers so they dont have to deal with a total collapse on their doorstep, it is easy to talk about "burning souls" from a keyboard but the guys on the ground are the ones paying the price for every single delay in peace talks, do you really think russia would stop at donbas though or is that just wishful thinking by people who want the war to end at any cost, seen this play out too many times since 2014 and it never ends where people think it will

[montaga]

It's only because people flee, even Putins own daughter lives in France
https://x.com/i/status/2003957189887598643

A Russian blogger about the situation
https://x.com/i/status/2004098787099443442

So this is now the third time Ukraine has a different date for Christmas as Russia, who have it on the 7th of January

[DaRude]

tbh i dont think the european leaders are forcing anything, they are probably just happy the front is moving by meters instead of kilometers so they dont have to deal with a total collapse on their doorstep, it is easy to talk about "burning souls" from a keyboard but the guys on the ground are the ones paying the price for every single delay in peace talks, do you really think russia would stop at donbas though or is that just wishful thinking by people who want the war to end at any cost, seen this play out too many times since 2014 and it never ends where people think it will

It's not about the land, it never was, Russia has plenty. It's about "west's" war of conquest using soft power.

Here are some recently declassified docs that show what's going on for anyone that might still be confused. It's worth to read the whole thing if you want to really see what's going on

But by the end of Bush's time in office, Putin had aired his severe criticisms of U.S. policies such as invading Iraq and expanding NATO in multiple venues including the famous Munich speech in 2007.
...
[Jun 16, 2001]In a short one-on-one meeting they cover all the most important issues of U.S.-Russian relations such as strategic stability, ABM treaty, nonproliferation, Iran, North Korea and NATO expansion...The Caucasus, too. Hard to imagine, and done by party bosses.” Putin raises a question of Russian NATO membership and says Russia feels “left out.”
...
[Apr 6, 2008]This meeting takes place right after the NATO summit in Bucharest where tensions flared about the U.S. campaign for an invitation to Georgia and Ukraine to join NATO...
Turning to conversations in Bucharest, Putin states his strong opposition to NATO membership for Ukraine and Georgia and says that Russia would be relying on anti-NATO forces in Ukraine and “creating problems” in Ukraine “all the time,” because it is concerned about “threat of military bases and new military systems being deployed in the proximity of Russia.” Surprisingly, in response, Bush expresses his admiration for the Russian president’s ability to present his case: “One of the things I admire about you is you weren't afraid to say it to NATO. That's very admirable. People listened carefully and had no doubt about your position. It was a good performance.”

So bottom line Russia's sphere was being eaten away with soft power, with the only logical conclusion is destruction/dismemberment of Russia in its current form. Putin saw what was going on back in 2001, and been warning many, many, many times for the west to stop, even offering for Russia to join NATO. After a lot of lip service, US literally brought cookies and still overthrew the democratically elected president of Ukraine, followed by oversaturation of Javelins in Ukraine in preparation for Russia's retaliation. And the rest is being played out now. So to answer your question, it's not about the land and where the lines lie, but Ukraine's roles after the guns go quiet. If west still insists on using Ukraine simply as a thorn in Russia's side (like Baltic states) then no, Russia has no reason to stop. If west agrees for Ukraine to be neutral, not a threat to Russia, return Russian religion, language, culture etc... (just as things were prior to 2014 before US's cookies arrived) Russia has no reason to spill blood.

[NINI2501]

idk if i buy the whole soft power conquest theory because at the end of the day ukraine is a sovereign nation that can make its own choices right, just because putin warned bush in 2008 doesn't mean he has the right to march into a neighbor's yard and start a fire just because he doesn't like their new friends, it is easy to blame nato expansion but nobody forced those eastern european countries to join they were practically begging for it because they remember what it was like under the old system, it is a complicated mess but saying it is not about the land seems a bit off when there are tanks literally everywhere

[DaRude]

idk if i buy the whole soft power conquest theory because at the end of the day ukraine is a sovereign nation that can make its own choices right, just because putin warned bush in 2008 doesn't mean he has the right to march into a neighbor's yard and start a fire just because he doesn't like their new friends, it is easy to blame nato expansion but nobody forced those eastern european countries to join they were practically begging for it because they remember what it was like under the old system, it is a complicated mess but saying it is not about the land seems a bit off when there are tanks literally everywhere

It's not about what you know, how you feel, or how you believe things should be. But what is actually happening in the real world. Look up what's happened to Cuba, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Iran, and now Venezuela. There was an old meme about the difference between a "freedom fighter" and a terrorist being who's side he's fighting for. Now care to guess the difference between a pirate stealing a ship and an enforcement of blockade of "sanctioned oil tankers"? Do any of those sovereign nation really have their own choices to make?

As for the argument for those nations just begging to join NATO, that's called soft power. Consider the difference in financial power between both sides (GDP of US is 12:1 to Russia, and EU is like 8:1). Now compare how that financial might is being applied to countries bordering Russia vs say countries in the middle of Africa? Now bring those principals to their logical conclusion, what is Russia to do when all that wealth is strategically deployed on its borders in a financial realm that Russia cannot compete and is destined to loose in? If you're still confused, try flipping the tables, what do you think would happen if say China would suddenly want to send $100k to every citizen in Cuba? Would you be saying that that sovereign Cubans could make their own choices on who's military bases they wanted to host? And how many generations of Cubans would have to suffer for exercising that sovereign choice?...oh wait we don't have to guess U.N. General Assembly Condemns U.S. Embargo on Cuba for 33rd Consecutive Year...165 countries voted in favor of a nonbinding resolution calling on the U.S. to lift the embargo, while seven nations, including the U.S., Ukraine and Israel, voted against it. yet somehow you're conditioned not to care about that right?

Edit: The argument for financial expansionism, that is, that one can send unlimited funds to buy up loyalty of bordering countries of your competitor is destined to either bring never ending wars or a one world goverment. Financial expansionism is still at its core is a war of conquest to enlarge your sphere of influence, just with soft power, but leads to same results if not worse (hard wars are more intense but end in few years, soft wars like against Cuba can last for many decades causing uncountable loss of unborn children, deprivation of future, brain drain etc etc etc...)  

[BADecker]

The people of the USA and Europe are actually financing the war without knowing it. Even if Trump and the EU didn't send any aid to Ukraine, Ukraine would still be financed via the people. How? Because the banking system is built to steal money from these nations without the people (and in some cases the government) really knowing it. How can we tell? By inflation, and the devaluing of the various currencies.

As the banks create more money for themselves, the value of all the money is debased. The owners of the banking systems send the money they create to Zelensky and Ukraine... to continue the war... no matter who dies, and no matter who DOESN'T understand how it works. Nobody even realizes that these funds are going into Ukraine through a banking back door.

While the governments of the West aren't waking up to this about the banks, they are gradually waking up to the financial drain that they see happening to their people.


Europe's Panic Economy: Frozen Assets, Empty Arsenals, and the Quiet Admission of Defeat - https://ronpaulinstitute.org/europes-panic-economy-frozen-assets-empty-arsenals-and-the-quiet-admission-of-defeat/


Are European Hawks Finally Sobering Up For Christmas? - https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/medvedev-asks-are-european-hawks-finally-sobering-christmas


Warmongers Want to Drag America Into War With Russia, Says Gabbard - https://www.lewrockwell.com/2025/12/no_author/warmongers-want-to-drag-america-into-war-with-russia-says-gabbard/


The State's Last Stand - https://www.lewrockwell.com/2025/12/george-f-smith/the-states-last-stand/