Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC

[Mr. Magkaisa]

[...]
I really hate those casino who will let you play so easy, make a deposit fast but when it comes to withdrawal its a decade or asked for KYC.
I just play big on that casino and if hits jackpot then ill do KYC if not, ill just continue to hit the goal but never deposit again.

Thats why I stay with Betpanda,

I'm not actively playing on Betpanda at the moment, so I really don't know, hence the question:

Are you sure that won't also be the case with Betpanda if you want to withdraw a larger amount (> $100, for example)? The behavior you describe is actually common practice at all casinos I know of (and don't require full KYC for registration, such as Roobet).

However, casinos don't do this because they enjoy it and like to boss their customers around, but because such procedures are often regulated either by national laws or by the gambling license used in each case.

To be honest i am not sure about that, I hope they will never ask about it, If they will, thats the last day I will deposit on their platform.
My highest amount of Withdrawal was 600USD I also had several transactions with 500 USD and it just went fast and they not required anything about it.

The amount you have withdrawn from Betpanda likely is not considered a huge amount or transaction that will require them to demand some KYC verification. I think withdrawals of $1000 and above will attract attention.

Another reason why KYC has not been demanded could be that your account has not raised any suspicion, and your activities on it are normal.

I think even the casinos that claim not to require KYC mean that only at the initial stage; it must be included in their terms of service that they can demand you to do a KYC verification anytime they see fit.

Ive been in many platform and the problem I faced to some of them is KYC even less than a hundred of withdrawal you need to do KYC at first and thats what I dont want.
Then, tehre is one casino that I played before that I am done with KYC but when you do withdrawal you need to wait for hours for approval but thats not the end poing.
You need to wait for hours if you withdrawal is good or rejected and mostly not going through, Then if you are lucky and approved, you need wo wait for hours again to see in on your personal wallet.

Once They asked me KYC thats a no no to deposit again for me

[mirakal]

Once They asked me KYC thats a no no to deposit again for me

You’re actually in the right casino. In some platforms, a $600 amount is already considered high and would usually trigger a KYC request. In my case, it’s been more than a year now, and my biggest withdrawal from a casino sportsbet was from sports betting, a bit over $1k. That only happened once, and at that time they didn’t ask me for KYC.

A few months later though, I suddenly received an email saying I needed to complete KYC. I complied, and after that they sent me my remaining balance and told me I couldn’t gamble anymore.

So here’s the thing, even if you comply with KYC, there’s still no guarantee the casino will continue to serve you. That’s why, for some players, it’s better to stick with casinos that aren’t so strict, especially if you value consistency.

[mikel_012]

You’re actually in the right casino. In some platforms, a $600 amount is already considered high and would usually trigger a KYC request. In my case, it’s been more than a year now, and my biggest withdrawal from a casino sportsbet was from sports betting, a bit over $1k. That only happened once, and at that time they didn’t ask me for KYC.

A few months later though, I suddenly received an email saying I needed to complete KYC. I complied, and after that they sent me my remaining balance and told me I couldn’t gamble anymore.

So here’s the thing, even if you comply with KYC, there’s still no guarantee the casino will continue to serve you. That’s why, for some players, it’s better to stick with casinos that aren’t so strict, especially if you value consistency.

This happened with sportsbet? What did you do that they said you could not gamble anymore?

I never got banned from any casino even after they ask for kyc so I do not know what you can do wrong that they don't want you as customer anymore. If I do kyc I just continue normally and can withdraw without fears that they will ask for more documents later

With betpanda I did not need kyc at any moment

[PX-Z]

A few months later though, I suddenly received an email saying I needed to complete KYC. I complied, and after that they sent me my remaining balance and told me I couldn’t gamble anymore.

So basically they just ban you after they identify yourself, they not just remove you on their platform but hostage or take your personal information as well. Would be glad if you share what casino is this, there's so many casino in this space and we need to filter out those good from those bad ones.

[impulse709]

A few months later though, I suddenly received an email saying I needed to complete KYC. I complied, and after that they sent me my remaining balance and told me I couldn’t gamble anymore.

So basically they just ban you after they identify yourself, they not just remove you on their platform but hostage or take your personal information as well. Would be glad if you share what casino is this, there's so many casino in this space and we need to filter out those good from those bad ones.

This is a typical problem of most crypto casinos. They promise privacy, and no KYC, but as soon as an account gets flagged, KYC is now required, and then users are banned later. Although casinos are justified in risk management, it is selective and done without clear up front regulations at the expense of trust. Lack of transparency is the key issue. KYC policies, terms of licensing and Bitcointalk reputation threads should be always checked by the players to differentiate between the reliable casinos and the ones that alter the rules after accepting the deposits.

[tabas]

This is a typical problem of most crypto casinos. They promise privacy, and no KYC, but as soon as an account gets flagged, KYC is now required, and then users are banned later. Although casinos are justified in risk management, it is selective and done without clear up front regulations at the expense of trust. Lack of transparency is the key issue. KYC policies, terms of licensing and Bitcointalk reputation threads should be always checked by the players to differentiate between the reliable casinos and the ones that alter the rules after accepting the deposits.

You've said it, they're selective and if they have a plan to ban their customer then they shouldn't just ask for KYC in the first place. But that's how they do it and that's why it's really the best idea to use and choose the casino that's not very sensitive with anonymity.

So here’s the thing, even if you comply with KYC, there’s still no guarantee the casino will continue to serve you. That’s why, for some players, it’s better to stick with casinos that aren’t so strict, especially if you value consistency.

I agree, they're the better option if they're not so strict at all. They're free to implement kyc verification but, there's no other thing that includes after complying.

Btw, I like to share a bet for NBA tonight. Under 250.5 total score looks a safe bet for me with that 1.90.

[stadus]

Honestly, with a line like this, 99% of the time I’d take the over.
But since I didn’t pick this game, I actually hope I’m wrong here so you end up winning.

In the Jazz’s last game, they had their lowest scoring output this season with just 95 points. If they struggle to score again, this bet should cash pretty easily.

Btw, I like to share a bet for NBA tonight. Under 250.5 total score looks a safe bet for me with that 1.90.

[dimonstration]

This is a typical problem of most crypto casinos. They promise privacy, and no KYC, but as soon as an account gets flagged, KYC is now required, and then users are banned later. Although casinos are justified in risk management, it is selective and done without clear up front regulations at the expense of trust. Lack of transparency is the key issue. KYC policies, terms of licensing and Bitcointalk reputation threads should be always checked by the players to differentiate between the reliable casinos and the ones that alter the rules after accepting the deposits.

Getting flagged is a different story. Having a privacy friendly casino doesn’t mean users are free to violate the ToS. Rules are still applied and KYC are just required for users that abused the casino while regular users without involving on unfair activity will usually doesn’t have a problem when it comes to KYC.

Abusers are mixing to regular user acting like they don’t do wrong that’s why they spread negativity about casino KYC despite being a privacy friendly to create confusion among all members.

You will less likely encounter a problem if you don’t violate the ToS.

[acuyaa]

Hello guys!,

I had been troubling with them since Jan 9. They requested KYC.
I done it in 5 mins.

In their KYC page it was written less than one hour it would complete. Anyway I have waited, 3 days.
Then just now they sent an email to me regarding their breach of T & C.

Here is the pictures of my account. Please tell me what did I ?


After all before January I played them on November. After november I deposited them 3 x 300 USDT.

never withdraw money on this time frame. But they reduced my account to my latest deposit. I did not win on this time range apprx 40-50 usdt lost comparing to my deposits.

This is the bookie which that kind of.

Please tell me What's my fault ?

Is it worth to play here by you guys ?

Please think twice.


https://hizliresim.com/fmpzgf0
https://hizliresim.com/5u8q82m
https://hizliresim.com/rv6oatk

[mitchr4]

A few months later though, I suddenly received an email saying I needed to complete KYC. I complied, and after that they sent me my remaining balance and told me I couldn’t gamble anymore.

So basically they just ban you after they identify yourself, they not just remove you on their platform but hostage or take your personal information as well. Would be glad if you share what casino is this, there's so many casino in this space and we need to filter out those good from those bad ones.

Since he previously mentioned Sportsbet, I assume he's referring to that casino. I don't know for sure whether this is the Sportsbet we usually know in this forum or a different one.

The interesting thing is that the balance refund and account restriction must have specific reasons behind them. If the casino didn't explain the exact cause, this clearly shows a lack of transparency on their part.

They did return his remaining balance, which indicates there was no intention to hold back his funds. However, the trade off is that he's already completed KYC and his personal information is now in the casino's hands. I'm just curious did the casino provide a specific reason why his account was restricted after KYC, or did they just send an email without a detailed explanation?

[acuyaa]

Also please tell me how can I contact with their license firm ?

I did not see on their website.

Which license has got them ?

[PX-Z]

Since he previously mentioned Sportsbet, I assume he's referring to that casino. I don't know for sure whether this is the Sportsbet we usually know in this forum or a different one.

The interesting thing is that the balance refund and account restriction must have specific reasons behind them. If the casino didn't explain the exact cause, this clearly shows a lack of transparency on their part.

They did return his remaining balance, which indicates there was no intention to hold back his funds. However, the trade off is that he's already completed KYC and his personal information is now in the casino's hands. I'm just curious did the casino provide a specific reason why his account was restricted after KYC, or did they just send an email without a detailed explanation?

Now that you mentioned it, i reread the post and yes, it sounds like the sportsbet casino, but there are lots of them actually, the famous one is .io domain, then there is .one both have ann thread here except for the com.au domain. Let's wait if he will share the casino name, naming a casino is not to tarnish them since it came from his experience.

[maydna]

A few months later though, I suddenly received an email saying I needed to complete KYC. I complied, and after that they sent me my remaining balance and told me I couldn’t gamble anymore.

So basically they just ban you after they identify yourself, they not just remove you on their platform but hostage or take your personal information as well. Would be glad if you share what casino is this, there's so many casino in this space and we need to filter out those good from those bad ones.

This is a typical problem of most crypto casinos. They promise privacy, and no KYC, but as soon as an account gets flagged, KYC is now required, and then users are banned later. Although casinos are justified in risk management, it is selective and done without clear up front regulations at the expense of trust. Lack of transparency is the key issue. KYC policies, terms of licensing and Bitcointalk reputation threads should be always checked by the players to differentiate between the reliable casinos and the ones that alter the rules after accepting the deposits.

But that is strange case. He complied and completed KYC but they told him that he can't gamble anymore. Usually, after someone doing KYC and gets verified, he can playing gambling without restrictions.

Unless there is something wrong he did and made him break the rules without he knows. It should be more explanations to him why he couldn't gambling on that casino.

Hopefully, he can solves his problem soon. But he can selects other casinos if he doesn't feel comfortable.

[tabas]

Honestly, with a line like this, 99% of the time I’d take the over.
But since I didn’t pick this game, I actually hope I’m wrong here so you end up winning.

In the Jazz’s last game, they had their lowest scoring output this season with just 95 points. If they struggle to score again, this bet should cash pretty easily.

Btw, I like to share a bet for NBA tonight. Under 250.5 total score looks a safe bet for me with that 1.90.

I hope that this bet would win. But I am not as good as you with your analysis but each game is unpredictable. Let's see if this will be under than over. I am kind of hesitant to take the over and that's why it is the choice as per my calculation. Hopefully, this does have a good ending tonight.

Is it worth to play here by you guys ?

In my experience, it is.

[PX-Z]

But that is strange case. He complied and completed KYC but they told him that he can't gamble anymore. Usually, after someone doing KYC and gets verified, he can playing gambling without restrictions.

Unless there is something wrong he did and made him break the rules without he knows. It should be more explanations to him why he couldn't gambling on that casino.

There are a few similar cases on the Scam Accusations board. Usually, once a casino finds something in a user's account activity, whether the user's defense is valid or not, their decision becomes final.

Best case, the casino allows a refund or withdrawal of the remaining balance. Worst case, they don't, which, unfortunately, aligns with Betpanda's policy.

[Peanutswar]

I'm guess I'm way too advanced to make a prediction yet. Even though they have a match against Newcastle this 13th, I'll make an early bet this match of Man United vs Man City seems there's a momentum right now after their consecutive draws from Sunderland, Chelsea, and their latest win on FAC against Exeter with a 10:1 well, I can say that there's a team gap or skill gap already.

Likewise with Man United came from a draw match but instead they ended up lossing to Brighton.

[BlackBaron]

Casinos definitely do this for a reason, whether it's regulatory or otherwise. So, I agree with you that sooner or later, they'll require KYC. Gambling is currently growing rapidly, and when something grows rapidly, it attracts the attention of various parties, such as the government.

Casinos also usually have verification stages that must be completed, which determine withdrawal limits. For example, if someone completes level 1 verification, the maximum withdrawal is a certain amount. If they want to increase the limit, they must complete the next level of verification. And so on.

The reason for making these rules and regulations is so that no one can organize activities like money laundering through casino sites. Although it was possible to gamble without kyc on casino sites earlier, now all sites are gradually making it mandatory, but in the new situation, sites allow gambling without kyc, but they can ask for kyc at any time, so there is fear there too. For this, kyc should now be considered as a normal matter and gambling should be done on a reputable site by doing KYC at least level 1

I think so too. The biggest reason is to avoid these kinds of things, which are indirectly very detrimental. However, there are other reasons why casinos ultimately agree to this. They don't want to be accused of money laundering and so on. This is a very fundamental reason, actually.

Even in the worst case, we might be the ones accused of money laundering. A friend of mine experienced this, though not at a casino, but at CEX. He was accused of money laundering and his account was permanently blocked. Luckily, CEX was willing to return his money. The problem was that the amount wasn't large, so it was a bit odd.

[rat03gopoh]

But that is strange case. He complied and completed KYC but they told him that he can't gamble anymore. Usually, after someone doing KYC and gets verified, he can playing gambling without restrictions.

Not necessarily, his identity could be blacklisted. Therefore, KYC serves as additional confirmation that this user should be blocked.

KYC here can reveal a person's history of dealing with any casino. This is usually handled by the game provider, but it's not limited to a specific universal database that all casinos may subscribe to.

[topbitcoin]

A few months later though, I suddenly received an email saying I needed to complete KYC. I complied, and after that they sent me my remaining balance and told me I couldn’t gamble anymore.

So here’s the thing, even if you comply with KYC, there’s still no guarantee the casino will continue to serve you. That’s why, for some players, it’s better to stick with casinos that aren’t so strict, especially if you value consistency.

Its bad experience to feel but there are definitely things like this that happen when we are not on the right site or indeed we are on a site that doesnt really operate properly.  Because when we do KYC and after that we can no longer play and even get banned, it is clear what the purpose of KYC is for and it cannot be denied that this can be a danger.

But this can be a good lesson for us to be able to choose the site well because these kinds of things can happen even if we do gambling or are on the site with the aim of being like gamblers in general without any intention of cheating.

[bettercrypto]

A few months later though, I suddenly received an email saying I needed to complete KYC. I complied, and after that they sent me my remaining balance and told me I couldn’t gamble anymore.

So basically they just ban you after they identify yourself, they not just remove you on their platform but hostage or take your personal information as well. Would be glad if you share what casino is this, there's so many casino in this space and we need to filter out those good from those bad ones.

Of course, we don't want that to happen unless you know for a fact you're doing something wrong at the casino. But if they do it without a deep reason, it’s really unfair to the gambler, especially if they ban your account right after you submit your KYC.

Some casinos really do this to their players, and we never truly know the reason why. Even though we know they have the right to do whatever
they want without explaining it to us, it still feels like we're completely defenseless against their decisions.