Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC

[khaled0111]

^^
Although this is a bit off-topic but connecting to a public Wi-Fi doesn’t necessarily mean you are at risk or that you can easily get hacked but it also doesn’t mean you are completely safe. Your security depends on who operates the network and how secure the network is. As arule of thumb, when connecting to a public network, always make sure your device is clean and that the website you are connecting to is  SSL-secured. This will lower the chances of falling victim to the MITM attack.

[gunhell16]

Also, in my knowledge, public Wi-Fi is really prone to hacking, and this is something the majority of people don't actually know. Some even really wish for public Wi-Fi access, especially in low-income communities or compounds. It’s no wonder so many people get hacked, because some hackers might see 'small change' as worth it if they can gather enough of it from many people to make a large sum.

Public wi-fi are not that prone to hacking. If that was the case, there wouldn't be public wifi on airports, libraries, everywhere basically.

When you visit BitcoinTalk, you access it through HTTPS (SSL). The hackers can't steal your data because everything is encrypted between your client and the server. Only if you access it with HTTP is that your traffic can get sniffed and you can get MITM attacked.

TLDR: You're not getting hacked for using a public wifi to gamble on betpanda.

That’s a great point, dude. If public Wi-Fi were that prone to hacking, then all airport passengers would have had their mobile devices compromised by now, and these are people who definitely have money.

We’re referring to overseas workers, tourists, and other individuals. You're also right that while HTTP URLs are vulnerable, HTTPS is protected.
This is exactly what the rest of the gambling community on this forum needs to understand.

[Questat]

That’s a great point, dude. If public Wi-Fi were that prone to hacking, then all airport passengers would have had their mobile devices compromised by now, and these are people who definitely have money.

We’re referring to overseas workers, tourists, and other individuals. You're also right that while HTTP URLs are vulnerable, HTTPS is protected.
This is exactly what the rest of the gambling community on this forum needs to understand.

Same goes for hotels. You’re sharing the same Wi-Fi with hundreds of guests, but there’s really no issue there. Once you access a site and it’s HTTPS, everything is encrypted anyway. The only real risk would be something extreme, like if someone had a hidden camera watching you type your login details, lol. Other than that, it’s generally safe.

[Smartvirus]

Certainly a hacker who can hack computer in public wi-fi wont be targeting poor cryptocurrency gamblers here  

That’s in the event they know that you are poor or broke but, hackers can be weird at times, they would just want to get along with it just to prove that they can, test themselves maybe and have an orgasm doing it.

A good hacker that is able to hack public wi-fi will certainly be looking for much bigger fish... People with much more money, not just a few bucks or at most a few hundreds dollars in a casino

That’s in the case of hackers only having to hack for monetary purposes. Some of them are out there for what credentials they could get from a KYC activated account, documents they can sell and use in other illicit purposes.

hacks usually happen when the password is compromised in some way. A large number of users set passwords with their birthday, children's names or similar, which is quite easy to "hack". Even the most famous hacks happened because the developer leaked the password.
Very far from what we see in the Hollywood movies

Yeah, there is always a weak link that would be attacked and it always comes from compromise.

[BitMaxz]

Same goes for hotels. You’re sharing the same Wi-Fi with hundreds of guests, but there’s really no issue there. Once you access a site and it’s HTTPS, everything is encrypted anyway. The only real risk would be something extreme, like if someone had a hidden camera watching you type your login details, lol. Other than that, it’s generally safe.

Accessing an HTTPS site doesn't mean you are encrypted completely. The wifi owner (hotel owner) is able to see the website, timestamp, device info, etc. you are accessing.
However, they can't see encrypted data like password credentials, but still, it isn't safe that they can see your activity and what site you are visiting.
The only way to prevent this leak is by using different DNS.

About hidden cameras, this isn't easy to avoid since you don't know if the hotel where you check in doesn't have hidden cameras. That's why it still isn't safe to log in to sensitive sites while you are outside the house, but I think having a 2FA authenticator still prevents them from accessing your account. Even if they know exactly the account username and password, they still need the 2FA authenticator to access it and you should be alerted immediately if someone is trying to access your account with wrong 2FA codes.

At least you are still protected with 2FA; that hotel owner doesn't.

[mirakal]

Same goes for hotels. You’re sharing the same Wi-Fi with hundreds of guests, but there’s really no issue there. Once you access a site and it’s HTTPS, everything is encrypted anyway. The only real risk would be something extreme, like if someone had a hidden camera watching you type your login details, lol. Other than that, it’s generally safe.

Accessing an HTTPS site doesn't mean you are encrypted completely. The wifi owner (hotel owner) is able to see the website, timestamp, device info, etc. you are accessing.
However, they can't see encrypted data like password credentials, but still, it isn't safe that they can see your activity and what site you are visiting.
The only way to prevent this leak is by using different DNS.

That’s normal since they control the server. They can see the devices accessing the network through MAC addresses, but the important thing is they can’t see your username or password. That means you’re still protected as long as you’re using your own device. The real concern is IP sharing. That’s usually where the issue comes in, because a casino might flag it as a possible TOS violation like multi-accounting, if that’s what the discussion is really about.

[dzungmobile]

Accessing an HTTPS site doesn't mean you are encrypted completely. The wifi owner (hotel owner) is able to see the website, timestamp, device info, etc. you are accessing.
However, they can't see encrypted data like password credentials, but still, it isn't safe that they can see your activity and what site you are visiting.
The only way to prevent this leak is by using different DNS.

As all other things, https  is only an infrastructure for other layers behind it so it can not protect Internet users completely. People who use Internet must know about more things about security and privacy, then from good knowledge, they can have better practice on the Internet for better security and privacy for their devices, accounts and themselves.

Difference between Secure Socket Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS).

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Big game tonight guys, what do you think the outcome will be?



Aston Villa have been a big problem for Arsenal in recent seasons. I have a feeling they may just squeeze out a vital win tonight though.

[Lakai01]

Big game tonight guys, what do you think the outcome will be?

Depending on the odds provider, Arsenal has an approximate probability of winning of 70 percent, which makes them the clear favorites, at least according to the odds.

However, Aston Villa definitely has the advantage of its streak in recent weeks; the team seems to be in very good form, and it can draw on its full lineup, whereas Arsenal cannot.

Personally, I would bet on +2.5 goals, as both teams have scored regularly in recent games and both are very strong offensively. It will definitely be an exciting game!

[bitmover]

Accessing an HTTPS site doesn't mean you are encrypted completely. The wifi owner (hotel owner) is able to see the website, timestamp, device info, etc. you are accessing.
However, they can't see encrypted data like password credentials, but still, it isn't safe that they can see your activity and what site you are visiting.
The only way to prevent this leak is by using different DNS.

I see this as a privacy risk and exposure, not a security problem.

They can see which websites you accessed, so they (the hotel owner) can see you are playing in betpanda, but he can't log in betpanda.

And betpanda also detects that you are using a public wifi, so if other person is using the same public wifi to log into betpanda, they won't accuse you of multi-accounting or whatever...

[tbct_mt2]

I see this as a privacy risk and exposure, not a security problem.

They can see which websites you accessed, so they (the hotel owner) can see you are playing in betpanda, but he can't log in betpanda.

And betpanda also detects that you are using a public wifi, so if other person is using the same public wifi to log into betpanda, they won't accuse you of multi-accounting or whatever...

They will or will not make that accusation against you of multi-accounting simply by IP address and logins. It is possibly an automatic tool triggers something against your account like restrict it to access the site again but if it is multi-accounting accusation, I believe that Betpanda or any casino will need to have more evidence for it.

They will check and investigate some accounts that login from a same IP address with other activities like how they bet, their bet styles, active bet hours and so on. In some appeals from users to such multi-accounting accusations, some casinos investigated and answered like this. I remember most about cases at FortuneJack with their answers and screenshots that blur some personal information of users.

[Finebone]

Big game tonight guys, what do you think the outcome will be?



Aston Villa have been a big problem for Arsenal in recent seasons. I have a feeling they may just squeeze out a vital win tonight though.

Judging from statistics and their head to head record in their last five meetings, Aston Villa has won three, arsenal has won only one time and they drew once.
 Though it looks like Aston Villa are the favorite here, and if you equally look at their current form, they are in a winning run of eleven games straight, so they seems like the favourite here even though they are below arsenal on the league table, but I wouldn't be giving them a direct winning because arsenal are good enough to put an end to their winning run.
I sees this game as one of those games to avoid if you love gambling on football games, but the chances of this game ending in a draw is a bit  high since arsenal is a top side and they will be playing at home.

[maknyos]

Big game tonight guys, what do you think the outcome will be?



Aston Villa have been a big problem for Arsenal in recent seasons. I have a feeling they may just squeeze out a vital win tonight though.

Aston Villa have been a threat in recent meetings, and they also just beat Chelsea in their last match. This poses a serious threat to Arsenal, and I'm sure they're aware of this.
I think Aston Villa have a pretty good chance of winning, even though they'll be playing at Arsenal's home ground. However, with their current form, it's very possible that Arsenal could lose points. Aston Villa's weakness lies in their defense, which can sometimes be easily penetrated. If they can overcome that in this match, they'll be able to take home a point, at least one point.

[liuka]

Big game tonight guys, what do you think the outcome will be?

Depending on the odds provider, Arsenal has an approximate probability of winning of 70 percent, which makes them the clear favorites, at least according to the odds.

However, Aston Villa definitely has the advantage of its streak in recent weeks; the team seems to be in very good form, and it can draw on its full lineup, whereas Arsenal cannot.

Personally, I would bet on +2.5 goals, as both teams have scored regularly in recent games and both are very strong offensively. It will definitely be an exciting game!

Doubt Aston Villa will win even though they are in top form, the opponent Arsenal faces is a difficult team to beat while the odds difference is more than 2x.
+2.5 goals is a good chance at least maybe the expected score is 2-1 for Arsenal's victory tonight, interestingly will Aston Villa just lose? As Unai E. has prepared tactics to beat Arsenal again as away.

[Renampun]

snip
The real concern is IP sharing. That’s usually where the issue comes in, because a casino might flag it as a possible TOS violation like multi-accounting, if that’s what the discussion is really about.

Many people are quite worried that when they use a public IP it will be detected as a multi-account, but I believe that sites like Betpanda have a system that can detect multi-accounts not only through IP, but also using other parameters that can identify suspicious activity, so we should not need to worry too much when using a public IP in my opinion. although we need to understand the security aspect, because public networks are more vulnerable in terms of security since they are more easily monitored by third parties.

[adultcrypto]

Doubt Aston Villa will win even though they are in top form, the opponent Arsenal faces is a difficult team to beat while the odds difference is more than 2x.
+2.5 goals is a good chance at least maybe the expected score is 2-1 for Arsenal's victory tonight, interestingly will Aston Villa just lose? As Unai E. has prepared tactics to beat Arsenal again as away.

The match is almost ending first half without a goal which reduces the chances of +2.5 goals. The match is looking like a draw judging by the first half statistics although Aston Villa is pressing so hard to score which may not happen in this first half. I was tempted to place a single bet on Aston Villa win at 7.5 odd, not that I believe they were going to win but because of the odd which I feel it was worth the risk. If we look at the odd a lone, it would have been expected that Arsenal was going to demolish their visitor but that does not happen, maybe they will win from second half.

[topbitcoin]

+2.5 goals is a good chance at least maybe the expected score is 2-1 for Arsenal's victory tonight, interestingly will Aston Villa just lose? As Unai E. has prepared tactics to beat Arsenal again as away.

Although the first half ended 0-0 but it seems that 2-1 is still possible so the probability for 2.5 will be more attractive but this could also be a little difficult when looking at Aston Villa's performance in the first half where there was nothing to do because they were just full defending.

for 1x2 with Arsenal odds at 1.4 can actually still be maximized with multi bets in some other matches but this choice is also a little complicated when looking at the results of Chelsea and Manchester United now.
I'm at 1x2 for this match and I'd like to see Aston Villa lose after the last 2 months they haven't had that feeling.

[notblox1]

Aston Villa have been a big problem for Arsenal in recent seasons. I have a feeling they may just squeeze out a vital win tonight though.

I thought the same thing and I placed asian handicap +0.5 bet on Aston Villa, but things are not going like I expected
There are 30 minutes left to play but it wont be easy to score two or more goals against Arsenal and avoid defeat in this match.
I am watching the match now and Arsenal is looking very good in second half.

[tabas]

snip
The real concern is IP sharing. That’s usually where the issue comes in, because a casino might flag it as a possible TOS violation like multi-accounting, if that’s what the discussion is really about.

Many people are quite worried that when they use a public IP it will be detected as a multi-account, but I believe that sites like Betpanda have a system that can detect multi-accounts not only through IP, but also using other parameters that can identify suspicious activity, so we should not need to worry too much when using a public IP in my opinion. although we need to understand the security aspect, because public networks are more vulnerable in terms of security since they are more easily monitored by third parties.

That's the common way of detecting if there's a multi account and if they're being abused by them. It's probably true that they have other ways through detecting suspicious activities. But that's the first clue they have and why someone has to do it when they can only use their account once if they want to stick around. And if findings are right, they didn't just guess it right but as you've said, they've done such parameters in determining if the user have abused the system or not through their own ways.

[impulse709]

Doubt Aston Villa will win even though they are in top form, the opponent Arsenal faces is a difficult team to beat while the odds difference is more than 2x.
+2.5 goals is a good chance at least maybe the expected score is 2-1 for Arsenal's victory tonight, interestingly will Aston Villa just lose? As Unai E. has prepared tactics to beat Arsenal again as away.

The match is almost ending first half without a goal which reduces the chances of +2.5 goals. The match is looking like a draw judging by the first half statistics although Aston Villa is pressing so hard to score which may not happen in this first half. I was tempted to place a single bet on Aston Villa win at 7.5 odd, not that I believe they were going to win but because of the odd which I feel it was worth the risk. If we look at the odd a lone, it would have been expected that Arsenal was going to demolish their visitor but that does not happen, maybe they will win from second half.

The pre match odds did not reflect well on the competitiveness that Aston Villa can be particularly with Unai Emery. It was value wise tempting to see Villa at 7.5 even when it was not expected to win. The 0-0 first half came very close to eliminating the +2.5 goals bet because the two teams were playing conservatively and concentrating on the strategies. Villa was of good quality but unfinished, and Arsenal were not dominating in spite of being such favorites. This was obviously a game, where knowledge of form and strategy was of more importance than just burdens of the dice.