Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC

[dimonstration]

In my experience, betting sites never have problems with large deposits. On the contrary they love them 

I think they have much more problems with large withdrawals 
Luckily I didnt have any problems with that recently and I hope this is going to continue with Betpanda casino.
Ever since Sportsbet announced their departure from bitcointalk forum and start of rebranding, I was looking for one casino to replace them.

Definitely. Withdrawals what always triggers security measures in case an account show a huge percentage growth compared to his deposit.

So far I don’t experience this kind of win like x10 of my deposit or more which most user experiencing problem with KYC happened to achieved with their profit before they withdraw.

[Peanutswar]

Seems after consecutive losses with the EPL due to draw matches of Liverpool seems I need to shift for a moment because the Dream League SEA qualifiers are in there in Dota 2.

After winning the Predator League seems Kukuys lead by Kuku, Chief armal mid can dominate this match so add up too with the Aurora which is another top tier teams reason why I made a parlay this match. Just to add some spices with the bet multiplier of course.

[EarnOnVictor]

In my experience, betting sites never have problems with large deposits. On the contrary they love them 

I think they have much more problems with large withdrawals 

Yes they do, and this is not applicable to gambling alone, but all establishments offering risky activities.

They do this for two reasons: 1. Security measure, which is cool and acceptable if they are sincere about the claims. 2. For selfish reasons. Some of them are greedy, and are only looking for ways to confiscate the money, or tempt you to play more through delay tactics.

Regardless, even if any casino delays your huge pay, but eventually still pays it, they are still worth kudos.

[Sanitough]

They do this for two reasons: 1. Security measure, which is cool and acceptable if they are sincere about the claims. 2. For selfish reasons. Some of them are greedy, and are only looking for ways to confiscate the money, or tempt you to play more through delay tactics.

All they really need to do is verify that the win is legit, then process it no matter how big the amount is, as long as there’s no cheating involved. I get that some withdrawals are flagged because of money laundering concerns, that’s why wagering requirements exist in the first place. But if we’re talking about honest bettors, then they should be treated honestly as well.

Regardless, even if any casino delays your huge pay, but eventually still pays it, they are still worth kudos.

But its better if they will not delay it so people will stop thinking casinos hate winners.

[maknyos]

Every activity we do, they will monitor it and if there is something suspicious then they will focus more on monitoring our account. In the case of large deposits, they will also definitely pay more attention, because it is feared that it will cause problems for them too later, for example they are suspected of money laundering.
This is a natural thing, because they also have to be responsible for government policies as well. Apart from that, they also ensure that there will be no fraud committed by users.

They firstly have to defend their business against any fraud and exploitation, next they will have to obey existing regulations for avoiding any possibly legal issues against their company.

People don't like KYC and AML and they don't need to be bad people, have dark money to dislike these AML and KYC. Need of privacy is for everyone and it truly exists but companies have opposite interests to chase. They prioritize their safety first, from their company safety to their owner safety in legal aspect. Therefore, they have to build up their platforms not only good in security, products but also in Legal Compliance.

Yes, it will definitely be like that, in any business they will definitely protect their business from any threats that can come at any time, and in gambling it is their form of protection to protect their business.
We as users should also be able to understand that and if what happens is not in accordance with what we want, then we can find another casino. But in my experience every casino will also definitely do the same thing to protect their business from things that can get them into trouble.

[tbct_mt2]

Yes they do, and this is not applicable to gambling alone, but all establishments offering risky activities.

They do this for two reasons: 1. Security measure, which is cool and acceptable if they are sincere about the claims. 2. For selfish reasons. Some of them are greedy, and are only looking for ways to confiscate the money, or tempt you to play more through delay tactics.

Regardless, even if any casino delays your huge pay, but eventually still pays it, they are still worth kudos.

Depends on their business size, they will have to take care of big withdrawals that can affect their business financial health especially if it is not a fair win from an user, but from cheating. At least the casino must investigate the case, confirm that there is nothing wrong, before approving and processing that big withdrawal for user.

It's like prevention is better than cure, as if they process the big withdrawal, that money gone and anything found later, it is too late and the casino can not get that money back.

Finally, if the withdrawal is approved and processed after investigation, it's good and I see no bad thing here.

[Rruchi man]

Regardless, even if any casino delays your huge pay, but eventually still pays it, they are still worth kudos.

But its better if they will not delay it so people will stop thinking casinos hate winners.

Casinos cannot be in control of what people want to think. As far as people having their opinions, they will always have opinions whether you are doing well or not.

Casinos may not like that they have to delay payments at times because of the complaints, but because of regulations and also past experiences, they have to do so to avoid sanctions first and then losses.

[stompix]

In my experience, betting sites never have problems with large deposits. On the contrary they love them  

Of course, you will trigger all sort of alarms if you deposit a shitload of money and try to withdraw it after playing very little with it. But if you are playing sports betting on top leagues or other sports with high limits you shouldn't have any problems. At least I didn't.

Yeah, that's the tiny detail, top leagues!
Deposit in the tens of thousands and going all in some WTA 250 qualifications or some darts tournament will raise the suspicion level to 100!
They don't care much about the deposit itself they care more about how you use it!

Every activity we do, they will monitor it and if there is something suspicious then they will focus more on monitoring our account. In the case of large deposits, they will also definitely pay more attention, because it is feared that it will cause problems for them too later, for example they are suspected of money laundering.

Here is a trick question for you: define "large"!

[Wakate]

Ever since Sportsbet announced their departure from bitcointalk forum and start of rebranding, I was looking for one casino to replace them.

There are so many casinos on this forum and I think your can select from hundreds of casinos here that you think you can like and trust. I don't know what you interest are but you don't have to wait too long to look for a similar alternative that will give you the similar fun you were getting there.

[Lida93]

But its better if they will not delay it so people will stop thinking casinos hate winners.

Casinos cannot be in control of what people want to think. As far as people having their opinions, they will always have opinions whether you are doing well or not.

Casinos may not like that they have to delay payments at times because of the complaints, but because of regulations and also past experiences, they have to do so to avoid sanctions first and then losses.

People are not thinking that the casino business is not an easy business to manage, beginning with handling government regulations and guidelines regarding huge wins and the casino ensuring they ain't cheated by one way or the other, all to be sure the whole processes are not compromised. I understand people wants their winnings to come quickly due to the excitement but it doesn't always has to be that way putting everything in hurry.

[bettercrypto]

Every activity we do, they will monitor it and if there is something suspicious then they will focus more on monitoring our account. In the case of large deposits, they will also definitely pay more attention, because it is feared that it will cause problems for them too later, for example they are suspected of money laundering.
This is a natural thing, because they also have to be responsible for government policies as well. Apart from that, they also ensure that there will be no fraud committed by users.

They firstly have to defend their business against any fraud and exploitation, next they will have to obey existing regulations for avoiding any possibly legal issues against their company.

People don't like KYC and AML and they don't need to be bad people, have dark money to dislike these AML and KYC. Need of privacy is for everyone and it truly exists but companies have opposite interests to chase. They prioritize their safety first, from their company safety to their owner safety in legal aspect. Therefore, they have to build up their platforms not only good in security, products but also in Legal Compliance.

Yes, it will definitely be like that, in any business they will definitely protect their business from any threats that can come at any time, and in gambling it is their form of protection to protect their business.
We as users should also be able to understand that and if what happens is not in accordance with what we want, then we can find another casino. But in my experience every casino will also definitely do the same thing to protect their business from things that can get them into trouble.

I don't think any online casino wants anything bad to happen to their business in an industry like this, right? As much as possible, they all want to keep their business secure, as well as the users who trust them enough to play on their platform.

That’s also why many gamblers are extremely cautious; they want to make sure the casino they choose is safe from exploiters who might try to introduce bugs or glitches into the platform.

[Renampun]

If we look at the current ToS when we do not violate any form of intentionally (or perhaps unintentionally) we will not experience anything including having an obligation to KYC.
I think for the most part this is enough to keep us out of KYC problems especially when we don't really like this because we just have to play like we always do except maybe for some people who don't really like the usual way and try to outsmart the site which in turn makes betpanda make this a form of suspicion that might definitely require KYC and hold or even free the user's account. This seems to be the case for some users here including for some who are still active which even makes me uncomfortable with some of the tags and remarks that I have always seen in recent times.

Betpanda only enforces KYC if they find any suspicious activity, but if you play normally and don't break any rules, it shouldn't be a problem. that's why in some cases, those whose accounts are restricted by Betpanda, they try to cheat the system and hope that they can get away with it, and that's what leads to their accounts being banned because they didn't have good intentions from the start, even though they say they are innocent and even call Betpanda a scam, like what that one guy who keeps saying bullshit in this thread, but they are just losers who don't want to admit their mistakes.

[Sanitough]

Casinos may not like that they have to delay payments at times because of the complaints, but because of regulations and also past experiences, they have to do so to avoid sanctions first and then losses.

Okay, I get that they have to follow regulations and do proper checks before processing and paying out. That part makes sense. But does that really justify long delays?

Most complaints start when withdrawals get stuck for days or even weeks. For me, that kind of processing time feels unreasonable, even considering regulatory requirements. A thorough check shouldn’t take that long.

[PX-Z]

Casinos may not like that they have to delay payments at times because of the complaints, but because of regulations and also past experiences, they have to do so to avoid sanctions first and then losses.

Okay, I get that they have to follow regulations and do proper checks before processing and paying out. That part makes sense. But does that really justify long delays?

Most complaints start when withdrawals get stuck for days or even weeks. For me, that kind of processing time feels unreasonable, even considering regulatory requirements. A thorough check shouldn’t take that long.

KYC is required by regulators, but it's not always the main reason it's requested during large withdrawals or long processing times. If KYC were the main reason, casinos would require it at registration or on first deposit.

In most cases, delays are due to multi-accounting checks or arbitrage reviews, not KYC alone. The very long processing might due to budget issue or just incompetence of the team handling it.

[tabas]

The .partners domain worked and loaded quickly on me. Maybe it's on you when you've visited it or it was down when you checked it. But do check it again and I guess just as with everyone, it'll work on you now.

I'm not entirely sure exactly what triggered that error. since every other platforms were working just fine at that time. I saw that error multiple times, the site was a bit then, but now it's working without any further issue.

That's good that it's working now, maybe some hiccups on the network either with you or with betpanda's domain server during that time. Well, it's not much of a problem anymore when some other mirror links are working well.

Another thing I noticed, I have been getting random Cloudflare errors for a few days, the other day, I saw the same error at altcoinstalk forum. Then again, we saw BTT were also effected somehow (forum sided issue), and now this .partner. It's probably a random bug/glitch from my end.

Possibly if it's getting those errors from various websites including the forum and the altt, it's a global problem from cloudflare itself. Otherwise, we can just think of it as a random glitch that has been fixed already.

[topbitcoin]

If we look at the current ToS when we do not violate any form of intentionally (or perhaps unintentionally) we will not experience anything including having an obligation to KYC.
I think for the most part this is enough to keep us out of KYC problems especially when we don't really like this because we just have to play like we always do except maybe for some people who don't really like the usual way and try to outsmart the site which in turn makes betpanda make this a form of suspicion that might definitely require KYC and hold or even free the user's account. This seems to be the case for some users here including for some who are still active which even makes me uncomfortable with some of the tags and remarks that I have always seen in recent times.

Betpanda only enforces KYC if they find any suspicious activity, but if you play normally and don't break any rules, it shouldn't be a problem. that's why in some cases, those whose accounts are restricted by Betpanda, they try to cheat the system and hope that they can get away with it, and that's what leads to their accounts being banned because they didn't have good intentions from the start, even though they say they are innocent and even call Betpanda a scam, like what that one guy who keeps saying bullshit in this thread, but they are just losers who don't want to admit their mistakes.

From this condition, it can actually be an advantage if we do not expect KYC and there are sites that still enforce it so that we can be comfortable with the gambling activities carried out but it cannot be denied that until now the greed of some gamblers is still the biggest role for them to get a little profit from bonuses but do not want to get the risks even though from the beginning we know that on any site (not only on betpanda) when caught violating ToS intentionally or maybe even unconsciously, there will definitely be consequences to be accepted because the rules are clear and when the risk is We know that on any site (not only on betpanda) when caught violating ToS intentionally or maybe even unconsciously, there will definitely be consequences that must be accepted because the rules are clear and when there is a violation by circumventing this, we as gamblers must be prepared for sanctions including restrictions or even banning the accounts we have.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Ever since Sportsbet announced their departure from bitcointalk forum and start of rebranding, I was looking for one casino to replace them.

There are so many casinos on this forum and I think your can select from hundreds of casinos here that you think you can like and trust. I don't know what you interest are but you don't have to wait too long to look for a similar alternative that will give you the similar fun you were getting there.

I am very sure he doesn't mean that, that since sportsbet left this forum, he's been looking for a casino to replace them, i dont think he meant this because to the best of my knowledge, sportsbet leaving the forum doesn't mean they shut down right?, they are still in operation.

But I get, I understand that some forum users won't gamble  on a casino that is outside of this forum, this is the type of gambler that I am too, but think if my favorite casino leaves this forum for whatever reason, finding another casino to replace them won't take me a day or two at most so long as I really want to gamble, are there any or many special features on sportsbet that aren't available on other sportsbooks still available and active on this forum?