Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC

[Rikafip]

Does this casino have KYC? or is it like wildead.com and doesnt require kyc? looking forward to test the site just want to make sure it doesnt require KYC.

Instead of relying on answers of others, what you should so is to check their Term of Service. It takes maybe 5-10 minutes to read it fully, and imho that's the least that you should do if you plan to send your money to a platform.

I've betting on Betpandas for a couple of months now (and I am pretty satisfied with it) and so far I wasn't ask for KYC, but I am also aware of the fact that it may happen at any moment.

[maydna]

Does this casino have KYC? or is it like wildead.com and doesnt require kyc? looking forward to test the site just want to make sure it doesnt require KYC.

Yes, technically they do. Maybe not imediately but at some point, in case of suspicious activity or when money laundering is suspected/involved, they can ask for additional informations or checks. Always, read the terms and conditions properly before you register to a platform or before making any deposits. Nobody wants any unexpected outcomes.

Correct. As long as a user does not violate the casino’s rules, they won’t be asked to complete KYC. Common issues usually arise from suspicious betting activity, such as arbitrage betting, casino bonus abuse, or repeatedly resetting passwords. These actions can trigger the system to enforce KYC on the customer involved.

So far, I’ve been using Betpanda without any issues, haven’t been asked for KYC, and feel comfortable betting on this platform.

Don't forget deposit in large money can sounds their alarm and they may monitor you. That is common thing usually happens but if you can managing your bankroll by not depositing large money in short time, that will not be a problem.

It is common if casinos asking KYC so you don't have to be worry. They just don't want to get into trouble so they also impose KYC to members.

As long as you don't doing suspicious things, you will not asked KYC although that will possible someday. You are responsible to yourself so you need to be careful using the money.

[dimonstration]

Does this casino have KYC? or is it like wildead.com and doesnt require kyc? looking forward to test the site just want to make sure it doesnt require KYC.

Instead of relying on answers of others, what you should so is to check their Term of Service. It takes maybe 5-10 minutes to read it fully, and imho that's the least that you should do if you plan to send your money to a platform.

I've betting on Betpandas for a couple of months now (and I am pretty satisfied with it) and so far I wasn't ask for KYC, but I am also aware of the fact that it may happen at any moment.

Same here, I’m playing on this casino since last year and I do deposit/withdrawal on weekly basis without requiring KYC verification.

In some casino, I was already being required to complete KYC with this frequent withdrawal and deposits transaction on my account. I only play table games and few sportsbook without doing any questionable strategy.

As normal gambler, I think KYC here will be rare to require as they promote anonymous casino as much as possible.

[dwyane36]

Don't forget deposit in large money can sounds their alarm and they may monitor you. That is common thing usually happens but if you can managing your bankroll by not depositing large money in short time, that will not be a problem.

Any casino has many triggers based on which they can request KYC. For example, user activity such as a deposit, a few bets, and then a quick withdrawal can clearly raise suspicion. So, I would say that it is not just about the size of the deposit, considering that casinos and payment providers have automatic monitoring of all transactions.

[tabas]

Does this casino have KYC? or is it like wildead.com and doesnt require kyc? looking forward to test the site just want to make sure it doesnt require KYC.

Test it, I've been betting some sports in it and have never been asked for any kyc. I'm just a casual gambler though.

Anybody facing problems accessing .partners? The .io seems to be working fine. But I noticed .partner not accessible from my end.

The .partners domain worked and loaded quickly on me. Maybe it's on you when you've visited it or it was down when you checked it. But do check it again and I guess just as with everyone, it'll work on you now.

[maknyos]

Don't forget deposit in large money can sounds their alarm and they may monitor you. That is common thing usually happens but if you can managing your bankroll by not depositing large money in short time, that will not be a problem.

Any casino has many triggers based on which they can request KYC. For example, user activity such as a deposit, a few bets, and then a quick withdrawal can clearly raise suspicion. So, I would say that it is not just about the size of the deposit, considering that casinos and payment providers have automatic monitoring of all transactions.

Every activity we do, they will monitor it and if there is something suspicious then they will focus more on monitoring our account. In the case of large deposits, they will also definitely pay more attention, because it is feared that it will cause problems for them too later, for example they are suspected of money laundering.
This is a natural thing, because they also have to be responsible for government policies as well. Apart from that, they also ensure that there will be no fraud committed by users.

[dzungmobile]

Every activity we do, they will monitor it and if there is something suspicious then they will focus more on monitoring our account. In the case of large deposits, they will also definitely pay more attention, because it is feared that it will cause problems for them too later, for example they are suspected of money laundering.
This is a natural thing, because they also have to be responsible for government policies as well. Apart from that, they also ensure that there will be no fraud committed by users.

They firstly have to defend their business against any fraud and exploitation, next they will have to obey existing regulations for avoiding any possibly legal issues against their company.

People don't like KYC and AML and they don't need to be bad people, have dark money to dislike these AML and KYC. Need of privacy is for everyone and it truly exists but companies have opposite interests to chase. They prioritize their safety first, from their company safety to their owner safety in legal aspect. Therefore, they have to build up their platforms not only good in security, products but also in Legal Compliance.

[Trofo]

Don't forget deposit in large money can sounds their alarm and they may monitor you. That is common thing usually happens but if you can managing your bankroll by not depositing large money in short time, that will not be a problem.

Any casino has many triggers based on which they can request KYC. For example, user activity such as a deposit, a few bets, and then a quick withdrawal can clearly raise suspicion. So, I would say that it is not just about the size of the deposit, considering that casinos and payment providers have automatic monitoring of all transactions.

Every activity we do, they will monitor it and if there is something suspicious then they will focus more on monitoring our account. In the case of large deposits, they will also definitely pay more attention, because it is feared that it will cause problems for them too later, for example they are suspected of money laundering.
This is a natural thing, because they also have to be responsible for government policies as well. Apart from that, they also ensure that there will be no fraud committed by users.

In my experience, betting sites never have problems with large deposits. On the contrary they love them  

Of course, you will trigger all sort of alarms if you deposit a shitload of money and try to withdraw it after playing very little with it. But if you are playing sports betting on top leagues or other sports with high limits you shouldn't have any problems. At least I didn't.

That being said I still haven't deposited/withdrew a significant amount from Betpanda. My transactions were capped to several hundred $ so far while I am testing a couple of sites to choose my next favorite.

[DYING_S0UL]

The .partners domain worked and loaded quickly on me. Maybe it's on you when you've visited it or it was down when you checked it. But do check it again and I guess just as with everyone, it'll work on you now.

I'm not entirely sure exactly what triggered that error. since every other platforms were working just fine at that time. I saw that error multiple times, the site was a bit then, but now it's working without any further issue.
Another thing I noticed, I have been getting random Cloudflare errors for a few days, the other day, I saw the same error at altcoinstalk forum. Then again, we saw BTT were also effected somehow (forum sided issue), and now this .partner. It's probably a random bug/glitch from my end.

As normal gambler, I think KYC here will be rare to require as they promote anonymous casino as much as possible.

Same from my end. I have an account on betpanda and so far I haven't been asked to do KYC yet (but I'm always expecting it at any given moment as the worst case). Fingers crossed. But I don't think they will ask for any, as long as it isn't a suspiciously large amount.

[bettercrypto]

All gamblers have different opportunities and, accordingly, different amounts of money they are willing to spend on gambling. What I mean is that even a slightly increased bet size can quickly deplete your deposit, especially if the goal is to catch a huge multiplier. By the way, it should be noted that he mentioned about a thousand tries, which is quite a lot.

Gambling has ait of opportunity but that does not mean that you can make the most money from betting when you increase your bankroll so that you can make bigger amounts. A gambler that can not be profitable using smaller bankroll to bet should not even bother to increasing their bet size because it is not going to yield any significant result.

I agree with what you said. I think gambling really comes down to pure luck, with the exception of sports betting. It’s also true that if our bet size is small,
we shouldn't expect a massive win. While it’s possible to hit a high multiplier, the actual winning amount will still be small if the initial bet was low.

That’s why I see only two real outcomes in gambling: first, if you get truly lucky and you have a large bet size, you’ll get a huge profit; otherwise, you’ll only get a small return if your bet was small. It’s as simple as that.

[stadus]

Same from my end. I have an account on betpanda and so far I haven't been asked to do KYC yet (but I'm always expecting it at any given moment as the worst case). Fingers crossed. But I don't think they will ask for any, as long as it isn't a suspiciously large amount.

That’s what they assured in one of their posts, if I remember correctly. Since they’re advertising themselves as an anonymous casino, it wouldn’t really make sense for them to suddenly require strict KYC. That’s why most of us feel more comfortable gambling there, knowing they won’t randomly trigger it.

Of course, we still shouldn’t do anything suspicious. I do wonder though what happens if someone wins really big, like really big. Hopefully there’s still no KYC, but if there is, I think people would trust them anyway since they’re building a good reputation here.

[notblox1]

In my experience, betting sites never have problems with large deposits. On the contrary they love them 

I think they have much more problems with large withdrawals 
Luckily I didnt have any problems with that recently and I hope this is going to continue with Betpanda casino.
Ever since Sportsbet announced their departure from bitcointalk forum and start of rebranding, I was looking for one casino to replace them.

[topbitcoin]

As normal gambler, I think KYC here will be rare to require as they promote anonymous casino as much as possible.

Same from my end. I have an account on betpanda and so far I haven't been asked to do KYC yet (but I'm always expecting it at any given moment as the worst case). Fingers crossed. But I don't think they will ask for any, as long as it isn't a suspiciously large amount.

If we look at the current ToS when we do not violate any form of intentionally (or perhaps unintentionally) we will not experience anything including having an obligation to KYC.
I think for the most part this is enough to keep us out of KYC problems especially when we don't really like this because we just have to play like we always do except maybe for some people who don't really like the usual way and try to outsmart the site which in turn makes betpanda make this a form of suspicion that might definitely require KYC and hold or even free the user's account. This seems to be the case for some users here including for some who are still active which even makes me uncomfortable with some of the tags and remarks that I have always seen in recent times.

[dimonstration]

In my experience, betting sites never have problems with large deposits. On the contrary they love them 

I think they have much more problems with large withdrawals 
Luckily I didnt have any problems with that recently and I hope this is going to continue with Betpanda casino.
Ever since Sportsbet announced their departure from bitcointalk forum and start of rebranding, I was looking for one casino to replace them.

Definitely. Withdrawals what always triggers security measures in case an account show a huge percentage growth compared to his deposit.

So far I don’t experience this kind of win like x10 of my deposit or more which most user experiencing problem with KYC happened to achieved with their profit before they withdraw.

[Peanutswar]

Seems after consecutive losses with the EPL due to draw matches of Liverpool seems I need to shift for a moment because the Dream League SEA qualifiers are in there in Dota 2.

After winning the Predator League seems Kukuys lead by Kuku, Chief armal mid can dominate this match so add up too with the Aurora which is another top tier teams reason why I made a parlay this match. Just to add some spices with the bet multiplier of course.

[EarnOnVictor]

In my experience, betting sites never have problems with large deposits. On the contrary they love them 

I think they have much more problems with large withdrawals 

Yes they do, and this is not applicable to gambling alone, but all establishments offering risky activities.

They do this for two reasons: 1. Security measure, which is cool and acceptable if they are sincere about the claims. 2. For selfish reasons. Some of them are greedy, and are only looking for ways to confiscate the money, or tempt you to play more through delay tactics.

Regardless, even if any casino delays your huge pay, but eventually still pays it, they are still worth kudos.

[Sanitough]

They do this for two reasons: 1. Security measure, which is cool and acceptable if they are sincere about the claims. 2. For selfish reasons. Some of them are greedy, and are only looking for ways to confiscate the money, or tempt you to play more through delay tactics.

All they really need to do is verify that the win is legit, then process it no matter how big the amount is, as long as there’s no cheating involved. I get that some withdrawals are flagged because of money laundering concerns, that’s why wagering requirements exist in the first place. But if we’re talking about honest bettors, then they should be treated honestly as well.

Regardless, even if any casino delays your huge pay, but eventually still pays it, they are still worth kudos.

But its better if they will not delay it so people will stop thinking casinos hate winners.

[maknyos]

Every activity we do, they will monitor it and if there is something suspicious then they will focus more on monitoring our account. In the case of large deposits, they will also definitely pay more attention, because it is feared that it will cause problems for them too later, for example they are suspected of money laundering.
This is a natural thing, because they also have to be responsible for government policies as well. Apart from that, they also ensure that there will be no fraud committed by users.

They firstly have to defend their business against any fraud and exploitation, next they will have to obey existing regulations for avoiding any possibly legal issues against their company.

People don't like KYC and AML and they don't need to be bad people, have dark money to dislike these AML and KYC. Need of privacy is for everyone and it truly exists but companies have opposite interests to chase. They prioritize their safety first, from their company safety to their owner safety in legal aspect. Therefore, they have to build up their platforms not only good in security, products but also in Legal Compliance.

Yes, it will definitely be like that, in any business they will definitely protect their business from any threats that can come at any time, and in gambling it is their form of protection to protect their business.
We as users should also be able to understand that and if what happens is not in accordance with what we want, then we can find another casino. But in my experience every casino will also definitely do the same thing to protect their business from things that can get them into trouble.

[tbct_mt2]

Yes they do, and this is not applicable to gambling alone, but all establishments offering risky activities.

They do this for two reasons: 1. Security measure, which is cool and acceptable if they are sincere about the claims. 2. For selfish reasons. Some of them are greedy, and are only looking for ways to confiscate the money, or tempt you to play more through delay tactics.

Regardless, even if any casino delays your huge pay, but eventually still pays it, they are still worth kudos.

Depends on their business size, they will have to take care of big withdrawals that can affect their business financial health especially if it is not a fair win from an user, but from cheating. At least the casino must investigate the case, confirm that there is nothing wrong, before approving and processing that big withdrawal for user.

It's like prevention is better than cure, as if they process the big withdrawal, that money gone and anything found later, it is too late and the casino can not get that money back.

Finally, if the withdrawal is approved and processed after investigation, it's good and I see no bad thing here.

[Rruchi man]

Regardless, even if any casino delays your huge pay, but eventually still pays it, they are still worth kudos.

But its better if they will not delay it so people will stop thinking casinos hate winners.

Casinos cannot be in control of what people want to think. As far as people having their opinions, they will always have opinions whether you are doing well or not.

Casinos may not like that they have to delay payments at times because of the complaints, but because of regulations and also past experiences, they have to do so to avoid sanctions first and then losses.