Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC

[topbitcoin]

Yesterday I could not open at all either https://betpanda.io/ or https://betpanda.partners/en. but for today everything is back to normal and there are no obstacles.
Maybe this happens in some regions, especially when seeing dr.Osh and I are in the same country, it is possible that it happens to other users in the same region, but for now it can be done and the site can be opened smoothly again.

But my experience is that things like this seem to happen often for some signal providers because this is not the first time I have felt the same thing but for a full day like what happened yesterday it was the first time for me, because usually I just can't open for some time and after trying to refresh and wait a few minutes everything goes as usual.

Its official website and domain link I know with Betpanda gambling casino, for Betpanda.io already official website and domain link after seeing at the Betpanda thread. For the domain betpanda.partners I got that at signature campaign of Betpanda handle by Little Mouse, agree with you recommended only the official domain from Betpanda its self already publishing at several official Betpanda thread in bitcointalk forum and for any one can't access with betpanda.io better use the alternative betpanda.partners.

I don't think signal problem faced by dr.Osh about failed to access betpanda.io its purely about IP local address usually block by the government, by the wat in his country the gambling casino is legal or illegal?

Forcing yourself onto another site even one that's still unclear or even a phishing scam as notblox1 mentioned can actually make the situation even more detrimental. So when I can't access the site for a while I won't force it or try another option except perhaps the mirror provided and confirmed by betpanda itself.

The problem Dr. Osh faced is similar to mine and it's likely part of the government's ban. Gambling is still illegal in our country but even though it's illegal many people still gamble. This situation usually occurs even if only temporarily because the site is now accessible again.

[Renampun]

snip
I don't think signal problem faced by dr.Osh about failed to access betpanda.io its purely about IP local address usually block by the government, by the wat in his country the gambling casino is legal or illegal?

Looking at the error details, I see that he's from Indonesia, where gambling is completely illegal, but I'm still a bit confused as to why he can't access it sometimes, but then again, could it be an inconsistent blocking mechanism, sometimes allowing the site to slip past the ISP's filters? I don't know for sure, but to overcome this problem, it's best to use a mirror link or he can use a VPN, so that the problem doesn't come back.

[Shishir99]

PX-Z has listed the domains that are confirmed as official on betpandamirrors.com and they are as follows.

• betpanda.io
• betpanda.partners
• betpandacasino.io

betpanda.partners should be official, because that's the domain they are advertising through their signature campaign.
Their support doesn't seem to have much information about the mirrors and that's very bad.

Damn. I thought the betpandamirrors.com is from Betpanda itself. PX-Z should not have created this, as he is not part of the betpanda team. People would assume the website is created by Betpanda themself, which is not. I know we can trust him since he is a forum member, but why would people trust third-party websites? Yep, since the betpanda.partners domain is advertised in the signature campaign, we can be sure that it is an official mirror domain. I agree that the support team does not have much information about the mirror domains. They should keep themself up to date with information.

[Botnake]

Damn. I thought the betpandamirrors.com is from Betpanda itself. PX-Z should not have created this, as he is not part of the betpanda team.

I don’t really see a problem with sharing mirror links or domains as long as they’re legit. What made it look like a Betpanda site is really just the theme.

If the user’s intention was to help or promote for whatever reason, maybe the better move would’ve been to make his own site and promote the casino from there. It’s still risky, but I don’t think the intention was bad. If there’s anything to improve here, it’s probably the presentation.

[EarnOnVictor]

• betpanda.io
• betpanda.partners
• betpandacasino.io

Their support doesn't seem to have much information about the mirrors and that's very bad.

You might see it that way, but I don't, because the customer support doesn't know "who is who". Casinos could be engaging in mirror activities, but that doesn't mean it couldn't put them in trouble with their licence domains, and with their regulators. This is why I believe they need to be diplomatic in their response, it's not something they can always openly disclose, IMO. Mirror websites are interpreted as law invasive by many strict jurisdictions, so they won't take it lightly.

[Lakai01]

[...]
Mirror websites are interpreted as law invasive by many strict jurisdictions, so they won't take it lightly.

That's actually true, yes. Offering mirror websites can even lead to license revocation and is prohibited for "higher-value" licenses, such as those issued by the Malta Gaming Authority. It's been a while, but 1xBet's license in GB was revoked precisely because it offered hundreds of mirror links.

Additionally, in countries such as India (under the Online Gaming Act 2025), Italy or smaller european countries like Austria mirror sites can also lead to domain blocks, IP blocks, or even prison sentences and heavy fines, as they are considered to be promoting illegal gambling.

[Wakate]

It doesn't cause a problem for the casino because even if you are using the VPN the casino will also be functioning as it should be but they wouldn't no if you are gambling from disallowed countries do to the anonymity the VPN will create, so actually in turn it will cause problems for you when they find out because when they say that no gamblers should use VPN and you neglected it, it means you have broken there rules and regulations so you can be affected through account, that casino has a lot of gamblers doesn't mean they wouldn't bothered about rules breaking gamblers.

If a casino find you guilty of breaking their terms of service, they might not give you a penalty immediately if they find out that you are their good customer that have been giving them the leverage to make money from you. This is strictly business and I don't think any company will have to chase their customers away when they start benefiting from him. They will have to allow you to continue using your account if you have not made any serious profit from them since you have been using their casino, but if it was noticed that you have made too much profits from them, they might ban you or restrict you immediately.

[Questat]

We might be overthinking this a bit because until now they still haven’t made an official post about it. The only thing I saw was a Telegram message confirming that one of the mirrors is official, but for the others there was nothing. What I’m actually curious about is who brought this up here in the first place and started advertising it. I didn’t really follow the previous posts closely, so I’m wondering if that person is connected to the team or part of it somehow.

I'm the guilty one here , as I was the one who brought it up in the first place and requested a verification page to check all the valid domains. It wasn't my intention to advertise it but simply my curisity to know the answer. So what happened was, one day I was outside, searching for betpanda in google where I came across a bunch of mirror looking domains. I was pretty confused at first, so I directly asked LM through PM and he suggested to post it here, so that we can have the correct explanation. But so far it seems I got everyone confused, sorry about that. Regarding the mirrors, it's safe to use the one provided by the support staff and and the ones we are using in our signature space. As for the rest, ignore them, even if they are valid (assuming they are). As I understood so far, some of them are used for different purposes.

Now we know who the culprit is, lol.

If this wasn’t brought up here, it probably wouldn’t have dragged on for so many pages. But seriously though, it’s still good that you shared it. At least people are aware now, otherwise some might’ve ended up using the wrong mirror without even knowing which ones are legit.

[examplens]

• betpanda.io
• betpanda.partners
• betpandacasino.io

Their support doesn't seem to have much information about the mirrors and that's very bad.

You might see it that way, but I don't, because the customer support doesn't know "who is who". Casinos could be engaging in mirror activities, but that doesn't mean it couldn't put them in trouble with their licence domains, and with their regulators. This is why I believe they need to be diplomatic in their response, it's not something they can always openly disclose, IMO. Mirror websites are interpreted as law invasive by many strict jurisdictions, so they won't take it lightly.

Mirror domains can have different purposes (marketing, partners, limited jurisdictions etc.), and the part dealing with customer support does not need to know such details. A certain domain can be dedicated exclusively to a specific jurisdiction, for which a completely different support team is responsible

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Leeds vs Man Utd kicks off in 20 minutes. I am looking forward to this one, these two clubs, historically hate each other.

Betpanda.io odds below -


https://betpanda.io/en/sportsbook?bt-path=%2Fsoccer%2Fengland%2Fpremier-league%2Fleeds-united-manchester-united-2616738067746263086

[Shishir99]

I don’t really see a problem with sharing mirror links or domains as long as they’re legit. What made it look like a Betpanda site is really just the theme.

If the user’s intention was to help or promote for whatever reason, maybe the better move would’ve been to make his own site and promote the casino from there. It’s still risky, but I don’t think the intention was bad. If there’s anything to improve here, it’s probably the presentation.

I know the intention is not bad. The problem is that he created an entire dedicated website for this purpose, and it appears to be official from the Betpanda team. Had he made the same page with a different domain name and declared that the creator of the page is not official, it would have been more transparent, and there would be no question about it. However, it is not ethical to create such a domain and website if you are not part of the official team. This is misleading. Average players would think the website is official.

Let's say a hacker hacked the website and added phishing links, and the creator didn't even notice unless someone reported it to them. In that case, people would start blaming Betpanda for the issue. The reality is that the Betpanda team is not even aware of this website.

[BABY SHOES]

Leeds vs Man Utd kicks off in 20 minutes. I am looking forward to this one, these two clubs, historically hate each other.

Betpanda.io odds below -


https://betpanda.io/en/sportsbook?bt-path=%2Fsoccer%2Fengland%2Fpremier-league%2Fleeds-united-manchester-united-2616738067746263086

It is still doubtful that Manchester United will win because Leeds have looked relentless in recent matches, even Liverpool were made difficult by Leeds.

Do not let the Liverpool match draw or lose, because we do not want to be passed by Manchester United... We believe Liverpool will win on the other hand hope Man United draw.

[PX-Z]

I don’t really see a problem with sharing mirror links or domains as long as they’re legit. What made it look like a Betpanda site is really just the theme.

If the user’s intention was to help or promote for whatever reason, maybe the better move would’ve been to make his own site and promote the casino from there. It’s still risky, but I don’t think the intention was bad. If there’s anything to improve here, it’s probably the presentation.

I know the intention is not bad. The problem is that he created an entire dedicated website for this purpose, and it appears to be official from the Betpanda team. Had he made the same page with a different domain name and declared that the creator of the page is not official, it would have been more transparent, and there would be no question about it. However, it is not ethical to create such a domain and website if you are not part of the official team. This is misleading. Average players would think the website is official.

Let's say a hacker hacked the website and added phishing links, and the creator didn't even notice unless someone reported it to them. In that case, people would start blaming Betpanda for the issue. The reality is that the Betpanda team is not even aware of this website.

I understand the concern, and it's a valid one.

To be clear, betpandamirrors.com is not an official and not from Betpanda website, and I'm not part of the Betpanda team as well (obviously). The site was created only to list already known, legitimate and verified mirror domains to help users during access issues, not to impersonate or mislead, and to answer everyone who asks here.

Regarding the security concern, you're absolutely right that any third party site carries risk if poorly maintained, and the site is actively monitored just like any other tools/websites i made. The hosting and registrar of the site are different thus its easy to disable, or dns update or simply put make it offline.

The intention was to be helpful, not deceptive, and I appreciate the constructive discussion.

[examplens]

Leeds vs Man Utd kicks off in 20 minutes. I am looking forward to this one, these two clubs, historically hate each other.

Betpanda.io odds below -


https://betpanda.io/en/sportsbook?bt-path=%2Fsoccer%2Fengland%2Fpremier-league%2Fleeds-united-manchester-united-2616738067746263086

It is still doubtful that Manchester United will win because Leeds have looked relentless in recent matches, even Liverpool were made difficult by Leeds.

Do not let the Liverpool match draw or lose, because we do not want to be passed by Manchester United... We believe Liverpool will win on the other hand hope Man United draw.

It's like there's an unwritten rule that no one can win, everyone must play a draw. ok, unlike last week, where several games ended without goals, this time we saw at least something. Managers stopped taking risks and playing to win.

[Renampun]

I know the intention is not bad. The problem is that he created an entire dedicated website for this purpose, and it appears to be official from the Betpanda team. Had he made the same page with a different domain name and declared that the creator of the page is not official, it would have been more transparent, and there would be no question about it. However, it is not ethical to create such a domain and website if you are not part of the official team. This is misleading. Average players would think the website is official.

Let's say a hacker hacked the website and added phishing links, and the creator didn't even notice unless someone reported it to them. In that case, people would start blaming Betpanda for the issue. The reality is that the Betpanda team is not even aware of this website.

I agree with you on this point, even though he has good intentions in providing a website intended to host mirror links for Betpanda, but this could end up being bad because the website looks almost like Betpanda and there is no information on the website that says it is an unofficial website from Betpanda. at least he should put a statement explaining that it is not the official Betpanda website, so people can understand that the site is only an alternative link provider or mirror, not the official Betpanda platform. without such a statement, visitors might think they are on the official site, when in fact they are not, and if a hacker puts malware or a virus on the website, then the one to blame is Betpanda.

[bettercrypto]

It is very important for the Betpanda admin to clarify this to avoid confusion among our members. You’re right that 'betpandapartners' is what we see in the signature code for the Betpanda campaign here. However, for our personal signature codes, it’s 'betpanda.io,' right?

Your's actually it's betpanda.io look when I hover your signature below



It seems you missed this post by Little Mouse below; we were informed to change the signature code last month.

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5524470.msg66197332#msg66197332


So it looks like phishing for you, but Little Mouse uses that link under our signature.

Oh shoot, it turns out I was at fault too. I completely missed the reminder from @little mouse and honestly, I only just read it now. Because of that, I’ve updated my signature code immediately. Thanks a lot, mate, for correcting me on this.

I actually use my link code quite often whenever I play at Betpanda though I always seem to lose anyway! Regardless, I appreciate you correcting me and giving me a heads-up. Thanks again.

[DYING_S0UL]

I'm the guilty one here , as I was the one who brought it up in the first place..... .

Now we know who the culprit is, lol.

If this wasn’t brought up here, it probably wouldn’t have dragged on for so many pages. But seriously though, it’s still good that you shared it. At least people are aware now, otherwise some might’ve ended up using the wrong mirror without even knowing which ones are legit.

Sorry about that, man! I thought this issue/curiosity might be sorted/fixed/answered within a few replies by the team and CM and those who are aware but who knew we'll generate multiple pages from this. This was kinda unexpected turn of events. Anyway, I guess, I have, we have, tried our best to identity the legitimate mirrors, mentioning their BTT representative, asking in support inbox as well as their CM, but so far there still are some sort of confusion, I must confess.

I might as well email them in my free time, asking about this mass confusion. This is the last resort I see now. Until then, let's just use the ones confirmed to be real.

[mikel_012]

I understand the concern, and it's a valid one.

To be clear, betpandamirrors.com is not an official and not from Betpanda website, and I'm not part of the Betpanda team as well (obviously). The site was created only to list already known, legitimate and verified mirror domains to help users during access issues, not to impersonate or mislead, and to answer everyone who asks here.

Regarding the security concern, you're absolutely right that any third party site carries risk if poorly maintained, and the site is actively monitored just like any other tools/websites i made. The hosting and registrar of the site are different thus its easy to disable, or dns update or simply put make it offline.

The intention was to be helpful, not deceptive, and I appreciate the constructive discussion.

Why did you not post a warning on the website that it's not official from betpanda and that you are the owner? Link your account and say you are a bitcointalk user so people visiting the website can know it's not from betpanda but from a member of the bitcointalk community. I see no mention to your username PX-Z on the website, maybe you should add it for disclosure and transparency.

[Bitinity]

.....

Why did you not post a warning on the website that it's not official from betpanda and that you are the owner? Link your account and say you are a bitcointalk user so people visiting the website can know it's not from betpanda but from a member of the bitcointalk community. I see no mention to your username PX-Z on the website, maybe you should add it for disclosure and transparency.

I support your suggestion, adding the information that the site he create is not official on top of the page will be better. No need to link his bitcointalk profile unless he wants to do it himself. It will be even better if betpanda create their own page to inform their players about the official mirror links so there is no more confusion from players when they find something similar to betpanda as they can check it in the official mirror links list.

[EarnOnVictor]

• betpanda.io
• betpanda.partners
• betpandacasino.io

Their support doesn't seem to have much information about the mirrors and that's very bad.

You might see it that way, but I don't, because the customer support doesn't know "who is who". Casinos could be engaging in mirror activities, but that doesn't mean it couldn't put them in trouble with their licence domains, and with their regulators. This is why I believe they need to be diplomatic in their response, it's not something they can always openly disclose, IMO. Mirror websites are interpreted as law invasive by many strict jurisdictions, so they won't take it lightly.

Mirror domains can have different purposes (marketing, partners, limited jurisdictions etc.), and the part dealing with customer support does not need to know such details. A certain domain can be dedicated exclusively to a specific jurisdiction, for which a completely different support team is responsible

There's truly a possibility that the customer support could be in the dark on this, as you hinted, but even if they know, they can't be running their mouths anyhow, because they do not know who is who. And as for different mirror websites being used for different purpose, that's equally correct, but the person who asked didn't ask for their marketing mirror website or the website that offers different services, but for the one that does the same thing the main/registered website does. For this, they needed to be diplomatic and smart in their responses.