memecoin be quiet you don't know anything about coding.
on topic i am looking at the source code etc. gettin deep in this biatch now
lol
ok so lets put this into perspective shall we.. Darkcoin was the first X11 coin so it has to be brought up specifically.
Next lets acknowledge the fact that it came out in January 2014 right ?
And when it was released it did not have a GPU miner.. at least not one the public could use (fishy Quark gpu miner bullshit reeks on that)
So when it was released it was being paraded around as an EFFICIENT cpu only coin.. far more than other algos
WHEN it did not even use the max CPU usage on many miners.. So the comparison on that is simply ridiculous to say the least.
Later GPU's were added to mien X11 as the dev ASKED FOR ! and then it was still listed on pages such as the CPU-ONLY coin listing topic etc
all the while still paraded around as a cpu ONLY coin and getting new users because of it AND the gpu miner was only added to the ANN page
because i harassed the hell out of them on their ANN topic about it which the dev ignored even though i know he seen me pointing it out
and only added it after this topic here has been on page 1 for days.. he had to add it now he was trapped in scammy bs !
The GPU stuff i babbled on matters because they are using that as a way to say its efficient BUT
the gpu miner didn't even exist when they posted the coin making these claims !
This is about comparing X11 to other hashing algo's.. so making unfair or misleading or outright false / deceptive comparisons is what the question is here.
Comparing a hashing algo that is easier for your machine to work with vs one that is harder does NOT equal more efficient
that measn they are different and in my view comparing apples to oranges.
A key issue here is X11 was a fancy name tacked on to Quark's modified mix of algo's. so this is partly a mod of Quark that the dev refuses to admit
and partly a marketing game with a snazzy brand name tacked on to it to give the less tech savvy something to cling on to with their fanboyism.
These guys have said lots that the most important thing about a coin is the marketing team and actually nothing to do with a coin
all the tech coin stuff is secondary after thought stuff..
The goal is to mount a campaign to get people involved. Hence the behavior of treading on the edge of lying with dramatic and misleading statements
such as the shit in these coin ANN page topic titles.. It's a game people !
The coin itself is a secondary thing they really don't even care about.
And i have shown how pretty much every point / claim the Dark coin "team" is crap.. on their topic a while back before this one was made.
I was bullied and ignored and attacked with rabid fanboyism.
Public perception is money.. control that and the cash rolls in.. hence the forum bs.. as usual.
X11 what is it ? who made it and how was it made ? is there an honest answer ? And what other coins was the so called team involved with ?
Does it work more efficiently or are the devs realizing that the Quark dev missed capitalizing on the whole it's more efficient angle to push their coin ?
I just went and looked at Dark coins github and i see the usual.. throw a busted half ass useless clone out there publicly so it gets little attention
than all kinds of stuff are added to it after the fact over time.. an ingenious and common ploy / angle around here that is used heavily to coin cloners advantage.
especially when it comes to parading it around for months as asic resistant and having no public GPU miners only for them to pop up later..
and if there is GPU miners then asics are not too far off if the coin becomes profitable enough to make them.
Anyway i want facts and it starts with knowing what other coins the X11 coders team or what ever worked on..
Lets start at the begging. WHO are we dealing with and what experience in coding etc do they have and how many other coins did they post here ?
