mmpool.org - 1.5% fee DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mine/tor

[jonnybravo0311]

Congrats on the block find!  Nice fat one, too

[FallingKnife]

Congratulations, MMPool! Great find.

PLEASE hurry back with the merged mining. I hate not mining here. I miss the Mmpool adrenaline rush.

[philipma1957]

When will funds clear for yesterdays' block?

[ZACHM]

I was wondering the same thing philipma1957 

No post from mmpool yet, it has been almost 3 days since the block was found?

[philipma1957]

I was wondering the same thing philipma1957 

No post from mmpool yet, it has been almost 3 days since the block was found?

it has been 36 hours not 72

it took around 18 hours to confirm

so  the delay is around  18 hours.

[ZACHM]

Wow, for some strange reason I was thinking today was the 18th!  

Thanks, you just gave me 2 days back.  

[philipma1957]

Wow, for some strange reason I was thinking today was the 18th!  

Thanks, you just gave me 2 days back.  

He has been this late,but as always when you are waiting on 2 plus coins in my case it creates nervous feelings.

[mmpool]

Oops, my notification of blocks found has failed again. Clearing the pending block shortly.

Edit: I found the issue with the notification of the block which queues the clearing of pending blocks so hopefully this delay won't happen again. My apologies for that.

[mmpool]

Block 443595 was found with a block reward of 13.54762711 BTC which includes 1.04762711 BTC of transaction fees. The total DGM payout made by the pool was  12.81299142 BTC. This is higher than the 12.5 block reward due to the DGM payment system still paying out the value of blocks before the halvening. User a5d78fff found the block earning them the transaction fees making a finders bonus of 1.04762711 BTC. Bitcoins are now available for withdrawal.

My apologies for the delay in processing the block. The pool is supposed to move from pending to paid after a certain time - unfortunately the notification system of a new block found was broken. I thought I'd fixed this last time but there was another issue. I think I've found the remaining problem and hope there won't be a repeat of the delay next time. If you have any concerns about payment delays email admin@mmpool.org and I'll investigate.

[philipma1957]

Block 443595 was found with a block reward of 13.54762711 BTC which includes 1.04762711 BTC of transaction fees. The total DGM payout made by the pool was  12.81299142 BTC. This is higher than the 12.5 block reward due to the DGM payment system still paying out the value of blocks before the halvening. User a5d78fff found the block earning them the transaction fees making a finders bonus of 1.04762711 BTC. Bitcoins are now available for withdrawal.

My apologies for the delay in processing the block. The pool is supposed to move from pending to paid after a certain time - unfortunately the notification system of a new block found was broken. I thought I'd fixed this last time but there was another issue. I think I've found the remaining problem and hope there won't be a repeat of the delay next time. If you have any concerns about payment delays email admin@mmpool.org and I'll investigate.

I cashed in  for 1.933 coins
See below:

[philipma1957]

I need some help  as I have like 9 accounts.   with you

most are idle and I am phasing them out by not mining with them.

I opened them over the years  if I needed to change an address.  I will email you details.

email sent


I am also pming you.

pm sent

Six accounts have dust I stopped using them.

2 accounts have about .19742364  and .22658875

1 account  the main one I cashed in had 1.933+ btc

I need to know that the payment addresses on the two secondary accounts  are   the address of my profile address.
If not I need them to be set to that.
This is really my fault as I used  a cex.io address on one account and I can not access that address.


The address I need for the accounts to be is:

1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje  from my profile info

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=64507


https://blockchain.info/address/1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje


the six dust accounts  I will let stay unmined.



Thanks phil


and I was paid the full 1.933+ for my main account.   


Also congrats to block finder a 1 coin + bonus damn that is nice

[mmpool]

email sent


I am also pming you.

pm sent

Thanks, I got the email and pm and will work on it shortly. Yes, the transaction fees were nice for this block. I think that's the largest we've done. If the fees continue to grow like that we might need to reconsider how they're distributed. At some point the fees will be larger than the mining subsidy and it'd be weird for the block finder to get the majority of the reward while the other miners get the smaller subsidy.

[philipma1957]

email sent


I am also pming you.

pm sent

Thanks, I got the email and pm and will work on it shortly. Yes, the transaction fees were nice for this block. I think that's the largest we've done. If the fees continue to grow like that we might need to reconsider how they're distributed. At some point the fees will be larger than the mining subsidy and it'd be weird for the block finder to get the majority of the reward while the other miners get the smaller subsidy.

   A good point  maybe up to .5 to block finder  and rest to be split to the miners.

 Starting with  next block or when ever we think it should start.



When the next ½ ing occurs  blocks will be 6.25  so  capping fee reward for block finder would surely be needed if blocks are 6.25 + 2 = 8.25 coins

[disclaimer201]

Is there a way to get amounts lower than 0.005 btc? I still have 0.00290909 btc on mmpool.org and stopped mining here a long time ago. My user name on mmpool is disclaimer203.

Thanks a lot and happy holidays!

[philipma1957]

email sent


I am also pming you.

pm sent

Thanks, I got the email and pm and will work on it shortly. Yes, the transaction fees were nice for this block. I think that's the largest we've done. If the fees continue to grow like that we might need to reconsider how they're distributed. At some point the fees will be larger than the mining subsidy and it'd be weird for the block finder to get the majority of the reward while the other miners get the smaller subsidy.

I remembered one of the two accounts

Obfuscated Name   29501a4c


and sent it out it went to this address

https://blockchain.info/address/1AHGCoFspYBSHW8iaqUMHq2VvXXh9r1tUX

so I emptied it and then sent it here

https://blockchain.info/address/1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje


that leaves the other account it has around 0.22658875  AND  I do not remember what the btc address is for it.

So it is the only one I need fixed.   If you get a chance please send the coin to :

https://blockchain.info/address/1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje




the 5 or 6  ones with the dust  can just sit.

  tia phil

[philipma1957]

email sent


I am also pming you.

pm sent

Thanks, I got the email and pm and will work on it shortly. Yes, the transaction fees were nice for this block. I think that's the largest we've done. If the fees continue to grow like that we might need to reconsider how they're distributed. At some point the fees will be larger than the mining subsidy and it'd be weird for the block finder to get the majority of the reward while the other miners get the smaller subsidy.

 

It has been a while  I can't get into my cex.io account  and I still have the one account with you that has good coin.


71602a00      HAS  0.22658875 BTC along with  

some:

 namecoin   please keep that
 syscoin      please keep that
devcoin      please keep that.



please send the 0.22658875 BTC to


https://blockchain.info/address/1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje

please make the btc address on that account 1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje


I want to point .1btc to the   pool  with nice hash rental

thanks phil

cex.io killed the address see below

[philipma1957]

all fixed thanks

[paramind22]

I noticed I put two machines using the same log in name for my worker.  That's ok, isn't it?  The second seems to be climbing up in hashrate very slowly. 

[philipma1957]

I noticed I put two machines using the same log in name for my worker.  That's ok, isn't it?  The second seems to be climbing up in hashrate very slowly. 

What machines?

I used to be able to point six or seven machines to one worker.

S7
 Avalon 6

Did this no issues.

I now point a r4. And a rental.

8th and 100th

Works okay

[paramind22]

It was just very slow this time, worked fine.