|
1blockologist
|
 |
November 21, 2017, 05:49:06 PM Last edit: November 21, 2017, 08:26:26 PM by 1blockologist |
|
great! now we can get some price discovery again gotta shake the weak hands out first and then its back to .0002 and beyonddd ready to come out with a new roadmap?
|
|
|
|
b4h4mu7
|
 |
November 21, 2017, 09:58:08 PM |
|
Anyone selling BBR ?
yeah i can sell you some coins @0.00033 btc  yeah, agreed, just more word from the exchanges would be good. Kucoin is a month late
i don't quite understand what ”leader” they mean(community,boolberry project or tech team of kucoin?). but in any case, those who understand problem from this chat - keep in mind that help will not prevent them. i also don't want to prevent b4h4mu7 (because he put a lot of effort in this regard),so we need to work together.i'm just trying to get some updated information or to locate any problems. p.s. sorry for my may be bad english.my native is russian,know english at the primary level  They are referring to Kent, the exchange owner. The ball is in their court.. they have everything they need to add BBR. As far as I can tell they have 1 main developer and his plate is full from adding all the tokens which has resulted in BBR backlog. Maybe if they stopped adding tokens and focused on BBR they would have it listed already. We've been in contact with them and they've indicated that they still plan on adding BBR. If anything changes we'll let everyone know. The last update from them was a few days ago "We're on business trip, will update you when we're ready."
|
|
|
|
s1lverbox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1039
|
 |
November 21, 2017, 10:10:01 PM |
|
We seen different ticker everywhere. Some using BBR and some XBB. Can anyone tell me which one is correct?
thanks.
|
|
|
|
b4h4mu7
|
 |
November 21, 2017, 10:25:10 PM |
|
We seen different ticker everywhere. Some using BBR and some XBB. Can anyone tell me which one is correct?
thanks.
BBR is the original ticker although it's listed on coinmarketcap as XBB. I have no opinion either way which ticker is used but it does create some confusion since this is the main thread and its using BBR for identification. I messaged coinmarketcap to ask them to change the ticker back to BBR and update the coin supply since they are still using the offline mingergate explorer but they never did. If anyone in the community wants to take up this task here's the information: Coinmarketcap Contact: https://coinmarketcap.com/request/ Current coin supply API: http://explorer.mining.blue/q/supply/10648593.638334142044
|
|
|
|
s1lverbox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1039
|
 |
November 21, 2017, 10:33:54 PM |
|
We seen different ticker everywhere. Some using BBR and some XBB. Can anyone tell me which one is correct?
thanks.
BBR is the original ticker although it's listed on coinmarketcap as XBB. I have no opinion either way which ticker is used but it does create some confusion since this is the main thread and its using BBR for identification. I messaged coinmarketcap to ask them to change the ticker back to BBR and update the coin supply since they are still using the offline mingergate explorer but they never did. If anyone in the community wants to take up this task here's the information: Coinmarketcap Contact: https://coinmarketcap.com/request/ Current coin supply API: http://explorer.mining.blue/q/supply/10648593.638334142044 Asking because we have debate if we should call it XBB or BBR. Maybe ask clint to specify what should we use for market creations.
|
|
|
|
b4h4mu7
|
 |
November 21, 2017, 10:40:30 PM |
|
We seen different ticker everywhere. Some using BBR and some XBB. Can anyone tell me which one is correct?
thanks.
BBR is the original ticker although it's listed on coinmarketcap as XBB. I have no opinion either way which ticker is used but it does create some confusion since this is the main thread and its using BBR for identification. I messaged coinmarketcap to ask them to change the ticker back to BBR and update the coin supply since they are still using the offline mingergate explorer but they never did. If anyone in the community wants to take up this task here's the information: Coinmarketcap Contact: https://coinmarketcap.com/request/ Current coin supply API: http://explorer.mining.blue/q/supply/10648593.638334142044 Asking because we have debate if we should call it XBB or BBR. Maybe ask clint to specify what should we use for market creations. For Bitcoin some exchanges use BTC some use XBT. At the end of the day its up to you which you want to use. I'd say it would lessen confusion if we go with BBR and have coinmarketcap change the ticker. On the flipside, if zoidberg can change the ticker here to XBB then that would resolve the identity confusion. Clintar's explorer shows "XBB" but that's an easy change back to BBR. We're planning on rebranding with the fork anyways to separate this codebase from the new one so ultimately BBR or XBB won't matter.
|
|
|
|
1blockologist
|
 |
November 21, 2017, 11:39:13 PM Last edit: November 21, 2017, 11:52:27 PM by 1blockologist |
|
We seen different ticker everywhere. Some using BBR and some XBB. Can anyone tell me which one is correct?
thanks.
BBR is the original ticker although it's listed on coinmarketcap as XBB. I have no opinion either way which ticker is used but it does create some confusion since this is the main thread and its using BBR for identification. I messaged coinmarketcap to ask them to change the ticker back to BBR and update the coin supply since they are still using the offline mingergate explorer but they never did. If anyone in the community wants to take up this task here's the information: Coinmarketcap Contact: https://coinmarketcap.com/request/ Current coin supply API: http://explorer.mining.blue/q/supply/10648593.638334142044 Asking because we have debate if we should call it XBB or BBR. Maybe ask clint to specify what should we use for market creations. For Bitcoin some exchanges use BTC some use XBT. At the end of the day its up to you which you want to use. I'd say it would lessen confusion if we go with BBR and have coinmarketcap change the ticker. On the flipside, if zoidberg can change the ticker here to XBB then that would resolve the identity confusion. Clintar's explorer shows "XBB" but that's an easy change back to BBR. We're planning on rebranding with the fork anyways to separate this codebase from the new one so ultimately BBR or XBB won't matter. stocks.exchange listed it as XBB , and these guys are just looking for an executive decision what ticker/name do you have in mind for the new codebase? still curious how a new chain is going to get all of our boolberry balances in it easily
|
|
|
|
1blockologist
|
 |
November 22, 2017, 02:57:26 AM |
|
I requested Coinmarketcap, Coincap.io and Worldcoinindex to update Boolberry information, so that we can get accruate price information via API for all the tertiary services people use for accounting and monitoring.
|
|
|
|
b4h4mu7
|
 |
November 22, 2017, 08:04:55 PM |
|
I requested Coinmarketcap, Coincap.io and Worldcoinindex to update Boolberry information, so that we can get accruate price information via API for all the tertiary services people use for accounting and monitoring.
Thanks. stocks.exchange has updated their listing to BBR. Moving forward I hope this will lessen the identity confusion for everyone. https://stocks.exchange/trade/BBR/BTCIf anyone else wants to help out, a request to coingecko.com to re-add Boolberry would be much appreciated.
|
|
|
|
Newton90
|
 |
November 23, 2017, 09:53:34 AM |
|
If anyone else wants to help out, a request to coingecko.com to re-add Boolberry would be much appreciated.
i request.
|
|
|
|
ninjacoins
Member

Offline
Activity: 170
Merit: 10
|
 |
November 24, 2017, 06:50:30 PM |
|
How is the development front looking for Boolberry? Great that we now have a exchange.
|
|
|
|
Kliv73
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 103
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 26, 2017, 09:19:09 AM |
|
I can not remove from the purse v.0.3 clintar from the beginning no more than 500bbr, then no more than 400bbr, then no more 300bbr , now not more than 100bbr
Failed to send transactio is too big
|
|
|
|
hashappliance
Copper Member
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 26, 2017, 09:21:41 AM |
|
I can not remove from the purse v.0.3 clintar from the beginning no more than 500bbr, then no more than 400bbr, then no more 300i, now not more than 100bbr
Failed to send transactio is too big
Wait a couple of minutes, and you will be able to send the rest.
|
|
|
|
Kliv73
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 103
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 26, 2017, 09:25:36 AM |
|
I can not remove from the purse v.0.3 clintar from the beginning no more than 500bbr, then no more than 400bbr, then no more 300i, now not more than 100bbr
Failed to send transactio is too big
Wait a couple of minutes, and you will be able to send the rest. It's not right This every day less and less
|
|
|
|
ph4nt0m
|
 |
November 26, 2017, 04:08:31 PM |
|
I can not remove from the purse v.0.3 clintar from the beginning no more than 500bbr, then no more than 400bbr, then no more 300i, now not more than 100bbr
Failed to send transactio is too big
Wait a couple of minutes, and you will be able to send the rest. It's not right This every day less and less The wallet picks largest chunks of coins first. In the end, there's only dust left. A tx should be within 25kb in size AFAIR.
|
|
|
|
ninjacoins
Member

Offline
Activity: 170
Merit: 10
|
 |
November 26, 2017, 04:13:08 PM |
|
Will there be a development update as to progress so far?
|
|
|
|
b4h4mu7
|
 |
November 27, 2017, 07:17:09 PM Last edit: November 27, 2017, 07:29:27 PM by b4h4mu7 |
|
Will there be a development update as to progress so far?
Yes. We're planning to reveal project highlights with R&D progress once we get all the exchanges and supporting services updated. This was planned for Nov 5th but the delay with Kucoin and other exchanges along with supporting services like coinmarketcap, coincap etc has derailed the scheduled update. In the spirit of transparency and without going into too much of the technical details which will be reserved for whitepaper here's the main features we're working on: - Improved Ring Signatures - Improved Stealth Addresses - Native i2pd Routing - Improved Hashing Algorithm - Improved GUI wallet The cryptographers on the research team are still working to further improve the designs through peer review. It should be noted these designs are unique to the new codebase and represent a massive leap forward for the technology. In a future update we'll be providing a more detailed overview of the new features and comparative analysis over other Cryponote projects. If you want to help out, put pressure on supportive services to update all relative Boolberry listing information i.e. coin supply, block explorer, ticker, exchange listing.
|
|
|
|
ninjacoins
Member

Offline
Activity: 170
Merit: 10
|
 |
November 27, 2017, 07:41:08 PM |
|
Thanks for the update, much appreciated. Will there be a development update as to progress so far?
Yes. We're planning to reveal project highlights with R&D progress once we get all the exchanges and supporting services updated. This was planned for Nov 5th but the delay with Kucoin and other exchanges along with supporting services like coinmarketcap, coincap etc has derailed the scheduled update. In the spirit of transparency and without going into too much of the technical details which will be reserved for whitepaper here's the main features we're working on: - Improved Ring Signatures - Improved Stealth Addresses - Native i2pd Routing - Improved Hashing Algorithm - Improved GUI wallet The cryptographers on the research team are still working to further improve the designs through peer review. It should be noted these designs are unique to the new codebase and represent a massive leap forward for the technology. In a future update we'll be providing a more detailed overview of the new features and comparative analysis over other Cryponote projects. If you want to help out, put pressure on supportive services to update all relative Boolberry listing information i.e. coin supply, block explorer, ticker, exchange listing.
|
|
|
|
1blockologist
|
 |
November 27, 2017, 08:17:26 PM Last edit: November 27, 2017, 10:12:44 PM by 1blockologist |
|
Will there be a development update as to progress so far?
Yes. We're planning to reveal project highlights with R&D progress once we get all the exchanges and supporting services updated. This was planned for Nov 5th but the delay with Kucoin and other exchanges along with supporting services like coinmarketcap, coincap etc has derailed the scheduled update. In the spirit of transparency and without going into too much of the technical details which will be reserved for whitepaper here's the main features we're working on: - Improved Ring Signatures - Improved Stealth Addresses - Native i2pd Routing - Improved Hashing Algorithm - Improved GUI wallet The cryptographers on the research team are still working to further improve the designs through peer review. It should be noted these designs are unique to the new codebase and represent a massive leap forward for the technology. In a future update we'll be providing a more detailed overview of the new features and comparative analysis over other Cryponote projects. If you want to help out, put pressure on supportive services to update all relative Boolberry listing information i.e. coin supply, block explorer, ticker, exchange listing. stocks exchange switching the ticker and breaking the old URL may have delayed things with some of those market cap sites. I'll try to update them what will the upgrade path be? and I'd like to see the new codebase
|
|
|
|
|