Bitcoin Forum
October 31, 2024, 11:55:45 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 [376] 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 ... 486 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014  (Read 1210765 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
crypjunkie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 05, 2017, 09:31:28 PM
 #7501

What is "LD project"?

LD is short for Louisd'or - the codename for the proposed hybrid PoW/PoS cryptonote project crypto_zoidberg plans on merging into BBR. We've covered the surrounding speculation in-depth in the following article https://coinopoly.xyz/monero-boolberry-and-the-return-of-crypto_zoidberg/



Have you any more information you can give on the interview with CZ? Has the interview already taken place or has there been an arrangement to conduct an interview? If so have you any idea when? Thanks
raimch89
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1169
Merit: 1000


View Profile
January 06, 2017, 08:22:38 AM
 #7502

What is "LD project"?

LD is short for Louisd'or - the codename for the proposed hybrid PoW/PoS cryptonote project crypto_zoidberg plans on merging into BBR. We've covered the surrounding speculation in-depth in the following article https://coinopoly.xyz/monero-boolberry-and-the-return-of-crypto_zoidberg/



but louisd'or was never launched, why?
BoscoMurray
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 450
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 06, 2017, 10:22:30 AM
 #7503

Probably best to forget about CZ and merging anything from Louisd'or.

Louisd'or was never launched, despite promises late 2015 and early 2016. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=887482.120

Can anyone produce evidence that Louisd'or is/was ever more than just a bitcointalk thread?!
CryptoRambler
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 06, 2017, 11:44:03 AM
 #7504

What is "LD project"?

LD is short for Louisd'or - the codename for the proposed hybrid PoW/PoS cryptonote project crypto_zoidberg plans on merging into BBR. We've covered the surrounding speculation in-depth in the following article https://coinopoly.xyz/monero-boolberry-and-the-return-of-crypto_zoidberg/



but louisd'or was never launched, why?

Probably because the db c++ work needed for both would take months, and CZ stated that he needed $ at the time.

Apparently getting BBR out of ram is no easy feat, and that appears to be the same point we are at now.
crypjunkie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 06, 2017, 02:18:20 PM
 #7505

Probably best to forget about CZ and merging anything from Louisd'or.

Louisd'or was never launched, despite promises late 2015 and early 2016. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=887482.120

Can anyone produce evidence that Louisd'or is/was ever more than just a bitcointalk thread?!

iirc someone said on the thread that they had tried the wallet for it but i have never seen anything for it, and Louisd'or was only a codename as far as i'm aware.
I certainly don't hang my all my hopes on CZ return as 1block and javajared are working away on it. Also as 1block has just stated on his recent post he is working on adding another C++ dev. With the codebase being so unique i think it has taken a bit more time than expected to get to grips with it.
SebSebastian from SDC is also contributing and 1block has been getting interest from others too...
Coinopoly
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 06, 2017, 07:42:08 PM
 #7506

What is "LD project"?

LD is short for Louisd'or - the codename for the proposed hybrid PoW/PoS cryptonote project crypto_zoidberg plans on merging into BBR. We've covered the surrounding speculation in-depth in the following article https://coinopoly.xyz/monero-boolberry-and-the-return-of-crypto_zoidberg/



but louisd'or was never launched, why?

While we don't presume to speak for crypto_zoidberg, we can speculate on numerous reasons why he chose not to launch it as a separate project.

First: Our understanding (from researching early BBR and LD threads) is that it was originally going to be a separate project, then at some point the repository was changed to private. From there it most likely became a testbed where cz and co have been actively working on it since his hiatus from BBR. Upon his return to the thread he stated he would be merging the work he's done into the BBR codebase.

My work is related to BBR codebase, which means that everything i do now gonna be migrated to BBR.

Unless proven otherwise we can assume his "related work" is the concepts from the LD project.

Second: Launching a currency project and successfully building a lasting community around it is no small feat. BBR is already listed on the two major altcoin exchanges and already has name recognition within the crypto community. In todays world, without major distribution on these exchanges a project is basically dead in the water. Even more so given Poloniex's currency controls that have a large amount of BTC trapped on the exchange.

Third: There are early Dash, XMR and Shadow whales who've taken up positions in this project. In our view, it can bridge a gap between the three by offering something that appeals to all communities. If LD were launched as a separate project it would alienate the investors who've been holding and supporting the project since its inception.
Coinopoly
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 08, 2017, 03:27:23 AM
 #7507

Greetings,

Our latest BBR price action analysis is available: https://coinopoly.xyz/boolberry-price-bbrbtc-consolidate/
raimch89
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1169
Merit: 1000


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 02:27:46 PM
 #7508

very quiet here
1blockologist
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 505
Merit: 250

Activist Investor


View Profile WWW
January 13, 2017, 05:07:03 PM
 #7509

very quiet here

we're watching ringCT proliferate on Monero's network, seeing how well that goes

                                     
                                    ▄██
                                  ▄████
                                ▄██████
                              ▄████████
                            ▄██████████
                          ▄████████████
                        ▄██████████████
                      ▄████████████████
                    ▄██████████████████
                  ▄████████████████████
                ▄██████████████████████
▄███████████▀ ▄████████████████████████
██████████▀ ▄█████████████████████████▀
████████▀
██████▀
████▀
██▀


=
PARETO 

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  The first Peer to Peer Financial Content 
& Information Marketplace

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  JOIN THE NETWORK
         airdrops available!       

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
              WHITEPAPER             
TELEGRAM ■■ FACEBOOK ■■ TWITTER ■■ LINKEDIN
     MEDIUM ■■ YOUTUBE ■■ GITHUB ■■ BOUNTY
crypjunkie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 13, 2017, 05:17:36 PM
 #7510

very quiet here

we're watching ringCT proliferate on Monero's network, seeing how well that goes

How well is it actually going?
1blockologist
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 505
Merit: 250

Activist Investor


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2017, 08:29:58 PM
 #7511

very quiet here

we're watching ringCT proliferate on Monero's network, seeing how well that goes

How well is it actually going?

the fork went fine, decent prep time, some users aren't prepared to use ringct and are turning it off but this looks like an adjustment period

                                     
                                    ▄██
                                  ▄████
                                ▄██████
                              ▄████████
                            ▄██████████
                          ▄████████████
                        ▄██████████████
                      ▄████████████████
                    ▄██████████████████
                  ▄████████████████████
                ▄██████████████████████
▄███████████▀ ▄████████████████████████
██████████▀ ▄█████████████████████████▀
████████▀
██████▀
████▀
██▀


=
PARETO 

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  The first Peer to Peer Financial Content 
& Information Marketplace

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  JOIN THE NETWORK
         airdrops available!       

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
              WHITEPAPER             
TELEGRAM ■■ FACEBOOK ■■ TWITTER ■■ LINKEDIN
     MEDIUM ■■ YOUTUBE ■■ GITHUB ■■ BOUNTY
crypjunkie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 14, 2017, 09:32:10 PM
 #7512

very quiet here

we're watching ringCT proliferate on Monero's network, seeing how well that goes

How well is it actually going?

the fork went fine, decent prep time, some users aren't prepared to use ringct and are turning it off but this looks like an adjustment period

Yeah was checking it earlier about 65% using, be mandatory soon enough. Probably the price of 0.1XMR preventing all transactions using it.
raimch89
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1169
Merit: 1000


View Profile
January 19, 2017, 08:59:37 PM
 #7513

no bi-weekly update?
crypjunkie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 19, 2017, 09:06:44 PM
 #7514

no bi-weekly update?

Yes 1block is working on it now, will be posted today.
1blockologist
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 505
Merit: 250

Activist Investor


View Profile WWW
January 20, 2017, 04:31:42 AM
 #7515

cross-posted here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1611499.msg17560977#msg17560977

Boolberry Network Address January 19, 2017

We are ramping up development and need to clarify a couple of things.

Donation Process
This update is primarily around formalizing the donations process.

Sporadically, people have donated to @blockology and that has been very helpful. Although the 1% miner tax has not been a priority incentive, this is still enabled and goes to CZ, voluntary donations would spur development better.

There are several objectives and key results which can be funded directly and this will allow the people that worked on those things to be paid directly without ambiguity.

This too is modeled after Monero’s approach to donations and development funding.

For example, there are several approaches to the seed node solution, and they require owning multiple domain names and setting the A names to stable peers.

The domain names themselves would have a cost and having at least one highly connected node under our control would a cost. And paying for it years into the future would be prudent.

Similarly, binaries, and the LMDB are very high priorities.

I’ll be organizing this more in the coming days, showing what the primary objectives are.

Cryptonote

Monero forked to include RingCT and I’ve been monitoring developments in that front, with Boolberry in mind. RingCT has been on the development roadmap since the first research paper was released, and it would require a hard fork in Boolberry.

For now, if a flaw is found in RingCT then boolberry is a good fallback network. If all goes well we would be looking to have the Boolberry community update via hard fork. There would be no contentious hard forks and there are a lot of improvements to bring over without a hard fork.




                                     
                                    ▄██
                                  ▄████
                                ▄██████
                              ▄████████
                            ▄██████████
                          ▄████████████
                        ▄██████████████
                      ▄████████████████
                    ▄██████████████████
                  ▄████████████████████
                ▄██████████████████████
▄███████████▀ ▄████████████████████████
██████████▀ ▄█████████████████████████▀
████████▀
██████▀
████▀
██▀


=
PARETO 

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  The first Peer to Peer Financial Content 
& Information Marketplace

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  JOIN THE NETWORK
         airdrops available!       

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
              WHITEPAPER             
TELEGRAM ■■ FACEBOOK ■■ TWITTER ■■ LINKEDIN
     MEDIUM ■■ YOUTUBE ■■ GITHUB ■■ BOUNTY
crypjunkie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 20, 2017, 01:47:42 PM
 #7516

cross-posted here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1611499.msg17560977#msg17560977

Boolberry Network Address January 19, 2017

We are ramping up development and need to clarify a couple of things.

Donation Process
This update is primarily around formalizing the donations process.

Sporadically, people have donated to @blockology and that has been very helpful. Although the 1% miner tax has not been a priority incentive, this is still enabled and goes to CZ, voluntary donations would spur development better.

There are several objectives and key results which can be funded directly and this will allow the people that worked on those things to be paid directly without ambiguity.

This too is modeled after Monero’s approach to donations and development funding.

For example, there are several approaches to the seed node solution, and they require owning multiple domain names and setting the A names to stable peers.

The domain names themselves would have a cost and having at least one highly connected node under our control would a cost. And paying for it years into the future would be prudent.

Similarly, binaries, and the LMDB are very high priorities.

I’ll be organizing this more in the coming days, showing what the primary objectives are.

Cryptonote

Monero forked to include RingCT and I’ve been monitoring developments in that front, with Boolberry in mind. RingCT has been on the development roadmap since the first research paper was released, and it would require a hard fork in Boolberry.

For now, if a flaw is found in RingCT then boolberry is a good fallback network. If all goes well we would be looking to have the Boolberry community update via hard fork. There would be no contentious hard forks and there are a lot of improvements to bring over without a hard fork.


Firstly thanks for the update and it's good to hear that development is going to be getting ramped up, have you got any figures for costs on the setting up of multiple domains and related costs to the seed node problem? I assume binaries and things like LMDB will be priced up by the contributing dev.

1blockologist
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 505
Merit: 250

Activist Investor


View Profile WWW
January 20, 2017, 05:46:51 PM
 #7517

cross-posted here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1611499.msg17560977#msg17560977

Boolberry Network Address January 19, 2017

We are ramping up development and need to clarify a couple of things.

Donation Process
This update is primarily around formalizing the donations process.

Sporadically, people have donated to @blockology and that has been very helpful. Although the 1% miner tax has not been a priority incentive, this is still enabled and goes to CZ, voluntary donations would spur development better.

There are several objectives and key results which can be funded directly and this will allow the people that worked on those things to be paid directly without ambiguity.

This too is modeled after Monero’s approach to donations and development funding.

For example, there are several approaches to the seed node solution, and they require owning multiple domain names and setting the A names to stable peers.

The domain names themselves would have a cost and having at least one highly connected node under our control would a cost. And paying for it years into the future would be prudent.

Similarly, binaries, and the LMDB are very high priorities.

I’ll be organizing this more in the coming days, showing what the primary objectives are.

Cryptonote

Monero forked to include RingCT and I’ve been monitoring developments in that front, with Boolberry in mind. RingCT has been on the development roadmap since the first research paper was released, and it would require a hard fork in Boolberry.

For now, if a flaw is found in RingCT then boolberry is a good fallback network. If all goes well we would be looking to have the Boolberry community update via hard fork. There would be no contentious hard forks and there are a lot of improvements to bring over without a hard fork.


Firstly thanks for the update and it's good to hear that development is going to be getting ramped up, have you got any figures for costs on the setting up of multiple domains and related costs to the seed node problem? I assume binaries and things like LMDB will be priced up by the contributing dev.



yes I have cost figures

I'll be working on the binaries and LMDB as well, although the project management and community aspect has been time consuming, still expect code Smiley

                                     
                                    ▄██
                                  ▄████
                                ▄██████
                              ▄████████
                            ▄██████████
                          ▄████████████
                        ▄██████████████
                      ▄████████████████
                    ▄██████████████████
                  ▄████████████████████
                ▄██████████████████████
▄███████████▀ ▄████████████████████████
██████████▀ ▄█████████████████████████▀
████████▀
██████▀
████▀
██▀


=
PARETO 

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  The first Peer to Peer Financial Content 
& Information Marketplace

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
  JOIN THE NETWORK
         airdrops available!       

██
 █
██
 █
██
 █
              WHITEPAPER             
TELEGRAM ■■ FACEBOOK ■■ TWITTER ■■ LINKEDIN
     MEDIUM ■■ YOUTUBE ■■ GITHUB ■■ BOUNTY
crypjunkie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 20, 2017, 08:34:24 PM
 #7518

For anyone interested in joining in on the chat about the recent update and funding please feel free to join the slack @  https://boolberry.herokuapp.com
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167

MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG


View Profile
January 27, 2017, 11:43:20 AM
 #7519

cross-posted here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1611499.msg17560977#msg17560977

Boolberry Network Address January 19, 2017

We are ramping up development and need to clarify a couple of things.

Donation Process
This update is primarily around formalizing the donations process.

Sporadically, people have donated to @blockology and that has been very helpful. Although the 1% miner tax has not been a priority incentive, this is still enabled and goes to CZ, voluntary donations would spur development better.

There are several objectives and key results which can be funded directly and this will allow the people that worked on those things to be paid directly without ambiguity.

This too is modeled after Monero’s approach to donations and development funding.

For example, there are several approaches to the seed node solution, and they require owning multiple domain names and setting the A names to stable peers.

The domain names themselves would have a cost and having at least one highly connected node under our control would a cost. And paying for it years into the future would be prudent.

Similarly, binaries, and the LMDB are very high priorities.

I’ll be organizing this more in the coming days, showing what the primary objectives are.

Cryptonote

Monero forked to include RingCT and I’ve been monitoring developments in that front, with Boolberry in mind. RingCT has been on the development roadmap since the first research paper was released, and it would require a hard fork in Boolberry.

For now, if a flaw is found in RingCT then boolberry is a good fallback network. If all goes well we would be looking to have the Boolberry community update via hard fork. There would be no contentious hard forks and there are a lot of improvements to bring over without a hard fork.





How about we fork BBR and increase the tax to 5% and send it to a a multi sig wallet with a full ledger. Would this aid development? BBR's development is pretty much at a snails pace compared to other projects. It is the lack of devleopment funds I expect which is causing this. Let's beef up the tax and beef up the dev team?

jwinterm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3136
Merit: 1116



View Profile
January 27, 2017, 04:12:07 PM
 #7520

There's no multisig in Boolberry or other cryptonotes, and Monero seems to be doing just fine without 1, 5, or more % dev taxes.
Pages: « 1 ... 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 [376] 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 ... 486 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!