Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 03:03:13 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 [197] 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 ... 486 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014  (Read 1210689 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
crypto_zoidberg (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 976
Merit: 646



View Profile WWW
September 15, 2014, 12:06:16 AM
 #3921

Have any of your heard the Buzz about Stealth Coin? I'm still a staunch supporter of Boolberry, and am holding and mining the coin, but I'd like to get the communities opinion about what I've read over on the Stealth coin forum. Here is what there saying about Boolberry and Monero.


"StealthCoin will implement (Sublinear signatures) "Chandran Signatures"  - this is ring signatures WITHOUT the block chain bloat                                                        
Ring signatures provide TRUE anoniminity - there is no doubt about that - but they suffer from bloating the block chain - this is why sublinear signatures are a good way to do anon - but wihout the bloat. Ring Signature coins (Crypto Note Coins) are not feasible for high volume transactions - the chain would grow to large to fast if people started using it like bitcoin or litecoin is used - Stealthcoin wont have this problem - which means stealthcoin could handle VISA or Mastercard type volume without being bloated out to butt fuck no where                                                        

Chandran signatures are square root in size - so it means that a 36KB ring signature now becomes a 4KB Chandran signature - means less space eaten on the block chain (faster synch times etc.) Crypto Note coins are impractical due to the large space requirements - this is why stealth will utilize "Sub linear Signatures" or "Chandran signatures" and be immune to the bloat - it allows to handle bitcoin volume like transactions. Chandran signatures (sublinear signatures) were conceptualized at UCLA (they are a real thing that DOES work) - stealth coin will be the FIRST coin to implant such thing                                                        
                                                        
BBR (Boolberry) was close to solving the bloat problem by pruning and expiring signatures - but this is not the optimal way to do it - "Chandran" SubLinear signatures is the PROPER and optimal way to do it - by means that the signatures themselves will no consume near the space - so no need to prune                                                    

AND THAT'S WHY XST WILL SEE AT LEAST A 10m MARKETCAP. THIS IS JUST THE BEGINING.




What does this mean? I'd love to hear your options on this?HuhHuh

At first, as i know, "Chandran signatures" will be slower(algorithmically) than CryptoNote ring signatures, so it's hard to talk about visa or mastercard volume.

Second, as i also read - there need trusted setup.(common reference string model,  http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/nichandr/ringsignaturessublinear.pdf)

Third even if they have less size RS - it's still not the same as zero size of pruned RS in Boolberry blockchain.


Anyway, i think this is interested project and will keep watching progress.

Zoidberg






1714834993
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714834993

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714834993
Reply with quote  #2

1714834993
Report to moderator
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714834993
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714834993

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714834993
Reply with quote  #2

1714834993
Report to moderator
1714834993
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714834993

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714834993
Reply with quote  #2

1714834993
Report to moderator
1714834993
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714834993

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714834993
Reply with quote  #2

1714834993
Report to moderator
sonoIO
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 209
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 12:39:13 AM
 #3922

In order for a coin to get wide scale recognition and adoption it needs to have a decent volume for quite some time....

All should make sure to vote for BBR at https://hitbtc.com/vote
It is northern EU based exchange responsible for 35-50% volume of other CryptoNotes. You can vote there once a day
sonoIO
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 209
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 12:45:36 AM
Last edit: September 15, 2014, 01:06:15 AM by sonoIO
 #3923

@clintar and @mbk - small suggestion:  Would you be willing to add a parameter to the username for your pools that allows users to increase the minimum payout value?

I'm getting a lot of 0.1 BBR payouts from the Clintar pool, and I don't really care about timeliness (I'd rather inflict fewer transactions on the network).  If I could do something like -u <address>.10 or something to reduce payout frequency, I'd totally take advantage of it. Smiley

Thanks!

dga, your mining power is not insignificant, is there another reason beside help tuning the BBR pool-mining system why you do not solo-mine with your rigs?
tuanvtau
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 179
Merit: 100


Glow Like Dat


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 12:47:28 AM
 #3924

is bittrex fix?

[ w h i t e p a p e r ]                      U B O N I U M                      [ a n n   t h r e a d ]
⚫  ETCF MARKET™       ⚫  UBOPAY™       ⚫  UBOBANK™       ⚫  UBOCARD™
Join Our TELEGRAM Community        ||     UBOCOIN PRE-ICO    March 1st
dga
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 737
Merit: 511


View Profile WWW
September 15, 2014, 01:14:05 AM
 #3925

@clintar and @mbk - small suggestion:  Would you be willing to add a parameter to the username for your pools that allows users to increase the minimum payout value?

I'm getting a lot of 0.1 BBR payouts from the Clintar pool, and I don't really care about timeliness (I'd rather inflict fewer transactions on the network).  If I could do something like -u <address>.10 or something to reduce payout frequency, I'd totally take advantage of it. Smiley

Thanks!

dga, your mining power is not insignificant, is there another reason beside help tuning the BBR pool-mining system why you do not solo-mine with your rigs?

For no real reason, I solo with my nvidia rigs, but I have one AMD GPU rig that's running an older build of linux, etc., etc., where I was just lazy and grabbed the pool client.  So 22 750tis are all soloing, but 3x 290x GPUs are on clintar's pool.  It's only about 2.6mh/s from that rig -- I probably should mine something else with the AMDs, but I don't want to deal with tracking any other currencies.

But 2.6 mh/s generates 0.1 every 30-60 minutes or so, and I'd prefer to just get 1 BBR 3-5 times per day.

dga
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 737
Merit: 511


View Profile WWW
September 15, 2014, 01:19:25 AM
 #3926

Have any of your heard the Buzz about Stealth Coin? I'm still a staunch supporter of Boolberry, and am holding and mining the coin, but I'd like to get the communities opinion about what I've read over on the Stealth coin forum. Here is what there saying about Boolberry and Monero.


"StealthCoin will implement (Sublinear signatures) "Chandran Signatures"  - this is ring signatures WITHOUT the block chain bloat                                                        
Ring signatures provide TRUE anoniminity - there is no doubt about that - but they suffer from bloating the block chain - this is why sublinear signatures are a good way to do anon - but wihout the bloat. Ring Signature coins (Crypto Note Coins) are not feasible for high volume transactions - the chain would grow to large to fast if people started using it like bitcoin or litecoin is used - Stealthcoin wont have this problem - which means stealthcoin could handle VISA or Mastercard type volume without being bloated out to butt fuck no where                                                        

Chandran signatures are square root in size - so it means that a 36KB ring signature now becomes a 4KB Chandran signature - means less space eaten on the block chain (faster synch times etc.) Crypto Note coins are impractical due to the large space requirements - this is why stealth will utilize "Sub linear Signatures" or "Chandran signatures" and be immune to the bloat - it allows to handle bitcoin volume like transactions. Chandran signatures (sublinear signatures) were conceptualized at UCLA (they are a real thing that DOES work) - stealth coin will be the FIRST coin to implant such thing                                                        
                                                        
BBR (Boolberry) was close to solving the bloat problem by pruning and expiring signatures - but this is not the optimal way to do it - "Chandran" SubLinear signatures is the PROPER and optimal way to do it - by means that the signatures themselves will no consume near the space - so no need to prune                                                    

AND THAT'S WHY XST WILL SEE AT LEAST A 10m MARKETCAP. THIS IS JUST THE BEGINING.




What does this mean? I'd love to hear your options on this?HuhHuh

At first, as i know, "Chandran signatures" will be slower(algorithmically) than CryptoNote ring signatures, so it's hard to talk about visa or mastercard volume.

Second, as i also read - there need trusted setup.(common reference string model,  http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/nichandr/ringsignaturessublinear.pdf)

Third even if they have less size RS - it's still not the same as zero size of pruned RS in Boolberry blockchain.


Anyway, i think this is interested project and will keep watching progress.

Zoidberg


+this.  The interesting thing about trying to use sublinear signatures is the potential for even stronger anonymity, NOT scaling.  I noted this in another thread already, but to briefly repeat it:  Once you get down to the relatively small mixin sizes used by BBR, the sublinear effect is probably dominated by constant factors anyway.  The thing that a more scalable signature scheme enables is being able to use 256 or so inputs as a mixin, cheaply, instead of only 4-16.  That would be cool - but it wouldn't be more scalable.

Pruning is actually the more fundamental size savings, as Zoidberg notes:  It gets rid of the signature overhead entirely after a sufficient window of time.

The two approaches are somewhat orthogonal, and there's no prima facie reason they couldn't be used together.  But saying that sublinear signatures are the "proper" way to solve bloat is misleading.  First, it's actually just dead wrong, because pruning solves it to a better degree.  Second, it ignores the potential cool thing you *can* do with scalable signatures, which makes me worry that the person you're quoting doesn't know what the heck he or she is talking about. Smiley

smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
September 15, 2014, 01:34:34 AM
 #3927

which makes me worry that the person you're quoting doesn't know what the heck he or she is talking about. Smiley

Strongly advise against worrying every time someone hypes a coin with confused or misleading technical information. Such frequent worrying will not be good for your health.

Quote
AND THAT'S WHY XST WILL SEE AT LEAST A 10m MARKETCAP. THIS IS JUST THE BEGINING
beitris.dwlul
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 02:17:23 AM
 #3928

 where is gpu pools

tljenson
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 04:06:01 AM
 #3929

For reference here is where I found the post on "Chandran signatures" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=681725.msg8754756#msg8754756
digicoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 15, 2014, 06:07:56 AM
 #3930

WHy is it disabled on bittrex?

Azure maintenance in progress, wallets will peroidically become unavailabe.

Microsoft Azure sucks.Why does Bittex continue to use it?
clintar
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 212
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 07:07:36 AM
 #3931

where is gpu pools
Any pool should be a gpu pool. Try http://bbr.mbkpool.info/ . He should have things tuned well for gpus.
pinky
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 538
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 15, 2014, 07:12:23 AM
 #3932

Boolberry(BBR) is added to BTER's BTC market at

https://bter.com/trade/BBR_BTC

deposit at

https://bter.com/myaccount/deposit/BBR

Awesome.

I advise everyone to send some BBR and help create functional market on BTER.



████████████▀████▄████████████████▀███▀████████████████▄█
███▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████▀█████████████████████▀████████████████████████████
████████▀▀████████████████████▀▀█████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████▀███████
      |                  |                  |            
OrientA
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 15, 2014, 08:31:12 AM
 #3933

Boolberry(BBR) is added to BTER's BTC market at

https://bter.com/trade/BBR_BTC

deposit at

https://bter.com/myaccount/deposit/BBR

Awesome.

I advise everyone to send some BBR and help create functional market on BTER.

Good idea. You can also use Poloniex. There is also an BBR/XMR market there.
jeezy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1237
Merit: 1010



View Profile
September 15, 2014, 09:13:58 AM
 #3934

Boolberry(BBR) is added to BTER's BTC market at

https://bter.com/trade/BBR_BTC

deposit at

https://bter.com/myaccount/deposit/BBR

Thanks! Let's get trading guys!
crypto_zoidberg (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 976
Merit: 646



View Profile WWW
September 15, 2014, 09:36:48 AM
 #3935

Boolberry(BBR) is added to BTER's BTC market at

https://bter.com/trade/BBR_BTC

deposit at

https://bter.com/myaccount/deposit/BBR

Great news!
I guess we should say thanks to James for that as well!

Zoidberg

crypto_zoidberg (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 976
Merit: 646



View Profile WWW
September 15, 2014, 10:29:49 AM
 #3936


sonoIO made an amazing HOWTO/FAQ:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=781961

Many thanks to you sonoIO!
Let's use this thread for collecting all information about BBR usage, i'll be putting this info to website from time to time.

sonoIO is mostly linux-man, we also need to expand this HOWTO/FAQ with Windows(and may be MACOS) information, so if someone feel that he can contribute to it - you very wellcome, contact with sonoIO or post in that thread.

jeezy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1237
Merit: 1010



View Profile
September 15, 2014, 11:02:45 AM
 #3937


sonoIO made an amazing HOWTO/FAQ:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=781961

Many thanks to you sonoIO!
Let's use this thread for collecting all information about BBR usage, i'll be putting this info to website from time to time.

sonoIO is mostly linux-man, we also need to expand this HOWTO/FAQ with Windows(and may be MACOS) information, so if someone feel that he can contribute to it - you very wellcome, contact with sonoIO or post in that thread.

Wow this looks cool. Great info, thanks sonoio!
sonoIO
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 209
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 15, 2014, 09:35:49 PM
 #3938


sonoIO made an amazing HOWTO/FAQ:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=781961

Many thanks to you sonoIO!
Let's use this thread for collecting all information about BBR usage, i'll be putting this info to website from time to time.

sonoIO is mostly linux-man, we also need to expand this HOWTO/FAQ with Windows(and may be MACOS) information, so if someone feel that he can contribute to it - you very wellcome, contact with sonoIO or post in that thread.

Wow this looks cool. Great info, thanks sonoio!

You are welcome everybody! Smart ppl from cryptocommunity are working on a brighter future for all. I'm not a cryptographer so this is my attempt to give something back to the community Cheesy
tuanvtau
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 179
Merit: 100


Glow Like Dat


View Profile
September 16, 2014, 05:33:56 AM
 #3939

i have 3 machi ne, but why connect 1 machine ok to http://cncoin.farm/#, 2 machine show retry...

[ w h i t e p a p e r ]                      U B O N I U M                      [ a n n   t h r e a d ]
⚫  ETCF MARKET™       ⚫  UBOPAY™       ⚫  UBOBANK™       ⚫  UBOCARD™
Join Our TELEGRAM Community        ||     UBOCOIN PRE-ICO    March 1st
thinkpad99
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 654
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 16, 2014, 05:57:31 AM
 #3940

good coin..up up
Pages: « 1 ... 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 [197] 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 ... 486 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!