[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency

[primer-]

Crypto-pool.fr got booted off for the first 12 blocks or so, but they are finding blocks again now.

He didn't get booted off, the fork was NOT COMPATIBLE with pool software. Onishin is a smart guy, i'm not surprised he fixed it in to time (still took him longer than me )

No, the pool software was not updated to support a well publicised fork, even though testnet was forked months ago and available for testing. Why and how would a hard fork support outdated software??

This was a ninja fork, poorly executed. You, the dev team, are amateurs. I'd be worried what other nasties will show up... 2 min blocks are a terrible idea in the first place.. How come the miners didn't get a say ?

Well my current hash rate seems to be 32% , should i try to do a double spend ?

Code:

1009853	59 to go	1627572355	2a97ce44a2e81d932a804668a93f2dd6670154283c04dd0005eeb1a8db47cdd5	3/23/2016, 7:20:59 PM	78%
1009852	58 to go	1621258227	7750098e01c2c457c5e90639883b6be73decb1442931a3bdc018244c6cf75e60	3/23/2016, 7:05:24 PM	83%
1009849	55 to go	1618724176	f20dfbe79664394d9b9920ea7095f516a24b5693f9166a10dbfe63f7db1ddf82	3/23/2016, 6:52:46 PM	84%
1009845	51 to go	1613905042	4977c235f696284b55a42207933c4f045f647ea73efce1e2c280370d0754fc24	3/23/2016, 6:41:44 PM	79%
1009843	49 to go	1621581315	a4a02510f2f376dff190c59486b370a022f01d45683b62bda83a4708bccdf36e	3/23/2016, 6:26:49 PM	48%
1009833	39 to go	1609202846	a937fead88d2a438e11eeaf0e8596dc0cb92a028831104a02406d9734dbb3718	3/23/2016, 5:48:13 PM	94%
1009831	37 to go	1602611350	65b2b5031e39702b8c5130d6254653cd00fbc7fe1bfd0b6be2664ac98776f09a	3/23/2016, 5:43:46 PM	84%

[CTTE]

Great Job Devs!   

[turkandjaydee]

is mymonero get affected by this fork?

[fluffypony]

is mymonero get affected by this fork?

Yes, busy fixing some issues that slipped past

[primer-]

is mymonero get affected by this fork?

Yes, busy fixing some issues that slipped past

"MOO HA HA"

[fluffypony]

This was a ninja fork, poorly executed. You, the dev team, are amateurs. I'd be worried what other nasties will show up... 2 min blocks are a terrible idea in the first place.. How come the miners didn't get a say ?

Well my current hash rate seems to be 32% , should i try to do a double spend ?

I have never heard anyone complain as much as you do. I'd say that you're like an old Italian mother, but that would be an insult to both Italians and women. Your attitude and behaviour is appalling, your parents must be disgusted to have raised a dim boy with such poor manners and such a limited world view.

Get a clue, primer-, you're an embarrassment to nobody but yourself.

[wpalczynski]

is mymonero get affected by this fork?

Yes, busy fixing some issues that slipped past

"MOO HA HA"

[primer-]

This was a ninja fork, poorly executed. You, the dev team, are amateurs. I'd be worried what other nasties will show up... 2 min blocks are a terrible idea in the first place.. How come the miners didn't get a say ?

Well my current hash rate seems to be 32% , should i try to do a double spend ?

I have never heard anyone complain as much as you do. I'd say that you're like an old Italian mother, but that would be an insult to both Italians and women. Your attitude and behaviour is appalling, your parents must be disgusted to have raised a dim boy with such poor manners and such a limited world view.

Get a clue, primer-, you're an embarrassment to nobody but yourself.

I'm ignoring personal attacks not related to monero development...  GFY..

Moderator delete fluffypony's post!

[canth]

I tried to get a dev donation transaction in on the fork block, but it got confirmed far too late.

I hit send as soon as I saw 1009826 but it didn't get confirmed until 1009844. Ohwell - glad to see this was a non-event for most users. GJ Devs!

[bitebits]

That was a really successful HF, thanks for all the hard work devs of the 'Monero Project'!

(and as well dEBRUYNE for all the information provided from every corner of the Monero habitat)

[smooth]

I tried to get a dev donation transaction in on the fork block, but it got confirmed far too late.

There was a backlog of some transactions that were a bit too large to fit in normal blocks before the fork, and those filled most of the first 10-20 blocks after the fork. Things seem back to normal now.

[smooth]

Crypto-pool.fr got booted off for the first 12 blocks or so, but they are finding blocks again now.

He didn't get booted off, the fork was NOT COMPATIBLE with pool software. Onishin is a smart guy, i'm not surprised he fixed it in to time (still took him longer than me )

No, the pool software was not updated to support a well publicised fork, even though testnet was forked months ago and available for testing. Why and how would a hard fork support outdated software??

This was a ninja fork, poorly executed. You, the dev team, are amateurs. I'd be worried what other nasties will show up... 2 min blocks are a terrible idea in the first place.. How come the miners didn't get a say ?

Well my current hash rate seems to be 32% , should i try to do a double spend ?

Code:

1009853	59 to go	1627572355	2a97ce44a2e81d932a804668a93f2dd6670154283c04dd0005eeb1a8db47cdd5	3/23/2016, 7:20:59 PM	78%
1009852	58 to go	1621258227	7750098e01c2c457c5e90639883b6be73decb1442931a3bdc018244c6cf75e60	3/23/2016, 7:05:24 PM	83%
1009849	55 to go	1618724176	f20dfbe79664394d9b9920ea7095f516a24b5693f9166a10dbfe63f7db1ddf82	3/23/2016, 6:52:46 PM	84%
1009845	51 to go	1613905042	4977c235f696284b55a42207933c4f045f647ea73efce1e2c280370d0754fc24	3/23/2016, 6:41:44 PM	79%
1009843	49 to go	1621581315	a4a02510f2f376dff190c59486b370a022f01d45683b62bda83a4708bccdf36e	3/23/2016, 6:26:49 PM	48%
1009833	39 to go	1609202846	a937fead88d2a438e11eeaf0e8596dc0cb92a028831104a02406d9734dbb3718	3/23/2016, 5:48:13 PM	94%
1009831	37 to go	1602611350	65b2b5031e39702b8c5130d6254653cd00fbc7fe1bfd0b6be2664ac98776f09a	3/23/2016, 5:43:46 PM	84%

Instead I would suggest that you learn how mining works. You got lucky there, or your hash rate is much higher than you claim. Probably the latter.

[smooth]

Crypto-pool.fr got booted off for the first 12 blocks or so, but they are finding blocks again now.

He didn't get booted off, the fork was NOT COMPATIBLE with pool software. Onishin is a smart guy, i'm not surprised he fixed it in to time (still took him longer than me )

No, the pool software was not updated to support a well publicised fork, even though testnet was forked months ago and available for testing. Why and how would a hard fork support outdated software??

Moreover their pool software is heavily customized. That was likely the cause of most pool problems across the board. The basic open source pool code we crowdfunded back in the early days seems to have worked fine.

[americanpegasus]

"Two minute block times are a bad idea anyway."  

 
  
   ok, you went to far.  No one who runs a mining pool would ever actually hold such a belief.  Obviously two minute block times are superior to single minute blocks.  In fact, 2 minutes is probably the bare minimum that a proof-of-work Blockchain should have given the current state of technology.

[birr]

Primer's not a professional troll, just a kvetch.
Look past his bitching and moaning, and judge him only by his actions' net effect.
Maybe he's not such a bad person.
I should know the difference between drama and misdemeanor; I am occasionally guilty of the former myself.

[primer-]

Crypto-pool.fr got booted off for the first 12 blocks or so, but they are finding blocks again now.

He didn't get booted off, the fork was NOT COMPATIBLE with pool software. Onishin is a smart guy, i'm not surprised he fixed it in to time (still took him longer than me )

No, the pool software was not updated to support a well publicised fork, even though testnet was forked months ago and available for testing. Why and how would a hard fork support outdated software??

This was a ninja fork, poorly executed. You, the dev team, are amateurs. I'd be worried what other nasties will show up... 2 min blocks are a terrible idea in the first place.. How come the miners didn't get a say ?

Well my current hash rate seems to be 32% , should i try to do a double spend ?

Code:

1009853	59 to go	1627572355	2a97ce44a2e81d932a804668a93f2dd6670154283c04dd0005eeb1a8db47cdd5	3/23/2016, 7:20:59 PM	78%
1009852	58 to go	1621258227	7750098e01c2c457c5e90639883b6be73decb1442931a3bdc018244c6cf75e60	3/23/2016, 7:05:24 PM	83%
1009849	55 to go	1618724176	f20dfbe79664394d9b9920ea7095f516a24b5693f9166a10dbfe63f7db1ddf82	3/23/2016, 6:52:46 PM	84%
1009845	51 to go	1613905042	4977c235f696284b55a42207933c4f045f647ea73efce1e2c280370d0754fc24	3/23/2016, 6:41:44 PM	79%
1009843	49 to go	1621581315	a4a02510f2f376dff190c59486b370a022f01d45683b62bda83a4708bccdf36e	3/23/2016, 6:26:49 PM	48%
1009833	39 to go	1609202846	a937fead88d2a438e11eeaf0e8596dc0cb92a028831104a02406d9734dbb3718	3/23/2016, 5:48:13 PM	94%
1009831	37 to go	1602611350	65b2b5031e39702b8c5130d6254653cd00fbc7fe1bfd0b6be2664ac98776f09a	3/23/2016, 5:43:46 PM	84%

Instead I would suggest that you learn how mining works. You got lucky there, or your hash rate is much higher than you claim. Probably the latter.

Stop pretending you don't know whats going on you idiot.
http://monero.crypto-pool.fr/#pool_blocks

Onishin's pool now doing way over 50% with less than 3MH/s. Let me guess, he's just lucky.  I had 1% total hash rate before the fork, over 15% now.

[magico]

Poloniex deposits and withdrawals temporarily disabled.

[primer-]

Poloniex deposits and withdrawals temporarily disabled.

I emailed busoni 2h ago, asked him to keep deposits/withdrawals down for at least 24h.

[aiwe]

Shapeshift is disabled too. I guess just in case, until network calms down.

[primer-]

Shapeshift is disabled too. I guess just in case, until network calms down.

Difficulty adjustment is completely fucked up. Have they changed the diff. retarget algo ?