WE PAY FOR SIGNATURE EVEN MORE. UP TO 0.0016 BTCs PER POST. W

[ReBoRn]

So did this one really turn into scam?  Or did OP promise to pay on 5th but hasn't been active?

Best thing for all is wait for OP until 5 July then give any comments about him and his service currently no one can say he is without payment because monthly pay day is 5 July

[BitCoinDream]

I left this campaign, but it doesn't make much sense for the op to run away. He already has several negative feedbacks and that can ruin his site. Unless he was losing money because of the campaign. A month of payments will (would?) hurt his pocket much more than a week or two.

None of his -ve feedbacks are from trusted members. So those dont have much significance to him.

[zimmah]

even if he's back and pays everyone at 5th, still will be a scam because many changed their signatures due to lack of response from OP.


Only way to correct that would be pay everyone enrolled by posts made in this month, regardless wether they keep the OP's signature or not, but I know this would never happen

that is their own choice, and they broke the agreement, not the OP.

You can't expect to enroll in a monthly sig campaign, get paid for your posts even though you changed your sig, and than get paid by the new sig campaign as well.

What the hell are you smoking?

[haploid23]

So many problems with this sig campaign. I'm glad I jumped ship as early as I did. A few hiccups is understandable, but there were many problems that were pointed out early on in the campaign. OP came back but never addressed those problems, so this foreshadows what will probably happen, which is exactly what's going on right now.

[sed]

The fact that the thread topic isn't even updated to "montly payouts" despite the fact that this changed over 3 weeks ago is a terrible omen, I think.

[BitcoinTraders]

Count me please!
Start post:252
Bitcoin address:1Pktp5gCfi44WhNwgZV7oCtMMiWuJ8cwEA
Thanks

[anujjain]

Count me please!
Start post:252
Bitcoin address:1Pktp5gCfi44WhNwgZV7oCtMMiWuJ8cwEA
Thanks

This campaign is not active, Op did not login last 3 weeks so better choose another campaign.

[Zyborg]

Shouldn't someone mark him with negative trust for not monitoring his campaign and paying out properly?
Most people will remember the name but for new users it might be helpful.

[u9y42]

Shouldn't someone mark him with negative trust for not monitoring his campaign and paying out properly?
Most people will remember the name but for new users it might be helpful.

He has already received a few negative feedbacks, just not from people on the default trust list. Still, he might not have done due diligence with this campaign and there are certainly a lot of outstanding issues, but it's probably better to wait until July 5, when he is supposed to return and pay people out, before branding him as a spammer.

[EternalWingsofGod]

Shouldn't someone mark him with negative trust for not monitoring his campaign and paying out properly?
Most people will remember the name but for new users it might be helpful.

Well the default trust list should start looking at this campaign soon
They are likely waiting a few more days on this just in case he appears at the beginning of july

[moreia]

Shouldn't someone mark him with negative trust for not monitoring his campaign and paying out properly?
Most people will remember the name but for new users it might be helpful.

My trust probably doesn't make a difference, but I have now done so.
I'm looking for a sig campaign sad the owner didn't uphold his advertisement

[zimmah]

Count me please!
Start post:252
Bitcoin address:1Pktp5gCfi44WhNwgZV7oCtMMiWuJ8cwEA
Thanks

This campaign is not active, Op did not login last 3 weeks so better choose another campaign.

The campaign is active until the op either

1) is not online by July 5 or
2) sais he ends this campaign.

Until then quit whining.

Shouldn't someone mark him with negative trust for not monitoring his campaign and paying out properly?
Most people will remember the name but for new users it might be helpful.

My trust probably doesn't make a difference, but I have now done so.
I'm looking for a sig campaign sad the owner didn't uphold his advertisement

This thread must be full of time travelers.

[jjc326]

Count me please!
Start post:252
Bitcoin address:1Pktp5gCfi44WhNwgZV7oCtMMiWuJ8cwEA
Thanks

This campaign is not active, Op did not login last 3 weeks so better choose another campaign.

The campaign is active until the op either

1) is not online by July 5 or
2) sais he ends this campaign.

Until then quit whining.

Shouldn't someone mark him with negative trust for not monitoring his campaign and paying out properly?
Most people will remember the name but for new users it might be helpful.

My trust probably doesn't make a difference, but I have now done so.
I'm looking for a sig campaign sad the owner didn't uphold his advertisement

This thread must be full of time travelers.

zimmah, I agree.  These people, ugh, what do you think, that the OP need to "reassure" you guys over and over?  Listen he said July 5.  If he doesn't come by July 5, then yes it's totally a scam and every single one of us should mark him negative feedback.  I agree it does not LOOK good, but all these people complaining and giving negative feedback, you're just flat out wrong.  You might end up being right, but he hasn't breached ANYTHING yet.

[wasserman99]

I'm withdrawing. Best of luck, Updown.BT and to all particpants.

[ranlo]

zimmah, I agree.  These people, ugh, what do you think, that the OP need to "reassure" you guys over and over?  Listen he said July 5.  If he doesn't come by July 5, then yes it's totally a scam and every single one of us should mark him negative feedback.  I agree it does not LOOK good, but all these people complaining and giving negative feedback, you're just flat out wrong.  You might end up being right, but he hasn't breached ANYTHING yet.

Not everyone giving negative feedback is wrong. He still owes me money from the past payouts, so mine isn't even based on the current month but rather the fact that he hasn't been following through with his agreed upon rates. I'm hoping he'll fix that, and if he does I'll gladly remove my feedback.

[sukamasoto]

This campaign is still paying.?
admin has not seemed Online

[zolace]

Count me please!
Start post:252
Bitcoin address:1Pktp5gCfi44WhNwgZV7oCtMMiWuJ8cwEA
Thanks

This campaign is not active, Op did not login last 3 weeks so better choose another campaign.

The campaign is active until the op either

1) is not online by July 5 or
2) sais he ends this campaign.

Until then quit whining.

Shouldn't someone mark him with negative trust for not monitoring his campaign and paying out properly?
Most people will remember the name but for new users it might be helpful.

My trust probably doesn't make a difference, but I have now done so.
I'm looking for a sig campaign sad the owner didn't uphold his advertisement

This thread must be full of time travelers.

zimmah, I agree.  These people, ugh, what do you think, that the OP need to "reassure" you guys over and over?  Listen he said July 5.  If he doesn't come by July 5, then yes it's totally a scam and every single one of us should mark him negative feedback.  I agree it does not LOOK good, but all these people complaining and giving negative feedback, you're just flat out wrong.  You might end up being right, but he hasn't breached ANYTHING yet.

The fact that the only way for people to contact him was mentioned on his site is his threads,  so when you run a gaming business, don't you wanna be attentive to it?   I mean your running a business and all entrepreneurs know running a business does give its financial freedom perk, but also we have to be responsible and pay attention to the website and the users of the website or any programs that organization is part of.  Please dont come and rebuttal when 95 percent of the forum users would agree to what I am saying.

[zimmah]

I'm withdrawing. Best of luck, Updown.BT and to all particpants.

Maybe it's a smart move for cheap advertisement. How many people have posted for 2 or 3 weeks and than left?

They can't expect him to pay out, they haven't upheld their end of the contract, so why should he uphold his end?

He only has to pay out the few members who actually kept on posting with his signature, which at this time look to be very few.

@ the post above me

I know running a business requires a channel of communication, however him failing to communicate does not make him a scammer by default. It's sketchy, sure, but he hasn't scammed yet. (Ok he seems to have some issues with some members who Apperantly did not get paid properly during the weekly campaign, but many others did get paid, so for now I give him the benefit of doubt).

[Gladdy]

OP havent been online since june 5 and thats very bad for the campain

[Lauda]

OP havent been online since june 5 and thats very bad for the campain

He probably won't come back anyways.