|
atcsecure
|
 |
May 30, 2014, 07:56:08 PM |
|
what is the question? User A wants to send to user B, instead the coins go to the XNODE - split across several transactions - that is what your seeing - This part "As you can see you can clearly see the values and addresses, so all the wallet does is replacing the sent from text field as 'unknown' in the GUI" So he is saying you just run a command with the transaction id and then you have the wallet address of the person it was sent from. @ATC could you please reply to the post of this guy? I have the same question This release does not have the multi-path paradigm code which will prevent that. This is only a test release |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
jorneyflair
|
|
May 30, 2014, 07:56:59 PM |
|
you cant just replace the address with others ,this is serious buddy , i got 50k coins and support you so long, i see no evidence in the core of the underlying code for any anonymity. a little disappointing  |
|
|
|
|
Minotaur26
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 30, 2014, 07:57:11 PM |
|
what's going on..
The wallet really anno ??
Is there a whitepaper of the anonymity concept that you could share while the development is still in progress? It would be great to understand the design better it is really not clear to me how it is trust-less? |
|
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
May 30, 2014, 07:57:41 PM |
|
you cant just replace the address with others ,this is serious buddy , i got 50k coins and support you so long, i see no evidence in the core of the underlying code for any anonymity. a little disappointing that is not what is happening here at all how did you come to this conclusion? |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
May 30, 2014, 07:59:27 PM |
|
what's going on..
The wallet really anno ??
Is there a whitepaper of the anonymity concept that you could share while the development is still in progress? It would be great to understand the design better it is really not clear to me how it is trust-less? high level summary of the concept, the multi-path code is NOT in this release |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
the_game1224
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:00:38 PM |
|
what is the question? User A wants to send to user B, instead the coins go to the XNODE - split across several transactions - that is what your seeing - This part "As you can see you can clearly see the values and addresses, so all the wallet does is replacing the sent from text field as 'unknown' in the GUI" So he is saying you just run a command with the transaction id and then you have the wallet address of the person it was sent from. @ATC could you please reply to the post of this guy? I have the same question This release does not have the multi-path paradigm code which will prevent that. This is only a test release Thank you for your answer. So you are saying this test release is only anonymous if you use the GUI? Running a simple command reveals the origin wallet address if you know the transaction id? |
|
|
|
|
|
Propulsion
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:02:01 PM |
|
what is the question? User A wants to send to user B, instead the coins go to the XNODE - split across several transactions - that is what your seeing - This part "As you can see you can clearly see the values and addresses, so all the wallet does is replacing the sent from text field as 'unknown' in the GUI" So he is saying you just run a command with the transaction id and then you have the wallet address of the person it was sent from. @ATC could you please reply to the post of this guy? I have the same question This release does not have the multi-path paradigm code which will prevent that. This is only a test release Thank you for your answer. So you are saying this test release is only anonymous if you use the GUI? Running a simple command reveals the origin wallet address if you know the transaction id? If that's the case, then this coin is not anonymous at all. |
|
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:03:34 PM |
|
a bit more description pardon my drawing. touchpad and me not good  |
|
|
|
|
cryptoyeah
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:04:15 PM |
|
advice:
- fully anonimity with noted blockchain technology is unreal and never will be released.
|
|
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:04:32 PM |
|
Thank you for your answer.
So you are saying this test release is only anonymous if you use the GUI? Running a simple command reveals the origin wallet address if you know the transaction id?
the receiver can not see the original wallet address |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:05:48 PM |
|
a bit more description pardon my drawing. touchpad and me not good Thank You for posting this! |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
georgeblair
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:05:57 PM |
|
If that's the case, then this coin is not anonymous at all.
from page one, day one: Anonymous Transactions: In Development what is everyone's problem jumping down the dev's throat at every turn? yowzers.... |
|
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:06:58 PM |
|
advice:
- fully anonimity with noted blockchain technology is unreal and never will be released.
Admittedly, it's quite a hack to make something transparent work anonymously. At most you can obfuscate things to a degree that is untraceable by 99.9999% of third parties, except some large adversary like the NSA which can control networks, nodes, entire coins through their $$$ etc etc. NSA-proofing (full anonymity) on the bitcoin's blockchain tech will require some very smart thinking. |
|
|
|
|
|
the_game1224
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:07:23 PM |
|
Thank you for your answer.
So you are saying this test release is only anonymous if you use the GUI? Running a simple command reveals the origin wallet address if you know the transaction id?
the receiver can not see the original wallet address Now I'm really confused. What address was shown in the post I asked about (mwcaGKQNeJGuaan2m1YQHfSoYJQV3ykiu5)? |
|
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:07:56 PM |
|
If that's the case, then this coin is not anonymous at all.
from page one, day one: Anonymous Transactions: In Development what is everyone's problem jumping down the dev's throat at every turn? yowzers.... They are trying to understand if the dev is for real / if he can deliver what he promises. Depending one's assessment of the situation, one can either buy or sell. |
|
|
|
|
|
jorneyflair
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:08:08 PM |
|
well, i can trust you dev but i dont like gambling...... need some real evidence  |
|
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:08:16 PM |
|
a bit more description pardon my drawing. touchpad and me not good Thank You for posting this! this shows the details - user A requests to send to user B (user b address is in the sendfrommixer) - but wallet sends to "xnode", not user B |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
battbot
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:09:10 PM |
|
Atcsecure, thanks for the progress so far. I hope everyone understands this is preliminary testing of decentralized anon transfers.
But I think it would be helpful if instead of answering one question or criticism at a time, you organized answer to everyones questions and concerns in one big informative post. I think this will be helpful. Thanks again
|
|
|
|
|
dida
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
SoNiC BooM
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:12:26 PM |
|
Atcsecure, thanks for the progress so far. I hope everyone understands this is preliminary testing of decentralized anon transfers.
But I think it would be helpful if instead of answering one question or criticism at a time, you organized answer to everyones questions and concerns in one big informative post. I think this will be helpful. Thanks again
+1 +1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
roede94105
|
|
May 30, 2014, 08:13:37 PM |
|
Atcsecure, thanks for the progress so far. I hope everyone understands this is preliminary testing of decentralized anon transfers.
But I think it would be helpful if instead of answering one question or criticism at a time, you organized answer to everyones questions and concerns in one big informative post. I think this will be helpful. Thanks again
Does dark currently have decentralized anon transfers? (sorry for talking about dark here) |
|
|
|
|
|
