[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[Rraider]

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

And this is what you get for trusting a retard .....

[atcsecure]

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

[atcsecure]

an updated release will resolve the output not being split, but I also want to see if there is an actual link on the blockchain between wallet A and C.. so the release covers any other potential gaps

[chaeplin]

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

I can.

are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?"

I use block explorer.

[atcsecure]

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

I can.

are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?"

I use block explorer.

okay POST IT

[cryptico]

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

I can.

are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?"

I use block explorer.

Cool post it so if you are here to help please.

[Grifftech]

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

And this is what you get for trusting a retard .....

Oh yeah, but everyone seems to be all huggy lovie for him though. Good grief people look at the guys post history and shit he says in the non-moderated XC thread. But he is sooo trying to help us

[SpringfieldM1A]

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

Without proof you are merely spreading false rumours, I really thought you were seriously testing the functionality of XC which would have been good for the infrastructure. Sadly you trolled everybody by making them believe you actually found something. Shame on you for perpetuating the endless fudding that goes on in this thread. For the record, I made screenshots of your posts so that when you were to spread fud in other channels it will easily be thwarted by showing your poor attempt at discrediting XC without anything to back those claims.

[studio1one]

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

and I was warming to you as well.

Oh well. I'll put you back in the troll box.

[chaeplin]

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

I can.

are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?"

I use block explorer.

okay POST IT

You don't need it.
You know your design.

Mixer use an address for input.

[atcsecure]

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

I can.

are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?"

I use block explorer.

okay POST IT

You don't need it.
You know your design.

Mixer use an address for input.

YES and that INPUT has NO connection to the OUTPUT - and if your saying otherwise, I would like to see proof to backup your statement

[ethereal73]

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

I can.

are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?"

I use block explorer.

okay POST IT

You don't need it.
You know your design.

Mixer use an address for input.

Come one, no need for this!

[chaeplin]

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

I can.

are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?"

I use block explorer.

okay POST IT

You don't need it.
You know your design.

Mixer use an address for input.

That's design flaw.

Splitted tx with one rx address ?

[SushiChef]

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

I can.

are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?"

I use block explorer.

okay POST IT

You don't need it.
You know your design.

Mixer use an address for input.

and another hour wasted while we could have done greater things for this community

[Slaxt]

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

[atcsecure]

I appreciate all the feedback, and if we see the proof from chaeplin I will review and make sure the issue is resolved in the next release...

ATCSECURE

[evtrmm]

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

And this is what you get for trusting a retard .....

Oh yeah, but everyone seems to be all huggy lovie for him though. Good grief people look at the guys post history and shit he says in the non-moderated XC thread. But he is sooo trying to help us

at least someone is vs everyone praising it when there are obvious holes.  those holes are not obvious to all, but we need people like him to help out.  

remember, it is not about coin vs coin, it is about moving cryptos forward.

[SpringfieldM1A]

chaeplin,

thank you for the test results, but my big question aside from the pattern issue, are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?

thanks

atcsecure

Yes Direct Link.

can you post that data?

thanks

atcsecure

Sorry, You are the Dev. You should know it.

So your saying you can't prove the link on the block chain?

I can.

are you seeing a direct link on the block chain?"

I use block explorer.

okay POST IT

You don't need it.
You know your design.

Mixer use an address for input.

What is the purpose of opting for a design test when you don't want to share your results? It's the same as being a test driver saying "yeah well there is something wrong with this car, but I am not going to tell you what exactly because you as a designer already know it"

Your attempts at FUD are laughable and pathetic.

[studio1one]

I think chances are that Chaeplin vetted the blocks but his ego is so big he wanted to show he had more knowledge of how it works than he does.

If he actually was smart enough to spot a direct block chain link he would post it. As it stands he's just lucky there are not many transactions.

[BADASS]

Theirs only one coin I give a hoot for and that's our XC!