[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[JakeThePanda]

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.

Yeah that was stupid, why even work towards these idiot, no other anon coin has to prove shit but xc, he will find the adress only with md5, he will NEVER admit that xc anon works, NEVER. read his post history

Completely agree, why are people so hung up on this?  All he should need is the receiving address and tx id.  If he can't do it with just that then it works, period.  Stop feeding the trolls

its the mentality of alot of nice people to work towards the assholes in this world. and since we have the nicest people in xc community we attract more FUDster than others cause some of us subconciously feed them again and again expecting them to change eventually. reality check: won't happen.
chap isn't giving constuctiv critisism and he will NEVER stop.  

I think he will stop. He already won't confront ATCSecure in this thread.  If he can't get this correct I think it all ends here.  I'm sorry, but I think if we can shut up the biggest critics, then the victory is enormous. I posted the new challenge in the uncensored thread.  

[JesstersDead]

Well, just had my first xnode transactions come through

So, working for me on v42

[hoertest]

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.

Yeah that was stupid, why even work towards these idiot, no other anon coin has to prove shit but xc, he will find the adress only with md5, he will NEVER admit that xc anon works, NEVER. read his post history

Completely agree, why are people so hung up on this?  All he should need is the receiving address and tx id.  If he can't do it with just that then it works, period.  Stop feeding the trolls

its the mentality of alot of nice people to work towards the assholes in this world. and since we have the nicest people in xc community we attract more FUDster than others cause some of us subconciously feed them again and again expecting them to change eventually. reality check: won't happen.
chap isn't giving constuctiv critisism and he will NEVER stop.  

I think he will stop.  I'm sorry, but I think if we can shut up the biggest critics, then the victory is enormous. I posted the new challenge in the uncensored thread.  

You are naive beyond believe. HE isn#t a critic he is an opponent and he is laughing his ass of that you all jump on his one liners that prove shit from day one the moment xc is gaining momentum again instead of concentrating on the positiv. every stupid rocket picture would be more constuctive in this situation than begging this asshole for another test

[evtrmm]

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.

Yeah that was stupid, why even work towards these idiot, no other anon coin has to prove shit but xc, he will find the adress only with md5, he will NEVER admit that xc anon works, NEVER. read his post history

Completely agree, why are people so hung up on this?  All he should need is the receiving address and tx id.  If he can't do it with just that then it works, period.  Stop feeding the trolls

its the mentality of alot of nice people to work towards the assholes in this world. and since we have the nicest people in xc community we attract more FUDster than others cause some of us subconciously feed them again and again expecting them to change eventually. reality check: won't happen.
chap isn't giving constuctiv critisism and he will NEVER stop.  

I think he will stop. He already won't confront ATCSecure in this thread.  If he can't get this correct I think it all ends here.  I'm sorry, but I think if we can shut up the biggest critics, then the victory is enormous. I posted the new challenge in the uncensored thread.  

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

[phosphorush]

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.

Yeah that was stupid, why even work towards these idiot, no other anon coin has to prove shit but xc, he will find the adress only with md5, he will NEVER admit that xc anon works, NEVER. read his post history

Completely agree, why are people so hung up on this?  All he should need is the receiving address and tx id.  If he can't do it with just that then it works, period.  Stop feeding the trolls

its the mentality of alot of nice people to work towards the assholes in this world. and since we have the nicest people in xc community we attract more FUDster than others cause some of us subconciously feed them again and again expecting them to change eventually. reality check: won't happen.
chap isn't giving constuctiv critisism and he will NEVER stop.  

I think he will stop. He already won't confront ATCSecure in this thread.  If he can't get this correct I think it all ends here.  I'm sorry, but I think if we can shut up the biggest critics, then the victory is enormous. I posted the new challenge in the uncensored thread.  

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

+1

[NewWorldCoiner]

If Chaeplin is willing to be more co-operative, I will personally give him 1 DRK, or 10 DOGE, whichever is worth more in 1 months time.

[hoertest]

If Chaeplin is willing to be more co-operative, I will personally give him 1 DRK, or 10 DOGE, whichever is worth more in 1 months time.

here we go again, nice people desease

[cyberhacker]

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

he already posted something.  check it now

[studio1one]

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.

no.

The MD5 is like a sealed envelope with the address in it, so that when it is revealed we know if the guess is correct or not, its that simple.

[braxx]

chaeplin already answered at unmoderated thread

is it correct?

[JakeThePanda]

chaeplin already answered at unmoderated thread

is it correct?

Why do I have a feeling he got it right?   

[cyberhacker]

chaeplin already answered at unmoderated thread

is it correct?

Why do I have a feeling he got it right?   

answer pls

[hoertest]

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

he already posted something.  check it now

and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me

[randomm00nwalk]

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

he already posted something.  check it now

and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me

evtrmm, where are you now. need you here.

[the_game1224]

Over 20 BTC worth of buy orders in the last 5 min

[atcsecure]

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

he already posted something.  check it now

and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me

evtrmm, where are you now. need you here.

All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two

[Profetu]

Wow. Such community...

MD5 is just to prove a string. I doesn't have to be that, it could be an uploaded image with a time stamp, or a zip protected file. To claim he reversed MD5 is utter nonsense. You can MD5 argrfz-address-fdfgg and that will return a completely different hash.

I am really embarrassed by the people's attitude in this thread. I guess it's human nature after all.

[chaeplin]

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

he already posted something.  check it now

and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me

evtrmm, where are you now. need you here.

All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two

First, say address is correct ?


I will show you hard evidence.

Design flaw.


Is there bounty ( BTC ) ?

[hoertest]

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

he already posted something.  check it now

and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me

evtrmm, where are you now. need you here.

All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two

+1 like the last 500 test, so can you idiots please stop backstabbin your own dev for once.

[greyskies]

In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you?  All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID.  
Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it.  It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.

he already posted something.  check it now

and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me

evtrmm, where are you now. need you here.

All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two

As I said before dev you need to make a dozen transactions, all of the same amount, as a test. Then simply searching for the transaction amoount won't work if you ask him to pick a specific one.