atcsecure
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:38:41 PM |
|
In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you? All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID. Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it. It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.
he already posted something. check it now and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me evtrmm, where are you now. need you here. All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two First, say address is correct ? I will show you hard evidence. Design flaw. Is there bounty ? I don't know the address and no there is not a bounty for that test
|
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
JakeThePanda
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:38:47 PM |
|
In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you? All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID. Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it. It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.
he already posted something. check it now and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me evtrmm, where are you now. need you here. All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two +1 like the last 500 test, so can you idiots please stop backstabbin your own dev for once. We aren't backstabbing anything. ATCSecure put a test out there. I'm not looking for a pump and dump here. If you are worried about what you are going to find out from a test then you should sell. You are obviously here just for a higher price so you can sell now.
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:39:39 PM |
|
In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you? All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID. Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it. It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.
he already posted something. check it now and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me evtrmm, where are you now. need you here. All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two As I said before dev you need to make a dozen transactions, all of the same amount, as a test. Then simply searching for the transaction amoount won't work if you ask him to pick a specific one.agreed, that wasn't a test I put forward here is one XYpmyasn9gRZuaumqjkk9XFccrz24XL2bk Tell me the source
|
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
getmining.info
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:39:52 PM |
|
In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you? All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID. Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it. It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.
he already posted something. check it now and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me evtrmm, where are you now. need you here. All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two Put an end to this.. People posting up "Tests" or "Challenges" need to know there is clearly a difference between "Tell me the FROMADDRESS" and "Show me a link back to the FROMADDRESS". If you are going to offer "Tests/Challenges" then do it right. Run the sendfrommixer 10 times, each from a different sentfrom address to the same sendto address with the same amount. Then ask which address is it for 1 of the 10 specific transactions. (This is needed as with so few mixed transactions going on right now, you can massively cut down the "guess work" when you know the amount sent.
|
All views are my own, except those that I have subconsciously inherited from my parents and those that I have nicked from far cleverer people.
|
|
|
cyberhacker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:40:01 PM |
|
where is @evtrmm?
reveal the address now
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:40:13 PM |
|
In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you? All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID. Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it. It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.
he already posted something. check it now and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me evtrmm, where are you now. need you here. All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two First, say address is correct ? I will show you hard evidence. Design flaw. Is there bounty ? I don't know the address and no there is not a bounty for that test I am saying hard evidence. hard link.
|
|
|
|
phosphorush
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:40:34 PM |
|
In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you? All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID. Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it. It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.
he already posted something. check it now and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me evtrmm, where are you now. need you here. All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two As I said before dev you need to make a dozen transactions, all of the same amount, as a test. Then simply searching for the transaction amoount won't work if you ask him to pick a specific one.+1
|
Your account locked, please contact support.
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:40:40 PM |
|
In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you? All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID. Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it. It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.
he already posted something. check it now and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me evtrmm, where are you now. need you here. All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two +1 like the last 500 test, so can you idiots please stop backstabbin your own dev for once. We aren't backstabbing anything. ATCSecure put a test out there. Actually I didn't put that test out there, that was done by evtrmm So far nobody has provided the source address for any test I have done
|
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:41:12 PM |
|
In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you? All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID. Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it. It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.
he already posted something. check it now and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me evtrmm, where are you now. need you here. just reading through now...
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:41:21 PM |
|
In a real life situation you would not have an MD5 would you? All you would have is the incoming amount and TX ID. Therefore, I hashed the MD5 including the sender and receiver, and zipped it. It is there. the password will be available later - say 4 pm CST, so 3hr45mins from now.
he already posted something. check it now and if he somehow cracked the zip , you guys have to be kidding me evtrmm, where are you now. need you here. All chaeplin did was search for transactions that equal = 2.2, he failed to show any link between the two Put an end to this.. There is clearly a difference between "Tell me the FROMADDRESS" and "Show me a link back to the FROMADDRESS". If you are going to offer "Tests" Then run the sendfrommixer 10 times, each from a different sentfrom address to the same sendto address with the same amount. Then ask which address is it for 1 of the 10 specific transactions. YES DONE received payment @ - XYpmyasn9gRZuaumqjkk9XFccrz24XL2bk
|
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:43:39 PM |
|
Where is his answer?
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:44:18 PM |
|
FYI: * ====> Working block height 28617 has 10 tx * ====> Searchng XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb tx: 7 percent 95 value 2.2 *===> block reached *===> Searchng 28618 : diff : 1 *===> XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.19999 link is : XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb <----> XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28617.htmhttp://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96074.htmDetails for Transaction Hash 3680e4bd53607ff677eb94fd0b15f17cdf21f6c8e89a0b5b573c5a2ee13cfdb5 Blockheight 28617 (34 confirmations) Date/Time 2014-06-11 16:03:57 Total Output 21.49996 XC Fee 1,E-5.0 XC
Inputs / Outputs Raw Transaction Inputs Index Previous output Address Amount 0 762a501de829...:0 XQaYnWevqYVfg7j75qr2YR38R3xbb5xjyw 21.49997 XC Outputs Index Redeemed in Address Amount 0 4eba6dee5d2a... XCfsrU7KGy6hzCmfvF47FjC2Mj56tqxR9d 21.484411 XC 1 dd438f2fbd86... XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb 0.015549 XC
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28618.htmhttp://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96083.htm Hash 1cd9a9bdc8cadc55de21d1dc640aa35bd0bc631f52d54e373b49c1b4ac3a42ed Blockheight 28618 (33 confirmations) Date/Time 2014-06-11 16:04:47 Total Output 2.210008 XC Fee 4,E-5.0 XC
Inputs / Outputs Raw Transaction Inputs Index Previous output Address Amount 0 2e4b75ef5a19...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 1 cd32a1861879...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 2 3ce0db590e12...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 3 02db662529db...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 4 447508bf02da...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 5 2d78dc9f56f4...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 6 11c03ded1646...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 7 621e30ceab64...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 8 94fdca2ed122...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 9 8b9b2670d7fe...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 10 9e0042d13a8c...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 11 3bf012c2084a...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 12 88d3f916833b...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 13 d3c04cd03e84...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 14 c2f94d8a07f7...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 15 6bf82a41a9ea...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 16 41a3ee9ac44a...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 17 5e4064a65a3b...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 18 3dd4c6f4142d...:1 XXh8LXMKYXiZ8dJMs57cBSZ93tDZddSoF7 0.003 XC 19 0a17a0ab48af...:2 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.003 XC 20 2ef543f876d2...:1 XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2 0.100593 XC 21 a5e213619ea1...:1 XFx7u2jjP2TSQA34m6wJRugivcsJPG9yHN 0.003 XC 22 c933acb99fd0...:1 XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2 0.003 XC 23 339cf1265d09...:1 XFx7u2jjP2TSQA34m6wJRugivcsJPG9yHN 2.094095 XC 24 b83aee2ba80c...:2 XYjDp5K1XTHn5ajiVxtaKw7CoL9CzRZKM2 0.003 XC Outputs Index Redeemed in Address Amount 0 Not yet redeemed XU9zPC349F4QVJmcn96d1S86bA9TwiyR7q 0.010018 XC 1 Not yet redeemed XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNuBITTREX 2.19999 XC
|
|
|
|
cyberhacker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:44:39 PM |
|
maybe we need a large scope test.
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:47:06 PM |
|
FYI: * ====> Working block height 28617 has 10 tx * ====> Searchng XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb tx: 7 percent 95 value 2.2 *===> block reached *===> Searchng 28618 : diff : 1 *===> XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.19999 link is : XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb <----> XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28617.htmhttp://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96074.htmDetails for Transaction Hash 3680e4bd53607ff677eb94fd0b15f17cdf21f6c8e89a0b5b573c5a2ee13cfdb5 Blockheight 28617 (34 confirmations) Date/Time 2014-06-11 16:03:57 Total Output 21.49996 XC Fee 1,E-5.0 XC
Inputs / Outputs Raw Transaction Inputs Index Previous output Address Amount 0 762a501de829...:0 XQaYnWevqYVfg7j75qr2YR38R3xbb5xjyw 21.49997 XC Outputs Index Redeemed in Address Amount 0 4eba6dee5d2a... XCfsrU7KGy6hzCmfvF47FjC2Mj56tqxR9d 21.484411 XC 1 dd438f2fbd86... XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb 0.015549 XC
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28618.htmhttp://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96083.htm Hash 1cd9a9bdc8cadc55de21d1dc640aa35bd0bc631f52d54e373b49c1b4ac3a42ed Blockheight 28618 (33 confirmations) Date/Time 2014-06-11 16:04:47 Total Output 2.210008 XC Fee 4,E-5.0 XC
Inputs / Outputs Raw Transaction Inputs Index Previous output Address Amount 0 2e4b75ef5a19...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 1 cd32a1861879...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 2 3ce0db590e12...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 3 02db662529db...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 4 447508bf02da...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 5 2d78dc9f56f4...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 6 11c03ded1646...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 7 621e30ceab64...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 8 94fdca2ed122...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 9 8b9b2670d7fe...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 10 9e0042d13a8c...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 11 3bf012c2084a...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 12 88d3f916833b...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 13 d3c04cd03e84...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 14 c2f94d8a07f7...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 15 6bf82a41a9ea...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 16 41a3ee9ac44a...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 17 5e4064a65a3b...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 18 3dd4c6f4142d...:1 XXh8LXMKYXiZ8dJMs57cBSZ93tDZddSoF7 0.003 XC 19 0a17a0ab48af...:2 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.003 XC 20 2ef543f876d2...:1 XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2 0.100593 XC 21 a5e213619ea1...:1 XFx7u2jjP2TSQA34m6wJRugivcsJPG9yHN 0.003 XC 22 c933acb99fd0...:1 XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2 0.003 XC 23 339cf1265d09...:1 XFx7u2jjP2TSQA34m6wJRugivcsJPG9yHN 2.094095 XC 24 b83aee2ba80c...:2 XYjDp5K1XTHn5ajiVxtaKw7CoL9CzRZKM2 0.003 XC Outputs Index Redeemed in Address Amount 0 Not yet redeemed XU9zPC349F4QVJmcn96d1S86bA9TwiyR7q 0.010018 XC 1 Not yet redeemed XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNuBITTREX 2.19999 XC
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
|
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:48:47 PM |
|
FYI: * ====> Working block height 28617 has 10 tx * ====> Searchng XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb tx: 7 percent 95 value 2.2 *===> block reached *===> Searchng 28618 : diff : 1 *===> XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.19999 link is : XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb <----> XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28617.htmhttp://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96074.htmDetails for Transaction Hash 3680e4bd53607ff677eb94fd0b15f17cdf21f6c8e89a0b5b573c5a2ee13cfdb5 Blockheight 28617 (34 confirmations) Date/Time 2014-06-11 16:03:57 Total Output 21.49996 XC Fee 1,E-5.0 XC
Inputs / Outputs Raw Transaction Inputs Index Previous output Address Amount 0 762a501de829...:0 XQaYnWevqYVfg7j75qr2YR38R3xbb5xjyw 21.49997 XC Outputs Index Redeemed in Address Amount 0 4eba6dee5d2a... XCfsrU7KGy6hzCmfvF47FjC2Mj56tqxR9d 21.484411 XC 1 dd438f2fbd86... XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb 0.015549 XC
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28618.htmhttp://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96083.htm Hash 1cd9a9bdc8cadc55de21d1dc640aa35bd0bc631f52d54e373b49c1b4ac3a42ed Blockheight 28618 (33 confirmations) Date/Time 2014-06-11 16:04:47 Total Output 2.210008 XC Fee 4,E-5.0 XC
Inputs / Outputs Raw Transaction Inputs Index Previous output Address Amount 0 2e4b75ef5a19...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 1 cd32a1861879...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 2 3ce0db590e12...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 3 02db662529db...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 4 447508bf02da...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 5 2d78dc9f56f4...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 6 11c03ded1646...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 7 621e30ceab64...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 8 94fdca2ed122...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 9 8b9b2670d7fe...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 10 9e0042d13a8c...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 11 3bf012c2084a...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 12 88d3f916833b...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 13 d3c04cd03e84...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 14 c2f94d8a07f7...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 15 6bf82a41a9ea...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 16 41a3ee9ac44a...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 17 5e4064a65a3b...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC 18 3dd4c6f4142d...:1 XXh8LXMKYXiZ8dJMs57cBSZ93tDZddSoF7 0.003 XC 19 0a17a0ab48af...:2 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.003 XC 20 2ef543f876d2...:1 XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2 0.100593 XC 21 a5e213619ea1...:1 XFx7u2jjP2TSQA34m6wJRugivcsJPG9yHN 0.003 XC 22 c933acb99fd0...:1 XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2 0.003 XC 23 339cf1265d09...:1 XFx7u2jjP2TSQA34m6wJRugivcsJPG9yHN 2.094095 XC 24 b83aee2ba80c...:2 XYjDp5K1XTHn5ajiVxtaKw7CoL9CzRZKM2 0.003 XC Outputs Index Redeemed in Address Amount 0 Not yet redeemed XU9zPC349F4QVJmcn96d1S86bA9TwiyR7q 0.010018 XC 1 Not yet redeemed XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNuBITTREX 2.19999 XC
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2.. I will give you hard link for this. What is bounty for this ? I will NOT answer your XYpmyasn9gRZuaumqjkk9XFccrz24XL2bk thing. Mix 10times ? 10 * fee ?
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:48:55 PM |
|
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:49:25 PM |
|
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD
|
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
Splatters
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 1400+ Coins Exchange
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:50:14 PM |
|
for who know better this coin, do you think it could have the same end like the DRK? I mean there're only 5.5 Milion coin, and it could give to the money the possibility to gain a very high price. I bought some when it was at 210k, and now I'm considering to take some coin at 140k, what do you believe is the destiny of this coin in the next few weeks?
|
I know why your pray will never be answered!
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:50:27 PM |
|
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD Then bounty ?
|
|
|
|
hoertest
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2014, 05:50:32 PM |
|
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully its the same talk all over again and he never proved anything
|
|
|
|
|