[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[Profetu]

None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..

well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully

It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD

Please place a bounty so we can get to the bottom of this.

[atcsecure]

None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..

well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully

It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD

Then bounty ?

bounty for what?

prove to me who sent the payment to

XWbKXuTjW65VhQ2yk7zhhUbiuPN4XMGE2k

and you can get a bounty

[evtrmm]

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

PW for Zip- OutgoingXCTransaction

[phosphorush]

Give him a boumty if what he claims is not true, no need to fear and all is cleared...

[greyskies]

None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..

well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully

It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD

Cheaplin is a big DRK supporter.

It's in his interests to try and create uncertainty.

Whenever the price moves up, DRK people get scared and start trying to spread FUD.

There is only one reason why they do this... they fear us  

[KimmyF]

None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..

well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully

It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD

Please place a bounty so we can get to the bottom of this.

Comeone, we had a new release & ATC posted an TX. After marketing is in place & final release ready, start talking bounty. For now i hope we are all crypto enthousiast testing a new release

[chaeplin]

None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..

well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully

It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD

Then bounty ?

bounty for what?

prove to me who sent the payment to

XWbKXuTjW65VhQ2yk7zhhUbiuPN4XMGE2k

and you can get a bounty

hard link in evtrmm test.

[evtrmm]

but now I try to unhash the MD5 and it can't   

[chaeplin]

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

PW for Zip- OutgoingXCTransaction

You have 7 tx.

follow input of http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96074.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82113.htm

[greyskies]

Then bounty ?

bounty for what?

prove to me who sent the payment to

XWbKXuTjW65VhQ2yk7zhhUbiuPN4XMGE2k

and you can get a bounty

+1.

Guys for now we should leave any challenges or bounties to the dev, who knows how to pose challenges in a way that cannot be cheated.

[acseric]

I think it is time for atcsecure to back his claims with a real BTC bounty.

I understand some of the nuance of the technology (by no means am I an expert), but I know semantic games when I see them.  Lay out a verifiable challenge, and see if chaeplin can deliver.  

Stop with all of this "that is only part of the answer" bullshit.  Set up a very concise challenge and see.

Anyone here should be demanding the same!

[hoertest]

Then bounty ?

bounty for what?

prove to me who sent the payment to

XWbKXuTjW65VhQ2yk7zhhUbiuPN4XMGE2k

and you can get a bounty

+1.

Guys for now we should leave any challenges or bounties to the dev, who knows how to pose challenges in a way that cannot be cheated.

+1

+2

+3 especially if you change conditions to chaps favour, plain stupid

[cyberhacker]

You have 7 tx.

follow input of http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96074.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82113.htm

did you find out sender address before evtrmm post the address?

be straightforward

[atcsecure]

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

PW for Zip- OutgoingXCTransaction

You have 7 tx.

follow input of http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96074.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82113.htm

The address he posted doesn't match your "guess".. regardless this was just a 1 off transaction .. we can organize a valid test with bounty

[JakeThePanda]

I think it is time for atcsecure to back his claims with a real BTC bounty.

I understand some of the nuance of the technology (by no means am I an expert), but I know semantic games when I see them.  Lay out a verifiable challenge, and see if chaeplin can deliver.  

Stop with all of this "that is only part of the answer" bullshit.  Set up a very concise challenge and see.

Anyone here should be demanding the same!

Not really.  No other coin is publicly testing.

[hoertest]

You have 7 tx.

follow input of http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96074.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82113.htm

did you find out sender address before evtrmm post the address?

be straightforward

you still believe hes honest

[KimmyF]

I think it is time for atcsecure to back his claims with a real BTC bounty.

I understand some of the nuance of the technology (by no means am I an expert), but I know semantic games when I see them.  Lay out a verifiable challenge, and see if chaeplin can deliver.  

Stop with all of this "that is only part of the answer" bullshit.  Set up a very concise challenge and see.

Anyone here should be demanding the same!

No, do not agree. Trust the Dev, he delivered so far and is at the moment the only one who knows his code well enough. Patients, that test will be there one day & Chaeplin is not the only one that needs to check it.

[acseric]

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

PW for Zip- OutgoingXCTransaction

You have 7 tx.

follow input of http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96074.htm

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?82113.htm

The address he posted doesn't match your "guess".. regardless this was just a 1 off transaction .. we can organize a valid test with bounty

Please do so.  This back and forth is really annoying.

[the_game1224]

The address he posted doesn't match your "guess".. regardless this was just a 1 off transaction .. we can organize a valid test with bounty

[hoertest]

I think it is time for atcsecure to back his claims with a real BTC bounty.

I understand some of the nuance of the technology (by no means am I an expert), but I know semantic games when I see them.  Lay out a verifiable challenge, and see if chaeplin can deliver.  

Stop with all of this "that is only part of the answer" bullshit.  Set up a very concise challenge and see.

Anyone here should be demanding the same!

Not really.  No other coin is publicly testing.

we don't even have rev2 yet, atc always made clear that atm it was about proving a link and it never happened