[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[acseric]

Guys, take some time to learn how to read the blockchain.

I wanted to see, so I did...I reviewed the information, based on it - chaeplin is correct.

However - why don't you lock down a real test in which neither side has an advantage?

I'd like to know the truth.

Thanks for dropping in from the DRK thread, could you tell us the truth on why the code was delayed? (again)

And why is darksend not actually anonymous?

IS that why you come here to spread FUD?

Okay, forget the first part I said. Lock down the test, I'd like to see it.
I reviewed the "test" from earlier - I checked the blockchain....did you?

I'm not going over DRK - I've done that a thousand times. I'd like to get this ironed out..cause it's important. Obviously it isn't to most of you?.....
I'm not fighting with anyone, looking for a solution cause I'm interested.

okay, show the link from SENDER to RECEIVER, and claim the bounty - this is an open challenge, who ever post the proof first gets the bounty

And to be clear, the bounty is how much?

[1715559235]

1715559235

[1715559235]

1715559235

[1715559235]

1715559235

[chaeplin]

Really? Good to know.

Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?


 

yes

Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.

Problem is received coins are reused.

Proof :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7254769#msg7254769

I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC

Right ?
 

[atcsecure]

Guys, take some time to learn how to read the blockchain.

I wanted to see, so I did...I reviewed the information, based on it - chaeplin is correct.

However - why don't you lock down a real test in which neither side has an advantage?

I'd like to know the truth.

Thanks for dropping in from the DRK thread, could you tell us the truth on why the code was delayed? (again)

And why is darksend not actually anonymous?

IS that why you come here to spread FUD?

Okay, forget the first part I said. Lock down the test, I'd like to see it.
I reviewed the "test" from earlier - I checked the blockchain....did you?

I'm not going over DRK - I've done that a thousand times. I'd like to get this ironed out..cause it's important. Obviously it isn't to most of you?.....
I'm not fighting with anyone, looking for a solution cause I'm interested.

okay, show the link from SENDER to RECEIVER, and claim the bounty - this is an open challenge, who ever post the proof first gets the bounty

And to be clear, the bounty is how much?

100 XC's or the equivalent in BTC

[acseric]

Guys, take some time to learn how to read the blockchain.

I wanted to see, so I did...I reviewed the information, based on it - chaeplin is correct.

However - why don't you lock down a real test in which neither side has an advantage?

I'd like to know the truth.

Thanks for dropping in from the DRK thread, could you tell us the truth on why the code was delayed? (again)

And why is darksend not actually anonymous?

IS that why you come here to spread FUD?

Okay, forget the first part I said. Lock down the test, I'd like to see it.
I reviewed the "test" from earlier - I checked the blockchain....did you?

I'm not going over DRK - I've done that a thousand times. I'd like to get this ironed out..cause it's important. Obviously it isn't to most of you?.....
I'm not fighting with anyone, looking for a solution cause I'm interested.

Just very peculiar, looking at your posts, you spend most your time on the DRK thread then come over here demanding answers..... Im sure you are 100% legit...

Who cares if he is legit.  he is asking for something completely reasonable

[greyskies]

No-one proving any links.

All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today  

Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.

Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.

[atcsecure]

Really? Good to know.

Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?


 

yes

Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.

Problem is received coins are reused.

Proof :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7254769#msg7254769

I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC

Right ?
 

ah but the received coins that are re-used at not from that transaction, it is from an earlier transaction through the mixer, so a different SENDER

[greyskies]

Who cares if he is legit.  he is asking for something completely reasonable

You are stirring shit yourself with the way you phrase all your posts.

[acseric]

No-one proving any links.

All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today 

Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.

Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.

I dont own DRK, but I am looking for a new coin to invest in.  The proof is very relevant to my interests.

[acseric]

Who cares if he is legit.  he is asking for something completely reasonable

You are stirring shit yourself with the way you phrase all your posts.

Seriously, why are you afraid of having the technology confirmed?  If it works, it is a total win for XC - and I will be investing also!

[atcsecure]

Really? Good to know.

Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?


 

yes

Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.

Problem is received coins are reused.

Proof :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7254769#msg7254769

I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC

Right ?
 

ah but the received coins that are re-used at not from that transaction, it is from an earlier transaction through the mixer, so a different SENDER

also your post doesn't clearly show any connection between the address's from the blockchain

[Teka]

This might be a good suggestion right now:

[policymaker]

No-one proving any links.

All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today  

Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.

Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.

I dont won DRK, but I am looking for a new coin to invest in.  The proof is very relevant to my interests.

you want proof? check the thread that was closed due to FUD, created by DKR member, for a COMPETELY STUPID MISTAKE OF HIS, making DKR official community managers taking advantage of it(twitter), thus plummeting price which stood at nearly 500k.


Thats ur proof.

[chaeplin]

Really? Good to know.

Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?


 

yes

Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.

Problem is received coins are reused.

Proof :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7254769#msg7254769

I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC

Right ?
 

ah but the received coins that are re-used at not from that transaction, it is from an earlier transaction through the mixer, so a different SENDER

Right. not from that transaction.

Used address by Mixer is related after all.

In this case, txs are fewer, so very clear.

It's related after 10 ~~ many blocks after.

So I call it flaw.

[Artoodeetoo]

No-one proving any links.

All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today  

Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.

Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.

I dont own DRK, but I am looking for a new coin to invest in.  The proof is very relevant to my interests.

LOL nice tag team, you have a funny way of building rapport then.. Do you always ask the dev for tests? If its a pre req before you invest im assuming you are yet to buy any coins....

EDIT  so you buy DRK even though masternode payments is broken - interesting.... And it is not even anonymous... Even more interesting...

[Teka]

Just to be sure even if chaeplin proves any  solid links (which from what it seems is unlikely), this rev 1 as in BETA.

[acseric]

No-one proving any links.

All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today 

Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.

Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.

I dont own DRK, but I am looking for a new coin to invest in.  The proof is very relevant to my interests.

LOL nice tag team, you have a funny way of building rapport then.. Do you always ask the dev for tests? If its a pre req before you invest im assuming you are yet to buy any coins....

Do you realize how many coins claim to either be working on or have anon functionality that works??  Crypto is full of scam artists and liars - anyone who isnt skeptical of every claim is just asking to be duped.

[chaeplin]

Really? Good to know.

Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?


 

yes

Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.

Problem is received coins are reused.

Proof :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7254769#msg7254769

I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC

Right ?
 

ah but the received coins that are re-used at not from that transaction, it is from an earlier transaction through the mixer, so a different SENDER

also your post doesn't clearly show any connection between the address's from the blockchain

I am giving you.


http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96187.htm
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96160.htm


Multi input == same owner == same wallet.

In coinjoin,  Multi input =/= same owner =/= same wallet.

[cyberhacker]

Just to be sure even if chaeplin proves any  solid links (which from what it seems is unlikely), this rev 1 as in BETA.

we are good now!

i can go sleep and wait XC to beat other coins.

[atcsecure]

Really? Good to know.

Anyway, You want hard link, that two address of mixer are connected.
Right ?


 

yes

Then code is right. Sending to real payee works good.

Problem is received coins are reused.

Proof :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7254769#msg7254769

I have to prove two address is related.
XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb === XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC

Right ?
 

ah but the received coins that are re-used at not from that transaction, it is from an earlier transaction through the mixer, so a different SENDER

Right. not from that transaction.

Used address by Mixer is related after all.

In this case, txs are fewer, so very clear.

It's related after 10 ~~ many blocks after.

So I call it flaw.

Ah, so there is no provable direct link

thank you

[acseric]

No-one proving any links.

All I am seeing is scared DRK owners trying to create FUD and XC price rising like rocket today  

Just wait until REV 2 comes out like multipath technology (similar to TOR) and encrypted realtime messaging.

Time to start hedging your DRK stack with XC imo.

I dont own DRK, but I am looking for a new coin to invest in.  The proof is very relevant to my interests.

LOL nice tag team, you have a funny way of building rapport then.. Do you always ask the dev for tests? If its a pre req before you invest im assuming you are yet to buy any coins....

EDIT  so you buy DRK even though masternode payments is broken - interesting.... And it is not even anonymous... Even more interesting...

I dont own any DRK.  I am not sold on their technology either.