|
chinchs
|
 |
August 18, 2014, 06:24:12 AM |
|
many ppl are mad about devs inside traders, but if they fud them self, maybe they want to lower the price, to buyback some coins, and if they dont fud themself, the report shows they are trying to solve this situation. I'll take a few to see...
|
|
|
|
|
|
illodin
|
|
August 18, 2014, 06:24:24 AM |
|
recent implementations of Zerocoin anonymity
From the libcubarex OP: "Libzero library in code for future feature support of Zerocoin anonymity . No Zerocoin Anonymity active in coin. When feature bearing Zerocoin implementation releases we will announce it here. When any of our Anonymity features release we will announce it here." So, what are these "recent implementations of Zerocoin anonymity"? |
|
|
|
|
nicklucky123
Member
 Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
|
|
August 18, 2014, 06:26:54 AM |
|
If CLOAK was a scam coin, why they dumped before OneMarket release?
So still hold my CLOAK
|
|
|
|
|
|
poornamelessme
|
|
August 18, 2014, 06:27:56 AM |
|
still don't understand this dump, DRK failed 3 times to deliver!
we just did one failure and nailed to the ground, i still believe in the Devs and the delivering of what they promising!
I've never seen a crypto community so obsessed about a coin they consider a competitor. Most of the time when I checked this thread out for news on Cloak, I instead learned more about Drk. People complaining about Drk trolls (right after cheering Bob for fudding in Drk's thread)... people going on about the price of Drk, such and such instamine, putting up stupid memes and so on. It was completely baffling. And even here in Cloak's death throes, some folks are still bringing up Drk. |
|
|
|
|
YourMother
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1046
|
|
August 18, 2014, 06:29:54 AM |
|
If CLOAK was a scam coin, why they dumped before OneMarket release?
So still hold my CLOAK
Because they are a bunch of fucking amateurs who cannot make OneMarket functional ? Anyway, the idea is copied from OpenBazaar. They just made a cute interface with radio boxes and drop down menus and managed to fool everyone in here. |
The absolute worst people in history, ranked by the wisdom of the crowd: "Vlad the Impaler", "Mihnea the Evil", "Ivan the Terrible" and "Evan the Instaminer".
|
|
|
|
poornamelessme
|
|
August 18, 2014, 06:30:46 AM |
|
recent implementations of Zerocoin anonymity
From the libcubarex OP: "Libzero library in code for future feature support of Zerocoin anonymity . No Zerocoin Anonymity active in coin. When feature bearing Zerocoin implementation releases we will announce it here. When any of our Anonymity features release we will announce it here." So, what are these "recent implementations of Zerocoin anonymity"? Zerocoin doesn't actually exist, the devs for that project gave up on it a long time ago. I think there they moved into something called Zerocash? Or something like that... which I believe is more an analytical piece than anything real at the moment. Any coin that starts off with that zerocoin nonsense gets a red flag immediately. Bankcoin also had zerocoin anonymity, as did one or two others. Of course it was meaningless. |
|
|
|
|
|
mikerutch
|
|
August 18, 2014, 06:44:27 AM |
|
get on that librexcoin looking like a big push to 150k....Im still invested in cloak
|
|
|
|
|
|
mikerutch
|
|
August 18, 2014, 06:47:43 AM |
|
holy crap LXC going nuts....make profit to put back into cloak yeah buddy!!!
|
|
|
|
|
david1365
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 18, 2014, 06:51:13 AM |
|
cloak dev working very well and there is nothing to worry about that
|
|
|
|
|
Starving_Marvin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 511
Merit: 250
Open and Transparent Science Powered By Blockchain
|
|
August 18, 2014, 06:53:42 AM |
|
still don't understand this dump, DRK failed 3 times to deliver!
we just did one failure and nailed to the ground, i still believe in the Devs and the delivering of what they promising!
I think the difference is that DRK had technical difficulties/bugs.... Cloak is fundamentally flawed in their design from the grounds up. It's like saying I don't understand why Leaning Tower of Pisa is so different from other buildings. Is this true? |
|
|
|
|
koralon
|
|
August 18, 2014, 06:55:08 AM |
|
Thank you for the dump, I've just made my fastest buck ever, bought at 15k and sold at 25k with 70% pure profit within 2 minutes. I put back a buy order at 5k  LoL, the volume was so low that you must be playing with very small amounts of BTC. |
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
August 18, 2014, 06:56:49 AM |
|
still don't understand this dump, DRK failed 3 times to deliver!
we just did one failure and nailed to the ground, i still believe in the Devs and the delivering of what they promising!
I think the difference is that DRK had technical difficulties/bugs.... Cloak is fundamentally flawed in their design from the grounds up. It's like saying I don't understand why Leaning Tower of Pisa is so different from other buildings. Is this true? PoSa which was supposed to be trustless is not. The solution that they proposed (block escrow) compound it further. So, the two basic feature of the coin to give it the trustless anon is no longer the way to go. So... it's definitely fundamentally flawed from the ground up. |
|
|
|
|
nsimmons
|
|
August 18, 2014, 06:57:04 AM |
|
still don't understand this dump, DRK failed 3 times to deliver!
we just did one failure and nailed to the ground, i still believe in the Devs and the delivering of what they promising!
I think the difference is that DRK had technical difficulties/bugs.... Cloak is fundamentally flawed in their design from the grounds up. It's like saying I don't understand why Leaning Tower of Pisa is so different from other buildings. Is this true?  |
|
|
|
|
poornamelessme
|
|
August 18, 2014, 06:57:14 AM |
|
get on the LXC train to recover losses from cloak, target 15k!!!
Yeah, sounds good. Bob is also pumping that coin too. I can't see anything going horribly, horribly wrong at any point. |
|
|
|
|
bigozh
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
August 18, 2014, 06:57:57 AM |
|
get on the LXC train to recover losses from cloak, target 15k!!!
Yeah, sounds good. Bob is also pumping that coin too. I can't see anything going horribly, horribly wrong at any point. +1 |
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
August 18, 2014, 06:59:45 AM |
|
still don't understand this dump, DRK failed 3 times to deliver!
we just did one failure and nailed to the ground, i still believe in the Devs and the delivering of what they promising!
I think the difference is that DRK had technical difficulties/bugs.... Cloak is fundamentally flawed in their design from the grounds up. It's like saying I don't understand why Leaning Tower of Pisa is so different from other buildings. Is this true? PoSa which was supposed to be trustless is not. The solution that they proposed (block escrow) compound it further. So, the two basic feature of the coin to give it the trustless anon is no longer the way to go. So... it's definitely fundamentally flawed from the ground up. Let me add though that it doesn't necessarily mean the dev won't come back with another solution that might work, but at this point, it's a disaster. v1 - using Exchange to "cloak" coins v2 - PoSa basic mixing v3 - Posa v2 mixing + block escrow All 3 failed and the dev came back with another solution. So, can they survive another death another time? Who knows... I just wouldn't put my money into it for now. |
|
|
|
|
poornamelessme
|
|
August 18, 2014, 07:03:05 AM |
|
Let me add though that it doesn't necessarily mean the dev won't come back with another solution that might work, but at this point, it's a disaster.
v1 - using Exchange to "cloak" coins
v2 - PoSa basic mixing
v3 - Posa v2 mixing + block escrow
All 3 failed and the dev came back with another solution.
So, can they survive another death another time? Who knows... I just wouldn't put my money into it for now.
I question why they would bother. I mean, why not just make a fresh new coin and start the process all over again? Free of any negativity. I guess they could work on 'something', and hope for a price rise at some point. But I doubt it's the sort of rise most here probably would have in mind... sort of dead to semi-dead prices. |
|
|
|
|
|
akujin
|
|
August 18, 2014, 07:04:49 AM |
|
|
BTC: 165rKPfGJ3ndrG1QziHR6ACnViP4EQHNK7
LTC: LMysGMFjmF9gR9RzStij74msXrDP1NqW8X
DOGE: DRZXGgcKN8kANwko3VycsBVVGqfy6XsSpM
|
|
|
papagravel
Member
Offline
Activity: 490
Merit: 11
|
|
August 18, 2014, 07:07:17 AM |
|
Looks like a tribal tattoo  |
|
|
|
|
bitc0000
|
|
August 18, 2014, 07:12:05 AM |
|
Epic dump, gonna be an epic rebound if it does though this is now a gambler's game rather than investors.
|
|
|
|
|
