cryptoangel
|
|
June 19, 2014, 11:12:36 PM |
|
ok, i will take one last crack at it... i am sure it will be futile, but.....
1.minerals coin - if you have been successful at crypto, and reinvested your profits in hardware thus amassing what is considered a "farm", we do not want you... and if you choose to participate, you would have to be neutered to a portion of your speed...
everyone in the thread - hooray for fairness...
2.minerals coin - if you don't have the time to keep up with all the latest announcements, and mine in a multipool, we do no want you...
everyone in the thread - hooray for fairness...
3.minerals coin - if you spent years building up a user base, rolling out new features and building trust within the community to create a successful pool, we do not want you...
everyone in the thread - hooray for fairness...
4.bittrex - you know what guys, your rules excluded a huge swath of the community, and rubbed a lot of people the wrong way, so we do not want you...
everyone in the thread - this is so totally unfair...
am i the only one seeing irony here ?
answers.... 1. Who says Minerals didnt welcome the big miners? they couldve mined with 50mhs too... A hash limitation isnt a gtfo message 2. Absolutely groundless statement... nothing too say 3. This coin had help from a "big" pool... check the OP... The reason for not allowing other poolowners too have the source, was too prevent this project from failing as well... it wouldve never worked like it did now... 4. again... a groundless statement... unless you can provide a quote of richie or ramie saying that come on man do you really have to justify it?? its just greed. 50mh isnt enough for them you know?? they have to get 20 out of the 30 million coins or they fud the coin to death. well game's over. moves making to eradicate the need and take back the power of crypto and put it where it should be... into the hands of the builders.. the investors.. the ones who want to see coins and crypto itself grow in value and not just selfishly ruin everything that others have worked so hard to build in a sea of scamcoins. you know what, i am done disagreeing, and will just agree to anything you guys say from now on... you are right, farms are evil... they spend a shitload of money amassing gear, just so they can "kill the golden goose" and make crypto worthless... that is their goal - to make mining incredibly unprofitable, and go out of business... yep, you're right... after all, it's not like most farms were upgraded with profits from previous investments... they all got their upgrade money from winning the lottery, or robbing a bank or some other shit like that... nope, none of the farm operators are successful because they played this market the right way... they are all just "asic rapists", as the other guy put it... great name, btw... i may change my nick to that and OBVOUSLY greed is exclusive to only the big farms and the big pools... anyone mining this coin will never ever even think of dumping it the moment it hits an exchange, and the word profit is just not in the vocabulary of a typical minerals coin miner... because you know - fairness and shit... so you're right, and i am wrong... everything is as fair with this coin as it possibly could be
|
|
|
|
MinermanNC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 19, 2014, 11:15:50 PM |
|
Did Bittrex really say this somewhere???
4.bittrex - you know what guys, your rules excluded a huge swath of the community, and rubbed a lot of people the wrong way, so we do not want you...
|
*BTC: 1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
barryzand
|
|
June 19, 2014, 11:16:47 PM |
|
Did Bittrex really say this somewhere???
4.bittrex - you know what guys, your rules excluded a huge swath of the community, and rubbed a lot of people the wrong way, so we do not want you...
no...
|
|
|
|
sovie
|
|
June 19, 2014, 11:17:28 PM |
|
ok, i will take one last crack at it... i am sure it will be futile, but.....
1.minerals coin - if you have been successful at crypto, and reinvested your profits in hardware thus amassing what is considered a "farm", we do not want you... and if you choose to participate, you would have to be neutered to a portion of your speed...
everyone in the thread - hooray for fairness...
2.minerals coin - if you don't have the time to keep up with all the latest announcements, and mine in a multipool, we do no want you...
everyone in the thread - hooray for fairness...
3.minerals coin - if you spent years building up a user base, rolling out new features and building trust within the community to create a successful pool, we do not want you...
everyone in the thread - hooray for fairness...
4.bittrex - you know what guys, your rules excluded a huge swath of the community, and rubbed a lot of people the wrong way, so we do not want you...
everyone in the thread - this is so totally unfair...
am i the only one seeing irony here ?
answers.... 1. Who says Minerals didnt welcome the big miners? they couldve mined with 50mhs too... A hash limitation isnt a gtfo message 2. Absolutely groundless statement... nothing too say 3. This coin had help from a "big" pool... check the OP... The reason for not allowing other poolowners too have the source, was too prevent this project from failing as well... it wouldve never worked like it did now... 4. again... a groundless statement... unless you can provide a quote of richie or ramie saying that come on man do you really have to justify it?? its just greed. 50mh isnt enough for them you know?? they have to get 20 out of the 30 million coins or they fud the coin to death. well game's over. moves making to eradicate the need and take back the power of crypto and put it where it should be... into the hands of the builders.. the investors.. the ones who want to see coins and crypto itself grow in value and not just selfishly ruin everything that others have worked so hard to build in a sea of scamcoins. you know what, i am done disagreeing, and will just agree to anything you guys say from now on... you are right, farms are evil... they spend a shitload of money amassing gear, just so they can "kill the golden goose" and make crypto worthless... that is their goal - to make mining incredibly unprofitable, and go out of business... yep, you're right... after all, it's not like most farms were upgraded with profits from previous investments... they all got their upgrade money from winning the lottery, or robbing a bank or some other shit like that... nope, none of the farm operators are successful because they played this market the right way... they are all just "asic rapists", as the other guy put it... great name, btw... i may change my nick to that and OBVOUSLY greed is exclusive to only the big farms and the big pools... anyone mining this coin will never ever even think of dumping it the moment it hits an exchange, and the word profit is just not in the vocabulary of a typical minerals coin miner... because you know - fairness and shit... so you're right, and i am wrong... everything is as fair with this coin as it possibly could be ok zhulick we can all see that you are one irony loving bullshit spewing troll so now as a holder of minerals please remove yourself and your pathetic non argument out of our thread. one of you many of us your view is just that soley yours so kindly go and tempt others to your stupid silly remarks. To the rest of the minerals gang just ignore this troll, don't answer back after this as that is what he feeds off and is a complete waste of our time, hes' not fooling anyone we know this even if hes warped brain thinks that he is SIMPLE AS THAT GOODBYE
|
|
|
|
zhulick
|
|
June 19, 2014, 11:18:22 PM |
|
ok, i will take one last crack at it... i am sure it will be futile, but.....
1.minerals coin - if you have been successful at crypto, and reinvested your profits in hardware thus amassing what is considered a "farm", we do not want you... and if you choose to participate, you would have to be neutered to a portion of your speed...
everyone in the thread - hooray for fairness...
2.minerals coin - if you don't have the time to keep up with all the latest announcements, and mine in a multipool, we do no want you...
everyone in the thread - hooray for fairness...
3.minerals coin - if you spent years building up a user base, rolling out new features and building trust within the community to create a successful pool, we do not want you...
everyone in the thread - hooray for fairness...
4.bittrex - you know what guys, your rules excluded a huge swath of the community, and rubbed a lot of people the wrong way, so we do not want you...
everyone in the thread - this is so totally unfair...
am i the only one seeing irony here ?
answers.... 1. Who says Minerals didnt welcome the big miners? they couldve mined with 50mhs too... A hash limitation isnt a gtfo message 2. Absolutely groundless statement... nothing too say 3. This coin had help from a "big" pool... check the OP... The reason for not allowing other poolowners too have the source, was too prevent this project from failing as well... it wouldve never worked like it did now... 4. again... a groundless statement... unless you can provide a quote of richie or ramie saying that come on man do you really have to justify it?? its just greed. 50mh isnt enough for them you know?? they have to get 20 out of the 30 million coins or they fud the coin to death. well game's over. moves making to eradicate the need and take back the power of crypto and put it where it should be... into the hands of the builders.. the investors.. the ones who want to see coins and crypto itself grow in value and not just selfishly ruin everything that others have worked so hard to build in a sea of scamcoins. you know what, i am done disagreeing, and will just agree to anything you guys say from now on... you are right, farms are evil... they spend a shitload of money amassing gear, just so they can "kill the golden goose" and make crypto worthless... that is their goal - to make mining incredibly unprofitable, and go out of business... yep, you're right... after all, it's not like most farms were upgraded with profits from previous investments... they all got their upgrade money from winning the lottery, or robbing a bank or some other shit like that... nope, none of the farm operators are successful because they played this market the right way... they are all just "asic rapists", as the other guy put it... great name, btw... i may change my nick to that and OBVOUSLY greed is exclusive to only the big farms and the big pools... anyone mining this coin will never ever even think of dumping it the moment it hits an exchange, and the word profit is just not in the vocabulary of a typical minerals coin miner... because you know - fairness and shit... so you're right, and i am wrong... everything is as fair with this coin as it possibly could be ok zhulick we can all see that you are one irony loving bullshit spewing troll so now as a holder of minerals please remove yourself and your pathetic non argument out of our thread. one of you many of us your view is just that soley yours so kindly go and tempt others to your stupid silly remarks. To the rest of the minerals gang just ignore this troll, don't answer back after this as that is what he feeds off and is a complete waste of our time, hes' not fooling anyone we know this even if hes warped brain thinks that he is SIMPLE AS THAT GOODBYE calling someone a troll = pussy way out...
|
|
|
|
barryzand
|
|
June 19, 2014, 11:20:33 PM |
|
zhulick.. cmon mate... let it rest... we all said what we think... lets see whos wrong or right in the end shall we?
|
|
|
|
alanx78
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
June 19, 2014, 11:22:50 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
MinermanNC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 19, 2014, 11:23:18 PM |
|
Did Bittrex really say this somewhere???
4.bittrex - you know what guys, your rules excluded a huge swath of the community, and rubbed a lot of people the wrong way, so we do not want you...
no... THX, I had to be sure, usually Richie with bittrex has seemed pretty cool in the past and fair minded. Also, as exchange operators, they surely do not want to upset a" large swath" of us miners either. I bring to their market Bittrex a ton of coin each month and am a very good customer of theirs as well as many others that have mined or got involved with this coin I'm sure... I hope THEY (exchanges) all understand that as well. Its a 2 -way street out in here crypto world.
|
*BTC: 1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
zhulick
|
|
June 19, 2014, 11:36:40 PM Last edit: June 19, 2014, 11:54:55 PM by zhulick |
|
zhulick.. cmon mate... let it rest... we all said what we think... lets see whos wrong or right in the end shall we?
you're right... i'm going to let it go, and see how it plays out... and no, i am not being sarcastic... edit: congrats, from what i hear this coin is going up on bittrex tonight...
|
|
|
|
Coinler
|
|
June 19, 2014, 11:58:58 PM |
|
am i the only one seeing the irony here ? here's a coin whose sole goal was exclusion... exclusion of the pools, exclusion of the exchanges... pretty much total control of every aspect of mining and trading... and now that some of the exchanges have decided to exclude this coin, suddenly there is bitching and moaning ? irony ))))))) it's called decentralization. there arent supposed to be any middlemen. they are just here while crypto is building it's infrastructure. understand the true goal of crypto and its function.
|
|
|
|
zhulick
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:00:43 AM |
|
am i the only one seeing the irony here ? here's a coin whose sole goal was exclusion... exclusion of the pools, exclusion of the exchanges... pretty much total control of every aspect of mining and trading... and now that some of the exchanges have decided to exclude this coin, suddenly there is bitching and moaning ? irony ))))))) it's called decentralization. there arent supposed to be any middlemen. they are just here while crypto is building it's infrastructure. understand the true goal of crypto and its function. i promised to stay out of it, so this will be my last hurrah - how can you consider something where the mining portion is controlled entirely by one entity to be decentralized... it literally is the polar opposite...
|
|
|
|
Coinler
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:01:37 AM |
|
come on man do you really have to justify it?? its just greed. 50mh isnt enough for them you know?? they have to get 20 out of the 30 million coins or they fud the coin to death. well game's over. moves making to eradicate the need and take back the power of crypto and put it where it should be...
into the hands of the builders.. the investors.. the ones who want to see coins and crypto itself grow in value and not just selfishly ruin everything that others have worked so hard to build in a sea of scamcoins.
Im trying too knock some sense in him... lol... though it wont work... But I will defend a coin that I like... and zhulick... lets just stop it for now... youve made your point... we made our point... lets just wait whos wrong or right in a month or so... i managed to mine 3k minerals.. i want more.. i will buy them this is the true hallmark and example a crypto enthusiast should set!
|
|
|
|
Coinler
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:02:56 AM |
|
am i the only one seeing the irony here ? here's a coin whose sole goal was exclusion... exclusion of the pools, exclusion of the exchanges... pretty much total control of every aspect of mining and trading... and now that some of the exchanges have decided to exclude this coin, suddenly there is bitching and moaning ? irony ))))))) it's called decentralization. there arent supposed to be any middlemen. they are just here while crypto is building it's infrastructure. understand the true goal of crypto and its function. i promised to stay out of it, so this will be my last hurrah - how can you consider something where the mining portion is controlled entirely by one entity to be decentralized... it literally is the polar opposite... nope, you couldve done like me and throw your gpu on it and get a fair share. noone would get 10million coins while others only got 100. that is the idea and true meaning of fair distribution. not what you have been brainwashed into thinking it is. edit: i will be buying asics in the future as the prices drop.. but i will be buying them to attach to multipools for my choice of pos coin. you see where this is going? asics will suck investment out of every non pos coin until they are dead. if u want these currencies to thrive it is time to start reinvesting and not just taking out.
|
|
|
|
techlover
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:05:45 AM |
|
Why I see so much FUD? Until now, everything looks pretty good, there is no scam
|
|
|
|
liominer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:10:26 AM |
|
Cmon guys do not trust and do not feed the troll please.
I see nothing from bittrex, so pls just stop.
|
|
|
|
zhulick
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:11:57 AM |
|
am i the only one seeing the irony here ? here's a coin whose sole goal was exclusion... exclusion of the pools, exclusion of the exchanges... pretty much total control of every aspect of mining and trading... and now that some of the exchanges have decided to exclude this coin, suddenly there is bitching and moaning ? irony ))))))) it's called decentralization. there arent supposed to be any middlemen. they are just here while crypto is building it's infrastructure. understand the true goal of crypto and its function. i promised to stay out of it, so this will be my last hurrah - how can you consider something where the mining portion is controlled entirely by one entity to be decentralized... it literally is the polar opposite... nope, you couldve done like me and throw your gpu on it and get a fair share. noone would get 10million coins while others only got 100. that is the idea and true meaning of fair distribution. not what you have been brainwashed into thinking it is. edit: i will be buying asics in the future as the prices drop.. but i will be buying them to attach to multipools for my choice of pos coin. you see where this is going? asics will suck investment out of every non pos coin until they are dead. if u want these currencies to thrive it is time to start reinvesting and not just taking out. me - the sky is blue (having one entity control the entire mining process is the opposite of decentralization) you - no, you're wrong because the ground is brown (you could've thrown some hash at it yourself) wtf does one have to do with the other, i have no clue... i give up... for real, i just give up... feel free to rejoice
|
|
|
|
anonymousxx1503
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:14:54 AM |
|
Cmon guys do not trust and do not feed the troll please.
I see nothing from bittrex, so pls just stop.
Just talked to the guys from bittrex again, they're announcing a few coins tonight, watch out on twitter @BittrexExchange
|
I'd like to thank eduffield and the other developers for this critically important evolution in virtual currency. DarkCoin is what bitcoin should have been. Some might call it "Bitcoin 2.0" but would do better by saying: "DarkCoin is digital cash." - Child Harold - February 28, 2014 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5424980#msg5424980
|
|
|
MinermanNC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:17:11 AM |
|
Why I see so much FUD? Until now, everything looks pretty good, there is no scam
Its all good, only been 1 or 2 fudders in here most realize the potential in fair distribution for the future of a coins stability and steady growth.
|
*BTC: 1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
MinermanNC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:20:26 AM |
|
Cmon guys do not trust and do not feed the troll please.
I see nothing from bittrex, so pls just stop.
Just talked to the guys from bittrex again, they're announcing a few coins tonight, watch out on twitter @BittrexExchange Maybe MIN?? either way, I think the slow and steady approach has been sustaining the value. 3 exchanges now and growing that's a good place to start. Don't want the coin to explode all at once then fade away..... lol
|
*BTC: 1DiR25SPo84sThzTATr27EZEQZLt6hv6tG
|
|
|
PepiX
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
June 20, 2014, 12:28:17 AM |
|
i promised to stay out of it, so this will be my last hurrah - how can you consider something where the mining portion is controlled entirely by one entity to be decentralized... it literally is the polar opposite...
MIN coin is not centralised! Don't you see the irony.. a guy knowing not the difference between past and present tense is trying to teach the rest.. Oh the irony..
|
|
|
|
|