LightRider
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1500
Merit: 1022
I advocate the Zeitgeist Movement & Venus Project.
|
|
September 03, 2012, 10:06:02 PM |
|
Me: So a little while ago, Gavin said that there was a big announcement coming up in September. Any chance this is it?
Charlie: No, this is not it. What he's announcing is an announcement, not... Well, I don't wanna say any more.
Me: Fair enough, didn't expect you to go on-record with it if you knew.
Charlie: No, he would kill me if I said anything. He was just here recently. He would kill me. Looks like Gavin's CIA training is beginning to pay off. I wonder just how lethal he is now.
|
|
|
|
Atlas
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 1
|
|
September 28, 2012, 03:04:33 AM |
|
The OP is also a part of The Bitcoin Foundation. A heads up. He did accept $3,000 for reporting about Bitcoin to the CIA.
|
|
|
|
misterbigg
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
|
|
September 28, 2012, 04:06:52 AM |
|
The OP is also a part of The Bitcoin Foundation. A heads up. He did accept $3,000 for reporting about Bitcoin to the CIA.
So what? Sounds like he got paid to speak about a subject on which he is knowledgable. What's the BFD?
|
|
|
|
Atlas
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 1
|
|
September 28, 2012, 04:09:52 AM |
|
The OP is also a part of The Bitcoin Foundation. A heads up. He did accept $3,000 for reporting about Bitcoin to the CIA.
So what? Sounds like he got paid to speak about a subject on which he is knowledgable. What's the BFD? It reeks of corruption to me. Satoshi left when Gavin announced this. Satoshi never wanted the establishment involved. Gavin does it anyways. It all makes me very worried for Bitcoin's protocol development.
|
|
|
|
markm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2982
Merit: 1116
|
|
September 28, 2012, 04:47:15 AM |
|
Satoshi didn't leave, he simply invited Gavin to come visit him at work and meet the team... -MarkM-
|
|
|
|
Envious
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
September 28, 2012, 10:58:28 AM |
|
The OP is also a part of The Bitcoin Foundation. A heads up. He did accept $3,000 for reporting about Bitcoin to the CIA.
So what? Sounds like he got paid to speak about a subject on which he is knowledgable. What's the BFD? It reeks of corruption to me. Satoshi left when Gavin announced this. Satoshi never wanted the establishment involved. Gavin does it anyways. It all makes me very worried for Bitcoin's protocol development. Atlas is this you 'internet personality' or are you this twitchy and paranoid in real life? You remind me of those conspiracy theorists who think the moon is a hologram created by the reptilians to hide their mothership (thousands of people believe this) and other retarded beliefs and who think that concrete proof of their claim is a YouTube video , you ignore posts asking for proof of your accusations so as far as I can tell you can either: A) Provide proof to back up your claims so people believe you. B) Design your own currency that fits your ideals.
|
|
|
|
benjamindees
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 28, 2012, 11:10:44 AM |
|
A) Provide proof to back up your claims so people believe you.
If you read his other thread, you can see that he has provided proof: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=113609.0
|
Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics
|
|
|
jgarzik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1099
|
|
September 28, 2012, 01:25:51 PM |
|
No it is a silly correlation. Did actor Harry Morgan leave this Earth in 2011 because Gavin was going to speak at the CIA in June 2012? One event happened before that other, so you never know.... </sarcasm> Satoshi had backed away from the project in December 2011, only sending a few scattered emails after that before finally disappearing.
|
Jeff Garzik, Bloq CEO, former bitcoin core dev team; opinions are my own. Visit bloq.com / metronome.io Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
|
|
|
The_Duke
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Lead Core BitKitty Developer
|
|
September 28, 2012, 01:56:51 PM |
|
Satoshi had backed away from the project in December 2011, only sending a few scattered emails after that before finally disappearing.
He just re-appeared as a founding member in the foundation-gang!
|
NOT a member of the so called ''Bitcoin Foundation''. Choose Independence!
Donate to the BitKitty Foundation instead! -> 1Fd4yLneGmxRHnPi6WCMC2hAMzaWvDePF9 <-
|
|
|
dishwara
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016
|
|
September 30, 2012, 06:53:43 AM |
|
Satoshi had backed away from the project in December 2011, only sending a few scattered emails after that before finally disappearing.
He just re-appeared as a founding member in the foundation-gang! In which name he re-appeared?
|
|
|
|
thebaron
|
|
September 30, 2012, 07:06:55 AM |
|
Satoshi had backed away from the project in December 2011, only sending a few scattered emails after that before finally disappearing.
He just re-appeared as a founding member in the foundation-gang! That Linked-in page is *very* interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
September 30, 2012, 11:06:39 AM |
|
Anyone can claim that Satoshi is a founding member of a particular organization. We should be sceptical about it until we see a message signed by Satoshi's private key.
|
|
|
|
BlackHeartFund
|
|
October 20, 2012, 10:43:24 AM |
|
Anyone can claim that Satoshi is a founding member of a particular organization. We should be sceptical about it until we see a message signed by Satoshi's private key. yeah these are going to be worse than Elvis sightings before long. If Satoshi wants to come back, he can do so and it will be easy to know it's him. Until then, no one wake me up for any sightings!
|
|
|
|
GernMiester
|
|
October 20, 2012, 05:23:29 PM |
|
And I don't think any of those goals are incompatible with the goals of government.
The government does not want, under any circumstances, a competing legal tender. Still sounds interesting though.
|
|
|
|
MoonShadow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1010
|
|
October 20, 2012, 06:56:52 PM |
|
And I don't think any of those goals are incompatible with the goals of government.
The government does not want, under any circumstances, a competing legal tender. Still sounds interesting though. No they don't, not within their own borders anyway. However, the CIA is not supposed to work within the borders of the USA. So it's entirely plausible that some government agencies very much would like to see a competing legal tender in some other countries.
|
"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."
- Carroll Quigley, CFR member, mentor to Bill Clinton, from 'Tragedy And Hope'
|
|
|
|