Bitcoin Forum
June 24, 2024, 08:01:56 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 ... 105 »
  Print  
Author Topic: FAIRLAY - SPORTS BETTING for experts - highest liquidity, provably best odds  (Read 135283 times)
erol34
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 04, 2017, 12:42:22 AM
 #861

Is the site down right now?  I'm getting Invalid SSL Certificate:

https://i.gyazo.com/75c9ceeded03467111ac42a65aaa648c.png
Barnstorm
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 13


View Profile
March 04, 2017, 12:44:58 AM
 #862

Down for me also.

Cloudfare thing?
hogie2010
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
March 04, 2017, 01:41:32 AM
 #863

Is there any estimate as to when the site will be back up? Huh
erol34
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 04, 2017, 05:31:07 AM
 #864

This is ridiculous to be down for this long and not take 10 seconds to post an update here.   WTF.
FairlaySupport
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 473
Merit: 252

please do not contact us here via PM.


View Profile WWW
March 04, 2017, 08:01:05 AM
Last edit: March 04, 2017, 08:38:58 AM by FairlaySupport
 #865

SSL certificate problem. We are looking into it.

Edit: it might take a few more hours.

FairlaySupport
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 473
Merit: 252

please do not contact us here via PM.


View Profile WWW
March 04, 2017, 05:12:08 PM
 #866

ETA 1 hour.

hogie2010
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
March 04, 2017, 05:27:45 PM
 #867

Thank you  Cheesy
FairlaySupport
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 473
Merit: 252

please do not contact us here via PM.


View Profile WWW
March 06, 2017, 11:35:33 PM
 #868

We lowered the minimum stake to 2mBTC  as requested by some of our users.

_sunshine_
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 07, 2017, 07:07:32 PM
 #869

Let's assume  for a moment Bitcoin was a company.

We as a shareholder in this company are hereby voting to fire Theymos, distance ourselves from him and his hyprocrisy and remove all Blockstream employees  from management and PR positions. No doubt the Core developers working for Blockstream are very valuable technnical experts in their domain, but not even in government someone as unpopular as them would be able to remain in their job.

We encourage all our customers to support a hard fork to 2 MB blocks.



good, but why not BU?  Block size is not the only one problem
FairlaySupport
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 473
Merit: 252

please do not contact us here via PM.


View Profile WWW
March 08, 2017, 01:52:04 PM
 #870

Let's assume  for a moment Bitcoin was a company.

We as a shareholder in this company are hereby voting to fire Theymos, distance ourselves from him and his hyprocrisy and remove all Blockstream employees  from management and PR positions. No doubt the Core developers working for Blockstream are very valuable technnical experts in their domain, but not even in government someone as unpopular as them would be able to remain in their job.

We encourage all our customers to support a hard fork to 2 MB blocks.



good, but why not BU?  Block size is not the only one problem


Miners or Nodes  should not have any say in the blocksize debate. Nor should exchanges, companies, wallet developers or core developers.  It should be the sole decision of all Bitcoin holders. Consensus among Bitcoin holders can be reached by voting or by the most reliable and well tested consensus mechanism: the price mechanism.   According to our experience there was always an overwhelming support for a hard fork to 2 MB.

 The argument that it will lead to centralization of nodes  is just a hypothetical one  and even in the unlikely case that this becomes a real threat, it can still be easily fixed later on.


hogie2010
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
March 08, 2017, 02:49:03 PM
 #871

I like the new limit Wink
_sunshine_
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 08, 2017, 11:28:51 PM
 #872

Quote
The argument that it will lead to centralization of nodes  is just a hypothetical one  and even in the unlikely case that this becomes a real threat, it can still be easily fixed later on.
i would say this argument looks like a big lie, if you take calculator to hand
alexbonaci
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 1


View Profile WWW
March 09, 2017, 06:38:41 PM
 #873

hi, My deposit was made 16 hours from now, my deposit have 99 confirmations and my account not receive the funds, I send one message for you in your website and in facebook but I not received reply, when I will receive my funds? thanks.
alexbonaci
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 1


View Profile WWW
March 09, 2017, 07:05:15 PM
 #874

hi, My deposit was made 16 hours from now, my deposit have 99 confirmations and my account not receive the funds, I send one message for you in your website and in facebook but I not received reply, when I will receive my funds? thanks.
Hi, I already get one reply and the funds in my account, thanks.
erol34
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 40
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 10, 2017, 12:25:34 AM
 #875

Some things to consider when redesigning the interface:


https://articles.matchbook.com/matchbook-beta-whats-new/#


Hopefully you can build all the functionality they have and then make it even better.
medenlin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 12, 2017, 07:08:15 PM
 #876

Hello!
I try to make a first deposit (8.4 mBTC) 19 hours ago, but my deposit have over 124 confirmations and my account not receive the funds.
Transaction ID: c1c062e11b27f53876bb48ea8f499d9fa8bafd1fed02746422ebb74f69c91c62
For: 1C3D43SKKj1i1kzbLJgT7Y49ZGkY7q5fiU
Please help.
Hatcher
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 369
Merit: 111


View Profile
March 12, 2017, 10:10:22 PM
 #877

Hi. I can't put orders in at the moment. I get a page with an error message:

Forbidden (403)
CSRF verification failed. Request aborted.
FairlaySupport
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 473
Merit: 252

please do not contact us here via PM.


View Profile WWW
March 12, 2017, 10:50:02 PM
 #878

Hi. I can't put orders in at the moment. I get a page with an error message:

Forbidden (403)
CSRF verification failed. Request aborted.

@Hatcher  Please check our FAQs.



@medelin  there was something odd with your transaction. It should be credited now.

medenlin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2017, 01:16:36 AM
 #879

@medelin  there was something odd with your transaction. It should be credited now.
Ok, cois available now. Thanks.
FairlaySupport
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 473
Merit: 252

please do not contact us here via PM.


View Profile WWW
March 13, 2017, 08:45:10 PM
 #880

We are asking all our customers to pull their support from the censored subreddit r/Bitcoin, from Theymos and from all Bitcoin Core developers, who work for Blockstream and do not support a block size increase. Statements like  "We do not care if fees rise to $100" really fill us with bitterness and anger.  In case of a hard fork we are more likely to support the network that has lower transaction costs as raising fees are endangering further adoption and growth of our platform.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 ... 105 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!