|
Barnstorm
Member
Offline
Activity: 160
Merit: 13
|
|
March 04, 2017, 12:44:58 AM |
|
Down for me also.
Cloudfare thing?
|
|
|
|
hogie2010
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
March 04, 2017, 01:41:32 AM |
|
Is there any estimate as to when the site will be back up?
|
|
|
|
erol34
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
March 04, 2017, 05:31:07 AM |
|
This is ridiculous to be down for this long and not take 10 seconds to post an update here. WTF.
|
|
|
|
FairlaySupport
|
|
March 04, 2017, 08:01:05 AM Last edit: March 04, 2017, 08:38:58 AM by FairlaySupport |
|
SSL certificate problem. We are looking into it.
Edit: it might take a few more hours.
|
|
|
|
|
hogie2010
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
March 04, 2017, 05:27:45 PM |
|
Thank you
|
|
|
|
FairlaySupport
|
|
March 06, 2017, 11:35:33 PM |
|
We lowered the minimum stake to 2mBTC as requested by some of our users.
|
|
|
|
_sunshine_
|
|
March 07, 2017, 07:07:32 PM |
|
Let's assume for a moment Bitcoin was a company.
We as a shareholder in this company are hereby voting to fire Theymos, distance ourselves from him and his hyprocrisy and remove all Blockstream employees from management and PR positions. No doubt the Core developers working for Blockstream are very valuable technnical experts in their domain, but not even in government someone as unpopular as them would be able to remain in their job.
We encourage all our customers to support a hard fork to 2 MB blocks.
good, but why not BU? Block size is not the only one problem
|
|
|
|
FairlaySupport
|
|
March 08, 2017, 01:52:04 PM |
|
Let's assume for a moment Bitcoin was a company.
We as a shareholder in this company are hereby voting to fire Theymos, distance ourselves from him and his hyprocrisy and remove all Blockstream employees from management and PR positions. No doubt the Core developers working for Blockstream are very valuable technnical experts in their domain, but not even in government someone as unpopular as them would be able to remain in their job.
We encourage all our customers to support a hard fork to 2 MB blocks.
good, but why not BU? Block size is not the only one problem Miners or Nodes should not have any say in the blocksize debate. Nor should exchanges, companies, wallet developers or core developers. It should be the sole decision of all Bitcoin holders. Consensus among Bitcoin holders can be reached by voting or by the most reliable and well tested consensus mechanism: the price mechanism. According to our experience there was always an overwhelming support for a hard fork to 2 MB. The argument that it will lead to centralization of nodes is just a hypothetical one and even in the unlikely case that this becomes a real threat, it can still be easily fixed later on.
|
|
|
|
hogie2010
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
March 08, 2017, 02:49:03 PM |
|
I like the new limit
|
|
|
|
_sunshine_
|
|
March 08, 2017, 11:28:51 PM |
|
The argument that it will lead to centralization of nodes is just a hypothetical one and even in the unlikely case that this becomes a real threat, it can still be easily fixed later on.
i would say this argument looks like a big lie, if you take calculator to hand
|
|
|
|
alexbonaci
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 1
|
|
March 09, 2017, 06:38:41 PM |
|
hi, My deposit was made 16 hours from now, my deposit have 99 confirmations and my account not receive the funds, I send one message for you in your website and in facebook but I not received reply, when I will receive my funds? thanks.
|
|
|
|
alexbonaci
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 1
|
|
March 09, 2017, 07:05:15 PM |
|
hi, My deposit was made 16 hours from now, my deposit have 99 confirmations and my account not receive the funds, I send one message for you in your website and in facebook but I not received reply, when I will receive my funds? thanks.
Hi, I already get one reply and the funds in my account, thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
medenlin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
March 12, 2017, 07:08:15 PM |
|
Hello! I try to make a first deposit (8.4 mBTC) 19 hours ago, but my deposit have over 124 confirmations and my account not receive the funds. Transaction ID: c1c062e11b27f53876bb48ea8f499d9fa8bafd1fed02746422ebb74f69c91c62 For: 1C3D43SKKj1i1kzbLJgT7Y49ZGkY7q5fiU Please help.
|
|
|
|
Hatcher
|
|
March 12, 2017, 10:10:22 PM |
|
Hi. I can't put orders in at the moment. I get a page with an error message:
Forbidden (403) CSRF verification failed. Request aborted.
|
|
|
|
FairlaySupport
|
|
March 12, 2017, 10:50:02 PM |
|
Hi. I can't put orders in at the moment. I get a page with an error message:
Forbidden (403) CSRF verification failed. Request aborted.
@Hatcher Please check our FAQs. @medelin there was something odd with your transaction. It should be credited now.
|
|
|
|
medenlin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
March 13, 2017, 01:16:36 AM |
|
@medelin there was something odd with your transaction. It should be credited now.
Ok, cois available now. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
FairlaySupport
|
|
March 13, 2017, 08:45:10 PM |
|
We are asking all our customers to pull their support from the censored subreddit r/Bitcoin, from Theymos and from all Bitcoin Core developers, who work for Blockstream and do not support a block size increase. Statements like "We do not care if fees rise to $100" really fill us with bitterness and anger. In case of a hard fork we are more likely to support the network that has lower transaction costs as raising fees are endangering further adoption and growth of our platform.
|
|
|
|
|