#1 RATINGS of BITCOIN SPORTSBOOKS since 2014 : KYC Rankings, Bonuses, Scam Accus

[gadado]

I was going to ask is the NitrogenSports safe? I think I've seen that they have a negative trust in the forum and I still wonder why they're on the first place. Still this is a good list of sportsbooks most of the sportsbooks I'm using is on the "C" Rated categories. I think I saw the reason why, the ratings were based on the time of their service well it might give a different view from new comers.

[Rating Place]

I was going to ask is the NitrogenSports safe? I think I've seen that they have a negative trust in the forum and I still wonder why they're on the first place. Still this is a good list of sportsbooks most of the sportsbooks I'm using is on the "C" Rated categories. I think I saw the reason why, the ratings were based on the time of their service well it might give a different view from new comers.

Nitrogensports is very safe as well as their sister book Nitrobetting. There are 3 other rating's guides here at BCT and all of them have Nitrogen rated as their top book. Betcoin is rated #2 here and if averaged, rated #2 at other guides. It helps me to feel secure in having those two books rated A.

[Rating Place]

I was going to ask is the NitrogenSports safe? I think I've seen that they have a negative trust in the forum and I still wonder why they're on the first place. Still this is a good list of sportsbooks most of the sportsbooks I'm using is on the "C" Rated categories. I think I saw the reason why, the ratings were based on the time of their service well it might give a different view from new comers.

Nitrogensports is very safe as well as their sister book Nitrobetting. There are 3 other rating's guides here at BCT and all of them have Nitrogen rated as their top book. Betcoin is rated #2 here and if averaged, rated #2 at other guides. It helps me to feel secure in having those two books rated A.

YOU ARE A COMPLETE JOKE WITH YOUR FAKE RATINGS

Here are the ratings of other guides at BCT. They are in align with the ratings here in this thread.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577102.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1820529.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158369.0

[dezoel]

Please post crypto books,that don't accept fiat, that are omitted from the list.

The reason why you are not getting the same participation from us as you used to is the fact that you no longer care about what people think or believe in anymore. I mean let's be honest, nobody in the crypto world (or at least bitcointalk if you consider it is just us here) thinks nitrogen bet is a+ or nobody believes betcoin.ag is A neither, they are at best C level places, all because they have been around for a very long period of time.

The places that I am not going to name here so you won't delete are the places people prefer, right now the top 2 includes one place that is not even in this list because they have a fiat acceptance and one of them is in your list but under C rated, and those are the biggest ones that gets wagered.

So, if the most wagered places are either not even listed or at C level for you, and places people haven't even messaged in the topics for years are getting a ratings, how do you imagine people could still take you seriously and help you? You will just ignore them just like how you will ignore me.

[Rating Place]

Please post crypto books,that don't accept fiat, that are omitted from the list.

The reason why you are not getting the same participation from us as you used to is the fact that you no longer care about what people think or believe in anymore. I mean let's be honest, nobody in the crypto world (or at least bitcointalk if you consider it is just us here) thinks nitrogen bet is a+ or nobody believes betcoin.ag is A neither, they are at best C level places, all because they have been around for a very long period of time.

The places that I am not going to name here so you won't delete are the places people prefer, right now the top 2 includes one place that is not even in this list because they have a fiat acceptance and one of them is in your list but under C rated, and those are the biggest ones that gets wagered.

So, if the most wagered places are either not even listed or at C level for you, and places people haven't even messaged in the topics for years are getting a ratings, how do you imagine people could still take you seriously and help you? You will just ignore them just like how you will ignore me.

I don't think that I've ever deleted anything in this thread. Posters are free to post whatever they want as long as it's not repetitive. All opinions matter since this is a players thread and all feedback is appreciated.

It's not just this thread, but all rating guides here at bitcointalk rate Nitrogen and Betcoin very high.

[ralle14]

I was going to ask is the NitrogenSports safe? I think I've seen that they have a negative trust in the forum and I still wonder why they're on the first place. Still this is a good list of sportsbooks most of the sportsbooks I'm using is on the "C" Rated categories. I think I saw the reason why, the ratings were based on the time of their service well it might give a different view from new comers.

They're safe enough, I still play there from time to time since they're one of the few books that offers a good range of markets in the esports side of things.

I myself use the C rated sportsbooks regularly but I can respect the rating because aside from the years of operation it's also focused on the odds offered and that's where sportsbook like Nitrogensports and Betcoin stands out the most so you get better returns on your bets overall. This is also the reason why bitcoinrush was rated that high but unfortunately they've stopped operations.

[SenseiBitcoin]

So i try my choice :

A+ : Playbetr and Betnomi ( Crypto sable , choice and odds )
A   : FortuneJack ( for basketball the most choice ever on under/over pts )

B : Nitrogen, Sportbet.io, Cloudbet, BETBTC, Fairlay ( Old and solid sportbooks)

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Here are the ratings of other guides at BCT. They are in align with the ratings here in this thread.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577102.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1820529.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158369.0

After a quick look -

1st link - OP inactive for 1 year, and also has #2 bitcoinrush.io.  which doesn’t exist anymore.
2nd link - OP inactive for 2 years.
3rd link - OP is an affiliate spammer.

Will all respect, those ratings are old and outdated, a bit like yours.

[Rating Place]

Here are the ratings of other guides at BCT. They are in align with the ratings here in this thread.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577102.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1820529.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158369.0

After a quick look -

1st link - OP inactive for 1 year, and also has #2 bitcoinrush.io.  which doesn’t exist anymore.
2nd link - OP inactive for 2 years.
3rd link - OP is an affiliate spammer.

Will all respect, those ratings are old and outdated, a bit like yours.

All of the above is all false. This thread was started in 2014. I've never been inactive, the thread is consistently updated. Bitcoinrush was taken down.


edit-  I apologize as I misread your post. You may be correct on the other guides. As far as I know, those are the only other guides at BCT. The ratings in this thread are current.

Here are the ratings of other guides at BCT. They are in align with the ratings here in this thread.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577102.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1820529.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158369.0

After a quick look -

1st link - OP inactive for 1 year, and also has #2 bitcoinrush.io.  which doesn’t exist anymore.
2nd link - OP inactive for 2 years.
3rd link - OP is an affiliate spammer.

Will all respect, those ratings are old and outdated, a bit like yours.

The links that you are quoting are from other rating's guide. They were posted to show that the ratings in this thread agree with ratings of other guides with Nitrogen and Betcoin as top books.

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[GamblingSiteFinder]

I can fully understand your thoughts of Sportsbet being a bitcoin book. At the same time, most books are bitcoin books. 90% of the transactions with Bookmaker are crypto transactions. Bookmaker is still considered to be a fiat book.

The trust feedback is read for all the books rated. No book is perfect and big books will have complaints. There are 3 other guides here at BCT that rate sportsbooks. All of the guides rate Nitrogensports as the top book. This helps me to feel comfortable with rating Nitrogen as the top book.

Other ratings guides at BCT:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577102.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1820529.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158369.0

This isn't a review of Sportsbet, since fiat books aren't rated here and Sportsbet may be a good book, but one of the guides above has Sportsbet rated last, another 4th and the other not rated. I haven't tested Sportsbet for years and haven't kept up to date with Sportsbet so I have no personal opinion.

It's incredibly impressive how you've managed to curate this thread consistently for nearly SEVEN YEARS, but I do think your rankings are in need of a little adjusting. To be quite honest, I personally wouldn't play at most of the sportsbooks listed in your rankings, nor would I recommend them to visitors at my website.

Like another poster has said here already, those other guides are very out-of-date and should not be used as a reference/guide by anyone looking for a reputable crypto sportsbook. But like you mentioned in a previous comment, it's incredibly hard to find a reputable, non-fiat sportsbooks these days! Especially ones that don't require KYC!

[Obito]

It's good that you are putting 1xbit in D for being high risk, one question though. What does the + and the - was for at the end of each letter, does the + mean that they are going to get out of the rank if they can prove it or the other way around?

[Rating Place]

I can fully understand your thoughts of Sportsbet being a bitcoin book. At the same time, most books are bitcoin books. 90% of the transactions with Bookmaker are crypto transactions. Bookmaker is still considered to be a fiat book.

The trust feedback is read for all the books rated. No book is perfect and big books will have complaints. There are 3 other guides here at BCT that rate sportsbooks. All of the guides rate Nitrogensports as the top book. This helps me to feel comfortable with rating Nitrogen as the top book.

Other ratings guides at BCT:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577102.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1820529.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5158369.0

This isn't a review of Sportsbet, since fiat books aren't rated here and Sportsbet may be a good book, but one of the guides above has Sportsbet rated last, another 4th and the other not rated. I haven't tested Sportsbet for years and haven't kept up to date with Sportsbet so I have no personal opinion.

It's incredibly impressive how you've managed to curate this thread consistently for nearly SEVEN YEARS, but I do think your rankings are in need of a little adjusting. To be quite honest, I personally wouldn't play at most of the sportsbooks listed in your rankings, nor would I recommend them to visitors at my website.

Like another poster has said here already, those other guides are very out-of-date and should not be used as a reference/guide by anyone looking for a reputable crypto sportsbook. But like you mentioned in a previous comment, it's incredibly hard to find a reputable, non-fiat sportsbooks these days! Especially ones that don't require KYC!

You have a nice site. One thing we do disagree somewhat is KYC. I don't think that KYC requirements determine the quality of a book. A book's payout history is most important. The top books have a great payout history. Books that are heavy handed in KYC are downgraded here. 

[Rating Place]

It's good that you are putting 1xbit in D for being high risk, one question though. What does the + and the - was for at the end of each letter, does the + mean that they are going to get out of the rank if they can prove it or the other way around?

The plus/minus is just part of the hierarchy. A+ is better than an A. And an A is better than A-.

[dezoel]

Posters are free to post whatever they want as long as it's not repetitive. All opinions matter since this is a players thread and all feedback is appreciated.

It's not just this thread, but all rating guides here at bitcointalk rate Nitrogen and Betcoin very high.

Well, when people do not write to you anymore about their experiences, and when they do not think that you care about what we say, and when they actually do come in here and many people say that nitrogensports should not be at the top and sportsbet.io should be listed here, and when you ignore them, do you know what you will get? You will get a lot of people who will keep not helping you and ignoring your list.

I mean after all isn't this suppose to be something we collectively do? Sure you are at the top that is no doubt but what we say supposedly has a weight as well, but looking at how you respond to everyone you are basically saying "this is how I rank them and I do not care what you think" so then why would we actually try to say something about it?

I personally believe that sportsbet should be in there, sure not make it A ranked but it is at least B ranked, or hell C ranked but ranked, and I believe nitrogen has been C+ at best for at least a year now. If you ignore that, why would I come back again and again?

[Adzivu]

I also think sportsbet should be here. They accept FIAT, but they are largerly crypto sportsbook.

[Pmalek]

You have a nice site. One thing we do disagree somewhat is KYC. I don't think that KYC requirements determine the quality of a book. A book's payout history is most important. The top books have a great payout history. Books that are heavy handed in KYC are downgraded here.

I think they do because many gamblers prefer to remain anonymous and if the casino requires them to undergo KYC, they lose their privacy and they can no longer be considered anonymous players. It's also dangerous to give away your sensitive data that will end up being stored on some servers somewhere because of the possibility of those records being hacked or sold one day.

Therefore, if we are comparing two casinos with equal payout history, I would consider the one that doesn't require KYC as the better choice.

[Rating Place]

Posters are free to post whatever they want as long as it's not repetitive. All opinions matter since this is a players thread and all feedback is appreciated.

It's not just this thread, but all rating guides here at bitcointalk rate Nitrogen and Betcoin very high.

Well, when people do not write to you anymore about their experiences, and when they do not think that you care about what we say, and when they actually do come in here and many people say that nitrogensports should not be at the top and sportsbet.io should be listed here, and when you ignore them, do you know what you will get? You will get a lot of people who will keep not helping you and ignoring your list.

I mean after all isn't this suppose to be something we collectively do? Sure you are at the top that is no doubt but what we say supposedly has a weight as well, but looking at how you respond to everyone you are basically saying "this is how I rank them and I do not care what you think" so then why would we actually try to say something about it?

I personally believe that sportsbet should be in there, sure not make it A ranked but it is at least B ranked, or hell C ranked but ranked, and I believe nitrogen has been C+ at best for at least a year now. If you ignore that, why would I come back again and again?

Posters here shaped this thread and have been the cause for many rating changes. It is a collaboration. There are many great posters such as Ralle. No one is ignored as this is our thread, the posters thread. People aren't going to be in 100% agreement with the ratings. This is why poster input is needed. We want to read opinions from all whether they agree or disagree with the ratings here.

The ratings have drastically changed throughout the years. Anonibet was once considered the top book. Nitrogen is now on top and they have improved over the years. The latest improvement was with live betting.

[Rating Place]

I also think sportsbet should be here. They accept FIAT, but they are largerly crypto sportsbook.

Almost all books now accept crypto-currencies and it's the number one deposit and withdrawal method for many. Sportsbet has a high presence here and is very popular but is dangerous to make exceptions to thread rules. There are too many books in the same class as Sportsbet.

[konabel]

I also think sportsbet should be here. They accept FIAT, but they are largerly crypto sportsbook.

WTF
Sportsbet the top scam bookmaker together with 1xbit? These sites should have banned for good

[milewilda]

You have a nice site. One thing we do disagree somewhat is KYC. I don't think that KYC requirements determine the quality of a book. A book's payout history is most important. The top books have a great payout history. Books that are heavy handed in KYC are downgraded here.

I think they do because many gamblers prefer to remain anonymous and if the casino requires them to undergo KYC, they lose their privacy and they can no longer be considered anonymous players. It's also dangerous to give away your sensitive data that will end up being stored on some servers somewhere because of the possibility of those records being hacked or sold one day.

Therefore, if we are comparing two casinos with equal payout history, I would consider the one that doesn't require KYC as the better choice.

I'd agree 100% with this post.

Decentralized market and things correlated to it wouldnt really become famous if not because of that anonymity that we are seeking off.
Everyone doesnt really like to give off their personal details but there are instances on where you dont have any choice but to comply and since
you are badly likes to play on a particular site then you wouldnt mind much or make it as an issue but those situations mentioned above \
are really like to happen and this is why undergoing KYC is never been appealing in crypto space and also we do have several choices as of this moment.