px66
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2014, 08:16:53 PM |
|
There isnt 4 million i think there is around 2.3/2.4 million
Funny how the exact number has not been made clear yet not hard jesus.  { "version" : "v2.0.0.0: Experimental", "protocolversion" : 60013, "walletversion" : 60000, "balance" : 0.00990000, "newmint" : 0.00000000, "stake" : 0.00000000, "blocks" : 2476, "timeoffset" : -38, "moneysupply" : 2424999.20502321, "connections" : 11, "proxy" : "", "ip" : "212.250.45.85", "difficulty" : { "proof-of-work" : 256.64616797, "proof-of-stake" : 0.00024414 }, "testnet" : false, "keypoololdest" : 1408269370, "keypoolsize" : 101, "paytxfee" : 0.00000000, "mininput" : 0.00000000, "errors" : "" } if you have a wallet you know how many coins there are. people are so fucking dumb...whining about not knowing how many coins when it takes literally 5 seconds to figure it out. how are you all investing in cryptocurrency when you don't even know how a wallet functions? @n3rfherder You are the funny type. Am going to cry in a corner now that you have said I am stupid. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Anyways, Dev cleared the doubt by updating the total coins-- 12million-- in the specification. Thanks for your puerile attempt at answering the question. Is all of the 15% premine for the pre-sale?
|
|
|
|
q327K091
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1010
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2014, 08:21:07 PM |
|
back to 22 GH/s from 10 GH/s I guess he waited till no one talks back in here again, I mine but if "edge" gets majority of coins it does not matter (for you too)
|
|
|
|
q327K091
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1010
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2014, 08:22:36 PM |
|
I don't understand what's so hard to comprehend. If you have a powerful miner, you set it up to an auto-switcher. Then you hit the pool when the difficulty is low. You receive many more coins this way. The tactic is very common.
this ain't automated trading it is a premeditated hijacking, for curiosity sake I will watch exchanges afterwords but I guarantee you almost this no one will put one single FIAT in this
|
|
|
|
q327K091
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1010
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2014, 08:25:00 PM |
|
back to 22 GH/s from 10 GH/s I guess he waited till no one talks back in here again, I mine but if "edge" gets majority of coins it does not matter (for you too)
You are one seriously paranoid dude. Anyway hold your coins and everything will be alright. not really paranoid this is exactly what is gonna be , a large stake will be dumped from above (but not immediate) wanna bet ? or you are on it ? keep watching the ever increasing delta http://www.suchpool.pw/int/index.php?page=statistics&action=pool5 Gig to next 600 M I say that is super large delta.. call me paranoid but it is right there in front of you. I am surprised he went out in the open probably for fun and is bored
|
|
|
|
miningfool
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2014, 08:25:48 PM |
|
q327K091 if you want coins why don't you just go rent a bunch of hash like everybody else and mine too? Strong nethash rate is a good sign to me. I bought a bunch and will hold my INT. This coin should be an easy x10 return, and apart from profit motive its a cool coin with cool tech.
|
|
|
|
|
BlockaFett
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2014, 08:28:27 PM |
|
q327K091 if you want coins why don't you just go rent a bunch of hash like everybody else and mine too? Strong nethash rate is a good sign to me. I bought a bunch and will hold my INT. This coin should be an easy x10 return, and apart from profit motive its a cool coin with cool tech.
Exactly, day 2 and we are at 22 gigahash, its a very good sign.
|
|
|
|
studio1one
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2014, 08:29:02 PM |
|
I don't understand what's so hard to comprehend. If you have a powerful miner, you set it up to an auto-switcher. Then you hit the pool when the difficulty is low. You receive many more coins this way. The tactic is very common.
this ain't automated trading it is a premeditated hijacking, for curiosity sake I will watch exchanges afterwords but I guarantee you almost this no one will put one single FIAT in this Dude it's just auto switching pools like waffle etc that auto switch to highest profit coins then leave wh diff goes up. Pu the tinfoil hat away
|
BINTEX | | ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
| | | | ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
| | Powered by,
|
|
|
|
q327K091
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1010
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2014, 08:30:11 PM Last edit: August 19, 2014, 08:32:05 AM by q327K091 |
|
ok ok ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) drifting away, was probing your reaction a bit.. love this coin spec btw lets see if the entertainment paid off here is my intell wallet address bla bla bla I love Paris btw (in the Autumn)
|
|
|
|
q327K091
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1010
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2014, 08:37:09 PM |
|
q327K091 if you want coins why don't you just go rent a bunch of hash like everybody else and mine too? Strong nethash rate is a good sign to me. I bought a bunch and will hold my INT. This coin should be an easy x10 return, and apart from profit motive its a cool coin with cool tech.
agree I love to be little schizo its good it adds spice to the equation, we hope it all goes as planned and adopted by the masses so far nothing 0 from so called "friends"
|
|
|
|
q327K091
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1010
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2014, 08:42:08 PM |
|
that is a lot actually.. (in terms of hash rate) thats like ~ 550$ good price.. actually, now I feel stupid, walking away tail under ashamed...
|
|
|
|
ayminer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2014, 08:45:15 PM |
|
Everyone was pretty confident until the dev(s) took down their real names--embedded in their emails. With the recent scam trends, its totally understandable why such a move raised suspicion. So if the devs are confident of their themselves, and are willing to disperse the community's wariness, all they have to do is to explain why they took down their names.
People who find their explanation reasonable would stay while the rest would move on. IMO, its unnecessary to come out to sarcastically challenge someone to try buy whatever website.
However, if they feel the community doesn't deserve apt responses to their queries then........
|
|
|
|
originalchilli
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2014, 08:48:21 PM |
|
Everyone was pretty confident until the dev(s) took down their real names--embedded in their emails. With the recent scam trends, its totally understandable why such a move raised suspicion. So if the devs are confident of their themselves, and are willing to disperse the community's wariness, all they have to do is to explain why they took down their names.
People who find their explanation reasonable would stay while the rest would move on. IMO, its unnecessary to come out to sarcastically challenge someone to try buy whatever website.
However, if they feel the community doesn't deserve apt responses to their queries then........
+1
|
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER - @originalchilli
|
|
|
q327K091
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1010
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2014, 08:49:03 PM |
|
Everyone was pretty confident until the dev(s) took down their real names--embedded in their emails. With the recent scam trends, its totally understandable why such a move raised suspicion. So if the devs are confident of their themselves, and are willing to disperse the community's wariness, all they have to do is to explain why they took down their names.
People who find their explanation reasonable would stay while the rest would move on. IMO, its unnecessary to come out to sarcastically challenge someone to try buy whatever website.
However, if they feel the community doesn't deserve apt responses to their queries then........
actually gentleman above explained to me phenomena of 3 GHs very well.. and it makes sense you are now attacking credential of developers.. if answered in positive I am self following all of this close... let others speak on the matter what you are questioning has bigger weight than the hardware what your are questioning is integrity of the development team behind Intell lets see...
|
|
|
|
solid12345
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2014, 08:49:06 PM |
|
Everyone was pretty confident until the dev(s) took down their real names--embedded in their emails. With the recent scam trends, its totally understandable why such a move raised suspicion. So if the devs are confident of their themselves, and are willing to disperse the community's wariness, all they have to do is to explain why they took down their names.
The fact they took down their names though makes me believe they might be telling the truth. Wouldn't scammers just not put their name up to begin with or try to pass off those fake names as being legit? I can't imagine the kind of emails a female dev would be getting right now in this vile forum frankly. I've heard women at crypto conventions get treated like pieces of meat.
|
|
|
|
px66
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2014, 08:55:43 PM |
|
How much of 1,800,000 premine went to the presale? and how much to DEVs? I do not see this listed anywhere.
|
|
|
|
originalchilli
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2014, 09:04:04 PM |
|
I can't imagine the kind of emails a female dev would be getting right now in this vile forum frankly.
fair point
|
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER - @originalchilli
|
|
|
Valzador
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2014, 09:23:51 PM |
|
Let's just try and get through the PoW phase without anyone forking off.
|
|
|
|
Valzador
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2014, 09:26:25 PM |
|
Yea, P2Pewl is facing a few issues. I'll try and get it up as soon as possible. Dev to lazy to upload source to github... I'll do it... ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Valzador, may I ask what is your involvement with the project? Dev said source will be released 1 week after launch but somehow you were able to obtain the source? Has anyone received a reply from dev at the intellicon@mit.edu address? Some might view my next comment as FUD but I call it due diligence... Someone has already mentioned that dev could be using purchased @mit.edu address and I think it could very well be a possibility. It seems, with a valid mit.edu email address, you can create any websites, including intellicon.mit.edu from sites.mit.edu. I also find it conflicting for dev to go through the trouble of protecting his/her name with privacyprotect.org when registering intellicoin.me, yet he/she openly posts two names and emails on the first page. These suspicions will exist unless dev(s) can prove their legitimacy. I'm not related to the development team in any way. I made an investment of 0.25 BTC and offered to host a pool. I also helped compile the mac wallet. I was given the source to compile and setup my pool. Since other people also wanted it, I decided it was best to just upload it to a git. With your other reply about how I could modify the source code. I could modify it but where does that take me with me investment? I have a reputation to keep and customers to serve.
|
|
|
|
ayminer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2014, 09:38:32 PM |
|
The fact they took down their names though makes me believe they might be telling the truth. Wouldn't scammers just not put their name up to begin with or try to pass off those fake names as being legit?
You have a good point but you cant hold it against others who would have thought of the other logical reasons for that action -- which could run to thousands-- and were not comfortable with same. It only makes sense to ask questions in order to make an informed conclusion rather than relying on some assumptions that has been drawn up based on sentiments (or not). Its the beauty of dialogue.
|
|
|
|
|