lovewiki
|
|
October 18, 2014, 01:50:58 PM |
|
Everybody is looking for a use of the coins in the real world, for me this use is under our noses and nobody seems to see it, or is not capable to create it. What I would like to see is that ECC will have it's own Exchange and that the holders of ECC coins will be the shareholders from that exchange, receiving dividend every 3 months from the fees generated by the trades. The % paid to each shareholder will depend on the coins they have in there wallet.
BUT....this is MY vision, we need to agree on this to make it happen.
Michael
I M INNNNN! =) I do agree and like your vision. ECC definitely should have its own exchange and ECC holders will then become shareholders from that exchange... Very nice idea and wish it will become a reality soon.
|
|
|
|
anotherlateminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1415
Merit: 1003
Bagholder. Hodling shit since 2014
|
|
October 18, 2014, 03:01:25 PM |
|
Please upload full blockchain. There are several sync problems.
|
|
|
|
BarTeam
|
|
October 18, 2014, 05:07:40 PM |
|
Please upload full blockchain. There are several sync problems.
Again... no need for uploading.. Just delete all but wallet.dat. (this includes peers.dat).. and it will work. Don't use .conf file.
|
|
|
|
Griffith (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 18, 2014, 07:01:06 PM |
|
Please upload full blockchain. There are several sync problems.
Again... no need for uploading.. Just delete all but wallet.dat. (this includes peers.dat).. and it will work. Don't use .conf file. correction: the conf file is fine. i actually have it so it auto generates a correct file for you. there arent very many sync problems. there are a few listed on the OP but it takes like 2 minutes to get past these. and once you are you are fine.
|
|
|
|
BarTeam
|
|
October 18, 2014, 08:38:07 PM |
|
Please upload full blockchain. There are several sync problems.
Again... no need for uploading.. Just delete all but wallet.dat. (this includes peers.dat).. and it will work. Don't use .conf file. correction: the conf file is fine. i actually have it so it auto generates a correct file for you. there arent very many sync problems. there are a few listed on the OP but it takes like 2 minutes to get past these. and once you are you are fine. I agree it's fine. What I meant was that you don't need it for the wallet to start well and sync. But you will need it for the specific options you want to give to the wallet of course.
|
|
|
|
anotherlateminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1415
Merit: 1003
Bagholder. Hodling shit since 2014
|
|
October 18, 2014, 08:43:15 PM |
|
Please upload full blockchain. There are several sync problems.
Again... no need for uploading.. Just delete all but wallet.dat. (this includes peers.dat).. and it will work. Don't use .conf file. I had already done this, of course. I've been waiting for more than 24 hours for the wallet to sync, it have passed ~70% and now "0 active connections" is shown. Restarting the wallet doesn't help.
|
|
|
|
BarTeam
|
|
October 18, 2014, 08:54:02 PM Last edit: October 19, 2014, 08:49:14 PM by BarTeam |
|
Please upload full blockchain. There are several sync problems.
Again... no need for uploading.. Just delete all but wallet.dat. (this includes peers.dat).. and it will work. Don't use .conf file. I had already done this, of course. I've been waiting for more than 24 hours for the wallet to sync, it have passed ~70% and now "0 active connections" is shown. Restarting the wallet doesn't help. I have just restarted my re-sync. I will let you know the results in a few hours. But 0 connections is a problem... (can you send me lines from debug.log stating the chain hash?) EDIT: Benchmark - Full Synchronization Startup time: 10/18/14 20:52:10 UTC - Synchronization @ 93% - 3 active clients -> then I ended up like you... getcheckpoint 12:40:15 { "synccheckpoint" : "ba96de8da95ac53cedc7fd0cd3c17b32f5d3a04f33a544060606c095b28bf4c1", "height" : 242150, "timestamp" : "2014-10-01 21:52:52 UTC" } Resolution being baked... For me it did not work to substitute the peers.dat because I think I ended up somewhere in another chain... There are still some guys running old wallets!!!! ARHRHRH! EDIT #2: After 3 retries... it got synchronized (after the last checkpoint it takes more time to sync). The reason for the failures might be the nodes that did not update yet. I recommend to hold a good backup of all the chain. Just in case you have to resync the all thing again, you just need to restore that backup and restart the wallet.
|
|
|
|
mdtspain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1076
Merit: 1003
|
|
October 18, 2014, 09:02:04 PM Last edit: October 18, 2014, 09:20:13 PM by mdtspain |
|
Please upload full blockchain. There are several sync problems.
Again... no need for uploading.. Just delete all but wallet.dat. (this includes peers.dat).. and it will work. Don't use .conf file. I had already done this, of course. I've been waiting for more than 24 hours for the wallet to sync, it have passed ~70% and now "0 active connections" is shown. Restarting the wallet doesn't help. I have just restarted my re-sync. I will let you know the results in a few hours. But 0 connections is a problem... (can you send me lines from debug.log stating the chain hash?) EDIT: 8% - 2 active clients Hi, maybe i can help, I have uploaded my peers.dat in a zip file. You can Download it here http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=71566802387590630202Can you also confirm that you are using wallet 2.1.0.0 Thanks *****Note for Griffith****** I think you didn't restart the ECC BE after the security updates
|
|
|
|
anotherlateminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1415
Merit: 1003
Bagholder. Hodling shit since 2014
|
|
October 18, 2014, 09:21:51 PM |
|
BarTeam, mdtspain, thanks, guys, looks like this peers.dat file has helped: the wallet began to sync. The progress is going very slowly, but now it is at least connected to the network.
|
|
|
|
BarTeam
|
|
October 18, 2014, 11:50:58 PM |
|
BarTeam, mdtspain, thanks, guys, looks like this peers.dat file has helped: the wallet began to sync. The progress is going very slowly, but now it is at least connected to the network.
Good. =) I am doing benchmark for a full update time lapse. This might be something where improvement can take place against other coins. Old blockchains are becoming main examples of sustainability and need adaptation over all issues into the future. Maybe now it will make sense for "higher parallelism of the downloads from block chain information from peers". Let me rephrase... - Big block chains need protection against recovery - that is usually made over security but some part over the "get all block chain information" will also play some role (so it matters to download block chain information faster in order to protect that information). - Higher parallelism from clients will mean better communication from ALL network - assuming internet will continue to evolve it will be required in the future to overcome single threaded p2p communication. - Faster recovery of one client into a very big network will mean better return of those users to the network - as this will mean... if they keep their keys safe... any device can loose the wallet and still reconstruct the wallet again in a much shorter time. Many other advantages... but how can this be done!? =) I have some ideas.. but I will sort them out with devs. I will need some time to look into the code and seek for where this can actually be done. But the idea is over ... just a little teaser... - POS @ rate of 1 block per second! - Dynamic confirmation rates for POS algos (POS is tricky to confirm in the real term... to improve security of confirmations is still a must.. cause it will ensure better security against forks, miss usage, bad intentions of altering the source code to damage the network, etc). Feel free to comment.
|
|
|
|
|
BarTeam
|
|
October 19, 2014, 08:51:12 PM |
|
Nice, and yes very helpful.
|
|
|
|
renbit
|
|
October 20, 2014, 10:14:17 PM |
|
it certainly does sound good and innovative , i think a difficulty would lie in getting the four exchanges to accept ecc - perhaps easier if wallet only traded in the exchanges it was already registered on - adding more as acceptance grew - but that may also hold it back perhaps permanently by only being on swisscex and allcoin only - - do you think that if the wallet with multiple exchanges was already present and available that it would act as a substantial leverage to push those other 4 exchanges to add ecc ? totalling six for ecc - its a gamble perhaps - but maybe a very good coin to try it on - i would hope it was successful - i can see ecc starting to mopve a little on the exchange now and i feel it deserves to get wider usage and acceptance - i'd like to hear how griffith feels about doing this multi exchange wallet thing to the coin, seeing as he has wrestled it back from crypto zombie world to become a living breathing coin again - is it a risk you feel is worthwhile Griffith ?
|
|
|
|
Griffith (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 20, 2014, 11:21:32 PM |
|
it certainly does sound good and innovative , i think a difficulty would lie in getting the four exchanges to accept ecc - perhaps easier if wallet only traded in the exchanges it was already registered on - adding more as acceptance grew - but that may also hold it back perhaps permanently by only being on swisscex and allcoin only - - do you think that if the wallet with multiple exchanges was already present and available that it would act as a substantial leverage to push those other 4 exchanges to add ecc ? totalling six for ecc - its a gamble perhaps - but maybe a very good coin to try it on - i would hope it was successful - i can see ecc starting to mopve a little on the exchange now and i feel it deserves to get wider usage and acceptance - i'd like to hear how griffith feels about doing this multi exchange wallet thing to the coin, seeing as he has wrestled it back from crypto zombie world to become a living breathing coin again - is it a risk you feel is worthwhile Griffith ?
im the one making it
|
|
|
|
xzh16888
|
|
October 21, 2014, 04:03:32 AM |
|
The coins transfer time is too long, suggestions on the design of ECC wallet reward online node
|
Bitnet. VjU9wvNgNe3PwfEgr6k5a7quWppzFvCrJj
|
|
|
taaku
|
|
October 21, 2014, 07:24:56 AM |
|
- 45 sec block target - difficulty re-target each block - 4 confirmations for a transaction
so for a amount to confirm
45*4=180 sec/60=3 min so can i say it takes 3 min to send a amount???
|
BTC: 1DgUj6s1yRwauEb89mGn92ZfNqK8xwcZPP
|
|
|
mdtspain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1076
Merit: 1003
|
|
October 21, 2014, 07:51:18 AM |
|
The coins transfer time is too long, suggestions on the design of ECC wallet reward online node
Transfer of ECC is nearly instant. I don't realy understand what you are trying to say
|
|
|
|
Ahab_the_great
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
October 21, 2014, 05:33:46 PM |
|
my debug.log keeps saying error when trying to connect i have been stuck for over a day now do i have reload the entire block chain again?
|
|
|
|
mdtspain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1076
Merit: 1003
|
|
October 21, 2014, 05:50:11 PM |
|
my debug.log keeps saying error when trying to connect i have been stuck for over a day now do i have reload the entire block chain again?
I have just send you an PM with help instructions
|
|
|
|
renbit
|
|
October 21, 2014, 06:31:53 PM |
|
it certainly does sound good and innovative , i think a difficulty would lie in getting the four exchanges to accept ecc - perhaps easier if wallet only traded in the exchanges it was already registered on - adding more as acceptance grew - but that may also hold it back perhaps permanently by only being on swisscex and allcoin only - - do you think that if the wallet with multiple exchanges was already present and available that it would act as a substantial leverage to push those other 4 exchanges to add ecc ? totalling six for ecc - its a gamble perhaps - but maybe a very good coin to try it on - i would hope it was successful - i can see ecc starting to mopve a little on the exchange now and i feel it deserves to get wider usage and acceptance - i'd like to hear how griffith feels about doing this multi exchange wallet thing to the coin, seeing as he has wrestled it back from crypto zombie world to become a living breathing coin again - is it a risk you feel is worthwhile Griffith ?
im the one making it lol . great work. well carry on then mate . i'm in
|
|
|
|
|