|
cptfisher
|
 |
September 13, 2014, 04:12:45 PM |
|
something wrong with version 1.1 ? im on block 11857 not foun a block sinc many hours ... my hasrate should find block average every 1 hour and half... also my base line is different compared to that one of mining calculator .... more over block explorer stuck at block 11800.... wtf ?
|
|
|
|
|
bolvan
Member
 Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
September 13, 2014, 04:18:05 PM |
|
something wrong with version 1.1 ? im on block 11857 not foun a block sinc many hours ... my hasrate should find block average every 1 hour and half... also my base line is different compared to that one of mining calculator .... more over block explorer stuck at block 11800.... wtf ?
They released 1.1.1. Upgrade |
AQJxzVdC8Au8a3nKjbzk5k66sziAJ5Y5Cw
|
|
|
|
omgbossis21
|
|
September 13, 2014, 04:18:34 PM |
|
Im still plotting with the cpu miner instead of the gpu since it hasn't been tested thoroughly yet. I got a 4770k overclocked running two plotting instances (one for each drive, 7 cores each instance and 2gb ram per instance). Its slower but not not much worse than one instance was. Still got one core to use the computer too
|
|
|
|
|
|
cptfisher
|
|
September 13, 2014, 04:20:50 PM |
|
but it is not mandatory i read... isnt it ?
|
|
|
|
|
good
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
September 13, 2014, 04:22:48 PM |
|
Why Error: Failed to submit nonce  ?
|
|
|
|
|
Matt9301
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1009
|
|
September 13, 2014, 04:25:15 PM |
|
Everyone that have more than 2Tb, tell me, there is a good pool and we need more good miners! Pm me!
|
|
|
|
|
|
regtable69
|
|
September 13, 2014, 04:33:05 PM |
|
Im still plotting with the cpu miner instead of the gpu since it hasn't been tested thoroughly yet. I got a 4770k overclocked running two plotting instances (one for each drive, 7 cores each instance and 2gb ram per instance). Its slower but not not much worse than one instance was. Still got one core to use the computer too
lemme get this straight you have a 15 core cpu?!? 7+7+1=15 right....... |
|
|
|
|
m3ta
|
|
September 13, 2014, 04:36:19 PM |
|
Everyone that have more than 2Tb, tell me, there is a good pool and we need more good miners! Pm me!
Why PM? You don't post info here because... it is private? Sorry, I will not waste my 24TB with a pool that has no sense of community. If it's "that good", make it public. |
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
September 13, 2014, 04:37:42 PM |
|
pool seems pretty bad, no response from uray
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
doge94
|
|
September 13, 2014, 04:39:25 PM |
|
Everyone that have more than 2Tb, tell me, there is a good pool and we need more good miners! Pm me!
Why PM? You don't post info here because... it is private? Sorry, I will not waste my 24TB with a pool that has no sense of community. If it's "that good", make it public. I run this pool. Let me just tell you that running a public pool is much more time consuming and makes it less stable because more people with less storage mine eat up all the server resources and bandwidth. |
|
|
|
|
enta2k
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 101
The Future of Security Tokens
|
|
September 13, 2014, 04:44:27 PM |
|
Guys please help me, the Plot File Names like: 321684321451554_1502209_2002944_3072
Does it mean i plottet vom 1502209 to 2002944 or does it mean i plottet 1502209+2002944?
Im really confused, could be i wrote huge chunks of files in the same numbers
|
|
|
|
|
timk225
|
|
September 13, 2014, 04:45:19 PM |
|
Im still plotting with the cpu miner instead of the gpu since it hasn't been tested thoroughly yet. I got a 4770k overclocked running two plotting instances (one for each drive, 7 cores each instance and 2gb ram per instance). Its slower but not not much worse than one instance was. Still got one core to use the computer too
You bonehead. An i7 has 8 cores with its hyperthreading. You cannot put 7 cores on one plot job and ANOTHER 7 cores on another plot job at the same time! Do you have the only 16 core i7 in the world? That is the kind of math the liberal democrats in the US government have used to get us into another 10 TRILLION dollars in debt during the 6 years of "hope and change" under Obama! |
|
|
|
|
|
twig123
|
|
September 13, 2014, 04:45:36 PM |
|
Got a problem with the GPU miner. It says it generated a plot file, but it didn't. I had 1.24 TB of free space on a 3 TB drive, and I got this 2.0.1 plotter working last night. It seemed to be doing fine. I came home this evening after work, and checked the drive..... and it still has 1.24 TB of free space after the GPU plotter appeared to successfully complete plotting 5,200,000 plots for me! What the FCUK? The "plots" folder in the GPU plotter has nothing in it. From the command line window in the directions on page 459, here's my code to get the plotter plotting: gpuPlotGenerator.exe generate 0 0 "D:\GPUPLOTGENERATOR\gpuPlotGenerator-bin-win-x86-2.0.1\plots" HERE IS MY ACCOUNT NUMBER 60000000 5200000 1024 64 2048 So what the hell did it spend 8 hours generating? Where's the file? It's not on my C drive, the C drive is nowhere near big enough to take this plot file that should've mostly filled a 1.24 GB free space. I am not happy.  LoL  Destination folder for your plot file is- D:\GPUPLOTGENERATOR\gpuPlotGenerator-bin-win-x86-2.0.1\plots But you are looking for it on drive C:\ Man,if my laptop will die,I will not give it to you to repair FAH Q man, how silly of me to think that the creator of the damn plotter actually knew what he was doing. I figured it out on my own. RE-EDIT - I see that you misread what I said when I wrote that I didn't see it on C drive. I did not mean that I was only looking for it on C drive, I meant that it was on neither the C or D drive, so what the hell did it spend all that time plotting? Did you get this figured out? I know on the CPU plotter, there was a bug that it would just delete the entire plot if the drive ran out of space. I'm not sure if this is an issue with the GPU plotter as well, but I'd suggest trying smaller plot files to see if that is the issue. |
Bitcoin: 11c3RRAyVA33DrkNyRz9dfvLogvGvYKWL
|
|
|
good
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
September 13, 2014, 04:52:42 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
silverduck
|
|
September 13, 2014, 04:56:25 PM |
|
how come this coin isnt on bigger exchange yet?
|
|
|
|
|
|
fabula
|
|
September 13, 2014, 05:04:46 PM |
|
how come this coin isnt on bigger exchange yet?
Noone knows. Probably never will hit big exchangers. Too many bagholder ready to dump in big exchanger. Normally coin getting listed on bittrex are affected by pump cause pumper knows that noone got too much coin,so they bought,they pump and then dump. Wich pumper want buy burst for a pump knowing that there are millions of holder ready to dump when burst hit 900-1000? When i heard pump about litecoindark,bitcoindark,darkcash,stealtcoin or any other shitcoin, it was however impossible to hold a good amount before pump. |
|
|
|
|
enta2k
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 101
The Future of Security Tokens
|
|
September 13, 2014, 05:06:47 PM |
|
Okay i think i found the problem, im fucking stupid. Im now plotting a 5,4TB file at once, with the new mod ~15h, so i cant fuck up with multiply files  |
|
|
|
|
regtable69
|
|
September 13, 2014, 05:08:28 PM |
|
12 blocks (confirmations on a tx) since 13 32 this afternoon gmt! so 12 blocks in 5 hrs. all these gpu plots must be messing with something. as i guess almost everyone used the gpu plotter! no wonder i feel im been scammed or skinted by the pool. 12 blocks paid out in 5 hrs! were grinding to a halt just like i thought
|
|
|
|
|
twig123
|
|
September 13, 2014, 05:08:38 PM |
|
how come this coin isnt on bigger exchange yet?
Noone knows. Because people are just mining and dumping. If there is no market for people BUYING the coin, the value will plummet. ...If you have SHA or Scrypt hardward, please point it to one of the multi-pools that mines other coins and sells them to buy burst! |
Bitcoin: 11c3RRAyVA33DrkNyRz9dfvLogvGvYKWL
|
|
|
|
