mmmaybe
|
|
September 18, 2014, 08:57:42 PM |
|
Great new version, thanks dcct! The optimizing tool, is it still restricted to 10 digit long nounces? Thanks! Of cause not. All fixed Aaaaah....! Thanks alot
|
|
|
|
cyberspacemonkey
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1002
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:04:10 PM |
|
is anyone else having issues with not being able to submit the nonce's but like only 20% of the time? the other 80% says "Failed to submit nonce, Retrying"
I have tried both ports on the pool and the same thing..
Any ideas?
Scratching my head over this as well, it seems like there is currently no decent pool to mine at the moment. some give wrong payouts or will give "Failed to submit nonce" error. I currently have 6TB but would rather not solo mine.
|
|
|
|
fivebells
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:04:28 PM |
|
Burst isn't the only coin on a downtrend, BTC and others are too
It's worth remembering some of the EPIC crashes BTC/USD has gone through, too.
|
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:05:21 PM |
|
So , which do we aprrove optimizing the stagger size? I've missed that info - why bigger stagger size is better?
|
|
|
|
enta2k
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 101
The Future of Security Tokens
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:06:43 PM |
|
Finally it´s done plotting, now my deadline average <1mio. just had one less than 1k, looks like now it´s working as it´s supposed to be.
|
|
|
|
fivebells
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:08:51 PM |
|
So , which do we aprrove optimizing the stagger size? I've missed that info - why bigger stagger size is better?
The stagger size is the number of hashes from a given nonce that are recorded contiguously on the disk. A single contiguous read is faster and easier on the disk mechanism than a lot of short reads interrupted by disk seeks.
|
|
|
|
soulmann
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:09:00 PM |
|
If you created your plots with a small stagger size, processing them takes a long time. You might miss your deadline if its found too late!The utility optimizes your already created files making them a lot faster to read. Is there any difference with 3072 stagger size and 100000 stagger size? How much time will it take to read 3 Tb with 3072 stagger size and 100000 stagger size?
|
|
|
|
unsoindovo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1042
https://locktrip.com/?refId=40964
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:14:37 PM |
|
C++ clone?
could be better yes Its crazy. Remember the virus clone? People jumped on it without a second thought. I guarantee you many will jump on next clone. Shit or not.
Yea, without even checking the source even once. Its that "ooh, something new, lets make quick money"-people. Let them go Yep, let the dummies walk off the cliff. It would take something very worthwhile to get everyone to replot their drives. with gpu is easy to replot, not for me because i've sold them all lol, but the point stand same here!!! just one 280x survived :-) hope some new maxwell wid high perfo and low consumption will come on market!
|
|
|
|
dcct
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:14:53 PM |
|
If you created your plots with a small stagger size, processing them takes a long time. You might miss your deadline if its found too late!The utility optimizes your already created files making them a lot faster to read. Is there any difference with 3072 stagger size and 100000 stagger size? How much time will it take to read 3 Tb with 3072 stagger size and 100000 stagger size? There is a huge difference! 100k stagger with 3TB is ~1s for seeking, 3072 is >30s.
|
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:14:59 PM |
|
So , which do we aprrove optimizing the stagger size? I've missed that info - why bigger stagger size is better?
The stagger size is the number of hashes from a given nonce that are recorded contiguously on the disk. A single contiguous read is faster and easier on the disk mechanism than a lot of short reads interrupted by disk seeks. Ok thanks for the info , and since my stagger sizes are 2048 and 3072 , do I need to optimize them ?
|
|
|
|
SpeedDemon13
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:16:20 PM |
|
Burst isn't the only coin on a downtrend, BTC and others are too
It's worth remembering some of the EPIC crashes BTC/USD has gone through, too. I've been through a couple and I'm still here...lol It's no different than the Stock Market, downtrends and up trends happens constantly. Just like cryptos, people spread the same type of Fud in the Stock Market too.
|
CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
|
|
|
Prototyp
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:19:59 PM |
|
The new dcct tools works fine, thanks and good work! I must test the new merge tool i have many plots with low stagger size....
|
|
|
|
enta2k
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 101
The Future of Security Tokens
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:21:27 PM |
|
Still get "dead letters encountert error" from time to time, something i have to worry about?
|
|
|
|
Palad1n
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:22:08 PM |
|
And where this new version of dcct merge for windows? )
|
|
|
|
hoze
Member
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:30:59 PM |
|
Heeeeeelp! What is wrong with this ? Always get "Passphrase does not match reward recipient" Submitting share {"result":"Passphrase does not match reward recipient"} {"baseTarget":"3940135","height":"13715","generationSignature":"553095e12d853542 4ccea2ad8bcc733b3f1770420a3c5cd4003b543ab90b1afe"} {"baseTarget":"4138068","height":"13716","generationSignature":"640a4d25ac0e2f9d 2f01170ca1b17a66435c79964a3cc352dc7689130b3983fa"} Error reading file: 2177804140358193474_0_2800000_1000 {"baseTarget":"4138068","height":"13716","generationSignature":"640a4d25ac0e2f9d 2f01170ca1b17a66435c79964a3cc352dc7689130b3983fa"} {"baseTarget":"4138068","height":"13716","generationSignature":"640a4d25ac0e2f9d 2f01170ca1b17a66435c79964a3cc352dc7689130b3983fa"} New best: 2177804140358193474:234412 Submitting share {"result":"Passphrase does not match reward recipient"} {"baseTarget":"4138068","height":"13716","generationSignature":"640a4d25ac0e2f9d U prob changed the reward assignment. No I make again a reward assigment , but nothing... pool mining or solo? when pool: which pool? Pool mining. http://burst-pool.cryptoport.io
|
|
|
|
soulmann
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:32:12 PM |
|
If you created your plots with a small stagger size, processing them takes a long time. You might miss your deadline if its found too late!The utility optimizes your already created files making them a lot faster to read. Is there any difference with 3072 stagger size and 100000 stagger size? How much time will it take to read 3 Tb with 3072 stagger size and 100000 stagger size? There is a huge difference! 100k stagger with 3TB is ~1s for seeking, 3072 is >30s. Thats cool
|
|
|
|
unsoindovo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1042
https://locktrip.com/?refId=40964
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:33:02 PM |
|
If you created your plots with a small stagger size, processing them takes a long time. You might miss your deadline if its found too late!The utility optimizes your already created files making them a lot faster to read. Is there any difference with 3072 stagger size and 100000 stagger size? How much time will it take to read 3 Tb with 3072 stagger size and 100000 stagger size? There is a huge difference! 100k stagger with 3TB is ~1s for seeking, 3072 is >30s. Thats cool i think it is really hard to plot with 100000satgger size! how many RAM do you need to do that?
|
|
|
|
oktay50000
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:35:54 PM |
|
And where this new version of dcct merge for windows? )
+1 on this
|
BTC : bc1qqz9hvv806w2zs42mx4rn576whxmr202yxp00e9
feel free to buy me a bear
|
|
|
hellojdk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:39:13 PM |
|
Thank you, developers, running very well, several times faster.I've created an advanced windows port of the dcct's-linux plotter: Download: https://mega.co.nz/#!DgsWFIJA!H_D0Tg-Laxwp1yvccUwZG8uRx2jgz0IBTTZ91r0IfQASource: https://github.com/BurstTools/BurstSoftwareImprovements against the Java miner: - At least a 5 times better performance. With a Haswell CPUs up to 14 times.
- Break and continue a plot a latter time. Please break only between writes.
- Optional asynchronous mode for writing the plots in the background. Use twice as much RAM.
- I have only access to Intel CPUs, so I don't know if it is working for AMD CPUs.
- Setting lower priority class at start up to ease the impact for foreground applications (e.g. miner)
Usage: wplotgenerator <account id> <start nonce> <number of nonces> <stagger size> <threads> [/async] <account id> = your numeric acount id <start nonce> = where you want to start plotting, if this is your first HDD then set it to 0, other wise set it to your last hdd's <start nonce> + <number of nonces> <number of nonces> = how many nonces you want to plot - 200gb is about 800000 nonces <stagger size> = set it to 2x the amount of MB RAM your system has (with async 1x the RAM your system has) <threads> = How many CPU threads you want to utilise options: /async ... writing plots from a background-thread for best throughput (needs twice as much RAM) Plotter | Codepath | CPU | Codename | Logical processors | Total average nonces per minute | Average nonces per thread per minute | pocminer_v1 | Java | Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1660 0 @ 3.30GHz | Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | 12 | 2'048 | 170,67 | wplotgenerator | SSE4 | Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz | Harpertown | 4 | 2'411 | 602,75 | wplotgenerator | SSE4 | Dual Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5650 @ 2.67GHz | Westmere-EP | 24 | 15'200 | 633,33 | wplotgenerator | AVX | Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1660 0 @ 3.30GHz | Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | 12 | 15'144 | 1'262,00 | wplotgenerator | AVX2 | Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4200M CPU @ 2.50GHz | Haswell | 4 | 7'830 | 1'957.50 | wplotgenerator | AVX2 | Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4790 CPU @ 3.60GHz | Haswell | 8 | 20'233 | 2'529.13 |
Please consider donating some of your newly mined Bursts to support further development: BURST-LNVN-5M4L-S9KP-H5AAC Happy mining! Janror
|
|
|
|
hoze
Member
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
|
September 18, 2014, 09:45:13 PM |
|
Heeeeeelp! What is wrong with this ? Always get "Passphrase does not match reward recipient" Submitting share {"result":"Passphrase does not match reward recipient"} {"baseTarget":"3940135","height":"13715","generationSignature":"553095e12d853542 4ccea2ad8bcc733b3f1770420a3c5cd4003b543ab90b1afe"} {"baseTarget":"4138068","height":"13716","generationSignature":"640a4d25ac0e2f9d 2f01170ca1b17a66435c79964a3cc352dc7689130b3983fa"} Error reading file: 2177804140358193474_0_2800000_1000 {"baseTarget":"4138068","height":"13716","generationSignature":"640a4d25ac0e2f9d 2f01170ca1b17a66435c79964a3cc352dc7689130b3983fa"} {"baseTarget":"4138068","height":"13716","generationSignature":"640a4d25ac0e2f9d 2f01170ca1b17a66435c79964a3cc352dc7689130b3983fa"} New best: 2177804140358193474:234412 Submitting share {"result":"Passphrase does not match reward recipient"} {"baseTarget":"4138068","height":"13716","generationSignature":"640a4d25ac0e2f9d It´s not starting to do this without your help. Just undo what you did, set the correct reward recipient. No, it's not worked from the begining
|
|
|
|
|