Bitcoin Forum
November 01, 2024, 10:51:23 AM *
News: Bitcoin Pumpkin Carving Contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 [886] 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 ... 1310 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [XMG] MAGI | CPU mining | mPoW | mPoS | [MagiPay]  (Read 2375690 times)
joelao95 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1009


Coin of the Magi!


View Profile
August 23, 2017, 09:14:16 AM
 #17701

@devs

if you rollback after weeks, your coin is dead!

The thing is that rollback has to be after fix, and fix needs to verify. We surely try to make it happen ASAP. Let me know your suggestions.


  Coin MAGI  . XMG   
Coin Source : Trust Verified    [ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ]
  ♓.NΣTWORK-DΣPΣNDΣNT  RΣWARDING SYSTΣM  ※ 
  ANN THREAD MAGIPAY FAQ FORUM
.CPU Mining   PoS-II   PoM   Unique Block Reward 
jorrit
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 41
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 23, 2017, 09:15:44 AM
 #17702

Mining at Suprnova is not working for me using the Magi minner. Anybody else having this issue?
Windozxpert
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 23, 2017, 09:27:25 AM
 #17703

Quote
At this point I was looking at how many times i got peers disconnected due to ERROR: ProcessBlock() : block with too little proof-of-work.
The proper chain told poolinfo that this is the block 10 times and actually disconnected and banned all 10 peers telling poolinfo about the proper block.

So to test my theory out, I increased banscore in magi.conf to 500 with

Code:
banscore=500

The debug log dropped from ~620MB to ~62MB in size (about the same running time +- a few hrs) + was able to recover from when poolinfo got invalid blocks.
I've seen in poolinfo logs block that was accepted but later on ORPHAN because the right chain was presented to poolinfo and thus got back on the right track.

So if you like to test this too, add this to
magi.conf
Code:
banscore=500
You might need to resync the chain if you are on a fork.

To test this properly, we are going to need to mine it. Anyone willing to try this out?

I'll throw some hashes that way to test. Where do you want it to go? Not that I have a whole lot, I think it was around 1 or 2 Mhs. I'm sure zpool would love to jump on that testing train with you. They've been adding and removing m7m the past few days constantly.

There's no I in team, but there is a "Me" if you jumble it up. ~ House, M.D.
edward0181
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 276
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
August 23, 2017, 09:32:47 AM
 #17704

That is the reason why I've send all my miners to my own wallet and created my own small pool to just keep mining. Don't care if it's going to be roll back or not. My wallets are on same chain as https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xmg/ and https://poolinfo.systms.org/ and I can see found blocks confirmed and created.

Will see what will happen.
Either way, feel free to use mine as long as it will keep running...
http://h2701744.stratoserver.net:85/

your pools offline, you went scamming with the coins? more than 120 blocks generated with you.

Nope. Just fixed the daemon. Wasn't reporting confirms. Now running again

Vitalik_Pedik
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 23, 2017, 09:37:51 AM
 #17705

@devs

if you rollback after weeks, your coin is dead!

The thing is that rollback has to be after fix, and fix needs to verify. We surely try to make it happen ASAP. Let me know your suggestions.

I support dev, coin will dead if we will not do anything.
ex33s
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 23, 2017, 09:38:25 AM
 #17706

Quote
At this point I was looking at how many times i got peers disconnected due to ERROR: ProcessBlock() : block with too little proof-of-work.
The proper chain told poolinfo that this is the block 10 times and actually disconnected and banned all 10 peers telling poolinfo about the proper block.

So to test my theory out, I increased banscore in magi.conf to 500 with

Code:
banscore=500

The debug log dropped from ~620MB to ~62MB in size (about the same running time +- a few hrs) + was able to recover from when poolinfo got invalid blocks.
I've seen in poolinfo logs block that was accepted but later on ORPHAN because the right chain was presented to poolinfo and thus got back on the right track.

So if you like to test this too, add this to
magi.conf
Code:
banscore=500
You might need to resync the chain if you are on a fork.

To test this properly, we are going to need to mine it. Anyone willing to try this out?

I'll throw some hashes that way to test. Where do you want it to go? Not that I have a whole lot, I think it was around 1 or 2 Mhs. I'm sure zpool would love to jump on that testing train with you. They've been adding and removing m7m the past few days constantly.

Since all pools are down that i know of, solomining would be the only way to go right now.

AngryWhiteWolf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 23, 2017, 09:46:40 AM
 #17707

Since all pools are down that i know of, solomining would be the only way to go right now.

Joe is talking about a rollback (see couple of posts above). Solo mining in this moment is waste of energy. Better wait until the situation will be clarified. I have the feeling that it'll be sorted very soon, community is helping.
orcanice
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 194
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 23, 2017, 09:55:14 AM
 #17708

Should'nt there be a warning sent out to users that dosen't read/use this forum? eg on the website before announcing a rollback. So they have a chance so shut down their mining else it would be a huge loss for some of them. - thats just my opinion.
dqy007
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 23, 2017, 09:58:39 AM
 #17709

@devs

if you rollback after weeks, your coin is dead!

The thing is that rollback has to be after fix, and fix needs to verify. We surely try to make it happen ASAP. Let me know your suggestions.

I support dev, coin will dead if we will not do anything.
Me to
ex33s
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 23, 2017, 10:06:15 AM
 #17710

Since all pools are down that i know of, solomining would be the only way to go right now.

Joe is talking about a rollback (see couple of posts above). Solo mining in this moment is waste of energy. Better wait until the situation will be clarified. I have the feeling that it'll be sorted very soon, community is helping.

I know, was asking if people would like to test my theory - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=735170.msg21124786#msg21124786

sCyborg
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 23, 2017, 10:10:51 AM
 #17711

Should'nt there be a warning sent out to users that dosen't read/use this forum? eg on the website before announcing a rollback. So they have a chance so shut down their mining else it would be a huge loss for some of them. - thats just my opinion.

Have to agree here not everyone is reading these forums, Hell most of the links on the website point to older wallets. the chain has been chugging along fine the last X hours for some so the could not know anything. anything other then a future rollback point which is announced everywhere not just here in a single response of 800+ comments. Even though the exchange might be offline people could still be doing transactions.
oVPN
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 116
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
August 23, 2017, 10:48:47 AM
Last edit: August 23, 2017, 11:06:06 AM by oVPN
 #17712

magi.conf

Code:
banscore=500
maxconnections=128
connect=104.128.225.215

add following to enable staking:

Code:
staking=1
posii=1

oVPN.to Anonymous Services
malafaya
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 256



View Profile
August 23, 2017, 10:58:04 AM
Last edit: August 23, 2017, 11:11:32 AM by malafaya
 #17713


Mind that poolinfo.systms.org and 104.128.225.215 are currently on different chains. Not sure if that's what you want to test.
oVPN
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 116
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
August 23, 2017, 11:00:59 AM
Last edit: August 23, 2017, 11:16:43 AM by oVPN
 #17714

@malafaya, please remove quote text, that's useles to quote directly on next post. thank you.

sorry, did not know that. all our nodes are @1451367 now, where is 104.128.225.215?

got it: 104. is @1450926

shutting down all nodes...

oVPN.to Anonymous Services
111magic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1005



View Profile
August 23, 2017, 11:38:04 AM
Last edit: August 23, 2017, 11:53:09 AM by 111magic
 #17715

Should'nt there be a warning sent out to users that dosen't read/use this forum? eg on the website before announcing a rollback. So they have a chance so shut down their mining else it would be a huge loss for some of them. - thats just my opinion.

Have to agree here not everyone is reading these forums, Hell most of the links on the website point to older wallets. the chain has been chugging along fine the last X hours for some so the could not know anything. anything other then a future rollback point which is announced everywhere not just here in a single response of 800+ comments. Even though the exchange might be offline people could still be doing transactions.
As Magi knows more details i will try to reach as much people i can with different forums, Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, trollboxen from the different exchanges and other social media.

To make things clear for people: hold with transactions until updates are released!!

bitcoin: bc1qyadvvyv29z08ln2ta7g3uqwzkscr7wq4p09wuz
My9bot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 239
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 23, 2017, 12:01:40 PM
 #17716

is anyone against a rollback???

I'm better with code than with words-SatoshiNakamoto
Espers [ESP]SiteOnBlockchain
My9bot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 239
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 23, 2017, 12:03:46 PM
 #17717

is anyone against a rollback???

A blockchain[1][2][3] – originally block chain[4][5] – is a continuously growing list of records, called blocks, which are linked and secured using cryptography.[1][6] Each block contains typically a hash pointer as a link to a previous block,[6] a timestamp and transaction data.[7] By design, blockchains are inherently resistant to modification of the data.
---wikipedia

I'm better with code than with words-SatoshiNakamoto
Espers [ESP]SiteOnBlockchain
joelao95 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1009


Coin of the Magi!


View Profile
August 23, 2017, 12:41:09 PM
 #17718

To ALL,

The fork takes place from one pool to another, and that I believe something fundamental needs a clarification as we haven't seen this before. This has messed around the mining. I suggest stop mining at this time until we firstly 1) get a keep-it-going solution, and 2) root cause finding and a solution to the fork. The mining just going on, unfortunately, doesn't make sense to me, and I would propose a rollover back to a fair point. Let me know if rollover sounds good to you, and where you want to startover.


Here I am going to nail down the plan that we believe better suite for the current situation, and make the corresponding wallet release at tonight.

1) A keep-it-going solution:

* New wallet release
* A Main Block chain from a starting point block #, afterwards, you can mine on that and all mining will be valid

Though I prefer starting from where all pools were down, pls vote for rollback vs non-rollback (rollback see my prior post) if this is still the case

Detail information will be posted.

In this period, I expect options of mining:

* Solo mining
* Mining through pools, such as, P2Pool, NOMP if one can offer that I can see easy work compared to MPOS
* MPOS if anyone would like to offer

2) Fix

This will be a parallel effort; as to how will be posted. Once Fix is done, we will bring fix to the main chain.

This is a balanced solutions to keep us going as I can see. I will make 1) to happen later today; guide will be posted.


  Coin MAGI  . XMG   
Coin Source : Trust Verified    [ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ]
  ♓.NΣTWORK-DΣPΣNDΣNT  RΣWARDING SYSTΣM  ※ 
  ANN THREAD MAGIPAY FAQ FORUM
.CPU Mining   PoS-II   PoM   Unique Block Reward 
Windozxpert
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 23, 2017, 12:43:48 PM
 #17719

To ALL,

The fork takes place from one pool to another, and that I believe something fundamental needs a clarification as we haven't seen this before. This has messed around the mining. I suggest stop mining at this time until we firstly 1) get a keep-it-going solution, and 2) root cause finding and a solution to the fork. The mining just going on, unfortunately, doesn't make sense to me, and I would propose a rollover back to a fair point. Let me know if rollover sounds good to you, and where you want to startover.


Here I am going to nail down the plan that we believe better suite for the current situation, and make the corresponding wallet release at tonight.

1) A keep-it-going solution:

* New wallet release
* A Main Block chain from a starting point block #, afterwards, you can mine on that and all mining will be valid

Though I prefer starting from where all pools were down, pls vote for rollback vs non-rollback (rollback see my prior post) if this is still the case

Detail information will be posted.

In this period, I expect options of mining:

* Solo mining
* Mining through pools, such as, P2Pool, NOMP if one can offer that I can see easy work compared to MPOS
* MPOS if anyone would like to offer

2) Fix

This will be a parallel effort; as to how will be posted. Once Fix is done, we will bring fix to the main chain.

This is a balanced solutions to keep us going as I can see. I will make 1) to happen later today; guide will be posted.


My vote: Pick up where the pools left off. No rollback.

There's no I in team, but there is a "Me" if you jumble it up. ~ House, M.D.
sCyborg
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 23, 2017, 12:46:15 PM
 #17720

Yeah preferably no rollback.
Pages: « 1 ... 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 [886] 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 ... 1310 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!