[SDC] ShadowCash | Welcome to the UMBRA

[Cornett]

The merging with DRK is bad proposal from that community. Because SDC is small and this project has better techs and extreme potential. DRK core developers fear to lose. ShadowCash is the future, DRK is the yesterday's techs - it's obviously.

None of your tech matters if no one will buy your coin because they have no idea what you're doing.

DRK is a widely publicized and PR hyped currency. SDC still a dark horse in crypto world and many people know nothing about this project. PR is the last stage for SDC. When it'll happen and the team will go to the wide promotion - This currency will be on the top. But now it is too early for SDC's PR. We are growing and improving every day

[rentahash]

nice progess you have.
At least Evan promote you in a nice way

Wish you bright future... pity we didnt merge
I change my BBR to SDC now

[00Smurf]

Alright, so after being exposed to your currency:

I have the wallet cloned from github. Is there anything I have to add to the configuration file for the HTML5 wallet? Right now, it's just a regular ugly QT wallet. 

I think sdcdev answered you in IRC.

[00Smurf]

nice progess you have.
At least Evan promote you in a nice way

Wish you bright future... pity we didnt merge
I change my BBR to SDC now

I still have my 42 DRK, Both coins have their pluses.

[rentahash]

nice progess you have.
At least Evan promote you in a nice way

Wish you bright future... pity we didnt merge
I change my BBR to SDC now

I still have my 42 DRK, Both coins have their pluses.

yep, it would be such a news if we merged...

[SebSebastian]

So Evan lead dev from Drk is stalking us now?  

They fear getting dethroned I guess  

Its not about dethroning anyone... It is in the best interest of everyone for like minded project developers to work together. A merge would rocket the value both coins, provide an epic team of developers, and lets face it, Darkcoin is much bigger than Shadow.

Although I have some reservations about the proposed merger, the DRK/BTC price action since the announcement was released suggests that the markets like this idea.  

Please feel free to join the discussion.
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/darkcoin-shadowcash-merger.2918

Well, it looks like the discussion's over anyway. I'm not sure the Shadow community would've gone for this to be honest, the proposal seems to have been stacked pretty heavily in DRK's favour.  

It's nice to see that the quality of the developers' work is being recognised by some of the others in the industry now. It's felt a bit like a secret club in here at times, like when you find an amazing new band playing in some shitty bar and you almost don't want loads of other people to find out about them because then they wouldn't be "yours" anymore. But I guess it was only a matter of time before the secret got out and the big labels came sniffing round.  

Anyway, welcome to anyone from the DRK community who's here wondering what could've prompted Evan to propose the merger in the first place. The OP gives a pretty good project overview and testing has begun on the zero knowledge anon implementation, so you've arrived at a pretty exciting time!  

[ItsNotMe]

nice progess you have.
At least Evan promote you in a nice way

Wish you bright future... pity we didnt merge
I change my BBR to SDC now

I still have my 42 DRK, Both coins have their pluses.

yep, it would be such a news if we merged...

It won't happen...drk holders are too caught up with the "first anon" thing to recognize superior technology.  

[rentahash]

nice progess you have.
At least Evan promote you in a nice way

Wish you bright future... pity we didnt merge
I change my BBR to SDC now

I still have my 42 DRK, Both coins have their pluses.

yep, it would be such a news if we merged...

It won't happen...drk holders are too caught up with the "first anon" thing to recognize superior technology.  

superior is relative thing...
DRK delivering what is promising , superior tech is yet to be found... it is incremental progress
BBR was also superior tech promoted..

I wish you all the best !

[00Smurf]

nice progess you have.
At least Evan promote you in a nice way

Wish you bright future... pity we didnt merge
I change my BBR to SDC now

I still have my 42 DRK, Both coins have their pluses.

yep, it would be such a news if we merged...

It won't happen...drk holders are too caught up with the "first anon" thing to recognize superior technology.  

superior is relative thing...
DRK delivering what is promising , superior tech is yet to be found... it is incremental progress
BBR was also superior tech promoted..

I wish you all the best !

Thanks for keeping an openmind. Glad to have you in the thread.

[4M8B]

What could be wrong -> My wallet shows 92072.60271167 SDC (Spendable) (This is the amount which I should have when I count my coins through cryptsy)

When I lookup the address on the block explorer I have 82036.71110493 SDC

I only have 3 addresses in my wallet 1 with zero SDC, 1with 20 SDC, and 1 with 82036.71110493 SDC (on blockchain)


06.11.14 19:56   Received with   My Wallet      1682.85063471
06.11.14 09:23   Received with   My Wallet      13899.999
06.11.14 08:50   Received with   My Wallet      56599.999
03.11.14 12:28   Received with   My Wallet      3310.09928007

08.10.14 22:16   Received with   My Wallet      6511.39961808

14.09.14 10:55   Received with   My Wallet      10027.27341972


Is there ever been a forked chain between october till today ??
Yesterday when I pulled shadowcoind it stated version 0.9xxx while I was using ha version of 1.2xxx till yesterday ,  I think I downloaded the higher version on the github under the tags a time ago , could this be the problem?

[CryptoChronic]

What could be wrong -> My wallet shows 92072.60271167 SDC (Spendable) (This is the amount which I should have when I count my coins through cryptsy)

When I lookup the address on the block explorer I have 82036.71110493 SDC

I only have 3 addresses in my wallet 1 with zero SDC, 1with 20 SDC, and 1 with 82036.71110493 SDC (on blockchain)


06.11.14 19:56   Received with   My Wallet      1682.85063471
06.11.14 09:23   Received with   My Wallet      13899.999
06.11.14 08:50   Received with   My Wallet      56599.999
03.11.14 12:28   Received with   My Wallet      3310.09928007

08.10.14 22:16   Received with   My Wallet      6511.39961808

14.09.14 10:55   Received with   My Wallet      10027.27341972


Is there ever been a forked chain between october till today ??
Yesterday when I pulled shadowcoind it stated version 0.9xxx while I was using ha version of 1.2xxx till yesterday ,  I think I downloaded the higher version on the github under the tags a time ago , could this be the problem?

Well it hasnt forked... pop in IRC some1 will be happy to help

[4M8B]

Well it hasnt forked... pop in IRC some1 will be happy to help

Ok thanks

[LongAndShort]

So Evan lead dev from Drk is stalking us now?  

They fear getting dethroned I guess  

Its not about dethroning anyone... It is in the best interest of everyone for like minded project developers to work together. A merge would rocket the value both coins, provide an epic team of developers, and lets face it, Darkcoin is much bigger than Shadow.

Although I have some reservations about the proposed merger, the DRK/BTC price action since the announcement was released suggests that the markets like this idea.  

Please feel free to join the discussion.
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/darkcoin-shadowcash-merger.2918

Well, it looks like the discussion's over anyway. I'm not sure the Shadow community would've gone for this to be honest, the proposal seems to have been stacked pretty heavily in DRK's favour.  

It's nice to see that the quality of the developers' work is being recognised by some of the others in the industry now. It's felt a bit like a secret club in here at times, like when you find an amazing new band playing in some shitty bar and you almost don't want loads of other people to find out about them because then they wouldn't be "yours" anymore. But I guess it was only a matter of time before the secret got out and the big labels came sniffing round.  

Anyway, welcome to anyone from the DRK community who's here wondering what could've prompted Evan to propose the merger in the first place. The OP gives a pretty good project overview and testing has begun on the zero knowledge anon implementation, so you've arrived at a pretty exciting time!  

Agreed, its nice that drk is showing the rest of this space they mean business and that they see value in this project, its community and its devs. I do however, see the proposal as extremely insulting (as a lowball) and a way to pick extremely talented devs on the cheap, and or consolidate the dev talent in a very cheap way. It all favored drk and i believe it made sense for Evan to propose such a thing. However, he could never have thought it wold move past just the insulting lowball. I'm sure he understands it was not very fair; taking a snapshot of our market cap before our milestone release.

Some may argue he is afraid, Shadows' Zero Knowledge will will basically push his master node, spaghetti network into the frey and he would have every right to be. But i cannot speculate on such things because i just don't know!

Shadow has not yet established itself to be calling its 400k market cap any type of true value to be proposing such an absorption based on its current market cap. Thats like as someone said, litecoin going to them right before their release of the 1000 master nodes and offering to absorb based on that snapshot of their market cap. Its just not fair on the project and it seems like an attempt to pick up cheap resource. Which makes sense in a business sense because big business absorbs competition and their tech on the cheap because they have the power to.

I'm more concerned Evan did not consult his community before offering such a proposal to increase drks money supply. He has, however, proposed it in a way that is covers a lot of bases with regards to emission and inflation. I am still a little concerned as to the transparency or lack of, rather. Thats something i firmly believe this whole industry can really do with focusing on; so there is no doubt in anyones mind about anything.

At the end of the day we (the community) are what really drive these projects and not a core dev team only!

It is a nice self esteem boost for Shadow and gives a lot of legitimacy to this project, dev and communities ability to give it value. Just my .9

[LongAndShort]

What could be wrong -> My wallet shows 92072.60271167 SDC (Spendable) (This is the amount which I should have when I count my coins through cryptsy)

When I lookup the address on the block explorer I have 82036.71110493 SDC

I only have 3 addresses in my wallet 1 with zero SDC, 1with 20 SDC, and 1 with 82036.71110493 SDC (on blockchain)


06.11.14 19:56   Received with   My Wallet      1682.85063471
06.11.14 09:23   Received with   My Wallet      13899.999
06.11.14 08:50   Received with   My Wallet      56599.999
03.11.14 12:28   Received with   My Wallet      3310.09928007

08.10.14 22:16   Received with   My Wallet      6511.39961808

14.09.14 10:55   Received with   My Wallet      10027.27341972


Is there ever been a forked chain between october till today ??
Yesterday when I pulled shadowcoind it stated version 0.9xxx while I was using ha version of 1.2xxx till yesterday ,  I think I downloaded the higher version on the github under the tags a time ago , could this be the problem?

Try running this command in the console the restart

Code:

repairwallet

If that doesn't fix it completely then run the other two one after another waiting for each one to finish first then run the other then restart the client

Code:

clearwallettransactions

Code:

scanforalltxns

[4M8B]

Ok thanks I've found the coins it all ok

[sdcoin]

Hey all

Please see our statement regarding the events that took place today:
http://shadowtalk.org/topic/252/darkcoin-proposal-statement

[pookielax31]

Future Shadow Holders

[ItsNotMe]

Hey all

Please see our statement regarding the events that took place today:
http://shadowtalk.org/topic/252/darkcoin-proposal-statement

This is exactly how I had hoped you would respond. The dev does not own the coin, the community needs to have a voice on these matters. ShadowCash will get the attention it deserves in due time.

[dadon]

Hey all

Please see our statement regarding the events that took place today:
http://shadowtalk.org/topic/252/darkcoin-proposal-statement

This is exactly how I had hoped you would respond. The dev does not own the coin, the community needs to have a voice on these matters. ShadowCash will get the attention it deserves in due time.

The Dev does own the coin but it's a lot nicer when he lets the community decide the future of it, he puts his time and money into it we speculate on the product he creates, without us he has a great product with no supporters but a great product will always find support, without him we have no product. so just don't forget that, it's great he respects the opinion of the community, but lets not forget who is putting the hard yards in.

[CryptoChronic]

Hey all

Please see our statement regarding the events that took place today:
http://shadowtalk.org/topic/252/darkcoin-proposal-statement

This is exactly how I had hoped you would respond. The dev does not own the coin, the community needs to have a voice on these matters. ShadowCash will get the attention it deserves in due time.

The Dev does own the coin but it's a lot nicer when he lets the community decide the future of it, he puts his time and money into it we speculate on the product he creates, without us he has a great product with no supporters but a great product will always find support, without him we have no product. so just don't forget that, it's great he respects the opinion of the community, but lets not forget who is putting the hard yards in.

Said it perfectly ^^^