xuy
Member
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
|
August 24, 2017, 04:45:59 AM |
|
I am looking at this page https://btc.com/stats/pool?pool_mode=month3Kano CK's transaction fee is 20%+ higher than the other pools. I wonder why there is no Kano pool August data yet.
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
August 24, 2017, 05:12:01 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
IntroVert
|
|
August 24, 2017, 05:32:51 AM |
|
https://kano.is results in "server DNS address could not be found" in Chrome from my tablet and phone from Washington, DC metro area in the past 10 mins. Anyone else experiencing the same? EDIT: Mining seems unaffected.
|
|
|
|
hyperindividet
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
August 24, 2017, 06:02:15 AM |
|
https://kano.is results in "server DNS address could not be found" in Chrome from my tablet and phone from Washington, DC metro area in the past 10 mins. Anyone else experiencing the same? EDIT: Mining seems unaffected. I'm also seeing this.
|
|
|
|
GWhisper
|
|
August 24, 2017, 06:03:39 AM |
|
No problem for me, perhaps a localised issue.
|
|
|
|
Apprentice
|
|
August 24, 2017, 06:07:15 AM |
|
https://kano.is results in "server DNS address could not be found" in Chrome from my tablet and phone from Washington, DC metro area in the past 10 mins. Anyone else experiencing the same? EDIT: Mining seems unaffected. I'm also seeing this. same here
|
|
|
|
NomadGroup
|
|
August 24, 2017, 06:19:56 AM |
|
Wow! What happened to like 20PH...?
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
August 24, 2017, 06:26:53 AM |
|
Wow! What happened to like 20PH...? Hi, there was a DNS problem for a while. Resolved now. Although I have 4 DNS servers with 4 different providers, they all slave off a "hidden" master Amazon AWS server. Unfortunately something has gone wrong with the AWS server - it reports on amazon as 100% ok but I can't connect to it (even after rebooting) and thus of course the DNS slaves can't talk to it either. I've rerouted the DNS for now and all should be OK again. Now to work out what's up with the AWS server ...
|
|
|
|
mdude77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
|
|
August 24, 2017, 12:26:36 PM |
|
Wow! What happened to like 20PH...? Hi, there was a DNS problem for a while. Resolved now. Although I have 4 DNS servers with 4 different providers, they all slave off a "hidden" master Amazon AWS server. Unfortunately something has gone wrong with the AWS server - it reports on amazon as 100% ok but I can't connect to it (even after rebooting) and thus of course the DNS slaves can't talk to it either. I've rerouted the DNS for now and all should be OK again. Now to work out what's up with the AWS server ... I've been having DNS issues on off yesterday all day. I use L3 as my primary and OpenDNS as secondary. M
|
I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent! Come join me!
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
August 24, 2017, 12:50:59 PM |
|
Wow! What happened to like 20PH...? Hi, there was a DNS problem for a while. Resolved now. Although I have 4 DNS servers with 4 different providers, they all slave off a "hidden" master Amazon AWS server. Unfortunately something has gone wrong with the AWS server - it reports on amazon as 100% ok but I can't connect to it (even after rebooting) and thus of course the DNS slaves can't talk to it either. I've rerouted the DNS for now and all should be OK again. Now to work out what's up with the AWS server ... I've been having DNS issues on off yesterday all day. I use L3 as my primary and OpenDNS as secondary. M I run all my own DNS servers (including the master that isn't accessible by anyone, but me and the other 4 DNS servers) The point of the 4 slaves is that they are on 4 different providers (also different from the master) so if a provider craps out or has network problems, the others should still be OK ... and 4, well ... 2 is better than 1 ... so 3 is better 2 ... so 4 is better again The 4th one is actually in China also - it's been running DNS for ages but not as a listed DNS server, I only added it to the list for kano.is yesterday, but long before the problem occurred, it's unrelated (and I've actually not done the last step yet of registering it on the registry yet) that was gonna be today ... but things went awry for a while there ... but it's all OK again and back with the AWS as the master of the other 4.
|
|
|
|
813bits
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
August 24, 2017, 01:13:56 PM |
|
I ask this question trying to understand and adapt to the new payout method..I have not received payment for blocks 481667 and 481716 which have both matured. I thought under the new method they were paid out once matured rather than once matured and next block found. I am not complaining, just trying to understand. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
DarKSm0ke
|
|
August 24, 2017, 01:23:51 PM |
|
Block by Abramov!
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
August 24, 2017, 01:24:35 PM |
|
Block by Abramov!
Nice size 16.84BTC and 2 payouts
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4606
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
August 24, 2017, 01:28:35 PM |
|
I ask this question trying to understand and adapt to the new payout method..I have not received payment for blocks 481667 and 481716 which have both matured. I thought under the new method they were paid out once matured rather than once matured and next block found. I am not complaining, just trying to understand. Thanks.
The transaction is always sent once matured (well almost always) You just may not see it until it confirms the first time, which will be when it gets in a block, any block, like just happened. Though recently blocks were pretty empty so I added a fee and they got confirmed by other pools and you would have often seen them unconfirmed also. I'm not adding the fee at the moment coz it's pointless - see the size of the block we just got, and that was only a 12 minute network block.
|
|
|
|
813bits
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
August 24, 2017, 01:44:30 PM |
|
I ask this question trying to understand and adapt to the new payout method..I have not received payment for blocks 481667 and 481716 which have both matured. I thought under the new method they were paid out once matured rather than once matured and next block found. I am not complaining, just trying to understand. Thanks.
The transaction is always sent once matured (well almost always) You just may not see it until it confirms the first time, which will be when it gets in a block, any block, like just happened. Though recently blocks were pretty empty so I added a fee and they got confirmed by other pools and you would have often seen them unconfirmed also. I'm not adding the fee at the moment coz it's pointless - see the size of the block we just got, and that was only a 12 minute network block. Ahhhh, so there was never a change to the payout method, you were just adding a transaction fee which is why we were seeing payouts faster. Got it. Thanks Kano.
|
|
|
|
NomadGroup
|
|
August 24, 2017, 06:35:42 PM |
|
Would be awesome if we got like a 5 block Friday or Saturday so that our statistics even out before the end of the month and get us little closer to 100% luck! . Let's cross our fingers fellas!
|
|
|
|
wmabern
|
|
August 24, 2017, 07:27:39 PM |
|
|
BITMIXER.IO Gone Baby, Gone.. ;-) Not any good sig campaigns out there that I want!
|
|
|
lakerunner22
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
August 24, 2017, 07:28:41 PM |
|
Moving my miners from F2. Whats the main difference from the way they payout to the way kano.is pays out?
|
|
|
|
overcon
|
|
August 24, 2017, 07:56:47 PM |
|
Moving my miners from F2. Whats the main difference from the way they payout to the way kano.is pays out?
I just know that Kano includes the block fees in the payment and that each block has to get 101 confirmations before it matures and then is paid when the next block is found. So it takes a little while for payments to arrive but they are more than others.
|
Donate BTC to: 1PXBBTLqXQnT9qAyWsc51XGj2GUt4WW57x
|
|
|
beltsniffer
|
|
August 24, 2017, 11:21:17 PM |
|
<deleted link> STILL! Don't see it as a scam I've been paid 4 times already and just started Aug 19-21! Please ELABORATE! Time Amount Address status 2017-08-24 20:57:35 0.00100000 BTC 1JyrTbppACAunfZC8oAxQD49RYNQpQHKh4 Pending 2017-08-22 21:17:05 0.00100000 BTC 1JyrTbppACAunfZC8oAxQD49RYNQpQHKh4 Paid (Txid) 2017-08-21 18:25:01 0.00100000 BTC 1JyrTbppACAunfZC8oAxQD49RYNQpQHKh4 Paid (Txid) 2017-08-19 21:57:18 0.00200000 BTC 1JyrTbppACAunfZC8oAxQD49RYNQpQHKh4 Paid (Txid)
And I'm gonna take the newbie's word who just registered to post this and tell me how great that SCAM is. Um yeah.
|
|
|
|
|