KanoPool since 2014 🐈 - PPLNS and Solo 0.5% fee - Worldwide - 2436 blocks

[qcdebug]

Hi all,

Not finding good information about this so I'll ask here.

If I've been mining using the wallet address and want to switch to the worker method to see my information in the portal will I lose what I've generated so far or will the pool figure out it's the same worker and keep up with the total so far?   I ask because even though I've set my payout address I still don't see anything accruing in my portal so far which makes me think I will loose what I've generated to date (about 6 days).

Thanks!

Debug

[1715690435]

1715690435

[1715690435]

1715690435

[1715690435]

1715690435

[NotFuzzyWarm]

No matter what you will not lose credit for work done. If the values is over the dust threshold you *will* be paid for it to the address you used.

If you are registered and just first used the address as a worker name and now change the worker name to be your username (eg in my case Fuzzy.minerID), yes the ramp up will start over but because the old name is ramping down and still paying to the wallet address at the same time earnings should be the same.

[ccgllc]

every sunday evening i transfer my credits to my ledger.

one !!!! block in a Week!!!! time...


This is soooo depressing...


10x S9, profit in a week:0.011002BTC... 

Yes, but that triple block day we recently experienced had to look sweet!  Remember it all evens out over time.

[Vertflyer]

I figured out my nya issue. embarrassingly enough, there was an extra space after the 3333 .

oh boy...

[clgrissom3]

every sunday evening i transfer my credits to my ledger.

one !!!! block in a Week!!!! time...


This is soooo depressing...


10x S9, profit in a week:0.011002BTC... 

And the week before that your profit was 0.08004323...I don't think I saw any complaints from you then.  So what's your point?

Bitcoin mining is a long term activity.  Short term analysis is not logical and only causes you stress.

Try looking at big picture and you will be a much happier miner.

Maybe so, but thats the average i expect it to be. About .01/day average. So no, no complaints that week, about .01 above the week-average.

And your average for 2018 is also at about 0.01/day so far if you've been here that long.  That's what I mean, if you look at the longer time spans you will realize that it works out just fine and you won't have to sweat the short-term results when they are less than ideal and depressing.  I celebrate every day that I'm on the best (and most transparent) pool on the planet because I go for the long term results instead of complaining about the latest short-term dip in luck. It really does work out just fine in the long run when you stay with the best!

[Shazam!!!]

Welp!!! After a serious windstorm, and 2.5 days of no power........I'm back!!! Thank God (or whatever you believe in) for the 5nd!!!

[Vlada69]

Welp!!! After a serious windstorm, and 2.5 days of no power........I'm back!!! Thank God (or whatever you believe in) for the 5nd!!!

Thx for sending it to me

[rifleman74]

MINE ON WITH KANO-SAN!

[tarby32]

MINE ON WITH KANO-SAN!

Right that’s it, chicken sacrifice needed. Dancing shoes are on and going to keep going to my feet bleed

MINE ON PEOPLE

[NotFuzzyWarm]

I figured out my nya issue. embarrassingly enough, there was an extra space after the 3333 .

oh boy...

Ja. Be careful when using copy/paste. Many times the selection will include a space. Same applies when c/p addresses to pay to/receive from. Always check it.
Been there done that a few times before catching on.

[NotFuzzyWarm]

Welp!!! After a serious windstorm, and 2.5 days of no power........I'm back!!! Thank God (or whatever you believe in) for the 5nd!!!

Been fun around Redford as well. My GF got her power back on last night after being out for 21hrs. Internet back on today about noon. Had 2x 741's there that were just coming back online after her internet had been out for 5 days prior from the last blustery day here.

Anywho, changed the miners there from 2x 741's to 2x 821's using command line voltage of -1. Was ~15TH from her feeding the farm now 20ish and I believe a bit lower power draw ta boot. The 741's will join their brethren in main farm at work replacing a flaky batch-1 T9 + a bit more there..

[ccgllc]

Anywho, changed the miners there from 2x 741's to 2x 821's using command line voltage of -1. Was ~15TH from her feeding the farm now 20ish and I believe a bit lower power draw ta boot. The 741's will join their brethren in main farm at work replacing a flaky batch-1 T9 + a bit more there..

I own two T9+s, and glad it is only two.  Bought them back when you couldn't get S9s and wish I hadn't.  Both have been in for repairs within weeks of powering them up.

[NotFuzzyWarm]

Anywho, changed the miners there from 2x 741's to 2x 821's using command line voltage of -1. Was ~15TH from her feeding the farm now 20ish and I believe a bit lower power draw ta boot. The 741's will join their brethren in main farm at work replacing a flaky batch-1 T9 + a bit more there..

I own two T9+s, and glad it is only two.  Bought them back when you couldn't get S9s and wish I hadn't.  Both have been in for repairs within weeks of powering them up.

Only have 3 T9's. 1st batch or 2 I got were great with only 1 dead fan a while back. This one being replaced only started acting up a month or so ago. Still - at 10-11THs and over 1,450w is a no-brainer to replace it with the slightly more efficient 741 running a fairly solid 8THs each. No matter what slowly creeping back to to my original hashrate from before the outages began.

[Toll-Booth-Jim]

T9+'s eat up way too much power, even with prices getting closer to 10,000 again. accept for todays bit of a downfall.  What are some of the thoughts on bch instead of btc mining now a days.  Does anyone know the difference in profits, like say 1 S9 mining BTC compared to one S9 mining BCH, which would make more? Any and all opinions welcome!  Even in solo mining?  Is there a way to make daily or even weekly profits from solo mining BCH or even BTC?  I've never gotten into even the most basic issues regarding solo mining.

[nazzer]

I figured out my nya issue. embarrassingly enough, there was an extra space after the 3333 .

oh boy...

Ja. Be careful when using copy/paste. Many times the selection will include a space. Same applies when c/p addresses to pay to/receive from. Always check it.
Been there done that a few times before catching on.

Too many cowboy developers, sanitizing inputs - i.e. trimming extra spaces and odd characters - should be standard on web interfaces, it's not like there isn't a standard library to help you do it these days


WHERE'S MY GODDAMN BLOCK??

C'mon Sidewinder, let's have 5 today?

[BSGMiner]

Been playing around with my Pool 0, 1, and 2 since I never fixed that read-only issue with my RPI...

Just wondering if making the same node for 0 and 1 would alleviate some of the "5 minute failover shenanigans" Kano mentions.

My logic is that if a node has a quick disconnect-reconnect and it's enough to cause a failover, that may be just enough time to see it as available again after the failover, and it ends up using the same node. Otherwise, it'll just resort to the main us.kano.is node.

Any thoughts?

[kano]

Been playing around with my Pool 0, 1, and 2 since I never fixed that read-only issue with my RPI...

Just wondering if making the same node for 0 and 1 would alleviate some of the "5 minute failover shenanigans" Kano mentions.

My logic is that if a node has a quick disconnect-reconnect and it's enough to cause a failover, that may be just enough time to see it as available again after the failover, and it ends up using the same node. Otherwise, it'll just resort to the main us.kano.is node.

Any thoughts?

I wouldn't rely on the failover in the miner code working well - I regularly hear from people asking questions that mean that it doesn't.
Make the 2nd one simply just another kano node somewhere else so if it fails over it will be to a node a bit further away.
The millisecond numbers people see are pretty much irrelevant unless they're well over 100ms - which should really only be the other side of the planet.

Pools in general used to take many times longer than that to switch work unless they were SPV pools mining empty blocks.
So it really isn't a big deal to take 100ms or a bit more.
Of course work change here has always been much quicker than that

There used to be stats about that info about pools, that I wrote, in the cgminer API so you could actually check, but ck broke all that long ago and never fixed it
They're still there ('stats') but they don't show the pool specific timing info any more - though there's still useful info in there

[AerialGopher]

Welp!!! After a serious windstorm, and 2.5 days of no power........I'm back!!! Thank God (or whatever you believe in) for the 5nd!!!

I have a 3100 watt generator.  Inverter style..  I could run two S9's  but I would be worried about bad power with the inverter.  BUT  if I needed heat, I would do that before I hooked up the furnace to the generator.

Priorities

[AerialGopher]

MINE ON WITH KANO-SAN!

Right that’s it, chicken sacrifice needed. Dancing shoes are on and going to keep going to my feet bleed

MINE ON PEOPLE

Okay, I sacrificed the biggest damn chicken I could find!  That should work!

This does NOT look like a sacrifice...  This looks like molestation!  But hey... if it gets a block...   uhhh.. yeah.. i'll leave that one alone.

[scaary]

meep, finally ramped up again after such a long time... and the blocks went hiding ^^