sjc1490
|
|
November 27, 2014, 01:26:07 AM |
|
Kano I also sent a question on lat payout when you have a chance.
|
BTC ADDRESS: 12Qwd8VKLQ4xF44ytHXBpCAKuF9VknG4X2
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
November 27, 2014, 02:19:08 AM |
|
Kano I also sent a question on lat payout when you have a chance.
Yes I've not done the payout for 331660 yet. Been working on code ... it matured 50 minutes ago ... will do it shortly. Payout 331660 sent - enjoy Edit: and confirmed
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4270
Merit: 8659
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
November 27, 2014, 02:51:29 AM |
|
Kano I also sent a question on lat payout when you have a chance.
Yes I've not done the payout for 331660 yet. Been working on code ... it matured 50 minutes ago ... will do it shortly. Payout 331660 sent - enjoy Edit: and confirmed got it thanks
|
|
|
|
sjc1490
|
|
November 27, 2014, 04:24:25 AM |
|
Me too, disregard pm question. Thanks.
|
BTC ADDRESS: 12Qwd8VKLQ4xF44ytHXBpCAKuF9VknG4X2
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
November 27, 2014, 06:09:10 AM |
|
Doing another ckdb restart - as usual, shouldn't affect mining, but the web stats will be unavailable while I do it. Quite a sizable change, so ... I thought I better warn when I did it (now) ... Finished.
|
|
|
|
loshia
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 27, 2014, 07:36:49 PM |
|
Con, There is a file descriptor leak in gen_loop(proc_instance_t *pi) probably in other loop places also
Some jumps to reconnect do not close sockd.
The quick fix for me is
reconnect: if (si) { kill_server(si); reconnecting = true; // close checks for -1 Close(sockd); }
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4256
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
|
November 27, 2014, 11:26:01 PM |
|
Con, There is a file descriptor leak in gen_loop(proc_instance_t *pi) probably in other loop places also
Some jumps to reconnect do not close sockd.
The quick fix for me is
reconnect: if (si) { kill_server(si); reconnecting = true; // close checks for -1 Close(sockd); }
Thanks Ioshia. Fixed in master and the development branch (userstats).
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
aurel57
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 30, 2014, 01:48:49 PM |
|
I think I have come to the conclusion that I must bring bad luck to this pool?
|
|
|
|
Miasma
Member
Offline
Activity: 110
Merit: 10
|
|
November 30, 2014, 04:08:59 PM |
|
Well, anyone looking at the CDF, that 0.98 means that all pools should average one block like that or longer in every ~50 blocks. That being the pool's 25th successful block, means it's not at all unexpected. But at least the average since the pool started is still looking pretty good 69.52% of diff average per block. i.e. we've found ~1.44 times the number of expected blocks so far. A long block like that indeed affected those two numbers as I said in that post on the previous page, but that luck streak before has kept the average better than expected. Of course if you start mining at any time, the expected long term average is 100%, but the shorter term average will of course vary a lot more. That all being said, the one thing that makes that guaranteed variance easier to bear with PPLNS, is the higher pool hash rate. We are slowly climbing up there, but of course the more hash rate the better 1700TH means at the moment an expected average block time of ~1day 4.25hrs so it's getting better But it looks like your standard deviation is over 101%. How has your variance been trending with time???
|
eBay, where Thieves Thrive
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4270
Merit: 8659
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
November 30, 2014, 04:26:11 PM |
|
I think I have come to the conclusion that I must bring bad luck to this pool? I gave up can't deal with it anymore. Maybe next month I will come back.
|
|
|
|
aurel57
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 30, 2014, 05:17:39 PM |
|
I think I have come to the conclusion that I must bring bad luck to this pool? I gave up can't deal with it anymore. Maybe next month I will come back. I noticed you were gone. I only have 1 miner pointed here and plan on staying this time. I left last time before a block was found and just gave up any payment I had earned.
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4270
Merit: 8659
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
November 30, 2014, 07:01:31 PM |
|
I think I have come to the conclusion that I must bring bad luck to this pool? I gave up can't deal with it anymore. Maybe next month I will come back. I noticed you were gone. I only have 1 miner pointed here and plan on staying this time. I left last time before a block was found and just gave up any payment I had earned. yeah I caught most of the good luck blocks. Missed some of them. But I did catch all the bad luck blocks. When I get some more hash I will point something here. ( purchased 2x sp20's). So maybe tues or weds I will point gear back here.
|
|
|
|
lowbander80
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 01, 2014, 09:14:35 AM |
|
Mining for more than 2 weeks with only 2 blocks found. Actually this was the first time that I joined a small pool I have you now as my second pool... good luck with your projects will come back soon
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
December 01, 2014, 11:45:12 PM |
|
From now - rather than yesterday - the actual block history is as the web site says: https://kano.is/index.php?k=pblocks5 days - 0 blocks 6 days - 1 block 7 days - 2 blocks 13 days - 3 blocks 17 days - 5 blocks lots and lots more blocks ... Oh well, lets hope we get more much closer to the expected time soon.
|
|
|
|
s0br
|
|
December 03, 2014, 03:44:27 AM |
|
From now - rather than yesterday - the actual block history is as the web site says: https://kano.is/index.php?k=pblocks5 days - 0 blocks 6 days - 1 block 7 days - 2 blocks 13 days - 3 blocks 17 days - 5 blocks lots and lots more blocks ... Oh well, lets hope we get more much closer to the expected time soon. With your current round, the probability of finding exactly 0 blocks in 7 days at 1.08PH is: 2.24%... based on Bitcoin's poisson distribution... it's not very probable to get the big swings your pool is having.. it's very unlikely... you sure you didn't screw anything up?
|
|
|
|
MrGreenHat
|
|
December 03, 2014, 03:54:16 AM |
|
From now - rather than yesterday - the actual block history is as the web site says: https://kano.is/index.php?k=pblocks5 days - 0 blocks 6 days - 1 block 7 days - 2 blocks 13 days - 3 blocks 17 days - 5 blocks lots and lots more blocks ... Oh well, lets hope we get more much closer to the expected time soon. With your current round, the probability of finding exactly 0 blocks in 7 days at 1.08PH is: 2.24%... based on Bitcoin's poisson distribution... it's not very probable to get the big swings your pool is having.. it's very unlikely... you sure you didn't screw anything up? This pool has had SHIT LUCK for a week. It happens. Look at the AMAZING luck it had during its initial launch month. Do you know who you are talking to? Have some fucking respect, man. I sure as hell hope you use BFGminer or some other mining software, assuming you actually own any hardware yourself instead of just renting it out, which I can guarantee you the majority of (the hash that you rent) is from rigs running some version of cgminer. Key word is PROBABLE. No, it's not probable, but probability is called probability for a fucking reason you moron.
|
|
|
|
nreal
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 932
Merit: 100
arcs-chain.com
|
|
December 03, 2014, 04:57:19 AM |
|
From now - rather than yesterday - the actual block history is as the web site says: https://kano.is/index.php?k=pblocks5 days - 0 blocks 6 days - 1 block 7 days - 2 blocks 13 days - 3 blocks 17 days - 5 blocks lots and lots more blocks ... Oh well, lets hope we get more much closer to the expected time soon. With your current round, the probability of finding exactly 0 blocks in 7 days at 1.08PH is: 2.24%... based on Bitcoin's poisson distribution... it's not very probable to get the big swings your pool is having.. it's very unlikely... you sure you didn't screw anything up? This pool has had SHIT LUCK for a week. It happens. Look at the AMAZING luck it had during its initial launch month. Do you know who you are talking to? Have some fucking respect, man. I sure as hell hope you use BFGminer or some other mining software, assuming you actually own any hardware yourself instead of just renting it out, which I can guarantee you the majority of (the hash that you rent) is from rigs running some version of cgminer. Key word is PROBABLE. No, it's not probable, but probability is called probability for a fucking reason you moron. Theres 13 hours round going on at ghash, with 50x hash power, 558266855266 shares so far - it can and will take some time sometimes.
|
|
|
|
s0br
|
|
December 03, 2014, 05:25:33 AM |
|
From now - rather than yesterday - the actual block history is as the web site says: https://kano.is/index.php?k=pblocks5 days - 0 blocks 6 days - 1 block 7 days - 2 blocks 13 days - 3 blocks 17 days - 5 blocks lots and lots more blocks ... Oh well, lets hope we get more much closer to the expected time soon. With your current round, the probability of finding exactly 0 blocks in 7 days at 1.08PH is: 2.24%... based on Bitcoin's poisson distribution... it's not very probable to get the big swings your pool is having.. it's very unlikely... you sure you didn't screw anything up? This pool has had SHIT LUCK for a week. It happens. Look at the AMAZING luck it had during its initial launch month. Do you know who you are talking to? Have some fucking respect, man. I sure as hell hope you use BFGminer or some other mining software, assuming you actually own any hardware yourself instead of just renting it out, which I can guarantee you the majority of (the hash that you rent) is from rigs running some version of cgminer. Key word is PROBABLE. No, it's not probable, but probability is called probability for a fucking reason you moron. Why does math make you so mad?
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
December 03, 2014, 06:40:15 AM |
|
From now - rather than yesterday - the actual block history is as the web site says: https://kano.is/index.php?k=pblocks5 days - 0 blocks 6 days - 1 block 7 days - 2 blocks 13 days - 3 blocks 17 days - 5 blocks lots and lots more blocks ... Oh well, lets hope we get more much closer to the expected time soon. With your current round, the probability of finding exactly 0 blocks in 7 days at 1.08PH is: 2.24%... based on Bitcoin's poisson distribution... it's not very probable to get the big swings your pool is having.. it's very unlikely... you sure you didn't screw anything up? This pool has had SHIT LUCK for a week. It happens. Look at the AMAZING luck it had during its initial launch month. Do you know who you are talking to? Have some fucking respect, man. I sure as hell hope you use BFGminer or some other mining software, assuming you actually own any hardware yourself instead of just renting it out, which I can guarantee you the majority of (the hash that you rent) is from rigs running some version of cgminer. Key word is PROBABLE. No, it's not probable, but probability is called probability for a fucking reason you moron. Why does math make you so mad? Prolly coz you've made such a ridiculous statement and I didn't delete it Having 17 blocks in a row under 100% is indeed very unlikely. However, it points out how silly your comment is - since ... it really isn't possible to fake getting blocks when I have the pool payment address and the pool name in them ... Swinging the other way is not very likely, however it's only 3 out of 4 blocks ... with a good one between them ... so not that unlikely ... However unlikely they are, they are not impossible ... as they have happened ... so your suggestion really does seem ludicrous since if screwing something up equates to getting 17 blocks in a row under 100% followed by 3 out of 4 slow blocks ... then "screwing up" suddenly takes on a whole new meaning ...
|
|
|
|
nreal
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 932
Merit: 100
arcs-chain.com
|
|
December 03, 2014, 08:45:35 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|