Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2017, 10:48:02 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 ... 113 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][BRK] Breakout Coin | Sale June 13 2016 | Multicurrencies | Smart Contracts  (Read 231261 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
barabbas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 04:53:41 AM
 #461

The "Bill Gates" argument is an exercise in absurdity for anyone intent of "scooping up" most of the coins could do it just the same during the ICO period. The same way that they could if the price is capped, so it is immaterial either way.

Now the 30 days ICO period is good and is bad. Some will not be interested in having the coins locked for that period. On the other hand,, many will be adjusting their investment along the 320 days depending on many factors, including availability of funds.

The only things I would implement if I were you is VIP coins, with privileges, which I have already pointed out before. Otherwise, this is going to be extremely successful and only limited by the limited availability of BTC in the crypto world that, at the moment, is quite stretched.

Anyone with a minimum investment acumen will see that this is by far the best long term investment ever to appear in crypto... regardless what the final price will be.

Nice to hear from you Barabbas.  You are one of the most critical knowledgeable informed investors on these forums and you've given our project an unequivocal endorsement.  Nice to hear.  Thank you

Thank you Randy for the nice words.

I'll have to add though that my "endorsement" is not without some important caveats:

-- I believe the price of BRO in the markets will be highly manipulated by Breakout Gaming.

-- I have only seen a few snapshots of the actual platform. If the experience is not easy and rewarding, from the entertainment side of things, the potential success will be clearly diminished. Not having a working test one available is, in my opinion, a severe mistake that may reasonably hold out some big investors.

-- Bergstake and its liquidity remain a big not fully explained enigma. Additionally, the 7 million BRO that is going to be given away should not include Bergstake and those Bergstake should be destroyed to increase the value of the ones mined or obtained through the ICO.

Other than that, yes, this is a very interesting project that will make crypto history, I believe.
POLONIEX TRADING SIGNALS
+50% Profit and more via TELEGRAM
ALTCOINTRADER.CO
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1495838882
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1495838882

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1495838882
Reply with quote  #2

1495838882
Report to moderator
1495838882
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1495838882

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1495838882
Reply with quote  #2

1495838882
Report to moderator
jaybny
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 391


Fantasybits - Proof-of-Skill


View Profile WWW
October 17, 2014, 05:03:15 AM
 #462


-- I believe the price of BRO in the markets will be highly manipulated by Breakout Gaming.


more like provide liquidity for. i just dont see the incentive.

barabbas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 05:08:54 AM
 #463


-- I believe the price of BRO in the markets will be highly manipulated by Breakout Gaming.


more like provide liquidity for. i just dont see the incentive.


I have explained it before a couple of times... adding that it isn't only legal but that if it was me I would use it as a souce of additional revenue:

Breakout Gaming through rakes, fees, buy ins, etc., will receive a lot of both fiat, BTC and BRO, along the huge amount it will have already through their 67% ownership of the coin. It WILL dump to replenish the reserves at will, thus sinking the market to buy cheaper. Whale action 101. The incentive will be significant from the get go but, as the success of the project augments, we are talking huge income on that manipulation alone. HUGE.
jaybny
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 391


Fantasybits - Proof-of-Skill


View Profile WWW
October 17, 2014, 05:23:10 AM
 #464


-- I believe the price of BRO in the markets will be highly manipulated by Breakout Gaming.


more like provide liquidity for. i just dont see the incentive.


I have explained it before a couple of times... adding that it isn't only legal but that if it was me I would use it as a souce of additional revenue:

Breakout Gaming through rakes, fees, buy ins, etc., will receive a lot of both fiat, BTC and BRO, along the huge amount it will have already through their 67% ownership of the coin. It WILL dump to replenish the reserves at will, thus sinking the market to buy cheaper. Whale action 101. The incentive will be significant from the get go but, as the success of the project augments, we are talking huge income on that manipulation alone. HUGE.

there is no 67% coins - more like 11%

where do you think some of the 2.5 million is going?  the humans in the company are breakoutcoin stakeholders to. also the bergstake, gives incentive to keep prices stable.

its doesn't work like that, even if you can sell it down.. there wont be enough liquidity to buy it back at lower prices. Whale action 101? has this ever been verified? does this even work? they have looking into silver prices forever, and its still inconclusive, its not such a simple strategy.

 

barabbas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 05:48:06 AM
 #465


-- I believe the price of BRO in the markets will be highly manipulated by Breakout Gaming.


more like provide liquidity for. i just dont see the incentive.


I have explained it before a couple of times... adding that it isn't only legal but that if it was me I would use it as a souce of additional revenue:

Breakout Gaming through rakes, fees, buy ins, etc., will receive a lot of both fiat, BTC and BRO, along the huge amount it will have already through their 67% ownership of the coin. It WILL dump to replenish the reserves at will, thus sinking the market to buy cheaper. Whale action 101. The incentive will be significant from the get go but, as the success of the project augments, we are talking huge income on that manipulation alone. HUGE.

there is no 67% coins - more like 11%

where do you think some of the 2.5 million is going?  the humans in the company are breakoutcoin stakeholders to. also the bergstake, gives incentive to keep prices stable.

its doesn't work like that, even if you can sell it down.. there wont be enough liquidity to buy it back at lower prices. Whale action 101? has this ever been verified? does this even work? they have looking into silver prices forever, and its still inconclusive, its not such a simple strategy.

 

I won't argue the % because it is irrelevant to the subject of price manipulation. It works like this: You get inflows of fiat, BTC and BRO constantly, right?
You need a supply, on a given period, of let's say 100,000 BRO. You accumulate (through those inflows, plus your "11%"), 20 times as much. So the price, while you have been only buying (with the BTC and Fiat incoming), has been  rising, lets say to 1000 sat. You start dumping. And continue dumping. And continue dumping, as the price dives. You dump until it goes to 500, not just because you dump but because people panic sell. At 500, you start buying. And price goes back up. Rinse and repeat. Because you have unlimited reserves, you can do this at whatever scale the markets support. If Breakout gaming is successful, the level can be very, very high. And the frequency. The obvious purpose is to dump at a median price of 7 and buy back the same amount at the median price of 6. Thousands of times. Millions to be had. Whale 101.
jaybny
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 391


Fantasybits - Proof-of-Skill


View Profile WWW
October 17, 2014, 06:02:33 AM
 #466

You start dumping. And continue dumping. And continue dumping, as the price dives. You dump until it goes to 500, not just because you dump but because people panic sell. At 500, you start buying. And price goes back up. Rinse and repeat.

what is your average selling price on the way down and what is your average buying price on the way back up? this is the only thing that determines alpha in this simple strategy. take a look at bottoms or lows at any free market. what do you notice?    



notice the volume spikes at the lows? this brings the vwap down on the way down and up on the way up.  prices move towards liquidity, not away from it. prices bottom when selling stops, the buyers at lows are not overwhelming, yet the snap back is so violent, simply due of lack of sellers. there is where liquidity in reality kills the backtested alpha.

this strategy has no alpha for the big player, maybe there are weak hands that capitulate at tops and bottoms, and this strategy works for a mid size player, by making an aggressive sell to start an avalanche of stops. the big player has better alpha providing heavy liquidly on both sides, and given that the gaming company wants to retain its players, and players don't like to be exposed to extreme volatility, i would say the alpha is in providing liquidity, rather then starting a panic.

BreakoutGaming
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 246



View Profile
October 17, 2014, 06:10:12 AM
 #467


-- I believe the price of BRO in the markets will be highly manipulated by Breakout Gaming.


more like provide liquidity for. i just dont see the incentive.


I have explained it before a couple of times... adding that it isn't only legal but that if it was me I would use it as a souce of additional revenue:

Breakout Gaming through rakes, fees, buy ins, etc., will receive a lot of both fiat, BTC and BRO, along the huge amount it will have already through their 67% ownership of the coin. It WILL dump to replenish the reserves at will, thus sinking the market to buy cheaper. Whale action 101. The incentive will be significant from the get go but, as the success of the project augments, we are talking huge income on that manipulation alone. HUGE.

there is no 67% coins - more like 11%

where do you think some of the 2.5 million is going?  the humans in the company are breakoutcoin stakeholders to. also the bergstake, gives incentive to keep prices stable.

its doesn't work like that, even if you can sell it down.. there wont be enough liquidity to buy it back at lower prices. Whale action 101? has this ever been verified? does this even work? they have looking into silver prices forever, and its still inconclusive, its not such a simple strategy.

 

I won't argue the % because it is irrelevant to the subject of price manipulation. It works like this: You get inflows of fiat, BTC and BRO constantly, right?
You need a supply, on a given period, of let's say 100,000 BRO. You accumulate (through those inflows, plus your "11%"), 20 times as much. So the price, while you have been only buying (with the BTC and Fiat incoming), has been  rising, lets say to 1000 sat. You start dumping. And continue dumping. And continue dumping, as the price dives. You dump until it goes to 500, not just because you dump but because people panic sell. At 500, you start buying. And price goes back up. Rinse and repeat. Because you have unlimited reserves, you can do this at whatever scale the markets support. If Breakout gaming is successful, the level can be very, very high. And the frequency. The obvious purpose is to dump at a median price of 7 and buy back the same amount at the median price of 6. Thousands of times. Millions to be had. Whale 101.

Barrabas,

We won't argue with your reasoning, but I will let you know this.  We will be working closely with the community throughout our entire project.  Our business plan is long-term.  We are not in this for the short run.  We want to end up competing with the likes of Pokerstars and Fanduel. The worst thing that can happen is for a player to buyin at a certain price and cashout at a lower price.  If that happens, we potentially lose a customer for life.  Our number one goal is to provide stability for the players, even if we occasionally have to take a loss, we will do what is necessary for the growth of our player base.

The worst thing we can do is to be short-sighted and think short term in terms of profits.  We will not shoot ourselves in the foot by hurting our own community.  We will be very active in these forums and will continue to communicate with our core investors and owners of Bergstake.  We appreciate all your constructive criticism and hope that you will continue to contribute to this forum so we can address the many concerns the Breakout community may have.  


▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
████BREAKOUT STAKEWEBSITEMULTICURRENCY SMART CONTRACTS + SIDECHAINS ANN ★  COINSALE July 10 – July 24  ████
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
nonlinearboy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 07:20:34 AM
 #468

You need to cap ICO because we will be Craiged. Too much investors= high price = drop :/

everyone should be careful of ICO at this time,
too much scamers!

exactly y im investing in bro.  its the only coin that has a real business plan and credible peeps baking it up. worthy
OK, I will keep eye on this coin ,too.
if the community prove it worthy ,I will join in.

ofortuna
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252



View Profile
October 17, 2014, 07:56:52 AM
 #469

You need to cap ICO because we will be Craiged. Too much investors= high price = drop :/

everyone should be careful of ICO at this time,
too much scamers!

exactly y im investing in bro.  its the only coin that has a real business plan and credible peeps baking it up. worthy
OK, I will keep eye on this coin ,too.
if the community prove it worthy ,I will join in.

Hi nonlinearboy and welcome to our community!  Grin


▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
████BREAKOUT STAKEWEBSITEMULTICURRENCY SMART CONTRACTS + SIDECHAINS ANN ★  COINSALE July 10 – July 24  ████
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
michaelb87
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 08:08:21 AM
 #470

Quote
2) More fair distribution vs price per coin.  There are only 4.5 millions BRO offered in the ICO and an uncapped ICO would not allow the Bill Gates to scoop up most or all of the coins
Not really.  'Bill Gates' or the 'whales' can still dump more btc than any other users and gain a higher % of the coins.  

Example 1: If 10 people give 10btc or 1 btc each, it wont matter.  They each get 1/10th of the 4.5 million coins with equal buy-ins.  The only thing that changes is the theoretical market cap.  No 'Bill Gates' here but this will not happen either.
 
Example 2: If 9 people give 1btc and 1 person gives 10btc, the MC is 19btc or 236,842bro per btc.  9 people get 236,842bro and 1 person gets 2,368,420bro.  You have a 'Bill Gates'.

Example 3: If 100 people give an avg of .5btc each and 10 people give an average of 5btc each, you have a MC of 100 btc or 45,000bro per btc.  100 people get avg of 22,500bro each and 10 people get 225,000bro each.  Now you have 10 'Bill Gates'.

Of course these are over simplified but the idea is still the same no matter how many investors join or the amount of btc paid in.  You will always have a 'Bill Gates'.  The idea of an uncapped ICO not allowing a 'Bill Gates' is erroneous imho.


Quote
3)  The assumption that uncapped ICO will generate money money than a capped ICO is erroneous imho

Really?  Did you see how much bitcoin the Ether project raised with their uncapped ICO?  An uncapped ICOs will most likely not benefit the investors unless very little bitcoin is paid in.  Based on past experiences, it will almost certainly only benefit you, the devs.



Potential ICO investors, remember this is a ICO/POW coin.  Miners are generally dumpers.  Looks like there are coins being given away free as well.  These can be dumped at any price.  You are paying a flat fee for the coins but you have no idea what that fee will be.  It will change as more btc is paid in.  Things actually get worse as you have more investors spending more btc.  Roughly 9,500bro will be mined every day.  As the potential market cap grows from the ICO, the daily cost in keeping the market price steady will increase.  

Will the amount of BTC raised be public so that investors can judge their potential holdings and cost per BRO?

I'm very, very interested in getting in on this coin but the uncapped limit is almost a deal breaker.  I'd only be a buyer at the end of the 30 days and with less than 500 btc raised.  That puts the MC low and at a really reasonable price.

+10000.

Without a cap there is no way I'm investing. Guaranteed loss if you do invest, especially with POW dumpers. Cap should be MAX 400 BTC, everything above that will guarantee a loss.

Look at SysCoin. They raised about 460 BTC and had a wat better businessplan but still people lost on it. More than 400 BTC makes sure all demand is sucked dry into the ICO and nobody willing to buy after the ICO.

I'm so tired of these greedy devs. Just be happy with 400 BTC, that's a huge amount! Take some pride in your work. Everybody here wants to hit the jackpot first and work after. That's not real life
barabbas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 08:17:36 AM
 #471

You start dumping. And continue dumping. And continue dumping, as the price dives. You dump until it goes to 500, not just because you dump but because people panic sell. At 500, you start buying. And price goes back up. Rinse and repeat.

what is your average selling price on the way down and what is your average buying price on the way back up? this is the only thing that determines alpha in this simple strategy. take a look at bottoms or lows at any free market. what do you notice?    



notice the volume spikes at the lows? this brings the vwap down on the way down and up on the way up.  prices move towards liquidity, not away from it. prices bottom when selling stops, the buyers at lows are not overwhelming, yet the snap back is so violent, simply due of lack of sellers. there is where liquidity in reality kills the backtested alpha.

this strategy has no alpha for the big player, maybe there are weak hands that capitulate at tops and bottoms, and this strategy works for a mid size player, by making an aggressive sell to start an avalanche of stops. the big player has better alpha providing heavy liquidly on both sides, and given that the gaming company wants to retain its players, and players don't like to be exposed to extreme volatility, i would say the alpha is in providing liquidity, rather then starting a panic.

Jay, I know you are fully aware of the term "capitulation". You can provoke that daily or even more frequently if you want to. That's where the scoop comes. And you can also control the rebound. You can control it both ways and determine tops and bottoms.

As for the price being stable, I don't know if that's even desirable or attractive to cryptonites... where are they going to make money to justify their investment if the price remains stable?  
barabbas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 08:22:20 AM
 #472

Quote
2) More fair distribution vs price per coin.  There are only 4.5 millions BRO offered in the ICO and an uncapped ICO would not allow the Bill Gates to scoop up most or all of the coins
Not really.  'Bill Gates' or the 'whales' can still dump more btc than any other users and gain a higher % of the coins.  

Example 1: If 10 people give 10btc or 1 btc each, it wont matter.  They each get 1/10th of the 4.5 million coins with equal buy-ins.  The only thing that changes is the theoretical market cap.  No 'Bill Gates' here but this will not happen either.
 
Example 2: If 9 people give 1btc and 1 person gives 10btc, the MC is 19btc or 236,842bro per btc.  9 people get 236,842bro and 1 person gets 2,368,420bro.  You have a 'Bill Gates'.

Example 3: If 100 people give an avg of .5btc each and 10 people give an average of 5btc each, you have a MC of 100 btc or 45,000bro per btc.  100 people get avg of 22,500bro each and 10 people get 225,000bro each.  Now you have 10 'Bill Gates'.

Of course these are over simplified but the idea is still the same no matter how many investors join or the amount of btc paid in.  You will always have a 'Bill Gates'.  The idea of an uncapped ICO not allowing a 'Bill Gates' is erroneous imho.


Quote
3)  The assumption that uncapped ICO will generate money money than a capped ICO is erroneous imho

Really?  Did you see how much bitcoin the Ether project raised with their uncapped ICO?  An uncapped ICOs will most likely not benefit the investors unless very little bitcoin is paid in.  Based on past experiences, it will almost certainly only benefit you, the devs.



Potential ICO investors, remember this is a ICO/POW coin.  Miners are generally dumpers.  Looks like there are coins being given away free as well.  These can be dumped at any price.  You are paying a flat fee for the coins but you have no idea what that fee will be.  It will change as more btc is paid in.  Things actually get worse as you have more investors spending more btc.  Roughly 9,500bro will be mined every day.  As the potential market cap grows from the ICO, the daily cost in keeping the market price steady will increase.  

Will the amount of BTC raised be public so that investors can judge their potential holdings and cost per BRO?

I'm very, very interested in getting in on this coin but the uncapped limit is almost a deal breaker.  I'd only be a buyer at the end of the 30 days and with less than 500 btc raised.  That puts the MC low and at a really reasonable price.

+10000.

Without a cap there is no way I'm investing. Guaranteed loss if you do invest, especially with POW dumpers. Cap should be MAX 400 BTC, everything above that will guarantee a loss.

Look at SysCoin. They raised about 460 BTC and had a wat better businessplan but still people lost on it. More than 400 BTC makes sure all demand is sucked dry into the ICO and nobody willing to buy after the ICO.

I'm so tired of these greedy devs. Just be happy with 400 BTC, that's a huge amount! Take some pride in your work. Everybody here wants to hit the jackpot first and work after. That's not real life


Sorry but that is very juvenile perception. This is a BUSINESS. With investors behind it. A business that requires big money to be built. It doesn't matter one bit if the cap the price or not, nothing changes the outcome. This will get whatever amount of BTC it will and that will be the same whether it is capped or not. The price of the coin is irrelevant, the only measure that matters is the market cap assigned to the entire supply, not the price per coin of the 4.5 million on offer.
michaelb87
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 12:24:22 PM
 #473

Quote
2) More fair distribution vs price per coin.  There are only 4.5 millions BRO offered in the ICO and an uncapped ICO would not allow the Bill Gates to scoop up most or all of the coins
Not really.  'Bill Gates' or the 'whales' can still dump more btc than any other users and gain a higher % of the coins.  

Example 1: If 10 people give 10btc or 1 btc each, it wont matter.  They each get 1/10th of the 4.5 million coins with equal buy-ins.  The only thing that changes is the theoretical market cap.  No 'Bill Gates' here but this will not happen either.
 
Example 2: If 9 people give 1btc and 1 person gives 10btc, the MC is 19btc or 236,842bro per btc.  9 people get 236,842bro and 1 person gets 2,368,420bro.  You have a 'Bill Gates'.

Example 3: If 100 people give an avg of .5btc each and 10 people give an average of 5btc each, you have a MC of 100 btc or 45,000bro per btc.  100 people get avg of 22,500bro each and 10 people get 225,000bro each.  Now you have 10 'Bill Gates'.

Of course these are over simplified but the idea is still the same no matter how many investors join or the amount of btc paid in.  You will always have a 'Bill Gates'.  The idea of an uncapped ICO not allowing a 'Bill Gates' is erroneous imho.


Quote
3)  The assumption that uncapped ICO will generate money money than a capped ICO is erroneous imho

Really?  Did you see how much bitcoin the Ether project raised with their uncapped ICO?  An uncapped ICOs will most likely not benefit the investors unless very little bitcoin is paid in.  Based on past experiences, it will almost certainly only benefit you, the devs.



Potential ICO investors, remember this is a ICO/POW coin.  Miners are generally dumpers.  Looks like there are coins being given away free as well.  These can be dumped at any price.  You are paying a flat fee for the coins but you have no idea what that fee will be.  It will change as more btc is paid in.  Things actually get worse as you have more investors spending more btc.  Roughly 9,500bro will be mined every day.  As the potential market cap grows from the ICO, the daily cost in keeping the market price steady will increase.  

Will the amount of BTC raised be public so that investors can judge their potential holdings and cost per BRO?

I'm very, very interested in getting in on this coin but the uncapped limit is almost a deal breaker.  I'd only be a buyer at the end of the 30 days and with less than 500 btc raised.  That puts the MC low and at a really reasonable price.

+10000.

Without a cap there is no way I'm investing. Guaranteed loss if you do invest, especially with POW dumpers. Cap should be MAX 400 BTC, everything above that will guarantee a loss.

Look at SysCoin. They raised about 460 BTC and had a wat better businessplan but still people lost on it. More than 400 BTC makes sure all demand is sucked dry into the ICO and nobody willing to buy after the ICO.

I'm so tired of these greedy devs. Just be happy with 400 BTC, that's a huge amount! Take some pride in your work. Everybody here wants to hit the jackpot first and work after. That's not real life


Sorry but that is very juvenile perception. This is a BUSINESS. With investors behind it. A business that requires big money to be built. It doesn't matter one bit if the cap the price or not, nothing changes the outcome. This will get whatever amount of BTC it will and that will be the same whether it is capped or not. The price of the coin is irrelevant, the only measure that matters is the market cap assigned to the entire supply, not the price per coin of the 4.5 million on offer.

Dream on. Most investors are here solely for a quick profit, not everybody, but most of them. I've seem them all come by. And that's not a bad thing. Let us support the build and launch of a coin, take our profit and let others get in for the long term.

But respect that type of investor because they are 80% of your potential investors. Uncapped ICO's will leave them with a loss which is a bad thing for crypto in general. Looks like greedy devs screwing people over.

Make an ICO reasonable or don't do it at all.

jaybny
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 391


Fantasybits - Proof-of-Skill


View Profile WWW
October 17, 2014, 02:28:35 PM
 #474

Make an ICO reasonable or don't do it at all.

please explain what a capped ICO is? Are we supposed to be deciding the price and the quantity? If so we would be deciding the initial market-cap of the coin? Isn't that for the market to decide?

If we set price to high, there will be no buyers, if we set price to low, it will be sold in in minutes, and the distribution will be centralized.

Quote
Uncapped ICO's will leave them with a loss which is a bad thing for crypto in general. Looks like greedy devs screwing people over.
If this is known, shouldn't the market adjust itself for this? If uncapped produces losses, then there should be less buying interest, which would eventually produce profits, and this should go back and forth until the market finds value.

jibble
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 03:17:47 PM
 #475


+10000.

Without a cap there is no way I'm investing. Guaranteed loss if you do invest, especially with POW dumpers. Cap should be MAX 400 BTC, everything above that will guarantee a loss.

Look at SysCoin. They raised about 460 BTC and had a wat better businessplan but still people lost on it. More than 400 BTC makes sure all demand is sucked dry into the ICO and nobody willing to buy after the ICO.

I'm so tired of these greedy devs. Just be happy with 400 BTC, that's a huge amount! Take some pride in your work. Everybody here wants to hit the jackpot first and work after. That's not real life


Eveerything you said here is verifiable bullshit, there have been numerous IPO's that have a fraction of the plans/feature and developments that have raised 900btc+ and investors have profited

Sys coin raised about 1500 btc and then on release it fucked up causing massive panic and people dumping at a loss.

I am so tired of people who can't even write truthful details , either you are trying to manipulate the facts to try and make them set a really low cap on investment or you really are a stupid fucker that just guesses shit without even researching, or just remembering what actually happened previously, it wasn't even that long ago, you could of just looked up what you were talking about instead of talking 100% bullsht
brother3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574



View Profile
October 17, 2014, 03:51:02 PM
 #476


+10000.

Without a cap there is no way I'm investing. Guaranteed loss if you do invest, especially with POW dumpers. Cap should be MAX 400 BTC, everything above that will guarantee a loss.

Look at SysCoin. They raised about 460 BTC and had a wat better businessplan but still people lost on it. More than 400 BTC makes sure all demand is sucked dry into the ICO and nobody willing to buy after the ICO.

I'm so tired of these greedy devs. Just be happy with 400 BTC, that's a huge amount! Take some pride in your work. Everybody here wants to hit the jackpot first and work after. That's not real life


I won't get into whether Syscoin has a better business plan, but i thought the initial ico was 460 btc or so raised but the total ipo raised 1500 btc no?

█    █     ██    ███     ███    ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████     ███     ███    ██     █    █
..BREAKOUT STAKE ..
  M U L T I C U R R E N C Y   S M A R T   C O N T R A C T S   +   S I D E C H A I N S
  A N N     |     W E B S I T E     |     T W I T T E R     |     G I T H U B    ★  C O I N S A L E   J U L Y  10  –  J U L Y  24  ★ 
.
█    █     ██    ███     ███    ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
BreakoutGaming
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 246



View Profile
October 17, 2014, 05:31:51 PM
 #477


+10000.

Without a cap there is no way I'm investing. Guaranteed loss if you do invest, especially with POW dumpers. Cap should be MAX 400 BTC, everything above that will guarantee a loss.

Look at SysCoin. They raised about 460 BTC and had a wat better businessplan but still people lost on it. More than 400 BTC makes sure all demand is sucked dry into the ICO and nobody willing to buy after the ICO.

I'm so tired of these greedy devs. Just be happy with 400 BTC, that's a huge amount! Take some pride in your work. Everybody here wants to hit the jackpot first and work after. That's not real life


Eveerything you said here is verifiable bullshit, there have been numerous IPO's that have a fraction of the plans/feature and developments that have raised 900btc+ and investors have profited

Sys coin raised about 1500 btc and then on release it fucked up causing massive panic and people dumping at a loss.

I am so tired of people who can't even write truthful details , either you are trying to manipulate the facts to try and make them set a really low cap on investment or you really are a stupid fucker that just guesses shit without even researching, or just remembering what actually happened previously, it wasn't even that long ago, you could of just looked up what you were talking about instead of talking 100% bullsht

Fyi, Breakout has already invested significant  capital into this project. This is not a conceptual project or investment. We have put a lot of sweat and capital to get the project to where we are now. Breakout Gaming will launch and follow our business plan to success.


The entire Breakout Team is all in. We truly believe in the the future of Cryptocurrencies and Gaming. The Breakout Team is dedicated to make this project a tremendous success. The participants in our crowd sale will also be receiving Bergstake and the right to mine all future coins.  Bergstake is potentially a bigger reward than the coins. This is the first time I can think of, where a crowd sale provided as much leverage and incentive to buyin as Bergstake.

Disclaimer: Breakout Coin and Breakout Gaming are two separate services/entities.  Breakout Coin is offering BRO coins for btc. By participating in this "coin sale," you are not purchasing interest in Breakout Gaming.  You are solely participating in the "coin sale" of a crypto coin that happens to have a gaming company that supports the BRO coin by having their chips denominated in the BRO crypto coin.

As specified in the first paragraph in the Terms and Conditions:

WARNING:  Do not purchase BRO if you are not an expert in crypto tokens or currency and blockchain technology.

This coin sale is not an offer of investment or securities in any business, venture, or company, or in any form of gaming operations or activity; purchase of BRO does not entitle the buyer to any interest in any profits or revenue of any common enterprise arising from the activities of others.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
████BREAKOUT STAKEWEBSITEMULTICURRENCY SMART CONTRACTS + SIDECHAINS ANN ★  COINSALE July 10 – July 24  ████
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
jibble
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 05:57:12 PM
 #478


+10000.

Without a cap there is no way I'm investing. Guaranteed loss if you do invest, especially with POW dumpers. Cap should be MAX 400 BTC, everything above that will guarantee a loss.

Look at SysCoin. They raised about 460 BTC and had a wat better businessplan but still people lost on it. More than 400 BTC makes sure all demand is sucked dry into the ICO and nobody willing to buy after the ICO.

I'm so tired of these greedy devs. Just be happy with 400 BTC, that's a huge amount! Take some pride in your work. Everybody here wants to hit the jackpot first and work after. That's not real life


Eveerything you said here is verifiable bullshit, there have been numerous IPO's that have a fraction of the plans/feature and developments that have raised 900btc+ and investors have profited

Sys coin raised about 1500 btc and then on release it fucked up causing massive panic and people dumping at a loss.

I am so tired of people who can't even write truthful details , either you are trying to manipulate the facts to try and make them set a really low cap on investment or you really are a stupid fucker that just guesses shit without even researching, or just remembering what actually happened previously, it wasn't even that long ago, you could of just looked up what you were talking about instead of talking 100% bullsht

Fyi, Breakout has already invested significant  capital into this project. This is not a conceptual project or investment. We have put a lot of sweat and capital to get the project to where we are now. Breakout will launch and follow our business plan to success.


The entire Breakout Team is all in. We truly believe in the the future of Cryptocurrencies and Gaming. The Breakout Team is dedicated to make this project a tremendous success and the investors should see growth if we execute properly. The investors in our crowd sale will also be receiving Bergstake and the right to mine all future coins.  Bergstake is potentially a bigger reward than the coins. This is the first time I can think of, where a crowd sale provided as much leverage and incentive to buyin as Bergstake.

I agree with what you are saying.

I am going to be buying into the IPO on release day to take advantage of bergstake , to allow me to steadily earn in the long term.

I was simply stating the information given by the person who provided it was false.

Syscoin raised 460 btc : No. it raised around 1500 btc in their IPO

everything above 400btc will guarantee a loss : No. there is historical data that proves that statement to be completely false, there have been numerous coins that have raised over 400btc and made profits. most with less foundation work and infrastructure in comparison to breakout.

The person was emotionally driven, given the fact he cherry picked information to back up his own opinion information that was fabricated bullshit, totally false .
ofortuna
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252



View Profile
October 17, 2014, 06:44:13 PM
 #479


+10000.

Without a cap there is no way I'm investing. Guaranteed loss if you do invest, especially with POW dumpers. Cap should be MAX 400 BTC, everything above that will guarantee a loss.

Look at SysCoin. They raised about 460 BTC and had a wat better businessplan but still people lost on it. More than 400 BTC makes sure all demand is sucked dry into the ICO and nobody willing to buy after the ICO.

I'm so tired of these greedy devs. Just be happy with 400 BTC, that's a huge amount! Take some pride in your work. Everybody here wants to hit the jackpot first and work after. That's not real life


Eveerything you said here is verifiable bullshit, there have been numerous IPO's that have a fraction of the plans/feature and developments that have raised 900btc+ and investors have profited

Sys coin raised about 1500 btc and then on release it fucked up causing massive panic and people dumping at a loss.

I am so tired of people who can't even write truthful details , either you are trying to manipulate the facts to try and make them set a really low cap on investment or you really are a stupid fucker that just guesses shit without even researching, or just remembering what actually happened previously, it wasn't even that long ago, you could of just looked up what you were talking about instead of talking 100% bullsht

Fyi, Breakout has already invested significant  capital into this project. This is not a conceptual project or investment. We have put a lot of sweat and capital to get the project to where we are now. Breakout will launch and follow our business plan to success.


The entire Breakout Team is all in. We truly believe in the the future of Cryptocurrencies and Gaming. The Breakout Team is dedicated to make this project a tremendous success and the investors should see growth if we execute properly. The investors in our crowd sale will also be receiving Bergstake and the right to mine all future coins.  Bergstake is potentially a bigger reward than the coins. This is the first time I can think of, where a crowd sale provided as much leverage and incentive to buyin as Bergstake.

I agree with what you are saying.

I am going to be buying into the IPO on release day to take advantage of bergstake , to allow me to steadily earn in the long term.

I was simply stating the information given by the person who provided it was false.

Syscoin raised 460 btc : No. it raised around 1500 btc in their IPO

everything above 400btc will guarantee a loss : No. there is historical data that proves that statement to be completely false, there have been numerous coins that have raised over 400btc and made profits. most with less foundation work and infrastructure in comparison to breakout.

The person was emotionally driven, given the fact he cherry picked information to back up his own opinion information that was fabricated bullshit, totally false .

Thank you Jibble  Grin

Through discussion on this thread and the presentation on Breakoutcoin.com, we are trying to get the word out about the cohesive long term plan as best we can.  When people come in with preconceived notions, biases based on their past experiences, or focus on a single detail of Breakout Coin, often they don't get that we are very different than the typical coin project armed with just a whitepaper.

Thank you setting the record straight and your highly valued support!

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
████BREAKOUT STAKEWEBSITEMULTICURRENCY SMART CONTRACTS + SIDECHAINS ANN ★  COINSALE July 10 – July 24  ████
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
illodin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966


View Profile
October 17, 2014, 07:29:02 PM
 #480

Regarding the unlimited ICO - if you'd like to invest 1 BTC, but don't know what to do because it's unlimited. Hedge your bets and use 0.5 BTC in the ICO, and 0.5 BTC to buy from the exchanges after the ICO. Problem solved?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 ... 113 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!