CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[Cryptozillah]

I have been mining at nicehash and hashpower for the last months. I have also tested the nicehash miner but i get a bit lower speed on all cards with it. But yeah, i think i can call myself a poolguy.
Right now i am not really sure what to do, keep these or replace them with 3x970 cards.

3x970 should give me around 30Mhs Lyra2rev2 @ around 430w ?

With 970 cards i should gain like 7Mhs and only get around 50-75w higher powerdraw.

I try to look at all factors as I have the system running in my room. You can get more cards, but with 7 mh/s, you'll also get more heat. I think of it as a way that may be you should get 2x970's, and find a 980 at a cheap price, it'll definitely be a win situation.

You'll always have that one itch for adding more cards.

I've left room for one or two more cards on the motherboard, also have enough power to power them all. Honestly, right now I'm just waiting for Pascal which is rumored to be out in Q1 16.

I am not sure what to think about Pascal yet. I think all the performance hype is quite overrated actually. But i guess there will be alot of used and cheap gear to buy when everyone is upgrading and that is nice for all of us

[theotherme]

I have been mining at nicehash and hashpower for the last months. I have also tested the nicehash miner but i get a bit lower speed on all cards with it. But yeah, i think i can call myself a poolguy.
Right now i am not really sure what to do, keep these or replace them with 3x970 cards.

3x970 should give me around 30Mhs Lyra2rev2 @ around 430w ?

With 970 cards i should gain like 7Mhs and only get around 50-75w higher powerdraw.

I try to look at all factors as I have the system running in my room. You can get more cards, but with 7 mh/s, you'll also get more heat. I think of it as a way that may be you should get 2x970's, and find a 980 at a cheap price, it'll definitely be a win situation.

You'll always have that one itch for adding more cards.

I've left room for one or two more cards on the motherboard, also have enough power to power them all. Honestly, right now I'm just waiting for Pascal which is rumored to be out in Q1 16.

I am not sure what to think about Pascal yet. I think all the performance hype is quite overrated actually. But i guess there will be alot of used and cheap gear to buy when everyone is upgrading and that is nice for all of us

not obvious...
In principle Pascal should have a 16nm die and should be more powerful also it should come with new HBM vram closer to the processor.
So it should be more powerful.

[antonio8]

I have been mining at nicehash and hashpower for the last months. I have also tested the nicehash miner but i get a bit lower speed on all cards with it. But yeah, i think i can call myself a poolguy.
Right now i am not really sure what to do, keep these or replace them with 3x970 cards.

3x970 should give me around 30Mhs Lyra2rev2 @ around 430w ?

With 970 cards i should gain like 7Mhs and only get around 50-75w higher powerdraw.

I try to look at all factors as I have the system running in my room. You can get more cards, but with 7 mh/s, you'll also get more heat. I think of it as a way that may be you should get 2x970's, and find a 980 at a cheap price, it'll definitely be a win situation.

You'll always have that one itch for adding more cards.

I've left room for one or two more cards on the motherboard, also have enough power to power them all. Honestly, right now I'm just waiting for Pascal which is rumored to be out in Q1 16.

I am not sure what to think about Pascal yet. I think all the performance hype is quite overrated actually. But i guess there will be alot of used and cheap gear to buy when everyone is upgrading and that is nice for all of us

not obvious...
In principle Pascal should have a 16nm die and should be more powerful also it should come with new HBM vram closer to the processor.
So it should be more powerful.

Looks like Nvidia will also pull an AMD and save HBM for the high end only Pascal cards. All other cards will get GDDR5x memory but it is supposedly faster than GDDR5. Or whatever they are calling it.

[theotherme]

I have been mining at nicehash and hashpower for the last months. I have also tested the nicehash miner but i get a bit lower speed on all cards with it. But yeah, i think i can call myself a poolguy.
Right now i am not really sure what to do, keep these or replace them with 3x970 cards.

3x970 should give me around 30Mhs Lyra2rev2 @ around 430w ?

With 970 cards i should gain like 7Mhs and only get around 50-75w higher powerdraw.

I try to look at all factors as I have the system running in my room. You can get more cards, but with 7 mh/s, you'll also get more heat. I think of it as a way that may be you should get 2x970's, and find a 980 at a cheap price, it'll definitely be a win situation.

You'll always have that one itch for adding more cards.

I've left room for one or two more cards on the motherboard, also have enough power to power them all. Honestly, right now I'm just waiting for Pascal which is rumored to be out in Q1 16.

I am not sure what to think about Pascal yet. I think all the performance hype is quite overrated actually. But i guess there will be alot of used and cheap gear to buy when everyone is upgrading and that is nice for all of us

not obvious...
In principle Pascal should have a 16nm die and should be more powerful also it should come with new HBM vram closer to the processor.
So it should be more powerful.

Looks like Nvidia will also pull an AMD and save HBM for the high end only Pascal cards. All other cards will get GDDR5x memory but it is supposedly faster than GDDR5. Or whatever they are calling it.

well if AMD does that already...   we should expect nvidia doing worst (feature and price)-wise 

[Epsylon3]

GDDR5x was a possible alternative if HBM was unavailable or not stable enough... ive read HBM2 also but maybe only for the next ones and/or the top ones

[Cryptozillah]

I have been mining at nicehash and hashpower for the last months. I have also tested the nicehash miner but i get a bit lower speed on all cards with it. But yeah, i think i can call myself a poolguy.
Right now i am not really sure what to do, keep these or replace them with 3x970 cards.

3x970 should give me around 30Mhs Lyra2rev2 @ around 430w ?

With 970 cards i should gain like 7Mhs and only get around 50-75w higher powerdraw.

I try to look at all factors as I have the system running in my room. You can get more cards, but with 7 mh/s, you'll also get more heat. I think of it as a way that may be you should get 2x970's, and find a 980 at a cheap price, it'll definitely be a win situation.

You'll always have that one itch for adding more cards.

I've left room for one or two more cards on the motherboard, also have enough power to power them all. Honestly, right now I'm just waiting for Pascal which is rumored to be out in Q1 16.

I am not sure what to think about Pascal yet. I think all the performance hype is quite overrated actually. But i guess there will be alot of used and cheap gear to buy when everyone is upgrading and that is nice for all of us

not obvious...
In principle Pascal should have a 16nm die and should be more powerful also it should come with new HBM vram closer to the processor.
So it should be more powerful.

Yes ofc it will be more powerful, but i think the performance expectations are a little too high at this point. But the future will tell when we see the new cards up and hashing. In the end everything is all about pricetag, power consumption and performance vs cheap older gear.

[theotherme]

I have been mining at nicehash and hashpower for the last months. I have also tested the nicehash miner but i get a bit lower speed on all cards with it. But yeah, i think i can call myself a poolguy.
Right now i am not really sure what to do, keep these or replace them with 3x970 cards.

3x970 should give me around 30Mhs Lyra2rev2 @ around 430w ?

With 970 cards i should gain like 7Mhs and only get around 50-75w higher powerdraw.

I try to look at all factors as I have the system running in my room. You can get more cards, but with 7 mh/s, you'll also get more heat. I think of it as a way that may be you should get 2x970's, and find a 980 at a cheap price, it'll definitely be a win situation.

You'll always have that one itch for adding more cards.

I've left room for one or two more cards on the motherboard, also have enough power to power them all. Honestly, right now I'm just waiting for Pascal which is rumored to be out in Q1 16.

I am not sure what to think about Pascal yet. I think all the performance hype is quite overrated actually. But i guess there will be alot of used and cheap gear to buy when everyone is upgrading and that is nice for all of us

not obvious...
In principle Pascal should have a 16nm die and should be more powerful also it should come with new HBM vram closer to the processor.
So it should be more powerful.

Yes ofc it will be more powerful, but i think the performance expectations are a little too high at this point. But the future will tell when we see the new cards up and hashing. In the end everything is all about pricetag, power consumption and performance vs cheap older gear.

power consumption should be lower or I miss the point... (or more operations for same consumption)

[Cryptozillah]

I have been mining at nicehash and hashpower for the last months. I have also tested the nicehash miner but i get a bit lower speed on all cards with it. But yeah, i think i can call myself a poolguy.
Right now i am not really sure what to do, keep these or replace them with 3x970 cards.

3x970 should give me around 30Mhs Lyra2rev2 @ around 430w ?

With 970 cards i should gain like 7Mhs and only get around 50-75w higher powerdraw.

I try to look at all factors as I have the system running in my room. You can get more cards, but with 7 mh/s, you'll also get more heat. I think of it as a way that may be you should get 2x970's, and find a 980 at a cheap price, it'll definitely be a win situation.

You'll always have that one itch for adding more cards.

I've left room for one or two more cards on the motherboard, also have enough power to power them all. Honestly, right now I'm just waiting for Pascal which is rumored to be out in Q1 16.

I am not sure what to think about Pascal yet. I think all the performance hype is quite overrated actually. But i guess there will be alot of used and cheap gear to buy when everyone is upgrading and that is nice for all of us

not obvious...
In principle Pascal should have a 16nm die and should be more powerful also it should come with new HBM vram closer to the processor.
So it should be more powerful.

Yes ofc it will be more powerful, but i think the performance expectations are a little too high at this point. But the future will tell when we see the new cards up and hashing. In the end everything is all about pricetag, power consumption and performance vs cheap older gear.

power consumption should be lower or I miss the point... (or more operations for same consumption)

Yes power consumption will probably be lower, but the pricetag will probably be pretty high. So older gear could still be in the game. But we will have to wait and see when someone get their hands on some new cards.

[AliMan]

I have been mining at nicehash and hashpower for the last months. I have also tested the nicehash miner but i get a bit lower speed on all cards with it. But yeah, i think i can call myself a poolguy.
Right now i am not really sure what to do, keep these or replace them with 3x970 cards.

3x970 should give me around 30Mhs Lyra2rev2 @ around 430w ?

With 970 cards i should gain like 7Mhs and only get around 50-75w higher powerdraw.

I try to look at all factors as I have the system running in my room. You can get more cards, but with 7 mh/s, you'll also get more heat. I think of it as a way that may be you should get 2x970's, and find a 980 at a cheap price, it'll definitely be a win situation.

You'll always have that one itch for adding more cards.

I've left room for one or two more cards on the motherboard, also have enough power to power them all. Honestly, right now I'm just waiting for Pascal which is rumored to be out in Q1 16.

I am not sure what to think about Pascal yet. I think all the performance hype is quite overrated actually. But i guess there will be alot of used and cheap gear to buy when everyone is upgrading and that is nice for all of us

not obvious...
In principle Pascal should have a 16nm die and should be more powerful also it should come with new HBM vram closer to the processor.
So it should be more powerful.

Yes ofc it will be more powerful, but i think the performance expectations are a little too high at this point. But the future will tell when we see the new cards up and hashing. In the end everything is all about pricetag, power consumption and performance vs cheap older gear.

power consumption should be lower or I miss the point... (or more operations for same consumption)

Yes power consumption will probably be lower, but the pricetag will probably be pretty high. So older gear could still be in the game. But we will have to wait and see when someone get their hands on some new cards.

Not really, it's not just about hardware. After compute 3.5, the jump to compute-5 with maxwell changed the game quite a bit.

[sp_]

Don't forget that the mining software has been optimized to become 50% faster in 1 year.

Most of the work has been done by me..

in sept 2014, x11 was hashing at 6.6MHASH with the djm34 miner. This was just abit faster than on the 780ti(compute 3.5)..

in release 74 x11 is breaking 10MHASH easy on the gtx980 ...

19 sep 2014:





http://cryptomining-blog.com/3503-crypto-mining-performance-of-the-new-nvidia-geforce-gtx-980/

[sp_]

Nope. Compute 3.5 also has max 255 regs per thread. https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-c-programming-guide/#compute-capabilities Table 13.

I can see it in the link. I don't have a compute 3.5 card. Maybe there are some possible speedups to be made on the 780ti.
Anyone with a 780ti card who can compile the latest version (add compute 3.5 in the projectfile (or makefile)
What hashrates are you getting?

EVGA 780ti SC +100 GPU OC

Quark:   11.7 MH/s
X11:       6.35 MH/s
Lyra2v2: 7.7 MH/s
Neo:       330 KH/s   (375 with r58)

But release 74 doesn't give a boost comparing to the old ccminer on compute 3.5. Most of the optimalizations are Maxwell only..

[sp_]

Some quick Quark testing. Cards overclocked 180Mhz

1 year ago quark was doing 14MHASH with heavy overclocking. so you got a 50% free boost with the SP-MOD

[scryptr]

yeah. Looks like the secret coin is the most profitable x11 coin at the moment.

SecretCoin (x11)   0.4804 BTC/GHASH
InfluxCoin (x11)    0.2471 BTC/GHASH
GraniteCoin (x11)   0.1958 BTC/GHASH

SOLO-MINE  SECRETCOIN (SCRT) --

SecretCoin has seen a consistently high trading volume for more than a week, several BitCoins a day.  I have found it easy to solo-mine this X11 algo coin.  First, download the wallet from "https://secretcoin.club".
Using the example wallet configuration file below, allow the wallet to synchronise.  Be sure to capitalise the "S" and "C" letters when titling the file:

SecretCoin.conf
==========

server=1
daemon=1
listen=1
maxconnections=1024
rpcuser=yourname
rpcpassword=pass
rpcport=23151
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcallowip=192.168.1.111
rpcallowip=192.168.1.112
addnode=23.227.190.110
addnode=104.255.33.191
addnode=185.81.164.238

==========

The addnodes are vital for synchronisation, and the rcpallowip addresses should reflect the local LAN net addresses of your miners.  My launch line for sp_'s ccminer reads like this:

"ccminer -a x11 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o http://127.0.0.1:23151" -u yourname -p pass"

It just works!  

The network hashrate and mining difficulty figures are on the rise, it is harder to mine a 31.25 SCRT block than when I started.  Also, besides miniing Proof-of-Work (POW) blocks, your wallet will be receiving Proof-of-Stake (POS) blocks for any coins that are being held.  POS blocks are generally smaller, a fraction of a coin each, unless the miner holds 100,000 SCRT or more.

I purchased 0.05 BTC worth of SCRT when I started so that I would have a stake.  It is now worth more than 2x what I paid, and trending up.  Earlier miners saw the value rise from about 50 satoshi per coin!

Good Luck!       --scryptr

[hashbrown9000]

what speed (x11 algo) will a 750ti hash at with the latest release?

[scryptr]

what speed (x11 algo) will a 750ti hash at with the latest release?

X11 hashrate--

Release dot 74 should hash at 3.1MH/s or better on a 750ti.  This depends on the model, overclocking, etc. My EVGA 750ti SC (no 6-pin connector, single fan) gets 3.1 MH/s on Linux with no overclocking.

--scryptr

[chrysophylax]

what speed (x11 algo) will a 750ti hash at with the latest release?

X11 hashrate--

Release dot 74 should hash at 3.1MH/s or better on a 750ti.  This depends on the model, overclocking, etc. My EVGA 750ti SC (no 6-pin connector, single fan) gets 3.1 MH/s on Linux with no overclocking.

--scryptr

the gigabyte 750ti oc lp cards ( in thefarm - no aux power connector ) do on average 2800KH with x11 - stock on fedora 22 x64 cuda 7.5 ...

#crysx

[bensam1231]

Don't forget that the mining software has been optimized to become 50% faster in 1 year.

Most of the work has been done by me..

in sept 2014, x11 was hashing at 6.6MHASH with the djm34 miner. This was just abit faster than on the 780ti(compute 3.5)..

in release 74 x11 is breaking 10MHASH easy on the gtx980 ...

19 sep 2014:

If only the market was still there for Quark... Right now it's Neo and Neo hasn't seen improvements in ages. The coins that use it also seem to be dominated by botnets using CPU miners.

[sp_]

what speed (x11 algo) will a 750ti hash at with the latest release?

X11 hashrate--
Release dot 74 should hash at 3.1MH/s or better on a 750ti.  This depends on the model, overclocking, etc. My EVGA 750ti SC (no 6-pin connector, single fan) gets 3.1 MH/s on Linux with no overclocking.
--scryptr

the gigabyte 750ti oc lp cards ( in thefarm - no aux power connector ) do on average 2800KH with x11 - stock on fedora 22 x64 cuda 7.5 ...
#crysx

Cuda 7.5 x86 build is doing 1.9 MHASH(750ti). And the 64bit build is around 10-15% slower than the x86 cuda 6.5 build.

[hashbrown9000]

Cuda 7.5 x86 build is doing 1.9 MHASH(750ti). And the 64bit build is around 10-15% slower than the x86 cuda 6.5 build.

Well that sucks. Why such a big difference between cuda 6.5 and 7.5?

[chrysophylax]

what speed (x11 algo) will a 750ti hash at with the latest release?

X11 hashrate--
Release dot 74 should hash at 3.1MH/s or better on a 750ti.  This depends on the model, overclocking, etc. My EVGA 750ti SC (no 6-pin connector, single fan) gets 3.1 MH/s on Linux with no overclocking.
--scryptr

the gigabyte 750ti oc lp cards ( in thefarm - no aux power connector ) do on average 2800KH with x11 - stock on fedora 22 x64 cuda 7.5 ...
#crysx

Cuda 7.5 x86 build is doing 1.9 MHASH(750ti). And the 64bit build is around 10-15% slower than the x86 cuda 6.5 build.

can i safely assume this is windows sp? ...

the linux compiles are running better than the cuda6.5 compiles that i was building prior to the fedora 22 x64 upgrade ... and being x64 native - maybe that has something to do with it ...

i dont use anything x86 - unless they only come in i686 format on linux ... and there is no other option ( which is quite rare in linux ) ...

#crysx