CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[djm34]

piss piss piss, someone pissed on the fire? Its starting to stink in here. lol

Yes. Enjoy the piss from the dj.

I don't know if it is mine,but your practices really stink...
(and attacking other dev doesn't plead in your favor)

[sp_]

piss piss piss, someone pissed on the fire? Its starting to stink in here. lol

Yes. Enjoy the piss from the dj.

you started it... and attacking every devs arounds didn't help either...

I just compiled the TP 1.7 release windows x86 cuda65.
Quark is hashing 12,5MHASH. In sp-mod 71 I get 18.2 MHASH (45.6%) faster

This is not an attack. This is just facts..

 

[crsminer]

Here SP 0.1 BTC to you - 2d5651a523ae8ca01023aa9361dc6d27f7ce0e4d787314de94531ca46bbf0399

In time I sent PM's to almost all devs around here asking about improved miners/kernels or advices for better hashes...you are the only one who responded... guess that says alot.

Please keep up all the good work you are doing here.
If it wasn't for this thread I don't think I would have been part of this interesting crypto world.

Thank you.

[djm34]

Here SP 0.1 BTC to you - 2d5651a523ae8ca01023aa9361dc6d27f7ce0e4d787314de94531ca46bbf0399

In time I sent PM's to almost all devs around here asking about improved miners/kernels...you are the only one who responded... guess that says alot.

Please keep up all the good work you are doing here.
If it wasn't for this thread I don't think I would have been part of this interesting crypto world.

Thank you.

sp puppet account ?  

well... theotherme sent me 10btc for my kernels  
anyway thanks for the good laugh...  

lost already too much time, have better things to think about and to do...

[scryptr]

SGMINER? --

Whatever happened to Sgminer?  The last official releases are over a year old.

I think the devs pissed in each other's beer.

--scryptr

[pallas]

SGMINER? --

Whatever happened to Sgminer?  The last official releases are over a year old.

I think the devs pissed in each other's beer.

--scryptr

Sgminer is maintained by nicehash: when they add an algo to their platform, they also update sgminer. But nobody's submitting optimisations (except some rare occasions like wolf0's whirlpoolx).

[zTheWolfz]

SOLO-MINE JoinCoin--
I set up solo-mining for JoinCoin.  My GTX 960 gets about 29.9Mh/s with standard PentaBlake ("penta" algo).  Currently, JoinCoin has a block reward of 2 coins, and a difficulty of ~300 for PentaBlake.  If I get any coins in the next few hours, I'll report back.
--scryptr
EDIT:
While I was typing, I got this:

     -snip-

     GTX 960 SSC solo-mining JoinCoin with standard PentaBlake
I will try a while longer.       --scryptr

What does your config look like. Are you sure you have set it to mine penta? Since joincoin is a multi-algo coin, you need to specify the algo in the config file.


This pool works, I mined 120coins in less than 24 hours some days ago with one single 6x 750ti rig.

http://coinspool.cu.cc/info_joincoin-pentablake

JoinCoin CONFIGURATION FILES--

My wallet configuration (in ...appdata/roaming/joincoin):

==========cut line===========
gen=0
listen=1
daemon=1
server=1
rpcuser=yourname
rpcpassword=x
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcport=9150
rpcconnect=127.0.0.1
algo=pentablake
addnode=gdhtrc7qoh3qowvf.onion:17941
addnode=5k7xsbnnw3mpotx6.onion:17941
addnode=7xbw5q6s4b66hdls.onion:17941
addnode=scfnohgtgod2rzid.onion:17941
addnode=2fsfvfcizsok7sx5.onion:17941
addnode=xdckaipkzzztc7qb.onion:17941
addnode=i5znffoaikqooeyc.onion:17941
addnode=drtevq326tweby2k.onion:17941
addnode=b2mgu5dvcw3m7cxw.onion:17941
addnode=gsmlz6gnk22kdij2.onion:17941
addnode=ufi2euhvrpakwrih.onion:17941
addnode=53zy47p5wly5penk.onion:17941
addnode=nwjw2badoulwc4yi.onion:17941
addnode=im4qpcjdr5uzd7yb.onion:17941
addnode=ecunlzj3niqwaeqs.onion:17941
==========cut line==========

The algo "pentablake" is spelled out completely as per the JoinCoin OP.  My mining configuration follows:

==========cut line===========
{
   "url" : "127.0.0.1:9150",
   "user" : "yourname",
   "pass" : "x",
   "algo" : "penta",
   "intensity" : 20,
   "cpu-mining" : true,
   "cpu-priority" : 5,
   
   "quiet" : false,
   "debug" : false
}
==========cut line===========

My solo-join.conf (above) is called with this batch file:

==========cut line===========
:loop

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -c solo-join.conf

pause
goto loop
==========cut line===========

I am goiing to try whirlpool next.       --scryptr

EDIT:

WHIRLPOOL SUCCESS--

I changed the algo in my solomining configuration to whirlpool (the default JoinCoin algo) and it worked!

      -snip-

--scryptr

Very helpful, some what. Could you make all the corrections in all the right spots above like "whirlpoolx" so it will help others better.

Thanks

Got it working I think after much trail & error. Also not sure if I have the correct algo=xxxxxx in the wallet conf
or is that even really needed in the wallet.conf? Think I still have something incorrectly configured because mine
is showing 12xxxx like your 960 when it got nooo's. Yours is showing 92xx when it found good blocks.

[scryptr]

SOLO-MINE JoinCoin--
I set up solo-mining for JoinCoin.  My GTX 960 gets about 29.9Mh/s with standard PentaBlake ("penta" algo).  Currently, JoinCoin has a block reward of 2 coins, and a difficulty of ~300 for PentaBlake.  If I get any coins in the next few hours, I'll report back.
--scryptr
EDIT:
While I was typing, I got this:

     -snip-

     GTX 960 SSC solo-mining JoinCoin with standard PentaBlake
I will try a while longer.       --scryptr

What does your config look like. Are you sure you have set it to mine penta? Since joincoin is a multi-algo coin, you need to specify the algo in the config file.


This pool works, I mined 120coins in less than 24 hours some days ago with one single 6x 750ti rig.

http://coinspool.cu.cc/info_joincoin-pentablake

JoinCoin CONFIGURATION FILES--

My wallet configuration (in ...appdata/roaming/joincoin):

==========cut line===========
gen=0
listen=1
daemon=1
server=1
rpcuser=yourname
rpcpassword=x
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcport=9150
rpcconnect=127.0.0.1
algo=pentablake
addnode=gdhtrc7qoh3qowvf.onion:17941
addnode=5k7xsbnnw3mpotx6.onion:17941
addnode=7xbw5q6s4b66hdls.onion:17941
addnode=scfnohgtgod2rzid.onion:17941
addnode=2fsfvfcizsok7sx5.onion:17941
addnode=xdckaipkzzztc7qb.onion:17941
addnode=i5znffoaikqooeyc.onion:17941
addnode=drtevq326tweby2k.onion:17941
addnode=b2mgu5dvcw3m7cxw.onion:17941
addnode=gsmlz6gnk22kdij2.onion:17941
addnode=ufi2euhvrpakwrih.onion:17941
addnode=53zy47p5wly5penk.onion:17941
addnode=nwjw2badoulwc4yi.onion:17941
addnode=im4qpcjdr5uzd7yb.onion:17941
addnode=ecunlzj3niqwaeqs.onion:17941
==========cut line==========

The algo "pentablake" is spelled out completely as per the JoinCoin OP.  My mining configuration follows:

==========cut line===========
{
   "url" : "127.0.0.1:9150",
   "user" : "yourname",
   "pass" : "x",
   "algo" : "penta",
   "intensity" : 20,
   "cpu-mining" : true,
   "cpu-priority" : 5,
   
   "quiet" : false,
   "debug" : false
}
==========cut line===========

My solo-join.conf (above) is called with this batch file:

==========cut line===========
:loop

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -c solo-join.conf

pause
goto loop
==========cut line===========

I am goiing to try whirlpool next.       --scryptr

EDIT:

WHIRLPOOL SUCCESS--

I changed the algo in my solomining configuration to whirlpool (the default JoinCoin algo) and it worked!

      -snip-

--scryptr

Very helpful, some what. Could you make all the corrections in all the right spots above like "whirlpoolx" so it will help others better.

Thanks

Got it working I think after much trail & error. Also not sure if I have the correct algo=xxxxxx in the wallet conf
or is that even really needed in the wallet.conf? Think I still have something incorrectly configured because mine
is showing 12xxxx like your 960 when it got nooo's. Yours is showing 92xx when it found good blocks.

WHIRLPOOL--

JoinCoin uses Whirlpool, not Whirlpoolx.  Spell out "whirlpool" completely in the wallet configuration file.  Type "algo" : "whirl" in the mining configuration file, or "-a whirl" on the launch line.  The Opening Page (OP) for JoinCoin states the Whirlpool is the default wallet algo, so you perhaps could skip it in the wallet configuration.  I did not.

My first attempt was with pentablake algo.  I do not know why it did not work.  Pentablake was very new at the launch for JoinCoin.  I only changed the algo configurations between the two attempts.  My GTX 960 runs at full speed (currently) mining Lyra2v2 and Quark.        --scryptr

P.S.  I now have 2 JoinCoins.     --scryptr

[bensam1231]

Here SP 0.1 BTC to you - 2d5651a523ae8ca01023aa9361dc6d27f7ce0e4d787314de94531ca46bbf0399

In time I sent PM's to almost all devs around here asking about improved miners/kernels or advices for better hashes...you are the only one who responded... guess that says alot.

Please keep up all the good work you are doing here.
If it wasn't for this thread I don't think I would have been part of this interesting crypto world.

Thank you.

Pretty much... when the going gets tough, the private miner makers come in here and make a stink. DJM and a few others also did not reply to my PMs asking about how much their miners cost or other stats on them.

The whole private miner BS is a sham as I mentioned before, which is why I wanted to shift to a % based miner fee, which I still think can be done and would be a good idea. Everyone copies everyone elses kernels and I'm sure DJM (despite what he says) will get ahold of SPs miner and also try to reverse engineer it too. This is like watching the pot call the kettle black.

And yes, Nvidia mining wouldn't be profitable without SP. Whenever the developers release algos for Nvidia there is a private version that follows shortly there after that almost no one can buy and costs a fuckton. Leaves the small miners to flop around at the bottom of the pool.

SGMINER? --

Whatever happened to Sgminer?  The last official releases are over a year old.

I think the devs pissed in each other's beer.

--scryptr

AMD is all private kernels. You don't even know who is making what anymore because no one advertises, there is no way to compare anything and know what speed you're getting, power usage, or how much people are paying.

It makes me really sad cryptos have come to this. This is the complete opposite of why they were made. I really hope Nvidia GPUs don't fall down the same hole as ASICs and AMD GPUs.

[scryptr]

Here SP 0.1 BTC to you - 2d5651a523ae8ca01023aa9361dc6d27f7ce0e4d787314de94531ca46bbf0399

In time I sent PM's to almost all devs around here asking about improved miners/kernels or advices for better hashes...you are the only one who responded... guess that says alot.

Please keep up all the good work you are doing here.
If it wasn't for this thread I don't think I would have been part of this interesting crypto world.

Thank you.

Pretty much... when the going gets tough, the private miner makers come in here and make a stink. DJM and a few others also did not reply to my PMs asking about how much their miners cost or other stats on them.

The whole private miner BS is a sham as I mentioned before, which is why I wanted to shift to a % based miner fee, which I still think can be done and would be a good idea. Everyone copies everyone elses kernels and I'm sure DJM (despite what he says) will get ahold of SPs miner and also try to reverse engineer it too. This is like watching the pot call the kettle black.

And yes, Nvidia mining wouldn't be profitable without SP. Whenever the developers release algos for Nvidia there is a private version that follows shortly there after that almost no one can buy and costs a fuckton. Leaves the small miners to flop around at the bottom of the pool.

SGMINER? --

Whatever happened to Sgminer?  The last official releases are over a year old.

I think the devs pissed in each other's beer.

--scryptr

AMD is all private kernels. You don't even know who is making what anymore because no one advertises, there is no way to compare anything and know what speed you're getting, power usage, or how much people are paying.

It makes me really sad cryptos have come to this. This is the complete opposite of why they were made. I really hope Nvidia GPUs don't fall down the same hole as ASICs and AMD GPUs.

AGREED!!!!! --

On this point we agree.  A few months ago everyone was getting along.  Dig we must...       --scryptr

[Liquid71]

And yes, Nvidia mining wouldn't be profitable without SP. Whenever the developers release algos for Nvidia there is a private version that follows shortly there after that almost no one can buy and costs a fuckton. Leaves the small miners to flop around at the bottom of the pool.

We should get Nvidia to sponsor the devs 

[bensam1231]

And yes, Nvidia mining wouldn't be profitable without SP. Whenever the developers release algos for Nvidia there is a private version that follows shortly there after that almost no one can buy and costs a fuckton. Leaves the small miners to flop around at the bottom of the pool.

We should get Nvidia to sponsor the devs 

I would sponsor the devs with 2% of my hashrate, would you?

I honestly don't know why anyone is against a miner fee at this point given the alternative...

[sp_]

piss piss piss, someone pissed on the fire? Its starting to stink in here. lol

Yes. Enjoy the piss from the dj.

you started it... and attacking every devs arounds didn't help either...

I just compiled the TP 1.7 release windows x86 cuda65.
Quark is hashing 12,5MHASH. In sp-mod 71 I get 18.2 MHASH (45.6%) faster
This is not an attack. This is just facts..

And without his work, half the functionality would be gone. Speed is NOT the only thing that matters...
Your post might as well be saying, "The engine of my car is better, even though I ripped off his transmission."

Opensource work is based on other peoples work. In the latest ccminer clones, there are many chefs. The problem is that people get angry when their code is forked and optimized. Why should they, when they have done the exact same thing themselfes..

The spmod was forked early tpruvot (1.5.2) release, he forked it from the CCminer release. (the 2 christians) they forked it from pooler cpu-miner and pooler used alot of opensource code from different authors to create his miner.

Now the spmod is forked again by the nicehash dev team. This is good because Nicehash want's to improve the speed of all the miners to ensure that they are using the latest and fastest software.

Tpruvot has done some great things in his fork recently. Solomining is showing the total nethashrate. Poolside the miner is bether than mine
because it supports alot of tricks the pool use to lower the speed and steal from the miner. This is why I want to do a refork and add my fast kernals into the modern ccminer fork. This is borring work, but needs to be done. I expect to be payed. Developers have bills too...

1 copy is sold for 0.1 BTC. And I will sell more copies.


 

[sp_]

SGMINER? --
Whatever happened to Sgminer?  The last official releases are over a year old.
I think the devs pissed in each other's beer.
--scryptr

Sgminer is maintained by nicehash: when they add an algo to their platform, they also update sgminer. But nobody's submitting optimisations (except some rare occasions like wolf0's whirlpoolx).

Wolf0 Also submitted a 100% increase in neoscrypt hashrate. (from 110H/s to 220H/s on the 280x)
And he bugfixed the lyra2v2 kernal on older amd cards..

[Liquid71]

And yes, Nvidia mining wouldn't be profitable without SP. Whenever the developers release algos for Nvidia there is a private version that follows shortly there after that almost no one can buy and costs a fuckton. Leaves the small miners to flop around at the bottom of the pool.

We should get Nvidia to sponsor the devs  

I would sponsor the devs with 2% of my hashrate, would you?

I honestly don't know why anyone is against a miner fee at this point given the alternative...

Yes I would, but it would still be great if we could get Nvidia to sponsor some devs. I know it's a pipe dream but Nvidia also benefits from all the devs work, without the devs they wouldn't be selling as many cards to miners.
The % based donation sounds good, not sure how you could make it work with open source but even if it's closed source if it's available to everyone that's better than private miners that most don't have access to or even know about. I know we are competing for coins, but without a healthy mining community many alts will just die. Profit motive is good and is what makes the world work, just need to find a compromise so their is still enough profit left to keep the rest of the mining community involved so coins and gpu mining don't die off and the devs are supported for their work. Not sure the solution, but in the meantime I donate whenever I can to the ccminer devs including sp.

[ldp5500]

I think we should definitely work SP, quarks, each of us are the beneficiaries.

[theotherme]

piss piss piss, someone pissed on the fire? Its starting to stink in here. lol

Yes. Enjoy the piss from the dj.

you started it... and attacking every devs arounds didn't help either...

I just compiled the TP 1.7 release windows x86 cuda65.
Quark is hashing 12,5MHASH. In sp-mod 71 I get 18.2 MHASH (45.6%) faster
This is not an attack. This is just facts..

And without his work, half the functionality would be gone. Speed is NOT the only thing that matters...
Your post might as well be saying, "The engine of my car is better, even though I ripped off his transmission."

Opensource work is based on other peoples work. In the latest ccminer clones, there are many chefs. The problem is that people get angry when their code is forked and optimized. Why should they, when they have done the exact same thing themselfes..

No people gets angry when someone claim speed increases which doesn't exist (and ask donation for this fictitious upgrade). When you spent 2 weeks working on an algo and you just have it released if someone claim an increase and that you test it and you don't find any difference well "angry people" don't like it...  

The spmod was forked early tpruvot (1.5.2) release, he forked it from the CCminer release. (the 2 christians) they forked it from pooler cpu-miner and pooler used alot of opensource code from different authors to create his miner.

Now the spmod is forked again by the nicehash dev team. This is good because Nicehash want's to improve the speed of all the miners to ensure that they are using the latest and fastest software.

Tpruvot has done some great things in his fork recently. Solomining is showing the total nethashrate. Poolside the miner is bether than mine
because it supports alot of tricks the pool use to lower the speed and steal from the miner. This is why I want to do a refork and add my fast kernals into the modern ccminer fork. This is borring work, but needs to be done. I expect to be payed. Developers have bills too...

so you admit now, that epsylon3 did the work and not copied it on you   good that's progress...

1 copy is sold for 0.1 BTC. And I will sell more copies.

each of your message are either about asking for donation or asking people to pay...
I think you became a bit too greedy even on crypto standard.
I mean sure, I like to get paid for the work I do, but I don't release stuff which doesn't work (like all your broken release) just to get additional donation.
That's clearly what I don't like in the way you act, you give a bad name to developers (we are many to do honest work in a transparent way and the way you behave is bad for everybody).  

[sp_]

No people gets angry when someone claim speed increases which doesn't exist (and ask donation for this fictitious upgrade).
When you spent 2 weeks working on an algo and you just have it released if someone claim an increase and that you test it and you don't find any difference well "angry people" don't like it...  

You got payed to do the work you did on lyra2v2. My kernal is 10% faster on the cards I use to test them on.. I have many cards. Windows 64 (x86 build) cuda 6.5.
I have have shared my work for free...
If you compile in linux and use 64bit builds It's not my problem. You loose 10%. My modded kernals are not made for Linux..

Yesterday I did a fresh build of ccminer 1.7 TP from github. Quark was hashing at 12.5MHASH. If I build it on linux it will probably hash at 14.5MHASH.
Same for the SP-mod 71. I build it on windows I get 18.2 MHASH. On linux it's probobly less. (around 17MHASH)

You compare apples and oranges...

[sp_]

since i was curious about the evolution of the miner, i've performed some benchmarks on a 960 with various popular building with both cuda 6.5 and 7.5...

Code:

cuda 6.5.19

version    x11       x13   neoscrypt   qubit     quark    lyra2v2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1.5.61   4896.75   3817.49   307.50   7370.82   9901.39   4975.50
1.5.62   4830.94   3824.48   308.17   7367.76   9832.79   4892.54
1.5.63   4829.33   3827.89   307.98   7329.33   9942.74   5064.79
1.5.64   4830.37   3828.82   305.08   7364.21   9939.97   5022.05
1.5.65   4833.80   3829.02   308.03   7316.46   9935.27   5128.57
1.5.66   4841.17   3828.98   308.19   7309.84   9945.59   4964.04
1.5.67   4843.54   3842.94   304.59   7307.92   9895.11   5311.58
1.5.68   4871.72   3849.88   304.81   7333.10   9897.92   5284.52
1.5.69   4871.32   3846.09   305.23   7316.51   9926.38   5291.48
1.5.70   4850.56   3840.83   300.97   7325.78   9928.29   5274.59
1.5.71   4864.87   3848.43   302.00   7311.15   9938.50   5434.95
HEAD     4859.92   3846.95   279.25   7309.49   9943.24   5442.70


cuda 7.5.18

version    x11       x13   neoscrypt   qubit     quark    lyra2v2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1.5.61   4545.64   3557.33    na      6833.08   9649.00   5137.34
1.5.62   4548.16   3536.73    na      6765.00   9741.35   5082.66
1.5.63   4549.85   3552.70    na      6766.62   9595.26   5254.05
1.5.64   4469.91   3544.88    na      6766.10   9772.69   5268.54
1.5.65   4537.04   3558.38    na      6760.28   9845.07   5329.07
1.5.66   4379.26   3547.62    na      6816.86   9779.27   5404.03
1.5.67   4572.08   3575.58    na      6764.94   9649.66   5782.35
1.5.68   4568.98   3576.28    na      6763.20  10016.10   5752.82
1.5.69   4564.96   3576.59    na      6760.18   9971.33   5747.59
1.5.70   4566.48   3564.19    na      6775.10   9936.68   5737.31
1.5.71   4529.04   3568.78    na      6756.01   9961.33   5505.06
HEAD     4564.34   3580.72    na      6748.33  10013.80   5506.37

edit: this is under linux

I am OK with these results (I work witk quark and lyra2rev2, Ubuntu and standard kernel/clock, for lower TdP) :
 Cuda 7.5 is faster rhan Cuda 6.5
 release 1.5.71/70/69 are lower than the previous 1.5.68 (the faster release for me).
Thanks for the table, skunk :-).

All my gtx 960 cards are hashing lyra2v2 above 6MHASH using windows 7 64bit, cuda 6.5 and release 71 (official exe file).
All my gtx 960 card are hashing quark above 10MHASH on the gtx 960, often 10.5-12 using windows 7, cuda 6.5 and release 71  (official exe file).

[bensam1231]

SOLO-MINE JoinCoin--
I set up solo-mining for JoinCoin.  My GTX 960 gets about 29.9Mh/s with standard PentaBlake ("penta" algo).  Currently, JoinCoin has a block reward of 2 coins, and a difficulty of ~300 for PentaBlake.  If I get any coins in the next few hours, I'll report back.
--scryptr
EDIT:
While I was typing, I got this:

    
     GTX 960 SSC solo-mining JoinCoin with standard PentaBlake
I will try a while longer.       --scryptr

What does your config look like. Are you sure you have set it to mine penta? Since joincoin is a multi-algo coin, you need to specify the algo in the config file.


This pool works, I mined 120coins in less than 24 hours some days ago with one single 6x 750ti rig.

http://coinspool.cu.cc/info_joincoin-pentablake

JoinCoin CONFIGURATION FILES--

My wallet configuration (in ...appdata/roaming/joincoin):

==========cut line===========
gen=0
listen=1
daemon=1
server=1
rpcuser=yourname
rpcpassword=x
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
rpcport=9150
rpcconnect=127.0.0.1
algo=pentablake
addnode=gdhtrc7qoh3qowvf.onion:17941
addnode=5k7xsbnnw3mpotx6.onion:17941
addnode=7xbw5q6s4b66hdls.onion:17941
addnode=scfnohgtgod2rzid.onion:17941
addnode=2fsfvfcizsok7sx5.onion:17941
addnode=xdckaipkzzztc7qb.onion:17941
addnode=i5znffoaikqooeyc.onion:17941
addnode=drtevq326tweby2k.onion:17941
addnode=b2mgu5dvcw3m7cxw.onion:17941
addnode=gsmlz6gnk22kdij2.onion:17941
addnode=ufi2euhvrpakwrih.onion:17941
addnode=53zy47p5wly5penk.onion:17941
addnode=nwjw2badoulwc4yi.onion:17941
addnode=im4qpcjdr5uzd7yb.onion:17941
addnode=ecunlzj3niqwaeqs.onion:17941
==========cut line==========

The algo "pentablake" is spelled out completely as per the JoinCoin OP.  My mining configuration follows:

==========cut line===========
{
   "url" : "127.0.0.1:9150",
   "user" : "yourname",
   "pass" : "x",
   "algo" : "penta",
   "intensity" : 20,
   "cpu-mining" : true,
   "cpu-priority" : 5,
   
   "quiet" : false,
   "debug" : false
}
==========cut line===========

My solo-join.conf (above) is called with this batch file:

==========cut line===========
:loop

C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -c solo-join.conf

pause
goto loop
==========cut line===========

I am goiing to try whirlpool next.       --scryptr

EDIT:

WHIRLPOOL SUCCESS--

I changed the algo in my solomining configuration to whirlpool (the default JoinCoin algo) and it worked!

      
       GTX 960 FTW finds JoinCoin block with whirlpool algo.

        
        First mined block on JoinCoin wallet.

--scryptr

I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong, but I can't mine to a solo wallet. I simply don't get accepted OR rejected shares from the wallet. However, if I set gen=1 then the CPU miner starts and it reports in CCminer when that gets accepted or rejected shares.