CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[theotherme]

except we know that nothing noticeable comes out at the end...
so as far as I am concerned, these are just baseless promises...

Please restore the performance of your neoscrypt kernal on cuda 7.5. My 750ti is only hashing @ 60KHASH.  66% slower

Not my problem, this algo was developed for cuda 6.5 (the newest algo, still unpublished, which is a lot faster would be the only one I would consider for upgrade...).
This is funny how when it comes to announce small and meaningless speed increase, you are there, and how it becomes everyone else fault when an algo gets slower 

[sp_]

This is funny how when it comes to announce small and meaningless speed increase, you are there, and how it becomes everyone else fault when an algo gets slower 

Just different ways to work. I don't wait 6 months to publish my kernals. They are getting faster every week, and most of my work is opensource.

[chrysophylax]

sp ...

ccminer-spmod76 has succeeded in hashing more compiled in f22x64c75 than the previous versions on f22x64c65 ...

the average hashrate i used to get per card ( gigabyte 750ti oc lp ) was 2800kh ... now the average is 2847kh ...

this is proof enough for me that you have improved it on x11 more than the previous versions ...

below is a copy of the most recent output of ccminer-spmod76 using the setting - ./ccminer -o stratum+tcp://donate-sp.granitecoin.com:7003/ -O chrysophylax.ace:x -a x11 -X 29 ...

-------

[2015-12-14 23:42:29] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2830 (T= 74C F= 60% C=1176/2700)
[2015-12-14 23:42:29] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2859 (T= 74C F= 60% C=1176/2700)
[2015-12-14 23:42:30] accepted: 126/133 (94.74%), 14237 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-14 23:42:30] accepted: 127/134 (94.78%), 14237 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-14 23:42:41] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2847 (T= 65C F= 54% C=1176/2700)
[2015-12-14 23:42:42] accepted: 128/135 (94.81%), 14237 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-14 23:42:44] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2857 (T= 74C F= 60% C=1176/2700)
[2015-12-14 23:42:45] accepted: 129/136 (94.85%), 14237 kH/s yes!
[2015-12-14 23:42:47] donate-sp.granitecoin.com:7003/ x11 block 116788
[2015-12-14 23:42:47] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2855 (T= 74C F= 60% C=1176/2700)
[2015-12-14 23:42:47] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2850 (T= 65C F= 54% C=1176/2700)
[2015-12-14 23:42:47] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2845 (T= 71C F= 57% C=1176/2700)
[2015-12-14 23:42:47] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2829 (T= 74C F= 60% C=1176/2700)
[2015-12-14 23:42:47] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2861 (T= 76C F= 62% C=1189/2700)
[2015-12-14 23:42:53] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2830 (T= 74C F= 60% C=1176/2700)
[2015-12-14 23:42:54] accepted: 130/137 (94.89%), 14237 kH/s yes!

-------

this is currently running on the donation link http://donate-sp.granitecoin.com:7003/ on nicehash - https://www.nicehash.com/?p=miners&addr=1CTiNJyoUmbdMRACtteRWXhGqtSETYd6Vd&a=3&l=0 ...

tanx ...

#crysx

[sp_]

But your cards are showing lower numbers than others. I get 2.9-3.1 on most of my cards on the factory clocks. With Overclocking you can reach 3.4-3.5 in the x11 algo. on the 750ti.

edit: I see that your cards are running with a corespeed of 1176 Mhz. this is very low. x11 performs best between 1300  and 1400

[chrysophylax]

But your cards are showing lower numbers than others. I get 2.9-3.1 on most of my cards on the factory clocks. With Overclocking you can reach 3.4-3.5 in the x11 algo. on the 750ti.

i know ...

my cards have ALWAYS shown lower numbers than that of the other miners ...

i have never been able to find out why this is so ...

BUT ... the upside is that in comparison to what these cards were getting - these figures are better hashrates ...

these cards have always done below the 2800kh mark on x11 ... then when i upgraded to f22x54 and c75 - the numbers jumped slightly to 2800kh ...

now they are averaging more - compiled in the exact same way that they were before - except with ccminer-spmod76 ...

what are your numbers on the stock 980ti g1 for x11 and quark? ...

#crysx

[sp_]

But your cards are showing lower numbers than others. I get 2.9-3.1 on most of my cards on the factory clocks. With Overclocking you can reach 3.4-3.5 in the x11 algo. on the 750ti.

what are your numbers on the stock 980ti g1 for x11 and quark? ...

27.5 MHASH in quark stock clocks (release 76)  I have the G1 OC card.
It did 13MHASH in x11 in an earlier release,  but haven't tested the latest build.

[chrysophylax]

But your cards are showing lower numbers than others. I get 2.9-3.1 on most of my cards on the factory clocks. With Overclocking you can reach 3.4-3.5 in the x11 algo. on the 750ti.

what are your numbers on the stock 980ti g1 for x11 and quark? ...

27.5 MHASH in quark stock clocks (release 76)  I have the G1 OC card.
It did 13MHASH in x11 in an earlier release,  but haven't tested the latest build.

now those are nice figures ...

could you test it in x11 when you have time please? ...

im very curious ...

#crysx

[theotherme]

This is funny how when it comes to announce small and meaningless speed increase, you are there, and how it becomes everyone else fault when an algo gets slower  

Just different ways to work. I don't wait 6 months to publish my kernals. They are getting faster every week, and most of my work is opensource.

no they're not faster...  
And your work is mostly to wait for other people to release them for you... (sorry for not playing by your rules... )

[sp_]

This is funny how when it comes to announce small and meaningless speed increase, you are there, and how it becomes everyone else fault when an algo gets slower  

Just different ways to work. I don't wait 6 months to publish my kernals. They are getting faster every week, and most of my work is opensource.

no they're not faster...  
And your work is mostly to wait for other people to release them for you... (sorry for not playing by your rules... )

I have modded and optimized all the kernals in ccminer, including your neoscrypt and lyra2v2 kernals..
My kernals are the fastest opensource there is for the maxwell cards. If you want to prove me wrong, please release something new. It's been a while now.

[theotherme]

except we know that nothing noticeable comes out at the end...
so as far as I am concerned, these are just baseless promises...

I just gave you 5% more quark on compute 5.2 devices(release 76). Everybody Know I have a faster private kernal.

oh yes, I forgot the 5% stuff, we see all the time and nobody can notice  

19-september 2014 (ccminer DJM34 version)
http://cryptomining-blog.com/3503-crypto-mining-performance-of-the-new-nvidia-geforce-gtx-980/


Quark was hashing at 12322 on the reference gtx 980 card (2048 shaders)
Quark is now  hashing at 12300 on a overclocked gtx 960 oc. (1024 shaders) and around 20MHASH on the reference 980 cards.(ccminer sp-mod release 76)'

A total of 63% gain

considering, I never worked on quark, your comparison is irrelevant as usual

[sp_]

considering, I never worked on quark, your comparison is irrelevant as usual

Your Lyra2v2 kernal is slow on the gtx 950 and the gtx 960. I have improved it. It is faster on all the maxwell models. My modded kernals are 100-200KHASH bether on the 750tis'

Around 5%.

It's enough to prove that my work is faster.

[theotherme]

considering, I never worked on quark, your comparison is irrelevant as usual

Your Lyra2v2 kernal is slow on the gtx 950 and the gtx 960. I have improved it. It is faster on all the maxwell models. My modded kernals are 100-200KHASH bether on the 750tis'

Around 5%.

It's enough to prove that my work is faster.

you just tweaked kernel parameters (which were adjustable by the user in my version btw), so no there is no real difference...
(except the huge overclock on your cards)

[sp_]

considering, I never worked on quark, your comparison is irrelevant as usual

Your Lyra2v2 kernal is slow on the gtx 950 and the gtx 960. I have improved it. It is faster on all the maxwell models. My modded kernals are 100-200KHASH bether on the 750tis'
Around 5%.
It's enough to prove that my work is faster.

you just tweaked kernel parameters (which were adjustable by the user in my version btw), so no there is no real difference...
(except the huge overclock on your cards)

No. I have done more. My kernel compiles down to 110 registers and no spillbytes. Yours is 213 regs. Do a filecompare and check for yourself.

[techcoin12]

SP_

thank you for all your work and continued effort ... it is truly rare to find in this day and age!

donation sent

[djm34]

considering, I never worked on quark, your comparison is irrelevant as usual

Your Lyra2v2 kernal is slow on the gtx 950 and the gtx 960. I have improved it. It is faster on all the maxwell models. My modded kernals are 100-200KHASH bether on the 750tis'
Around 5%.
It's enough to prove that my work is faster.

you just tweaked kernel parameters (which were adjustable by the user in my version btw), so no there is no real difference...
(except the huge overclock on your cards)

No. I have done more. My kernel compiles down to 110 registers and no spillbytes. Yours is 213 regs. Do a filecompare and check for yourself.

doesn't make any difference, you should know it... as long as there is enough registers (and it is clearly not 213 reg either... but hey I am happy to keep your thread on top of the mining forum... so you can get donation... for a last time)

[sp_]

doesn't make any difference, you should know it... as long as there is enough registers (and it is clearly not 213 reg either... but hey I am happy to keep your thread on top of the mining forum... so you can get donation... for a last time)

On compute 5.0 it does.

[chrysophylax]

sp ...

have you been able to test with the latest git the x11 stock hashrate for the gigabyte 980ti g1 cards? ...

it is important to me if you could please do this ...

i know you have given an estimate for previous compiles - but im really interested to knwo what it actually does with the current git code ...

id really appreciate it mate ...

#crysx

[sp_]

Not yet. I'll be back in a couple of days to test for you.

[bensam1231]

considering, I never worked on quark, your comparison is irrelevant as usual

Your Lyra2v2 kernal is slow on the gtx 950 and the gtx 960. I have improved it. It is faster on all the maxwell models. My modded kernals are 100-200KHASH bether on the 750tis'
Around 5%.
It's enough to prove that my work is faster.

you just tweaked kernel parameters (which were adjustable by the user in my version btw), so no there is no real difference...
(except the huge overclock on your cards)

No. I have done more. My kernel compiles down to 110 registers and no spillbytes. Yours is 213 regs. Do a filecompare and check for yourself.

doesn't make any difference, you should know it... as long as there is enough registers (and it is clearly not 213 reg either... but hey I am happy to keep your thread on top of the mining forum... so you can get donation... for a last time)

Typical troll. Disprove a argument > switch the topic. Do it over and over again till the person you're arguing with gives up.

I like how you talk about broken software and yours is, then you say 'it doesn't matter cause a earlier release wasn't broken'. Same thing could be said about SPs software when things break. But oh it's different because it's a different version of cuda? That's like having software that only works on XP when everyone is using W7 or W10, then stating it works on XP so everyone should stay on it. GG hypocrite

[pallas]

I just think there should be no such discussion.

People wonna donate to sp_? Do it.
People wonna pledge djm34? Do it.
People wonna buy private AMD kernels from me? Do it! :-D

I've done so much opensource that I'll never feel guilty for selling some software ;-)