scryptr
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
 |
August 01, 2015, 03:22:24 AM
Last edit: August 01, 2015, 04:30:37 AM by scryptr |
|
Does anyone happen to know the current speed for Neo-scrypt on a 750ti, 960, and 970?
GTX HASH RATES-- I get 180kh/s, 320kh/s, and 510kh/s, respectively, for NeoScrypt. I do not have a GTX 980. --scryptr P.S. Anyone who wants a game code for "BATMAN: ARKHAM KNIGHT", please PM me. ok can we have the card instead ?  No, sorry, the hash it generates goes for bread, beer, and occasional donations. Yours took 7 days to confirm last time; blockchain traffic issues. Pallas might be in line for one if the Axiom algo gets hammered out between the movers and shakers in the Cuda world...  I wish I could code better. --scryptr |
|
|
|
|
zTheWolfz
|
|
August 01, 2015, 04:48:40 AM |
|
This speed look about normal for a GTX960SSC under these conditions ? Command line as followed: ccminer.exe -a Quark -o stratum+tcp://quark.ua.nicehash.com:3345 -i 22 -u zxxxxz -p x -d 0 -l 16x24 I set -i to 22 to make the system more use friendly, default was causing a bit of lag while doing other things, like surfing or open GPUZ tabs.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Fuzzbawls
|
|
August 01, 2015, 04:50:12 AM |
|
This speed look about normal for a GTX960SSC under these conditions ? Command line as followed: ccminer.exe -a Quark -o stratum+tcp://quark.ua.nicehash.com:3345 -i 22 -u zxxxxz -p x -d 0 -l 16x24 I set -i to 22 to make the system more use friendly, default was causing a bit of lag while doing other thing, like surfing or open GPUZ tabs. -l 16x24 shouldn't be necessary? thought that was just for scrypt based algos |
|
|
|
|
|
zTheWolfz
|
|
August 01, 2015, 05:05:34 AM
Last edit: August 01, 2015, 07:11:44 AM by zTheWolfz |
|
Its probably not, I had just gotten use to adding it so it didn't run the 2min. benchmark each time it was started. I've removed it to see if there will be any improvement without it. So far looks about the same, starts out with a little higher khash rate but settles in after its been running a good long while to what you see above, will see if that is the same now without it. I worked with it a good while last night and at first was getting some booo's as you can see that has been corrected by the accepted counts. Edit: These are the numbers I am seeing without it but was also seeing these same numbers last night/early morning. The above number could have been changed by the heat of the day and didn't think to look at the clock speeds to see if maybe it had down clocked a little and didn't ramp back up after it cooled back down. Note that for some reason the memory clock is not being pushed to its full speed. Should be 1753Mhz, but the core clock is at 1392Mhz and stock clock for core is 1279Mhz for this card. Boost at work there but not for the memory?  |
|
|
|
|
|
dominuspro
|
|
August 01, 2015, 05:41:15 PM |
|
Anyone with a nice 980ti using ccminer? I mean a non reference one, possibly an Asus strix or Gigabyte G1...
I would like to know about the quark hashrate if possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
fenomenhaa
|
|
August 01, 2015, 08:47:09 PM
Last edit: August 01, 2015, 09:20:30 PM by fenomenhaa |
|
With relase 57 in neoscyrtp itook this error. @sp what's the reason?This rig have 3-750 ti and 2-970. Rigs with just 750ti's working without problem..   |
▄▄█▄█▄[/color] ▄▀▀▀▄ ██ ██ ▄▀▀▀▄ █ █▀▀[color=#2C97 |
|
|
DominatorST
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
August 01, 2015, 10:13:47 PM |
|
Install over old drivers. 970-series only with them works correctly on windows - 10 |
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
August 01, 2015, 10:49:53 PM |
|
You should mine the SIA coin. Looks like you have been strux'ed. The strix is not the dominant NVIDIA board out there...
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
|
August 01, 2015, 11:30:33 PM
Last edit: August 02, 2015, 02:04:28 AM by scryptr |
|
@fenomenhaa, DominatorST--
Make sure that the nVidia drivers that you have installed support the GTX 900 series cards. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
|
hashbrown9000
|
|
August 02, 2015, 04:45:27 AM |
|
what algo is SIA?
|
Pinkcoin:
ETH:
VTC:
BTC:
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
August 02, 2015, 06:26:32 AM |
|
what algo is SIA?
blake2b ... and requires its own miner ... been on this coin for a long time - and has a long way to go - but the project is awesome ... and the dev ( taek ) is always around and improving the coin and project as a whole - like sp does here  ... #crysx |
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
August 02, 2015, 06:52:15 AM |
|
You should mine the SIA coin. Looks like you have been strux'ed. The strix is not the dominant NVIDIA board out there...
sp - i pm'd you a while back when sia was just starting - and asked if there was a way you could implement the algo into ccminer so that we could solomine sia ... you didnt respond ... with the advent of the current miner - i recognized that it would be a great deal of work involved - and probably premature to do so at this juncture of the development of sia ... but the question remains - CAN you do it? ... even as a private optimized miner? ... i would be first on the list for that please ... i would also like to present an issue for your advice ( or any other dev that sees this and knows ) ... i have just upgraded the test machine to fedora 21 x64 - cuda 7.0-28 and applied the cufft_patch_linux.tar.gz patch ... compiled your fork of ccminer - and it went through without a hitch - no meddling with the makefile like i had to with cuda 6.5 ... run the miner on a fresh reboot - and it runs without issue ... until the hashing starts to really get going - then the errors begin ... cpu validation errors on x11 and quark ... i didnt try any other algo as they are the main two algo we use in thefarm ... decided to compile tpruvot's version ... the same issues arose ... decided to compile klaust's version ... would not compile due to c++11 errors ... and i have no idea how to overcome that issue as fedora ( as far as i am aware ) has no support for that particular standard ... any ideas as to the problem here? ... any advice on how to fix? ... tanx in advance sp ... #crysx |
|
|
|
|
hashbrown9000
|
|
August 02, 2015, 02:30:30 PM |
|
hope some of you got in on the profitable Bitcrystals mining last night. I started up when the payout was 11 mBTC/MH/day. It's dropped to 4.2 now, but still good to mine for now.
|
Pinkcoin:
ETH:
VTC:
BTC:
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 02, 2015, 02:58:18 PM |
|
I forget, what was the hash on qubuit for a 970?
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks  |
|
|
|
fenomenhaa
|
|
August 02, 2015, 04:04:10 PM |
|
hope some of you got in on the profitable Bitcrystals mining last night. I started up when the payout was 11 mBTC/MH/day. It's dropped to 4.2 now, but still good to mine for now.
Could u seggest a stable pool for this coin? @antonio8 Qubit 970 o/c 13.5Mh/s |
▄▄█▄█▄[/color] ▄▀▀▀▄ ██ ██ ▄▀▀▀▄ █ █▀▀[color=#2C97 |
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
|
August 02, 2015, 05:38:04 PM |
|
BITCRYSTALS--
From what I read, BTCRY are worth 3-12 satoshis each? It is a dead coin revived, now dying again? A quark based coin?
Excuse me, I am missing something. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
|
hashbrown9000
|
|
August 02, 2015, 06:25:08 PM |
|
yeah looks dead, but mining was profitable for about 12-15 hours. i was lucky enough to catch it.
|
Pinkcoin:
ETH:
VTC:
BTC:
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
|
August 02, 2015, 06:32:14 PM |
|
BUM WALLETS--
I think I have several wallets to delete. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
August 02, 2015, 07:57:47 PM |
|
submitted a 50KHASH increase in qubit on the 970.
luffa512
More precalculation, and removed some code.
|
|
|
|
ArkBlitz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
 |
August 02, 2015, 08:56:02 PM |
|
I've been having a bug that, for whatever reason, happens only in Linux and only in the X11 algo. With that combination, shares are never validated on the CPU. However, Lyra2RE does work, and both algos work flawlessly on Windows. For the record, I'm using a GeForce 750Ti + Intel Core i3 2100 on Arch Linux and Windows 10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
