bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 13, 2016, 05:33:49 PM Last edit: August 13, 2016, 05:52:18 PM by bensam1231 |
|
will just ignore what sp said, i could be impolite again, fyi i got in total 0.02 btc for a 33% boost (and not even from bensam who asked it, like steem actually)
nvm i hope at least my work helped klaus to finalize his version...
If you're talking about your SIA miner, it's a 12% improvement over the GO miner, which brings it up to par with ETH on a 970. If I can't get anywhere close to ROI it's not something people will pay for most of the time (hence why people are saying .2 BTC is too high for SPs miner). I don't know what you're capable of in terms of improvements, SIA has huge volume flowing through it. It still does. If it hit close to a 33% improvement over the GO miner, there would probably be a lot of people purchasing it or at least looking at it. It would be close to the income of Lbry right now. BTW not really sure what's happening with Lbry right now, but difficulty jumped up by +600GH. You'll make about as much mining it then ETH at the moment. Someone with a big farm has no idea what they're doing. Probably a big Eth-baby that got a hold of Wolfs AMD miner. Nvidia dagger driver fix couldn't come sooner.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
giagge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 13, 2016, 06:33:19 PM |
|
yiimp pool lbry offline!!! .
Epsylon3 seems offline at the moment, suggesting there's some issue with his connection right now. His downtimes are usually pretty brief though... Offline 1 hour and 30 minutes ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) .
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 13, 2016, 06:35:06 PM Last edit: August 14, 2016, 10:46:00 AM by tbearhere |
|
yiimp pool lbry offline!!! .
Epsylon3 seems offline at the moment, suggesting there's some issue with his connection right now. His downtimes are usually pretty brief though... Offline 1 hour and 30 minutes ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) . SP where are you ... pools down. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Epsylon3 opps was in a hurry. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 13, 2016, 06:44:25 PM |
|
yiimp pool lbry offline!!! .
Epsylon3 seems offline at the moment, suggesting there's some issue with his connection right now. His downtimes are usually pretty brief though... Offline 1 hour and 30 minutes ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) . SP where are you ... pools down. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) SP_ !!!!!!======= Epsylon3 :-D
|
|
|
|
Slava_K
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 13, 2016, 06:59:27 PM |
|
Pool again online. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 14, 2016, 09:01:45 AM |
|
Yep sorry, never seen that, second big power cut in the area this year ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) The ups worked 30mn but i had to power off properly then
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 14, 2016, 10:47:17 AM |
|
yiimp pool lbry offline!!! .
Epsylon3 seems offline at the moment, suggesting there's some issue with his connection right now. His downtimes are usually pretty brief though... Offline 1 hour and 30 minutes ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) . SP where are you ... pools down. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Epsylon3 SP_ !!!!!!======= Epsylon3 :-D Opps was in a hurry ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 14, 2016, 02:27:35 PM |
|
Anyone know where djm34 is? Maybe hes using the other me ?
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 14, 2016, 04:05:53 PM |
|
Anyone know where djm34 is? Maybe hes using the other me ?
DJM34 MUST BE QUIET-- Haven't seen him in a while. His M7 branch CCminer (Cryptonite, XCN) could use some optimization. It runs, but it hasn't been touched since early 2015. It could be optimized for Maxwell, and Pascal, and given the API fetures and stuff. Or, blended into Epsylon3's release. Is everyone afraid to touch it? --scryptr
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 14, 2016, 05:15:14 PM |
|
Anyone know where djm34 is? Maybe hes using the other me ?
DJM34 MUST BE QUIET-- Haven't seen him in a while. His M7 branch CCminer (Cryptonite, XCN) could use some optimization. It runs, but it hasn't been touched since early 2015. It could be optimized for Maxwell, and Pascal, and given the API fetures and stuff. Or, blended into Epsylon3's release. Is everyone afraid to touch it? --scryptr criptonote for pascal is pretty bad at the moment, running at 350 for a 1070, when it should be like 800, clearly not optimized
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 14, 2016, 05:21:12 PM |
|
Anyone know where djm34 is? Maybe hes using the other me ?
DJM34 MUST BE QUIET-- Haven't seen him in a while. His M7 branch CCminer (Cryptonite, XCN) could use some optimization. It runs, but it hasn't been touched since early 2015. It could be optimized for Maxwell, and Pascal, and given the API fetures and stuff. Or, blended into Epsylon3's release. Is everyone afraid to touch it? --scryptr criptonote for pascal is pretty bad at the moment, running at 350 for a 1070, when it should be like 800, clearly not optimized Cryptonite (M7) is not cryptonight.
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 14, 2016, 05:23:01 PM |
|
Anyone know where djm34 is? Maybe hes using the other me ?
DJM34 MUST BE QUIET-- Haven't seen him in a while. His M7 branch CCminer (Cryptonite, XCN) could use some optimization. It runs, but it hasn't been touched since early 2015. It could be optimized for Maxwell, and Pascal, and given the API fetures and stuff. Or, blended into Epsylon3's release. Is everyone afraid to touch it? --scryptr criptonote for pascal is pretty bad at the moment, running at 350 for a 1070, when it should be like 800, clearly not optimized Cryptonite (M7) is not cryptonight. i mean cryptonight yes, bad typo, the one of monero, it's called also cryptonote i always confuse that...
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 14, 2016, 05:46:31 PM |
|
Anyone know where djm34 is? Maybe hes using the other me ?
DJM34 MUST BE QUIET-- Haven't seen him in a while. His M7 branch CCminer (Cryptonite, XCN) could use some optimization. It runs, but it hasn't been touched since early 2015. It could be optimized for Maxwell, and Pascal, and given the API fetures and stuff. Or, blended into Epsylon3's release. Is everyone afraid to touch it? --scryptr criptonote for pascal is pretty bad at the moment, running at 350 for a 1070, when it should be like 800, clearly not optimized Cryptonite (M7) is not cryptonight. i mean cryptonight yes, bad typo, the one of monero, it's called also cryptonote i always confuse that... CRYPTONITE (XCN) USES M7 ALGO-- And the various currencies and algos are confusing. I never bothered to mine XCN until I got questioned about it in another thread. My 980ti gets 11.5MH/s with the CudaMiner XCN miner, and 14MH/s on DJM34's CCminer M7 branch. Right now, I am trying to figure out whether it earns as much as Library Credits (LBC). I am positive that optimization of M7 algo code for Maxwell and Pascal would significantly increase the hash rate. Claymore's fee-based AMD miner reportedly gets 9MH/s on a 290X, haven't tried it yet. He gets a 5% feee, and just updated the miner to v2.2 for Win10 and etc. And, to add to the confusion, what is this M7M algo? CPU only, I think... --scryptr
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 14, 2016, 06:27:45 PM Last edit: August 14, 2016, 06:59:49 PM by Amph |
|
Anyone know where djm34 is? Maybe hes using the other me ?
DJM34 MUST BE QUIET-- Haven't seen him in a while. His M7 branch CCminer (Cryptonite, XCN) could use some optimization. It runs, but it hasn't been touched since early 2015. It could be optimized for Maxwell, and Pascal, and given the API fetures and stuff. Or, blended into Epsylon3's release. Is everyone afraid to touch it? --scryptr criptonote for pascal is pretty bad at the moment, running at 350 for a 1070, when it should be like 800, clearly not optimized Cryptonite (M7) is not cryptonight. i mean cryptonight yes, bad typo, the one of monero, it's called also cryptonote i always confuse that... CRYPTONITE (XCN) USES M7 ALGO-- And the various currencies and algos are confusing. I never bothered to mine XCN until I got questioned about it in another thread. My 980ti gets 11.5MH/s with the CudaMiner XCN miner, and 14MH/s on DJM34's CCminer M7 branch. Right now, I am trying to figure out whether it earns as much as Library Credits (LBC). I am positive that optimization of M7 algo code for Maxwell and Pascal would significantly increase the hash rate. Claymore's fee-based AMD miner reportedly gets 9MH/s on a 290X, haven't tried it yet. He gets a 5% feee, and just updated the miner to v2.2 for Win10 and etc. And, to add to the confusion, what is this M7M algo? CPU only, I think... --scryptr ah yes m7 algo, i remember i mined that long time ago in 2014, i thought it was dead already, i need to check the hashrate with a 1070 m7m is for magi a cpu only coin it seems p.s. do you have the release for this, i can not compile at the moment, i want to see how much hashrate one 1070 do with the m7 algo ok i tried, not optimized at all, getting 12MH with 100-120w consumption...also very unstable, bottom 50MH+ top was 72MH ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FEECCx49.png&t=665&c=j8_cc78dS1n4cA)
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 14, 2016, 06:50:25 PM |
|
it was a short pump for xcn on polo, it was rather good to mine it with gtx750 using lowmem ccminer by djm. Now xcn is dead again ))
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 14, 2016, 06:52:04 PM |
|
if it was optimized for a 1070 it would be very profitable, should be at least 15MH per card, so the profit would be like lbry at least
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 14, 2016, 06:54:51 PM |
|
if it was optimized for a 1070 it would be very profitable, should be at least 15MH per card, so the profit would be like lbry at least
gtx750 can do > 4mh. gtx1070 roughly 5-10 times faster then gtx750 so the good speed should be 20-40 ))
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 14, 2016, 06:58:45 PM |
|
if it was optimized for a 1070 it would be very profitable, should be at least 15MH per card, so the profit would be like lbry at least
gtx750 can do > 4mh. gtx1070 roughly 5-10 times faster then gtx750 so the good speed should be 20-40 )) i don't think it work that way, because the 980ti can do only 14MH, but yes i also think a 1070 might do 20MH, but 40MH seems too much
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 14, 2016, 07:02:28 PM Last edit: August 14, 2016, 07:17:26 PM by scryptr |
|
Anyone know where djm34 is? Maybe hes using the other me ?
DJM34 MUST BE QUIET-- Haven't seen him in a while. His M7 branch CCminer (Cryptonite, XCN) could use some optimization. It runs, but it hasn't been touched since early 2015. It could be optimized for Maxwell, and Pascal, and given the API fetures and stuff. Or, blended into Epsylon3's release. Is everyone afraid to touch it? --scryptr criptonote for pascal is pretty bad at the moment, running at 350 for a 1070, when it should be like 800, clearly not optimized Cryptonite (M7) is not cryptonight. i mean cryptonight yes, bad typo, the one of monero, it's called also cryptonote i always confuse that... CRYPTONITE (XCN) USES M7 ALGO-- And the various currencies and algos are confusing. I never bothered to mine XCN until I got questioned about it in another thread. My 980ti gets 11.5MH/s with the CudaMiner XCN miner, and 14MH/s on DJM34's CCminer M7 branch. Right now, I am trying to figure out whether it earns as much as Library Credits (LBC). I am positive that optimization of M7 algo code for Maxwell and Pascal would significantly increase the hash rate. Claymore's fee-based AMD miner reportedly gets 9MH/s on a 290X, haven't tried it yet. He gets a 5% feee, and just updated the miner to v2.2 for Win10 and etc. And, to add to the confusion, what is this M7M algo? CPU only, I think... --scryptr ah yes m7 algo, i remember i mined that long time ago in 2014, i thought it was dead already, i need to check the hashrate with a 1070 m7m is for magi a cpu only coin it seems p.s. do you have the release for this, i can not compile at the moment, i want to see how much hashrate one 1070 do with the m7 algo ok i tried, not optimized at all, getting 12MH with 100-120w consumption ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FEECCx49.png&t=665&c=j8_cc78dS1n4cA) I TRIED TO COMPILE DJM34's CCMINER IN LINUX-- I also got a compile error. I believe it was coded for CUDA 6.5, and I have a CUDA 7.5 environment. The links for the compiled Windows versions work at 1GH.com, the CryptoMining-Blog links are dead. I would appreciate any coder's advice in how to get a Linux compile from the source at DJM34's github. "It should compile with any version of CUDA 6.5+", was posted somewhere. The source there does not include a "build.sh" file, and the code must be compiled with "./autogen.sh", followed by "./configure", and finally, "make". I'd appreciate a "build.sh" that gets the job done. CryptoNite (XCN) just had a major value spike. Miners and traders are still interested. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 14, 2016, 07:08:03 PM |
|
there is definitely big profit for nvidia on m7 algo, if it can be added as a main algo, would be good
maybe we can rise a donation for this
|
|
|
|
|