CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[Amph]

sp can you post screen about 1070 +5% boost, which would put a 1070 around 300 already

265 *1.05 = 278.25 (on average, not considering too high settings, that are simply useless in a multigpu environment given the absence of rock solid stability)

@bensam: you're not the only one with a "decent" amount invested in cryptos, but there's also a thing callededucation and mutual respect. I understand your frustration in such discussions, but it should be better if you both ignore each others; it's a nonsense to continue like this in every thread you both collide.

@sp: would you be so kind to post hashrates with a human, achievable, frequency? A common 1070, even custom, barely reaches 2000MHz in stability without thermal and power throttling (in a multigpu setup obviously, due thermal complications). Interesting findings about the memory controller btw. Have you measured the difference between the reference values (TDP 150) and  TDP to 170 + forced p0 state? Such tests would be much more interesting with watt measures. What's you model of 1070?

Thanks

no that is wrong, you need to check the maximum which is 290MH done by a guy here and with 5% is above 300MH

just see few posts back, and anyway i'm at 280 with mine also, which would put me at around 295....

[antantti]

I don't know if anyone is interested but 970 to do 150MH I need to limit power to 120 watts (70% tdp), 160MH needs 140 watts (82% tdp).

Max these 8-pin cards can consume is 196 watts at 120% tdp.

[go6ooo1212]

I don't know if anyone is interested but 970 to do 150MH I need to limit power to 120 watts (70% tdp), 160MH needs 140 watts (82% tdp).

Max these 8-pin cards can consume is 196 watts at 120% tdp.

Which exact model you are talking about, mate?

[antantti]

I don't know if anyone is interested but 970 to do 150MH I need to limit power to 120 watts (70% tdp), 160MH needs 140 watts (82% tdp).

Max these 8-pin cards can consume is 196 watts at 120% tdp.

Which exact model you are talking about, mate?

Asus strix 970. Samsung/ Elpida memory.

[mirny]

This is my result with ccminer-rel1.8.1-vc2013



.

hmm, I see, your first card is doing 240MHs and second one 280MHs,
are both cards clocked at 1733/3402?

[go6ooo1212]

Here is my score with 1070 and 1080  Palit SJS 3 + 3 on a single rig:



EDIT: Thats with open - source miner...

[bensam1231]

sp can you post screen about 1070 +5% boost, which would put a 1070 around 300 already

265 *1.05 = 278.25 (on average, not considering too high settings, that are simply useless in a multigpu environment given the absence of rock solid stability)

@bensam: you're not the only one with a "decent" amount invested in cryptos, but there's also a thing callededucation and mutual respect. I understand your frustration in such discussions, but it should be better if you both ignore each others; it's a nonsense to continue like this in every thread you both collide.

@sp: would you be so kind to post hashrates with a human, achievable, frequency? A common 1070, even custom, barely reaches 2000MHz in stability without thermal and power throttling (in a multigpu setup obviously, due thermal complications). Interesting findings about the memory controller btw. Have you measured the difference between the reference values (TDP 150) and  TDP to 170 + forced p0 state? Such tests would be much more interesting with watt measures. What's you model of 1070?

Thanks

no that is wrong, you need to check the maximum which is 290MH done by a guy here and with 5% is above 300MH

just see few posts back, and anyway i'm at 280 with mine also, which would put me at around 295....

There is no 'maximum' we should all be doing the same speed on the same kernels at the same clocks as long as we aren't limited by TDP. This is why your logic is bat shit insane, you don't even have any idea how mining actually works. There is no way for someone to do faster with the same hardware unless their clocks/tdp/drivers/OS are different and in weird cases memory types (such as with Ethereum). Most cases Windows 7/8 are all the same, occasionally W10, but usually it's just slower.

Which is why on the last page rednow corrected himself and fell inline with speeds everyone else is getting. The only other thing that could possible effect it is intensity, but default intensity is almost always spot on.

This completely puts aside that you're comparing apples to oranges. rednoW isn't magically going to get the same speed as another guy on the other page running at 290Mhs, nor is it magically going to be 5% higher unless everything I posted above is the same, but it isn't... Mentioning hashrate without clocks or other information is dumb... even more so when people try to 'pad' their scores.

I don't know if anyone is interested but 970 to do 150MH I need to limit power to 120 watts (70% tdp), 160MH needs 140 watts (82% tdp).

Max these 8-pin cards can consume is 196 watts at 120% tdp.

Still more efficient then AMD... Still not bad, it's last gen hardware and costs half as much as a 1070. XD

Here is my score with 1070 and 1080  Palit SJS 3 + 3 on a single rig

EDIT: Thats with open - source miner...

Nice to see a 1080 getting somewhere around where it should be.

[sp_]

EDIT: Thats with open - source miner...

What do you get with the sp-mod #2 on the 1080? did you try higher intensities? like -i 29 ?

[sp_]

My test card is this one:

http://www.inno3d.com/products_detail.php?refid=248

The opensource does 245MHASH on the default clock wich is around 1830

In the latest mod I have increased that to 260 MHASH on the same clock, but then the card start to trottle and the speed decline. Normally overvolting / increase TDP will fix this, but the single 8 pin connector on the card is the bottleneck. The pascal kernel is still in development. New hardware, new possibilities.

[ioglnx]

Nice I have the Zotac AMP GTX1080 with 2x8pin :-D
For which algo the hashrates are? Can't see or maybe missed it?

Is it possible to test your decred ccminer ?

[antantti]

I don't know if anyone is interested but 970 to do 150MH I need to limit power to 120 watts (70% tdp), 160MH needs 140 watts (82% tdp).

Max these 8-pin cards can consume is 196 watts at 120% tdp.

Still more efficient then AMD... Still not bad, it's last gen hardware and costs half as much as a 1070. XD

170-200€ against 460-500€ here. Second hand/ open box under warranty. F..., if I needed some lbry power right now I need to buy back my maxwells.

C is about to change lbry mining markets if you ask me.

[sp_]

Nice I have the Zotac AMP GTX1080 with 2x8pin :-D
For which algo the hashrates are? Can't see or maybe missed it?
Is it possible to test your decred ccminer ?

The algo is LBRY. You can test it if you donate 0.1 BTC. You will also be added to the subscription list with updates and future speed improvements for free. The miner has a 3.3% fee and work best on Maxwell cards. (compute 5.2)

[sp_]

C is about to change lbry mining markets if you ask me.

LBRY +75% tonight

0.00034044 BTC (75.51%)

[ioglnx]

Still mining to earn 0.1 BTC..1 week already lol.
From XCN to MNM and back to DASH and DCR :-D

[antantti]

C is about to change lbry mining markets if you ask me.

LBRY +75% tonight

0.00034044 BTC (75.51%)

I know, 1 btc for that email would be 1.75 now. Too bad I was painting my mancave back then...

-edit- I'm not after btc, most of the the time it is just unwanted middleman to me. And a cashcow å)

[reb0rn21]

My test card is this one:

http://www.inno3d.com/products_detail.php?refid=248

The opensource does 245MHASH on the default clock wich is around 1830

In the latest mod I have increased that to 260 MHASH on the same clock, but then the card start to trottle and the speed decline. Normally overvolting / increase TDP will fix this, but the single 8 pin connector on the card is the bottleneck. The pascal kernel is still in development. New hardware, new possibilities.

I know all 1070 are different by my rig of Gainward phoenix with 1x8pin 1070 doing 135w by card on TDP and clock of ~1900mhz with 255Mhs and power limit set to 85% (power limit on same cards undervolts as mine 1070 works on 0.92v and 0.88V on 78% powerlimit)

If you lover volts to GPU you can reach more frequency on same TDP, only problem is if card boost to +1950 then it will crash driver on 0.88v and boost 3.0 is that way, would like to limit max boost which would help

MSI behave as power limit does not drop voltage

[Nikolaj]

My test card is this one:

http://www.inno3d.com/products_detail.php?refid=248

The opensource does 245MHASH on the default clock wich is around 1830

In the latest mod I have increased that to 260 MHASH on the same clock, but then the card start to trottle and the speed decline. Normally overvolting / increase TDP will fix this, but the single 8 pin connector on the card is the bottleneck. The pascal kernel is still in development. New hardware, new possibilities.

Looking forward to it, thank you  

@bensam: indeed, but regarding profitability, as you can see tonight it's a real pain to guarantee something. Good for us  

@amph: I've got 30 of them so I can talk due facts, and statistics. On average 265 it's even an high standard for an overclocked 1070

Proof (Open source 1.8.1 from tpruvot)

[ioglnx]

Here is my GTX1080 and a XEON E5 1650V3 at mining lbry :-D


how to get the inline picture?

[klondike_bar_recovery]

Here is my GTX1080 and a XEON E5 1650V3 at mining lbry :-D


how to get the inline picture?

your account needs to be a certain age or postcount first

[klondike_bar_recovery]

Yeah, you have to act remotely intelligent to get respect, Amph acts intelligent and then just posts something you instantly corrected him on. That was what he 'regurgitated' from the guy a couple pages back posting his 280Mh/s 'normal' hashrates for Lbry, which all of us know is complete bullshit. If I could get 280Mh/s per card, I'd love that. Only way you get that is with a 2070Mhz overclock... which is extremely rare. Even my high end cards don't get that if I want to remain stable for 8+ hours.


That's incorrect, I have two cards that run at 2063 doing 276Mhs... They have a TDP of 120 and never hit it to start throttling.

I'm curious why everyone is quoting really high GPU speeds? Something say like 1950 is much more common. Fast overclocks are fast, almost no one will be able to hit them though.

calm down - amph has put some good posts and stats in this thread, whether you agree with them or not.

Im using opensource 1.8.1 and a pair of strix gaming 1070 cards (not the OC version). one gets 265MHz and the other has 285Mhz. both are overclocked with the specs tat suit them best in order to keep temps around 65C and fans around 65-70%. (i posted exact specs a few pages back, but they are running round 1990-2030MHz core and mem is -500 on each.


while id love an sp_ software that can give me 300MHz+ (and expect the 285Mhz card would get there), the 0.1BTC cost is the killer since i only have two cards. to re-coup that cost (and the extra mining fee) would add significant time to my ROI and just doesn't make sense.