sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 22, 2016, 11:32:30 AM |
|
zcash rally today..
|
|
|
|
ioglnx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
|
|
November 22, 2016, 12:35:06 PM |
|
How the modification going on? Any success to adapt krnlx code into your repo?
|
GTX 1080Ti rocks da house... seriously... this card is a beast³ Owning by now 18x GTX1080Ti :-D @serious love of efficiency
|
|
|
jeanjean15
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
|
November 22, 2016, 12:46:48 PM |
|
Hi . Can we hope a new miner more powerful soon for Nvidia ? Thanks .
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 22, 2016, 01:07:04 PM |
|
Don't have time now. Perheps in the weekend.
|
|
|
|
nicehash
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 885
Merit: 1006
NiceHash.com
|
|
November 22, 2016, 01:14:26 PM |
|
Can we hope a new miner more powerful soon for Nvidia ?
We are planning to release an improved version of EQM, targeting 100+ Sol/s on GTX 970 and 180+ Sol/s on 1070 (not yet fully tested, though).
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
November 22, 2016, 01:22:33 PM |
|
Can we hope a new miner more powerful soon for Nvidia ?
We are planning to release an improved version of EQM, targeting 100+ Sol/s on GTX 970 and 180+ Sol/s on 1070 (not yet fully tested, though). ok but we need the sources
|
|
|
|
bathrobehero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
|
|
November 22, 2016, 01:25:57 PM |
|
Can we hope a new miner more powerful soon for Nvidia ?
We are planning to release an improved version of EQM, targeting 100+ Sol/s on GTX 970 and 180+ Sol/s on 1070 (not yet fully tested, though). Doesn't really matter if that's locked to nicehash. Payments in BTC are much, much worse than mining ZEC/ZCL directly. And the dedicated pool (zcash.nicehash.com) is also pretty crap. For a giant like nicehash, I'm not sure why there isn't a proper pool with the option for the locked miner to work there as well.
|
Not your keys, not your coins!
|
|
|
giagge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1001
|
|
November 22, 2016, 01:30:58 PM |
|
Yes nicehash pls unlocked for other pool .
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
|
|
November 22, 2016, 01:33:27 PM |
|
Can we hope a new miner more powerful soon for Nvidia ?
We are planning to release an improved version of EQM, targeting 100+ Sol/s on GTX 970 and 180+ Sol/s on 1070 (not yet fully tested, though). That's a good start, but only if it's not locked to your pools, which your miners have been. The extra hashrate barely makes up for the low payouts on your service. Please consider as a option in the miner 'locked to pool' OR '2.5% dev fee'. A lot of people can calculate prices and realize it's not worth mining on the service even with the extra hashrate. A in between would be nice. Just a reminder. The community 30k miner bounty program is just about up too. They mentioned they're releasing the miners at the beginning of Dec. How much that's going to change? Are we already at what the bounty miners are at? Who knows, but we'll find out in a week or so.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 22, 2016, 01:34:51 PM Last edit: November 22, 2016, 02:41:30 PM by sp_ |
|
krnlx commited to github 3 hours ago: (opencl code) Performance 6x1070, Linux, +1600mem (it seems that on Linux +1600 = +800 on win), samsung memory Total 836.0 sol/s [dev0 129.0, dev1 141.0, dev2 143.6, dev3 141.2, dev4 147.7, dev5 135.7] 55 shares Total 835.5 sol/s [dev0 131.4, dev1 139.4, dev2 143.6, dev3 139.7, dev4 145.0, dev5 136.8] 56 shares Total 833.7 sol/s [dev0 130.6, dev1 139.1, dev2 143.9, dev3 140.1, dev4 143.3, dev5 137.6] 56 shares Total 837.0 sol/s [dev0 129.5, dev1 138.2, dev2 146.0, dev3 139.7, dev4 139.6, dev5 137.6] 57 shares Total 837.9 sol/s [dev0 130.3, dev1 138.1, dev2 144.7, dev3 138.8, dev4 136.6, dev5 136.6] 58 shares Total 841.4 sol/s [dev0 132.3, dev1 138.8, dev2 145.7, dev3 138.8, dev4 137.9, dev5 136.7] 59 shares Total 842.2 sol/s [dev0 139.7, dev1 137.9, dev2 145.3, dev3 139.6, dev4 138.0, dev5 137.6] 59 shares Total 842.7 sol/s [dev0 139.7, dev1 136.2, dev2 145.7, dev3 141.7, dev4 135.8, dev5 136.7] 59 shares Total 842.7 sol/s [dev0 139.2, dev1 139.2, dev2 144.0, dev3 143.0, dev4 135.0, dev5 137.5] 61 shares Total 841.0 sol/s [dev0 136.9, dev1 139.6, dev2 145.3, dev3 142.0, dev4 137.3, dev5 136.6] 61 shares Total 840.1 sol/s [dev0 134.9, dev1 137.7, dev2 145.6, dev3 140.3, dev4 137.2, dev5 138.4] 61 shares Total 837.2 sol/s [dev0 133.5, dev1 138.6, dev2 145.7, dev3 139.5, dev4 137.7, dev5 138.9] 61 shares Total 832.4 sol/s [dev0 134.0, dev1 136.4, dev2 148.5, dev3 138.0, dev4 130.7, dev5 130.8] 62 shares https://github.com/krnlx/silentarmy-nvmod/blob/e608e829f309cc7992134e89e3161206420612e8/README.mdI think if merge the latest code I can do 170Sol/s (gtx 1070) because I modded different parts of the code. I still think I can do a free miner that does 170sol/s on the gtx 1070 that works on all pools. Sp-mod #2. But I don't have time right now.
|
|
|
|
lawrencelyl
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
November 22, 2016, 03:05:12 PM |
|
Can't wait for it
|
|
|
|
CoffeeCat
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
November 22, 2016, 03:16:36 PM |
|
krnlx commited to github 3 hours ago: (opencl code) Performance 6x1070, Linux, +1600mem (it seems that on Linux +1600 = +800 on win), samsung memory Total 836.0 sol/s [dev0 129.0, dev1 141.0, dev2 143.6, dev3 141.2, dev4 147.7, dev5 135.7] 55 shares Total 835.5 sol/s [dev0 131.4, dev1 139.4, dev2 143.6, dev3 139.7, dev4 145.0, dev5 136.8] 56 shares Total 833.7 sol/s [dev0 130.6, dev1 139.1, dev2 143.9, dev3 140.1, dev4 143.3, dev5 137.6] 56 shares Total 837.0 sol/s [dev0 129.5, dev1 138.2, dev2 146.0, dev3 139.7, dev4 139.6, dev5 137.6] 57 shares Total 837.9 sol/s [dev0 130.3, dev1 138.1, dev2 144.7, dev3 138.8, dev4 136.6, dev5 136.6] 58 shares Total 841.4 sol/s [dev0 132.3, dev1 138.8, dev2 145.7, dev3 138.8, dev4 137.9, dev5 136.7] 59 shares Total 842.2 sol/s [dev0 139.7, dev1 137.9, dev2 145.3, dev3 139.6, dev4 138.0, dev5 137.6] 59 shares Total 842.7 sol/s [dev0 139.7, dev1 136.2, dev2 145.7, dev3 141.7, dev4 135.8, dev5 136.7] 59 shares Total 842.7 sol/s [dev0 139.2, dev1 139.2, dev2 144.0, dev3 143.0, dev4 135.0, dev5 137.5] 61 shares Total 841.0 sol/s [dev0 136.9, dev1 139.6, dev2 145.3, dev3 142.0, dev4 137.3, dev5 136.6] 61 shares Total 840.1 sol/s [dev0 134.9, dev1 137.7, dev2 145.6, dev3 140.3, dev4 137.2, dev5 138.4] 61 shares Total 837.2 sol/s [dev0 133.5, dev1 138.6, dev2 145.7, dev3 139.5, dev4 137.7, dev5 138.9] 61 shares Total 832.4 sol/s [dev0 134.0, dev1 136.4, dev2 148.5, dev3 138.0, dev4 130.7, dev5 130.8] 62 shares https://github.com/krnlx/silentarmy-nvmod/blob/e608e829f309cc7992134e89e3161206420612e8/README.mdI think if merge the latest code I can do 170Sol/s (gtx 1070) because I modded different parts of the code. I still think I can do a free miner that does 170sol/s on the gtx 1070 that works on all pools. Sp-mod #2. But I don't have time right now. You are about a month too late anyway so don't bother.
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
|
November 23, 2016, 05:13:32 AM |
|
krnlx commited to github 3 hours ago: (opencl code) Performance 6x1070, Linux, +1600mem (it seems that on Linux +1600 = +800 on win), samsung memory Total 836.0 sol/s [dev0 129.0, dev1 141.0, dev2 143.6, dev3 141.2, dev4 147.7, dev5 135.7] 55 shares Total 835.5 sol/s [dev0 131.4, dev1 139.4, dev2 143.6, dev3 139.7, dev4 145.0, dev5 136.8] 56 shares Total 833.7 sol/s [dev0 130.6, dev1 139.1, dev2 143.9, dev3 140.1, dev4 143.3, dev5 137.6] 56 shares Total 837.0 sol/s [dev0 129.5, dev1 138.2, dev2 146.0, dev3 139.7, dev4 139.6, dev5 137.6] 57 shares Total 837.9 sol/s [dev0 130.3, dev1 138.1, dev2 144.7, dev3 138.8, dev4 136.6, dev5 136.6] 58 shares Total 841.4 sol/s [dev0 132.3, dev1 138.8, dev2 145.7, dev3 138.8, dev4 137.9, dev5 136.7] 59 shares Total 842.2 sol/s [dev0 139.7, dev1 137.9, dev2 145.3, dev3 139.6, dev4 138.0, dev5 137.6] 59 shares Total 842.7 sol/s [dev0 139.7, dev1 136.2, dev2 145.7, dev3 141.7, dev4 135.8, dev5 136.7] 59 shares Total 842.7 sol/s [dev0 139.2, dev1 139.2, dev2 144.0, dev3 143.0, dev4 135.0, dev5 137.5] 61 shares Total 841.0 sol/s [dev0 136.9, dev1 139.6, dev2 145.3, dev3 142.0, dev4 137.3, dev5 136.6] 61 shares Total 840.1 sol/s [dev0 134.9, dev1 137.7, dev2 145.6, dev3 140.3, dev4 137.2, dev5 138.4] 61 shares Total 837.2 sol/s [dev0 133.5, dev1 138.6, dev2 145.7, dev3 139.5, dev4 137.7, dev5 138.9] 61 shares Total 832.4 sol/s [dev0 134.0, dev1 136.4, dev2 148.5, dev3 138.0, dev4 130.7, dev5 130.8] 62 shares https://github.com/krnlx/silentarmy-nvmod/blob/e608e829f309cc7992134e89e3161206420612e8/README.mdI think if merge the latest code I can do 170Sol/s (gtx 1070) because I modded different parts of the code. I still think I can do a free miner that does 170sol/s on the gtx 1070 that works on all pools. Sp-mod #2. But I don't have time right now. You are about a month too late anyway so don't bother. ZCASH IS PROFITABLE-- The algorithm uses little energy, and Zcash (ZEC) is currently peaking in price. The block reward is rising. It is worth $10/day more (with my rigs) than mining Ethereum (ETH) with the same rigs. FeatherCoin (FTC) is a distant third. If SilentArmy were optimized more, I would mine with it. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
November 23, 2016, 06:50:42 AM |
|
krnlx commited to github 3 hours ago: (opencl code) Performance 6x1070, Linux, +1600mem (it seems that on Linux +1600 = +800 on win), samsung memory Total 836.0 sol/s [dev0 129.0, dev1 141.0, dev2 143.6, dev3 141.2, dev4 147.7, dev5 135.7] 55 shares Total 835.5 sol/s [dev0 131.4, dev1 139.4, dev2 143.6, dev3 139.7, dev4 145.0, dev5 136.8] 56 shares Total 833.7 sol/s [dev0 130.6, dev1 139.1, dev2 143.9, dev3 140.1, dev4 143.3, dev5 137.6] 56 shares Total 837.0 sol/s [dev0 129.5, dev1 138.2, dev2 146.0, dev3 139.7, dev4 139.6, dev5 137.6] 57 shares Total 837.9 sol/s [dev0 130.3, dev1 138.1, dev2 144.7, dev3 138.8, dev4 136.6, dev5 136.6] 58 shares Total 841.4 sol/s [dev0 132.3, dev1 138.8, dev2 145.7, dev3 138.8, dev4 137.9, dev5 136.7] 59 shares Total 842.2 sol/s [dev0 139.7, dev1 137.9, dev2 145.3, dev3 139.6, dev4 138.0, dev5 137.6] 59 shares Total 842.7 sol/s [dev0 139.7, dev1 136.2, dev2 145.7, dev3 141.7, dev4 135.8, dev5 136.7] 59 shares Total 842.7 sol/s [dev0 139.2, dev1 139.2, dev2 144.0, dev3 143.0, dev4 135.0, dev5 137.5] 61 shares Total 841.0 sol/s [dev0 136.9, dev1 139.6, dev2 145.3, dev3 142.0, dev4 137.3, dev5 136.6] 61 shares Total 840.1 sol/s [dev0 134.9, dev1 137.7, dev2 145.6, dev3 140.3, dev4 137.2, dev5 138.4] 61 shares Total 837.2 sol/s [dev0 133.5, dev1 138.6, dev2 145.7, dev3 139.5, dev4 137.7, dev5 138.9] 61 shares Total 832.4 sol/s [dev0 134.0, dev1 136.4, dev2 148.5, dev3 138.0, dev4 130.7, dev5 130.8] 62 shares https://github.com/krnlx/silentarmy-nvmod/blob/e608e829f309cc7992134e89e3161206420612e8/README.mdI think if merge the latest code I can do 170Sol/s (gtx 1070) because I modded different parts of the code. I still think I can do a free miner that does 170sol/s on the gtx 1070 that works on all pools. Sp-mod #2. But I don't have time right now. You are about a month too late anyway so don't bother. ZCASH IS PROFITABLE-- The algorithm uses little energy, and Zcash (ZEC) is currently peaking in price. The block reward is rising. It is worth $10/day more (with my rigs) than mining Ethereum (ETH) with the same rigs. FeatherCoin (FTC) is a distant third. If SilentArmy were optimized more, I would mine with it. --scryptr only good thing is that there are chance of a pump after the block hit the maximum, i can see this coming, but currently zcash is producing too many btc per day this is the reason why it can not be pumped higher enough
|
|
|
|
grendel25
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1031
|
|
November 23, 2016, 08:05:06 AM |
|
What makes a technology great? Support for that technology. So who is winning right now between AMD and Nvidia? Obviously AMD. And this thread is the holy grail for Nvidia support.
It's funny. It's ironic. It's cruel. It's disgusting. It's a lot of four letter words and it can all be summed up by the best four-letter word of them all. That's:
LIFE
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 23, 2016, 08:30:07 AM |
|
The opensource NVIDIA developers have quit. But Nicehash will release a new miner that does 180SOl/s on the gtx 1070 soon. (zcash)
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
November 23, 2016, 08:49:18 AM |
|
The opensource NVIDIA developers have quit. But Nicehash will release a new miner that does 180SOl/s on the gtx 1070 soon. (zcash)
yeah but it will be closed and tied to their pool so useless, unless you can reverse engineering it
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1003
|
|
November 23, 2016, 02:21:51 PM |
|
krnlx commited to github 3 hours ago: (opencl code) Performance 6x1070, Linux, +1600mem (it seems that on Linux +1600 = +800 on win), samsung memory Total 836.0 sol/s [dev0 129.0, dev1 141.0, dev2 143.6, dev3 141.2, dev4 147.7, dev5 135.7] 55 shares Total 835.5 sol/s [dev0 131.4, dev1 139.4, dev2 143.6, dev3 139.7, dev4 145.0, dev5 136.8] 56 shares Total 833.7 sol/s [dev0 130.6, dev1 139.1, dev2 143.9, dev3 140.1, dev4 143.3, dev5 137.6] 56 shares Total 837.0 sol/s [dev0 129.5, dev1 138.2, dev2 146.0, dev3 139.7, dev4 139.6, dev5 137.6] 57 shares Total 837.9 sol/s [dev0 130.3, dev1 138.1, dev2 144.7, dev3 138.8, dev4 136.6, dev5 136.6] 58 shares Total 841.4 sol/s [dev0 132.3, dev1 138.8, dev2 145.7, dev3 138.8, dev4 137.9, dev5 136.7] 59 shares Total 842.2 sol/s [dev0 139.7, dev1 137.9, dev2 145.3, dev3 139.6, dev4 138.0, dev5 137.6] 59 shares Total 842.7 sol/s [dev0 139.7, dev1 136.2, dev2 145.7, dev3 141.7, dev4 135.8, dev5 136.7] 59 shares Total 842.7 sol/s [dev0 139.2, dev1 139.2, dev2 144.0, dev3 143.0, dev4 135.0, dev5 137.5] 61 shares Total 841.0 sol/s [dev0 136.9, dev1 139.6, dev2 145.3, dev3 142.0, dev4 137.3, dev5 136.6] 61 shares Total 840.1 sol/s [dev0 134.9, dev1 137.7, dev2 145.6, dev3 140.3, dev4 137.2, dev5 138.4] 61 shares Total 837.2 sol/s [dev0 133.5, dev1 138.6, dev2 145.7, dev3 139.5, dev4 137.7, dev5 138.9] 61 shares Total 832.4 sol/s [dev0 134.0, dev1 136.4, dev2 148.5, dev3 138.0, dev4 130.7, dev5 130.8] 62 shares https://github.com/krnlx/silentarmy-nvmod/blob/e608e829f309cc7992134e89e3161206420612e8/README.mdI think if merge the latest code I can do 170Sol/s (gtx 1070) because I modded different parts of the code. I still think I can do a free miner that does 170sol/s on the gtx 1070 that works on all pools. Sp-mod #2. But I don't have time right now. Sp is it possible that you can build that so i can use it on my vista without msvs 2015? I upgraded the hdd 3 yrs ago and its missing a file that updates anything even to win 7. thx
|
|
|
|
krnlx
|
|
November 23, 2016, 02:27:04 PM |
|
The opensource NVIDIA developers have quit. But Nicehash will release a new miner that does 180SOl/s on the gtx 1070 soon. (zcash)
yeah but it will be closed and tied to their pool so useless, unless you can reverse engineering it It's all about shitty nvidia community -(
|
|
|
|
|
|