fhh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1206
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 20, 2015, 07:34:21 AM |
|
yeah thanks for explaining!
|
|
|
|
primeminer
|
|
January 20, 2015, 08:52:02 AM |
|
anyone else is seeing a negative dividend on amhash direct GHs with a suspicious date? Pay Time Dividends Date Dividends Amount 2015-01-19 02:16:53 20151161 -0.00405 mBTC/GHS @amhash could you explain that? I've been wondering about this negative values on dividend's - fhh you are not the only one seeing it. probably just a glimpse, but that makes me wander how reliable is their payout system and how much have we missed in unpaid dividends. From my calculations it is not a massive difference but still about 3.4% is missing...
|
|
|
|
fhh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1206
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 20, 2015, 09:00:29 AM |
|
they already explained and I can follow it 16th was paid twice (same value) and now one of them is corrected
so where are you getting a 3,4% miss in dividends?
|
|
|
|
primeminer
|
|
January 20, 2015, 11:20:37 AM |
|
they already explained and I can follow it 16th was paid twice (same value) and now one of them is corrected
so where are you getting a 3,4% miss in dividends?
from pure adding the correct dividends and checking against the ballance - there is 3.4% missing which fair play gets to something around 5 micro
|
|
|
|
thevictimofuktyranny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1004
|
|
January 20, 2015, 03:31:35 PM Last edit: January 20, 2015, 06:40:32 PM by thevictimofuktyranny |
|
they already explained and I can follow it 16th was paid twice (same value) and now one of them is corrected
so where are you getting a 3,4% miss in dividends?
from pure adding the correct dividends and checking against the ballance - there is 3.4% missing which fair play gets to something around 5 micro At current BTC price is really worth dwelling upon a software error or a adding/minusing mistakes It's only happened once , since AMhash started doing direct sales So many non-crypto businesses makes mistakes on weekly basis AMhash is a beacon of a good business performance in comparison
|
|
|
|
flyingplows
|
|
January 20, 2015, 06:19:57 PM |
|
any news about AMHash4 or when will ghs trading be available on AMHash direct?
|
|
|
|
ajw7989
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 20, 2015, 07:38:50 PM |
|
any news about AMHash4 or when will ghs trading be available on AMHash direct? I think they might be waiting until the price of bitcoin rebounds since its barely profitable
|
|
|
|
DARKANGEL6415
|
|
January 20, 2015, 11:54:15 PM |
|
Genesis Mining (they are manufacturer) have cut their cloudmining prices. 30% cut in prices They have better hashing equipment then AMhash at the moment, payout is about 40% high per gigahash then AMhash Gen 3 2/3 days ago I compared it AMhash Gen 3 3.18mbtc Genesis 4.59mbtc And, like AMhash there Bitcoin farms are located in Iceland. Here is the main article: http://cryptomining-blog.com/This website has a 5% discount voucher code as well. Read the article yourselves and run the numbers yourselves It's Sunday and I can't be bothered Ridiculous. They sell 50 GH/s for $24.49 that is 0.00220000 BTC per GH/s. Payout/GH/s per day 0.00000600. Yeah, they're running the equipment anyway and earning BTC. Therefore, it is the price you'd have to pay them to make it worthwhile for them to sign it over to you It is clear though, that they expect BTC to rise i think we all want the value of bitcoin to go up and at the same time keep the bitcoin difficulty down as much as possible lol, i do see a nice drop in difficulty in few days
|
|
|
|
DARKANGEL6415
|
|
January 21, 2015, 03:40:49 AM |
|
Well, BTC hasn´t cratered for several days now. Is the bottom finally in ?
Unless some volume and buying interest comes in it looks like the same old pattern will continue: Suddenly tanks on good volume then muddles along sideways for a while on weak and diminishing volume until it suddenly tanks down to the next level and so on.
generally bears say the bottom is not in yet and bulls say the bottom is in, it's 50/50. I do know some normally quite bearish people who have now switched their positions to long BTC, that for me is an indicator. We´ll have to see. If it´s getting more bullish this will reflect in volume and price. Unfortunately I see nothing there yet but then again it´s too early to tell I suppose. well i just want price to go up i dont need no $2000 like some so called experts predict bitcoin should be worth or all this mumble jumble. I will be happy with $300 if karma wants to be good then i will take $500 nice round number
|
|
|
|
DARKANGEL6415
|
|
January 21, 2015, 05:58:32 AM |
|
they already explained and I can follow it 16th was paid twice (same value) and now one of them is corrected
so where are you getting a 3,4% miss in dividends?
from pure adding the correct dividends and checking against the ballance - there is 3.4% missing which fair play gets to something around 5 micro payouts so low on everything even amhash
|
|
|
|
|
DARKANGEL6415
|
|
January 23, 2015, 05:49:37 AM |
|
k thank you definately appreciated, by any chance will you all add sms text 2fa function for people like me who dont use google 2fa app but preffer our cell phones texts?
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
|
January 23, 2015, 06:21:47 AM |
|
k thank you definately appreciated, by any chance will you all add sms text 2fa function for people like me who dont use google 2fa app but preffer our cell phones texts? SMS isn't secure.
|
|
|
|
jm1978
Member
Offline
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
|
|
January 23, 2015, 10:19:09 AM |
|
k thank you definately appreciated, by any chance will you all add sms text 2fa function for people like me who dont use google 2fa app but preffer our cell phones texts? SMS isn't secure. Why not? It is the same or...?
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
|
January 23, 2015, 10:58:00 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
ajw7989
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 23, 2015, 12:51:20 PM |
|
Wow thanks for sharing didnt think that was possible but goes to show you are sneaky people are
|
|
|
|
newIndia
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2226
Merit: 1052
|
|
January 23, 2015, 04:05:44 PM |
|
Wow thanks for sharing didnt think that was possible but goes to show you are sneaky people are hmm... now 2FA is unsafe too !!! Time for biometric authentication ?
|
|
|
|
Mabsark
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
|
|
January 23, 2015, 05:32:10 PM |
|
hmm... now 2FA is unsafe too !!! Time for biometric authentication ?
No, SMS used as 2FA is unsafe.
|
|
|
|
DARKANGEL6415
|
|
January 23, 2015, 06:01:12 PM |
|
Wow thanks for sharing didnt think that was possible but goes to show you are sneaky people are hmm... now 2FA is unsafe too !!! Time for biometric authentication ? lol seems that way we going to need biometrics, with a 20 character long password and a final mechanical input to finish a circuit connection to get authorized haha
|
|
|
|
HarmonLi
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Honest 80s business!
|
|
January 23, 2015, 11:41:02 PM |
|
Wow thanks for sharing didnt think that was possible but goes to show you are sneaky people are hmm... now 2FA is unsafe too !!! Time for biometric authentication ? lol seems that way we going to need biometrics, with a 20 character long password and a final mechanical input to finish a circuit connection to get authorized haha Biometrics are a very bad way of enforcing access control. They're quite easily reproduced in certain situations, also the entropy they offer isn't necessarily what you'd want. Also, they might call for centralized storage of the credentials.
|
|
|
|
|